Sangh Parivar-backed trade union boycotts SCO meet on labour issues, faces flak
Sangh Parivar-backed trade union Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS) has boycotted the first meeting of the trade union leaders of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) member countries held in Beijing on Thursday and Friday (May 15 and May 16, 2025). Though the BMS had earlier decided to send a three-member delegation for the event, in the background of Pahalgam attacks it decided to boycott the proceedings.
BMS national secretary Pawan Kumar told The Hindu that the decision to boycott was taken as China supported Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. The meeting was organised by the All China Federation of Trade Unions. Leaders of other CTUs, such as All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) and the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) have attended the meeting.
AITUC leader Vidya Sagar Giri, who attended the meeting, said he raised the issue of terrorism in his speech. 'My stand was welcomed by other trade unions too. The declaration adopted by the meeting condemned all types of terrorism. SCO is a forum that represents 45% of the world population. As trade union representatives, our concern was trade union activities in this region. The meeting discussed issues such as workers' rights, possible impact of Artificial Intelligence on workers and the problems of gig and platform workers. But by boycotting such a meeting, BMS proved that it does not stand for workers' issues, but is playing the politics of Sangh Parivar,' Mr. Giri said.
The SCO said in a social media post that the meeting was held for the first time at the initiative of the Chinese side and it featured thematic discussions on 'Deepening Humanitarian Exchanges to Enhance Mutual Understanding Among the Peoples of SCO Countries,' 'Uniting Trade Union Efforts to Fulfil the SCO Mission,' and 'Addressing Contemporary Challenges and Jointly Developing Measures to Protect Workers' Rights.'
Mr. Kumar said the decision to boycott was taken at the last minute. 'It is in protest against China's open support to Pakistan,' he said. CITU leader R. Karumalaiyan said SCO meeting was not about India or Pakistan, but about workers. 'We attended the meeting based on our understanding of proletarian internationalism. Our representative Swadesh Debroy has raised issues of Indian workers in the meeting,' he said.
Earlier, on May 10, the BMS said in a statement that the SCO is an inter-governmental political, economic, and security organisation established in 2001 and it primarily focusses on strengthening relations between member states, promoting cooperation in various fields, and maintaining regional peace and stability. 'For the first time, labour-related prospects will also be discussed in this meeting, which points to the acknowledgement of the fact that labour is an important component for regional security,' the BMS said adding that a three-member delegation of the BMS comprising of Hiranmay Pandya, Rajesh CV and Trupti Alti would join the meetings and present India's concerns. 'We are looking forward to fruitful meetings.' the BMS had said.
At the opening ceremony, Deputy Secretary-General of the SCO Batyr Tursunov said convening this meeting as part of China's chairmanship agenda is a practical step toward implementing the decisions made by the heads of state to improve the well-being of workers. 'It was emphasised that the meeting agenda reflects the concept of joint development within the SCO framework and underscores the significant role of trade unions in ensuring the protection of workers' rights and promoting social justice,' the SCO statement said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
JD Vance sends 'veiled threats' to deport 'Menswear Guy' who 'hates his suits'
'You don't like VP's suit, you gotta deal with the consequences'! But what might be the fitting 'punishment' for a man who did not like the suit that the Vice President of the United States of America wore? Turns out, deportation is the answer! After all, isn't that enough to uproot a man from his habitat and deport him for his 'crime'! At least, JD Vance thinks so! In a recent incident that has sparked widespread debate, VP Vance seemingly threatened to deport Derek Guy, a prominent fashion critic known as the 'Menswear Guy', after he criticized Vance's sartorial choices. What happened? Derek Guy, who boasts a significant following on social media platforms, has found himself in the crosshairs of JD Vance. Guy, who has built his reputation by offering detailed analyses of men's fashion, often targeting public figures, recently revealed that he has been living in the United States without legal documentation since his childhood. In a detailed thread, Guy recounted his personal journey, saying his mother brought him across the Canadian border as a baby after his family fled Vietnam during the Tet Offensive. After that revelation, one X account posted, 'The menswear guy just openly admitted on here that he's here illegally.' A second user quote-tweeted that initial post and added, 'JD Vance I know you're reading this and you have the opportunity to