
Trump claims banks discriminate against conservatives through debanking. Here's what that means.
Mr. Trump made the comment in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday, after he was asked about a report by the Wall Street Journal that said he would soon sign an executive order aimed at stamping out debanking. Mr. Trump claimed that JPMorgan Chase gave him 20 days to close his account, although he didn't specify when this occurred or what reason he was given by the bank for doing so. He also claimed that Bank of America refused his business after he left JPMorgan.
The issue of debanking has become a sticking point for some conservatives who claim that they've been unfairly targeted by financial institutions. Debanking can occur for a number of reasons, such as if a financial institution detects potentially fraudulent activity or the account owner is overdrawn, but some conservatives claim they have been rejected due to their political views.
"They discriminated against many conservatives," the president told CNBC.
Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan rejected such allegations of bias against conservatives, in a recent interview on CBS News' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" that took place ahead of Mr. Trump's comments on CNBC. Moynihan pointed to the nation's second-largest bank's massive customer base as evidence of its diverse clientele. He also emphasized the impact of federal regulations, in addition to concerns over legal and financial risk, on banking decisions.
"We have 70 million consumers, and we're the biggest small business lender. That's not — the issue they're focused on is the regulators impact on this industry. And you heard Senator Scott talk about this this week. This reputation, this after the fact, look, that you banked x, and now after the fact, you're gonna say x didn't turn out to be what you thought," the CEO told Margaret Brennan. "So we look at it. We look at it based on risk. People may feel those decisions are made for some other reason, but we always make it on what's best for our company, what's best for our client."
At a Senate hearing in February over the issue, Sen. Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, said debanking harms individuals as well as the economy, and violates the principles of fair market access. Debanking has also been highlighted by some crypto investors, such the CEO of crypto platform Anchorage Digital, who testified in the Senate hearing that his bank had closed his company's account on short notice because they weren't comfortable with crypto transactions.
The White House declined to comment on the EO.
JPMorgan Chase said in a statement that it doesn't close accounts for political reasons, adding that it agrees with Mr. Trump that "regulatory change is desperately needed." It added, "We're pleased to see the White House is addressing this issue, for which we've been advocating for many years, and look forward to working with them to get this right."
Earlier this year, Bank of America said, "Political beliefs are not a factor in account closure decisions." Referring to the reported EO, the bank said in a statement that it welcomes "regulatory clarity" from the Trump administration.
Reached for comment on Mr. Trump's recent comments, Bank of America pointed to its earlier statement.
Debanking isn't just happening at banks, said Nicholas Anthony, a policy analyst at the libertarian-leaning Cato Institute.
"This can be something that happens to you at a credit union, at a cryptocurrency exchange or anywhere else really," Anthony said. "It's just having that sudden abrupt closure of your financial account where you've been, and essentially kicked out of the system or cut off from the system."
Banks are not required by law to give account owners a reason for why their account is being closed. Under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks are obligated to track their customers' activity and file a so-called suspicious activity report (or SAR) if they notice anything unusual. Banks aren't allowed to disclose to customers if there's a SAR, which can leave some people in the dark if their account is shut for this reason.
"It's a terrible feeling to suddenly have this relationship cut off, and you really don't know why," Anthony said. "In a lot of cases, it's by federal law that banks can't tell you what happened, and you're kind of left to just spiral there."
More than 8,000 consumers filed complaints with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau during the last three years related to their financial institutions' "improperly closing checking, savings or other deposit accounts," according to a February analysis from the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.
By comparison, consumers made about 1.3 million complaints about credit reporting in 2023 alone, according to CFPB data.
Banks can close accounts if they suspect fraudulent or suspicious behavior, or if a customer violates their terms. In the complaints cited by the Senate banking committee analysis, some consumers said they had faced overdraft fees due to overdrawn funds before their banks shuttered their accounts, for example.
