
Is Canada now free of internal trade barriers? Read the fine print
OTTAWA - Federal and provincial leaders are working to dismantle internal trade barriers that push up the cost of goods and make it harder to do business within Canada.
But anyone expecting all of them to be gone by tomorrow should read the fine print.
Throughout the spring federal election campaign, Liberal Leader Mark Carney repeatedly vowed to 'eliminate' interprovincial trade barriers and create 'free trade by Canada Day.'
The rhetoric has been at times confusing and the political scorecard on this one is hard to track.
With July 1 just a day away, Carney's government has passed its planned changes into law — but it's more like the start of a conversation than the final word.
'It's a starting gun and it's starting a lot more activity and work, which is honestly the really exciting part,' said internal trade expert Ryan Manucha. 'If any of this was easy, it would have been done.'
Manucha writes on the topic for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think tank and authored the book, 'Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada's Quest for Interprovincial Trade.'
'When I'm advising governments, I say, 'Don't think of this as a light switch,'' he said. 'We are changing the way that everyone approaches the concept of regulation and risk here, and so it's going to take some time.'
The rush to break down internal barriers to trade comes in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war with Canada. One study estimates that existing internal trade hurdles cost the economy some $200 billion a year.
Manucha said Canada has talked about this problem for decades but is only addressing it seriously now — and it would 'never have happened had we not had Trump.'
He said the introduction of the Carney government's bill on internal trade was 'incredible to see' because the idea was just 'an academic theory maybe even as little as eight months ago.'
Bill C-5, the omnibus bill that reduces federal restrictions on interprovincial trade and also speeds up permitting for large infrastructure projects, became law on June 26.
An analysis of the law by McMillan Vantage says that 'this legislation would not achieve' the elimination of all internal trade barriers.
When Carney made his campaign promise, he was talking about cutting red tape put up by the federal government — not the rules set by the provinces, which have the most authority in this area.
The prime minister described this effort as a sort of quid pro quo with the provinces.
'We're getting rid of a bunch of duplicative federal regulations. We're going to have a principle of one project, one review — and in exchange, they're going to agree to eliminate all the barriers to trade and labour mobility,' Carney said at a rally in Kitchener, Ont., on March 26.
'The federal government committed that we will sweep away all of our impediments by Canada Day. Free trade by Canada Day.'
But Canada's internal trade barriers won't all be eliminated by then — not even all the federal ones.
Canada's supply management system for dairy products, which sets provincial production quotas, will remain in place. Quebec also retains language requirements that will stay in place.
Credit unions have complained that the new law does not break down barriers to their expansion into multiple provinces.
Bill C-5 aligns federal requirements for goods and services with provincial ones if they cross provincial or territorial borders. It allows the provincial requirement to replace a federal one if the rules are 'comparable.'
Ottawa likes to point to energy efficiency standards. A washing machine made in B.C. that meets the provincial standard still needs to meet additional federal standards before it can be sold in Alberta or Ontario. But this new law means the B.C. standard would replace the federal one.
The law also eliminates redundant licensing requirements for labourers. Federal regulators would have to recognize provincial occupational certifications.
So just how many federal barriers does the bill eliminate? That's hard to sort out. A lot of the details will have to wait until regulations are drafted — a process that will involve consultations with affected industries.
'I don't really know what this legislation could end up doing because a lot of veto power, a lot a discretion still rests with the regulatory authorities,' Manucha said.
'According to the text of that legislation, it would seem like meat inspection would come off. Is (the Canadian Food Inspection Agency) really going to allow for interprovincial trade and inspection of meat coming from non-federally licensed abattoirs? I don't know.'
There is no comprehensive list of existing internal trade barriers. Even some lobby groups have told parliamentarians they don't know how many barriers their own industries face.
There isn't even consensus on what all counts as a trade barrier.
'In the provincial legislation in Ontario, they're talking for many occupations having a 30-day service standard for how long it'll take for credentials to be recognized,' Manucha said. 'Nova Scotia, meanwhile, is on the 10-day turnaround time. That's less than a third. Can you call the 30-day versus 10-day a trade barrier?'
Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, who has repeatedly stated that most of the barriers are at the provincial level, testified to the Senate that she will meet with her provincial counterparts on July 8 to discuss next steps.