do the funniest thing ever.' Now, this X post caught the VP's attention, and he replied with a GIF of Jack Nicholson slowly nodding his head, raising his eyebrows, and flashing his menacing, signature grin. What followed: Although VP Vance did not elaborate further on his 'veiled threat' wrapped in the sinister grin, or issue any statement via his office, Guy responded to the threat with a joke about how tight Vance's clothes can be on occasion. Guy said, 'I think I can outrun you in these clothes,' in a post directed at Vance. Derek Guy's immigration status In the wake of Vance's post, when Guy revealed that he had entered the United States illegally from Canada as a child, he explained that his family had fled Vietnam, and he has been living in the US since his mother brought him across the border during his childhood. Despite not being a DACA recipient, Guy insisted that the US is the only home he knows. But why did Guy expose himself at such a vulnerable moment? Guy said he was inspired to tell his story because of the growing unrest in Los Angeles, which has been the site of recent immigration raids and demonstrations against the crackdown that have not always been peaceful. The past feuds Last year in July, Guy posted that Vance's jackets 'don't hug him very well.' He compared photos of Vance in a jacket with those of Chinese leader Xi Jinping, whom he noted has jackets that are 'properly seated on his neck.' That was just the beginning. In October, Guy posted a thread criticizing Vance for wearing a fuchsia raw silk tie to his vice presidential debate against Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. 'You should also know what you're communicating,' Guy wrote. 'A fuchsia raw silk tie is very casual because of its color and material. To me, this is something you wear with seersucker or cream linen suits to summertime garden parties. The tie says, 'I'm here to have fun. '' He wrote on the eve of the inauguration, 'Vance's sleeves are too slim, causing them to catch on his shirt and ride up. Common problem any time something is too slim—might look good when you're standing still at the fitting, but it will bunch and catch as soon as you move.' Then, a month in, he could not resist taking a jab at Vance for wearing way-too-short pants on stage at CPAC, occasionally exposing part of his shin and calf. 'The second lady should advise him to get wider pants and over the calf socks so that his bare leg doesn't show when he sits down,' he wrote. The aftermath: Now, VP Vance's response to Guy's open admission aligns with the Trump administration's broader stance on immigration, which has emphasized stricter enforcement and the deportation of undocumented individuals, including non-criminals. However, it may be argued that Vance's response was an inappropriate use of political power to silence dissent. Will he really deport Guy? Or has it been just a simple social media banter? Time will tell.
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
China risks overplaying its hand by curbing rare earth exports
China has once again weaponized its dominant position in the supply of rare earth minerals. It has imposed stringent export curbs on these elements that are critical inputs in a range of industries from automobiles to aerospace and defence. The move comes as a response to US restrictions on the export of semiconductor technology to China. These battles are being waged against the backdrop of a broader truce in the once-escalating trade war between the world's two largest national economies. The Chinese chokehold on the supply of rare earth minerals has sent a jolt through many industries in other parts of the world, including India. For example, there are fears that assembly lines in the automobile industry will grind to a halt in the coming weeks unless China starts exporting rare earth minerals again. Also Read: Barry Eichengreen: US export curbs on high-tech enablers have rarely worked This is not the first time that Beijing has restricted the flow of rare earth minerals across its borders. It did so in 2010 after a dispute with Japan on the high seas, and was forced to roll back its export curbs by the World Trade Organization in 2015. Even though China's export ban was targeted at Japan, other countries naturally saw it as a signal of what could happen in the years ahead. The effectiveness of any export restriction depends on three factors. First, how important the input is in the production structure of the country's economy. Second, how easy or difficult it is to increase the production of that input in response to higher prices that naturally follow restricted supplies. Third, how concentrated the production of that input is in one country or in a small cartel of countries. Rare earth minerals are needed in many important industries, their supplies are inelastic and China has a massive share in their production. That suggests that the rest of the world will be at the mercy of China. Also Read: China's export ban on key minerals may have a silver lining for the US However, such events create incentives for governments as well as private companies to respond strategically. There is perhaps a lesson to be learnt here from