But there's no data that tracks whether people or institutions are debanked due to their political views, although there are anecdotal accounts, experts said.
"There is no actual data or proof that conservatives are being debanked for their beliefs," Jeremy Siegel, senior associate at research firm Pleiades Strategy, told CBS MoneyWatch. "In fact, Florida set up a hotline for this very reason, and got zero complaints. A Virginia Credit League Lobbyist said this in his testimony against a similar bill in Virginia."
Banks set risk tolerances and conduct their business within those perimeters, added Shayna Olesiuk, director of banking policy at Better Markets, a financial advocacy group.
"They must always understand and manage any risk that they are accepting in their business activities and decisions; this could include things like financial risk or unlawful or discriminatory activity," she added.
There have been allegations from some conservatives that their political views led to account closures. The attorney general for Kansas, Kris W. Kobach, sent a letter to Bank of America last year, alleging discrimination by the bank of religious groups he states had their accounts closed without explanation.
Banking policies appear "to be systematically punishing religious and political views with which it disagrees," the Kobach claimed in the letter.
But some of these organizations had red flags that could have led to the debanking, such running a debt collection business outside of the U.S., Cato's Anthony added.
"There are anecdotal cases of conservative account holders that have had their accounts closed, but at the same time, we see that with others as well," he added. "There's been a longstanding history of people who are Muslim having their accounts denied, people with Russian last names or Middle Eastern last names for that matter, having their accounts denied."
"It seems to be a widespread issue in the sense that it affects all different sorts of people," Anthony said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NYC mayoral hopeful Curtis Sliwa's group bills itself a charity despite losing tax-exempt status
NEW YORK —Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa's crime prevention group, the Guardian Angels, is soliciting donations while portraying itself as a tax-exempt charity — even though it was stripped of that status years ago amid tax issues and legal troubles involving the organization's longtime treasurer, according to a Daily News review of federal and state records. The Guardian Angels, which Sliwa founded in 1979 and still controls as CEO, hasn't filed a 990 Form with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service since 2019, the IRS's publicly available nonprofit database shows. In that database, the group's legal business name is listed as Alliance of Guardian Angels, Inc. The 990 Form is the equivalent of a tax return for a charitable organization, and due to the Guardian Angels' failure to file 990s three years in a row, the IRS revoked its tax-exempt 501(c)(3) charity designation in November 2022, per a notice included on the group's profile in the database. The revocation came a year after Rafael Alvarez, the Guardian Angels' now-former treasurer, landed in trouble with the U.S. Department of Justice, which forced his accounting firm, ATAX, to shutter permanently in 2021 due to a suspicion he was filing fraudulent returns for clients — a case that eventually resulted in Alvarez pleading guilty to criminal charges. Despite the charity status, the Guardian Angels has continued to describe itself as a 501(c)(3) group on its website, including on a page where it's asking supporters for money. 'The Alliance of Guardian Angels is a non-profit 501 (c) (3) organization founded in 1979 in New York City,' a banner reads on the page soliciting contributions via a big red 'donate' button that sends supporters to a PayPal page if they click it. 'Our mission is to provide positive role models for today's youth and work toward promoting community safety and betterment for the good of society overall.' According to legal experts, falsely portraying a group as a 501(c)(3) can result in fines and even criminal charges, especially if the misrepresentation involves the solicitation of donations. Taxpayers who donate to nonprofit charities who've lost their 501(c)(3) status can, in turn, also end up getting in trouble with the IRS if they claim their contributions as tax deductible. 