One major obstacle is in Freeland's crosshairs: Canada's patchwork of interprovincial trucking regulations.
'One of three areas that I will be putting on the agenda at that meeting is trucking,' she said on June 16. 'It should be a lot easier than it is to drive a truck from Halifax to Vancouver. We need to get rid of conflicting requirements.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Alberta byelection called for Aug. 18, giving Poilievre path to House
OTTAWA - A byelection has been called in the federal riding of Battle River—Crowfoot, where Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is hoping to win a seat in the House of Commons. Prime Minister Mark Carney has set Aug. 18 as the date for the vote. Poilievre, who represented the Ottawa-area riding of Carleton for more than 20 years, lost to Liberal MP Bruce Fanjoy in the April 28 election. Damien Kurek resigned his seat earlier this month to make way for the Conservative leader's return to Parliament. Carney had pledged to call a byelection quickly to give Poilievre a chance to return to as soon as possible. If he wins, Poilievre will be able to resume his role as Opposition leader in the House of Commons for the fall sitting, which is set to start in September. This was first published by The Canadian Press on June 30, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
Pitney Bowes Parcel Shipping Index: U.S. Carrier Disruption Is Increasing—And That's Good News for Shippers
STAMFORD, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Pitney Bowes Inc. (NYSE: PBI) ('Pitney Bowes' or the 'Company'), a technology-driven products and services company that provides SaaS shipping solutions, mailing innovation and financial services to clients around the world, today released its annual Pitney Bowes Parcel Shipping Index, which includes comprehensive data on U.S. parcel shipping for 2024. The Company also provided U.S. parcel shipping data for the first quarter of 2025. Key takeaways from the Parcel Shipping Index, which can be viewed and downloaded here, include: Parcel volume outpaced revenue growth. In 2024, U.S. parcel volume saw significant growth, reaching 22.4 billion shipments, a 3.4% increase over the prior year. However, revenue growth was outpaced by the rise in volume, with total revenue growing by just 2.7%. Pricing pressure will increase disruption among carrier services, which is good news for shippers. To capture a larger market share, carriers are increasingly offering competitive pricing, leading to lower revenue per parcel. Pricing pressure is largely driven by the rapid growth of alternative carriers, as well as USPS' new low-cost shipping option, Ground Advantage. Smaller carriers are experiencing double-digit volume growth while parcel market heavyweights FedEx, UPS and USPS lag. Amazon Logistics handled 6.3B parcels in 2024, claiming the number two spot for market share by volume, just behind USPS' 6.9B parcels. Amazon is projected to overtake USPS by 2028. The 'Others' (carriers excluding FedEx, UPS, and USPS) also experienced significant year-over-year growth of 23%, going from 0.6B in 2023 to 0.8B in 2024. Tariffs could cause further disruption, producing new opportunities for smaller carriers. The newly imposed tariffs are expected to affect carriers' cross-border shipping costs and disrupt supply chains with longer delivery times for international shipments. New, final-mile and regionally specialized carriers could capitalize on the growing demand for localized, cost-effective shipping solutions in markets where the larger international carriers may struggle to offer affordable services. Key parcel shipping data for the first quarter of 2025 include: In Q1 2025, U.S. parcel volume remained relatively flat, increasing by 0.4% year-over-year, underscoring the slowdown in volume growth. FedEx had a positive trend in volume for the first time since 2021, with volume increasing 5.8% year-over-year. Key drivers of this increase include: Integration of FedEx Ground and FedEx Services into a unified network under Federal Express, which helped streamline operations. Targeted growth strategy for FedEx Ground Economy services aimed at boosting volumes by focusing on specific market segments and optimizing delivery routes. USPS volume declined by 6.2% year-over-year despite advancement of Ground Advantage; ongoing concerns about tariffs uncertainty and weather disruptions are impacting volumes. UPS volume dropped by 5.4% year-over-year with Amazon volume to UPS reduction affecting the decline. The carrier volume of 'Others' has not yet been negatively affected by reduction in small packages from China. Average RPP was up only 0.07%, continuing to reflect excess capacity and competitive pricing. Shemin Nurmohamed, EVP & President of Sending Technology Solutions at Pitney Bowes, commented: 'Since Pitney Bowes began tracking shipments a decade ago, the parcel market has been dominated by FedEx, UPS and USPS. We are witnessing a turning of the tide, evidenced by the nearly 40% volume growth in the five-year CAGR