what happened after the first oil shock to hit the world in 1973. The oil embargo that year brought many economies to their knees, but it also led to a search for new energy supplies as well as incentivized companies in sectors such as automobiles to build more fuel-efficient products. Can that happen in the case of rare earth minerals as well? In a recent paper titled 'Trade and Industrial Policy in Supply Chains: Directed Technological Change in Rare Earths, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper,' four economists have taken a closer look at the broader consequences of the earlier supply squeeze. Laura Alfaro, Harald Fadinger, Jan S. Schymik and Gede Virananda have shown that export restrictions on rare earth minerals imposed by China in 2010 triggered a surge elsewhere in technological innovations as well as exports in sectors that used rare earth minerals as inputs. More specifically, they found a surge in patents in downstream industries that use rare earth minerals, both in terms of using them more efficiently as well as developing alternatives. This increase in patents in countries outside China exceeded the overall rise in patents in industries that use rare earth minerals. Productivity, as proxied by exports growth, also improved. In other words, technological dynamism helped the rest of the world adapt to Chinese monopoly power in rare earth minerals. Also Read: Ajit Ranade: The success of 'Made in China 2025' alarmed the West This is a more general lesson. Jensen Huang, the head of chip-maker Nvidia, said at a recent technology industry event in Taipei that firm attempts by successive US administrations to deny China access to advanced technology have actually spurred rather than hindered Chinese innovation. 'The local companies are very, very talented and very determined, and the export control gave them the spirit, the energy and the government support to accelerate their development," Huang was quoted as saying by The Guardian. Parsing his statement provides two lessons. First, that there needs to be a private sector innovation ecosystem that has the ability to respond to either higher prices or restricted supplies. Second, there have to be at least some additional government incentives as well as policy clarity for innovators. They complement each other. The point is not to tell a sanguine story about how all will be well in the long run. It is instead to point out that dynamic economies adapt to changing circumstances. 'In capitalist reality as distinguished from its textbook picture, it is not (traditional) competition that counts but competition from the new commodity, the new technology, the new source of supply, the new type of organisation," wrote the prophet of innovation, Joseph Schumpeter, in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, his classic work. The Chinese dominance in rare earths is undoubtedly a strategic lever that Beijing will use to increase its geopolitical heft in an unsettled world. However, the overuse of such power will create strong incentives for others to adapt by innovation—as everyone from West Asians to Americans have learnt over the years. The author is executive director at Artha India Research Advisors.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Panama Canal boss says MSC ports deal threatens neutrality, Infra News, ET Infra
Advt The sale of two ports near the Panama Canal to a global consortium led by Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) threatens the canal's principle of neutrality, the canal's head Ricaurte Vasquez told the Financial Times."There is a potential risk of capacity concentration if the deal comes the way it is structured as we understand right now," Vasquez told the FT in a report published on Tuesday."If there is a significant level of concentration on terminal operators belonging to an integrated or one single shipping company, it will be at the expense of Panama's competitiveness in the market and inconsistent with neutrality."MSC is one of the world's top container shipping groups. MSC and the Panama Canal Authority did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. CK Hutchison confirmed last month that MSC, run by the family of Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte , was the main investor in a group seeking to buy 43 ports, including the two ports in Panama, for $22.8 clarification follows weeks of scrutiny and criticism in China over CK Hutchison's plan to sell the ports to a consortium, which was previously led by US investment firm BlackRock . BlackRock remains part of the proposed sale has also drawn the attention of US President Donald Trump , who has repeatedly expressed his desire to reduce Chinese influence around the Panama Canal and termed the deal a "reclaiming" of the waterway after it was first April, China's top market regulator said it was paying close attention to CK Hutchison's planned sale and that parties to the deal should not try to avoid an antitrust added that the canal should use the ports deal as an opportunity to become a terminal operator itself by reactivating a project to build a terminal in the Port of Corozal at the Pacific end of the canal, according to the FT.
