logo
Is Canada now free of internal trade barriers? Read the fine print

Is Canada now free of internal trade barriers? Read the fine print

OTTAWA - Federal and provincial leaders are working to dismantle internal trade barriers that push up the cost of goods and make it harder to do business within Canada.
But anyone expecting all of them to be gone by tomorrow should read the fine print.
Throughout the spring federal election campaign, Liberal Leader Mark Carney repeatedly vowed to 'eliminate' interprovincial trade barriers and create 'free trade by Canada Day.'
The rhetoric has been at times confusing and the political scorecard on this one is hard to track.
With July 1 just a day away, Carney's government has passed its planned changes into law — but it's more like the start of a conversation than the final word.
'It's a starting gun and it's starting a lot more activity and work, which is honestly the really exciting part,' said internal trade expert Ryan Manucha. 'If any of this was easy, it would have been done.'
Manucha writes on the topic for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think tank and authored the book, 'Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada's Quest for Interprovincial Trade.'
'When I'm advising governments, I say, 'Don't think of this as a light switch,'' he said. 'We are changing the way that everyone approaches the concept of regulation and risk here, and so it's going to take some time.'
The rush to break down internal barriers to trade comes in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war with Canada. One study estimates that existing internal trade hurdles cost the economy some $200 billion a year.
Manucha said Canada has talked about this problem for decades but is only addressing it seriously now — and it would 'never have happened had we not had Trump.'
He said the introduction of the Carney government's bill on internal trade was 'incredible to see' because the idea was just 'an academic theory maybe even as little as eight months ago.'
Bill C-5, the omnibus bill that reduces federal restrictions on interprovincial trade and also speeds up permitting for large infrastructure projects, became law on June 26.
An analysis of the law by McMillan Vantage says that 'this legislation would not achieve' the elimination of all internal trade barriers.
When Carney made his campaign promise, he was talking about cutting red tape put up by the federal government — not the rules set by the provinces, which have the most authority in this area.
The prime minister described this effort as a sort of quid pro quo with the provinces.
'We're getting rid of a bunch of duplicative federal regulations. We're going to have a principle of one project, one review — and in exchange, they're going to agree to eliminate all the barriers to trade and labour mobility,' Carney said at a rally in Kitchener, Ont., on March 26.
'The federal government committed that we will sweep away all of our impediments by Canada Day. Free trade by Canada Day.'
But Canada's internal trade barriers won't all be eliminated by then — not even all the federal ones.
Canada's supply management system for dairy products, which sets provincial production quotas, will remain in place. Quebec also retains language requirements that will stay in place.
Credit unions have complained that the new law does not break down barriers to their expansion into multiple provinces.
Bill C-5 aligns federal requirements for goods and services with provincial ones if they cross provincial or territorial borders. It allows the provincial requirement to replace a federal one if the rules are 'comparable.'
Ottawa likes to point to energy efficiency standards. A washing machine made in B.C. that meets the provincial standard still needs to meet additional federal standards before it can be sold in Alberta or Ontario. But this new law means the B.C. standard would replace the federal one.
The law also eliminates redundant licensing requirements for labourers. Federal regulators would have to recognize provincial occupational certifications.
So just how many federal barriers does the bill eliminate? That's hard to sort out. A lot of the details will have to wait until regulations are drafted — a process that will involve consultations with affected industries.
'I don't really know what this legislation could end up doing because a lot of veto power, a lot a discretion still rests with the regulatory authorities,' Manucha said.
'According to the text of that legislation, it would seem like meat inspection would come off. Is (the Canadian Food Inspection Agency) really going to allow for interprovincial trade and inspection of meat coming from non-federally licensed abattoirs? I don't know.'
There is no comprehensive list of existing internal trade barriers. Even some lobby groups have told parliamentarians they don't know how many barriers their own industries face.
There isn't even consensus on what all counts as a trade barrier.
'In the provincial legislation in Ontario, they're talking for many occupations having a 30-day service standard for how long it'll take for credentials to be recognized,' Manucha said. 'Nova Scotia, meanwhile, is on the 10-day turnaround time. That's less than a third. Can you call the 30-day versus 10-day a trade barrier?'
Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, who has repeatedly stated that most of the barriers are at the provincial level, testified to the Senate that she will meet with her provincial counterparts on July 8 to discuss next steps.
One major obstacle is in Freeland's crosshairs: Canada's patchwork of interprovincial trucking regulations.
'One of three areas that I will be putting on the agenda at that meeting is trucking,' she said on June 16. 'It should be a lot easier than it is to drive a truck from Halifax to Vancouver. We need to get rid of conflicting requirements.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air Canada Strike To Continue Despite Government Order
Air Canada Strike To Continue Despite Government Order

Newsweek

time44 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Air Canada Strike To Continue Despite Government Order

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Flight attendants for Air Canada will continue to strike despite a back-to-work order issued by the Canadian Government, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) said in an interview with Radio-Canada Sunday. The announcement came just a day after the Canadian government ordered the union and airline back into arbitration. The Canadian Industrial Relations Board acted on a directive from the country's Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu, ordering Air Canada "to resume airline operations and for all Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flight attendants to resume their duties" by 2 p.m. ET on Sunday, Newsweek previously reported. Air Canada said previously that they would resume operations Sunday following the cabin crew strike that grounded hundreds of flights, causing cancellations affecting tens of thousands passengers. The strike came following requests for pay increases and better working conditions, CUPE said in a statement issued Saturday. "The Liberal government has invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to end a strike by Air Canada flight attendants fighting to end unpaid work and poverty wages," CUPE said in the statement. Newsweek has reached out to CUPE via email for more information Sunday. This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.