'When a charitable nonprofit is no longer recognized as tax-exempt, it will be required to pay income taxes on revenue, including donations, and donors will no longer be able to deduct contributions to the organization,' according to the National Council of Nonproifts. IRS' press office didn't immediately return a request for comment this week. In addition to the IRS delinquencies, the Guardian Angels hasn't submitted tax filings with the New York state attorney general's office as required since 2019, either, an AG spokeswoman confirmed. The spokeswoman wouldn't comment further, but the AG's office typically works with delinquent nonprofits to try to get them into compliance before taking any enforcement action. Sliwa's campaign referred questions to Mario Kranjac, an attorney for the Guardian Angels, who blamed the filing failures on Alvarez, who served as the group's treasurer for over a decade and was personally friendly with Sliwa. Kranjac said the Guardian Angels believed all tax returns had been filed properly by Alvarez. 'Curtis Sliwa had no involvement in financial filings,' said Kranjac, an ex-mayor of Englewood, N.J. who mounted an unsuccessful Republican bid for governor of the state this year. 'The Guardian Angels are allowed to continue operating and are taking steps to correct the issue with counsel.' The tax troubles involving the Guardian Angels, whose members have been known for doing street and subway 'safety patrols,' are emerging as Sliwa is gearing up his GOP bid for mayor ahead of November's election. The revelations about the tax filing failures — and previously unreported details about Alvarez's role in the Guardian Angels' finances — could cast a shadow over Sliwa as he campaigns heavily on an anti-corruption message. It also raises questions about how, as mayor, Sliwa would manage a city with an annual budget of $116 billion, in addition to his own campaign, which just on Wednesday received $1.9 million in public matching funds. Alvarez served as the Guardian Angels' treasurer between 2010 and 2024, per his LinkedIn profile. Before the Guardians abruptly stopped submitting 990s, Alvarez and his accounting firm used to prepare and handle all of the group's federal and state tax filings, The News' review found. In those filings, Alvarez identified himself both as the group's treasurer and accountant. An attorney for Alvarez — who's currently in prison — didn't say why he stopped filing the group's taxes in 2019. The attorney, Michael Bachrach, did say he wasn't sure whether Alvarez ever filed fraudulent tax forms for the Guardian Angels. 'There were over 80,000 tax returns disclosed in discovery in that case, some fraudulent and other perfectly lawful,' said Bachrach. 'I don't recall whether Guardian Angels were amongst them.' When Alvarez had his firm shuttered by the feds in June 2021, he was already under criminal investigation by the DOJ over suspicions he had helped clients file tax returns with the IRS claiming fraudulent deductions for fictitious charity donations, medical costs and other expenses in order to lower their tax burdens, according to his indictment and other filings made in his case. In April 2024, the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office indicted Alvarez on charges alleging he had orchestrated a sprawling tax fraud scheme between 2010 and 2020 — spanning the period when he was handling the Guardian Angels' books — in which he and his firm stole $145 million from the IRS. His indictment alleged Alvarez was known as 'The Magician' among his clients because of the advanced methods he used to defraud the IRS. This spring, Alvarez was sentenced to four years in prison, ordered to forfeit more than $11 million and pay, together with any clients identified as having participated in the scheme, $145 million in restitution to the U.S. government. Alvarez's indictment doesn't identify his clients, but prosecutors wrote in court papers this spring some of them are being made to pay years' worth of back taxes. The Guardian Angels, which as a 501(c)(3) was exempt from most — but not all — federal and state taxes, isn't referenced in Alvarez's indictment and hasn't been accused of any wrongdoing. Sliwa and Alvarez go back personally, and he has over the years hyped up Alvarez's business many times on the radio. Speaking on his talk radio show in 2012, Sliwa called Alvarez 'my very cumpà,' Italian slang that translates to close friend, and told listeners in need of tax help: 'You need to talk to a professional, and the best is Rafael Alvarez.' Sliwa's group also gave Alvarez its coveted 'Red Beret Award' in 2011. On the campaign trail, Sliwa has vowed to turn the page on the dysfunction and corruption he argues has marred Mayor Adams' time at City Hall, pointing to the incumbent's federal bribery indictment, which was quashed this spring by President Trump's DOJ as part of a controversial arrangement. Sliwa ran unsuccessfully for mayor in 2021, clinching about 28% compared to the 67% received by Adams, the Democratic mayoral nominee in that race. Sliwa's seen as having a better shot this year, as the city's Democratic vote could be fractured by the fact that, in addition to Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, Adams and Andrew Cuomo are running on independent lines on the November ballot. Attorney Jim Walden is on an independent line as well. Mamdani continues to poll as the favorite to win the November contest, with most surveys predicting Cuomo as the runner-up candidate. Sliwa has in a number of polls placed third, pulling more support than Adams. _____