of 'Other' carriers. This disruption presents a unique opportunity for businesses to take advantage of competitive pricing. With carriers facing increased competition, evolving service offerings and potential tariff impacts, it's essential for businesses to have flexibility in shipping providers. Leveraging shipping technology that grants access to multiple carriers – and comes with pre-negotiated discounted rates – provides the flexibility to adapt to shifting dynamics in the market.' Appendix: Summary of Key Data Carrier Volume Parcel volume reached 22.37B in 2024, a 3.4% increase from 2023's 21.65B By volume, USPS shipped 6.9B parcels, up 3.2% from 2023, Amazon Logistics shipped 6.3B parcels, up 7.3% from 2023, and UPS shipped 4.7B parcels in 2024, up 1.7% from 2023 FedEx was the only carrier whose volume declined year-over-year from 3.9B parcels in 2023 to 3.7B parcels in 2024 Market Share by Volume USPS continues to hold the largest market share at 31% Amazon Logistics is the second largest provider, increasing its share from 27% to 28% UPS ranks third with a 21% market share FedEx saw its share of volume decline from 18% to 17% The 'Others' category increased its market share from 3% to 3.5% of the market Carrier Revenue Total U.S. parcel revenue increased 2.7% to $203.2B in 2024, up from $197.9B in 2023 However, carrier revenue per parcel saw a slight decline of 0.6% dropping to $9.09 down from $9.10 in 2023 UPS led the carriers with the highest revenue with $69.8B in 2024, marking a 1.3% increase from 2023. FedEx followed with $63.2B, USPS and Amazon Logistics parcel revenues were $32.3B and $31.1B respectively Market Share by Revenue UPS held the largest parcel revenue market share at 34% though this was a slight decrease from 35% in 2023. FedEx followed with a 31% share, reflecting a 0.8 percentage point decline USPS maintained its revenue market share of 16%, experiencing a minor decrease of 0.2 percentage points Amazon Logistics saw an increase of 0.9 percentage points, reaching 15.3% The 'Others' category also grew, rising from 2.8% to 3.4% Forecast Pitney Bowes forecasts that U.S. parcel volume will reach between 23B and 35B by 2029 The most likely scenario predicts a volume of 30.5B with a 5% CAGR between 2025 and 2030 About the Pitney Bowes Parcel Shipping Index The Pitney Bowes Parcel Shipping Index measures parcel volume and spend for business-to-business, business-to-consumer, consumer-to-business and consumer consigned shipments with weight up to 31.5kg (70 pounds) across the United States. Population data points were sourced from About Pitney Bowes Pitney Bowes (NYSE: PBI) is a technology-driven products and services company that provides SaaS shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world—including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entities rely on Pitney Bowes to reduce the complexity of sending mail and parcels. For the latest news, corporate announcements, and financial results, visit For additional information, visit Pitney Bowes at


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Canada scrapping tax on US tech firms after Trump suspends talks
Canada's government announced late Sunday that it would scrap its digital services tax on U.S. technology companies, paving the way for the resumption of trade talks that President Trump suspended late last week. Canada's government had planned to begin collecting the tax on Monday but said on Sunday it would no longer do so 'in anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade agreement with the United States,' according to Canada's Department of Finance. Officials said that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Trump agreed to resume negotiations, aiming to strike a deal by July 21. 'In our negotiations on a new economic and security relationship between Canada and the United States, Canada's new government will always be guided by the overall contribution of any possible agreement to the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses,' Carney said in a statement. 'Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis,' he added. The news comes after Carney confirmed on Friday that Canada still planned to collect its tax on digital companies that generate revenue from Canadian users. The tax would have applied retroactively, forcing U.S. companies to pay $2 billion by the end of the month, The Associated Press noted. Trump, on Friday, called the tax a 'direct and blatant attack on our Country.' 'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. A political science professor at McGill University in Montreal labeled the latest development a 'clear victory' for Trump in remarks to the AP. 'At some point this move might have become necessary in the context of Canada-U.S. trade negotiations themselves but Prime Minister Carney acted now to appease President Trump and have him agree to simply resume these negotiations, which is a clear victory for both the White House and big tech,' Daniel Béland said. The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.