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says He'll Likely Name Temporary Fed Governor to Open Seat
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump indicated he would likely nominate a temporary Federal Reserve governor to fill the soon-to-be vacant seat on the central bank's board within the coming days, rather than use the seat to signal his choice to replace Jerome Powell as chairman. All Hail the Humble Speed Hump Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads Major Istanbul Projects Are Stalling as City Leaders Sit in Jail PATH Train Service Resumes After Fire at Jersey City Station 'We're probably going to go with the temp and then a permanent,' Trump told reporters Wednesday at the White House. 'I think the temp is going to be named, I'd say, over the next two, three days, and then we're going to go permanent.' Fed Governor Adriana Kugler announced last week that she plans to vacate her role on Aug. 8. That gives Trump a choice. He can elevate someone to serve out the rest of her term, which expires in January, and keep weighing his options for the more prominent chair role, or he can make a decision on the Fed chair role months earlier than he'd planned and announce that now. Several of those on Trump's Fed short list are outsiders, and the president isn't guaranteed to get another chance to name a new board member before Powell's term as chair expires in May. While Fed chairs typically step off the board when they step down, he does have the option to stay on and deny Trump a second opening. Powell's underlying post as a governor extends into 2028 and he has so far declined to reveal his plans. Advisers had encouraged the president to name a short-term pick first, simply to complete Kugler's term that expires in January. That approach would give Trump weeks or months more to interview candidates to serve as chair. And it's the strategy Trump said Wednesday he's leaning toward. Trump said he was considering 'probably' three candidates for the temporary position, adding that they could come from Wall Street. 'Yeah, essentially, we're all from Wall Street, aren't we, when you get right down to it?' Trump said. He added that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Vice President JD Vance were among the advisers participating in the process. Separately, Trump reiterated that he considered 'the two Kevins' — former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh and National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett — as top candidates for the Fed Chair role when it becomes open. --With assistance from Justin Sink. (Updates with additional details on Fed timing and selection process starting in fourth paragraph.) Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay Government Steps Up Campaign Against Business School Diversity The GOP Is Choosing Pesticides Over the MAHA Moms ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Broncos salary cap update after Courtland Sutton and Zach Allen extensions
Going into training camp two weeks ago, the Denver Broncos had a little more than $12.5 million in salary cap space. After making four roster moves and giving contract extensions to wide receiver Courtland Sutton and defensive lineman Zach Allen, the team has around $5,545,012 remaining, according to an estimate from Allen will have a salary cap hit of $14.345 million this season and Sutton will have a cap hit of $13.9 million. Allen's cap charge will skyrocket to $28.625 million in 2026 while Sutton's will take a small jump up to $13.975 million. Allen and Sutton are the team's third- and fourth-biggest cap hits this year, only behind guard Ben Powers ($17.425 million) and right tackle Mike McGlinchey ($23.775 million). The team's biggest cap bargains this season include running back J.K. Dobbins ($2.065 million), safety Talanoa Hufanga ($3,411,765) and quarterback Bo Nix ($4,230,265). Other players who could be next in line for extensions include outside linebacker Nik Bonitto and defensive linemen John Franklin-Myers and Malcolm Roach. Social: Follow Broncos Wire on Facebook and Twitter/X! Did you know: These 25 celebrities are Broncos fans. This article originally appeared on Broncos Wire: Denver Broncos: Salary cap update after Sutton, Allen extensions