Air Canada says it is restarting flights Sunday
Air Canada says it is restarting flights Sunday

Chicago Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Air Canada says it is restarting flights Sunday

TORONTO — Air Canada said it plans to resume flights on Sunday after the Canadian government intervened and forced the airline and its striking flight attendants back to work and into arbitration. The strike stranded more than 100,000 travelers around the world during the peak summer travel season. The country's largest airline said in a release that the first flights will resume Sunday evening but that it will take several days before its operations return to normal. It said some flights will be canceled over the next seven to 10 days until the schedule is stabilized. Less than 12 hours after workers walked off the job, Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu ordered the 10,000 flight attendants back to work, saying now is not the time to take risks with the economy and noting the unprecedented tariffs the U.S. has imposed on Canada. Hajdu referred the work stoppage to the Canada Industrial Relations Board. The airline said Sunday the Canada Industrial Relations Board has extended the term of the existing collective agreement until a new one is determined by the arbitrator. The shutdown of Canada's largest airline early Saturday was impacting about 130,000 people a day. Air Canada operates around 700 flights per day. According to numbers from aviation analytics provider Cirium, Air Canada had canceled a total of 671 flights by Saturday afternoon — following 199 on Friday. And another 96 flights scheduled for Sunday were already suspended. The bitter contract fight escalated Friday as the union turned down Air Canada's prior request to enter into government-directed arbitration, which allows a third-party mediator to decide the terms of a new contract. Flight attendants walked off the job around midnight Central Time on Saturday. Around the same time, Air Canada said it would begin locking flight attendants out of airports. Last year, the government forced the country's two major railroads into arbitration with their labor union during a work stoppage. The union for the rail workers is suing, arguing the government is removing a union's leverage in negotiations. The Business Council of Canada had urged the government to impose binding arbitration in this case, too. And the Canadian Chamber of Commerce welcomed the intervention. Hajdu maintained that her Liberal government is not anti-union, saying it is clear the two sides are at an impasse. Passengers whose flights are impacted will be eligible to request a full refund on the airline's website or mobile app, according to Air Canada. The airline said it would also offer alternative travel options through other Canadian and foreign airlines when possible. Still, it warned that it could not guarantee immediate rebooking because flights on other airlines are already full 'due to the summer travel peak.' Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees have been in contract talks for about eight months, but they have yet to reach a tentative deal. Both sides have said they remain far apart on the issue of pay and the unpaid work flight attendants do when planes aren't in the air. The airline's latest offer included a 38% increase in total compensation, including benefits and pensions, over four years, that it said 'would have made our flight attendants the best compensated in Canada.' But the union pushed back, saying the proposed 8% raise in the first year didn't go far enough because of inflation.

Gavin Newsom thanks you for your attention to redistricting
Gavin Newsom thanks you for your attention to redistricting

CNN

time4 hours ago

  • CNN

Gavin Newsom thanks you for your attention to redistricting

Gavin Newsom knows the popular image of him is of a smooth talker with slicked-back hair, the wealthy liberal who co-owns a vineyard. He knows, regarding the presidential ambitions he's hardly hiding, that the biggest question he would face out of the gate is whether he could sell Americans on wanting California to represent their future rather than seeing it as the place where the wackiest liberal dreams go to run wild. The redistricting fight that Newsom and the state legislature are launching Monday could, he and his inner circle believe, give him all the rebuttals he needs. If it succeeds. Newsom is already raising money and preparing for an onslaught of Republican cash aimed at defeating the November ballot initiative California legislators expect to enact as quickly as Thursday, asking voters to allow a gerrymander of five new Democratic seats in the US House. He has started making plans for what he assumes will be President Donald Trump's retaliation against him for trying to erase Republican gains in Texas. He recently spent an hour on the phone trying to smooth over former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who created California's independent redistricting commission and has made fighting gerrymandering one of his post-politics priorities. (It may not have helped: Schwarzenegger posted a deliberately cryptic photo Friday of himself lifting weights in a T-shirt reading: 'F*** The Politicians: Terminate Gerrymandering.') Democrats often talk about fighting Trump more. Newsom now has yet another actual fight to have. Newsom told CNN that he feels 'blessed' to have the chance and that he's worried Democrats are undermining voters' faith with inspiring but ultimately empty promises. 'It's faith and works,' he said in an interview hours after he formally launched his redistricting push with a vow to fight 'fire with fire.' 'You go to church. It's, as you pray, move your feet. It's passion and action.' 'I don't want to go to another candlelight vigil. I don't want to hold hands. People need to do something. 'Do something!' I hear it. 'Do something.' People are done with us. If I give another speech and I don't follow up with something, I'm done. And (Trump's Republicans) are going to roll us over,' Newsom said. Aides to several of Newsom's potential presidential primary rivals told CNN they weren't going to address directly what the governor is doing. But all the people already thinking about the bigger political picture for Democrats know what this showdown could mean for him. 'What do you mean he can't win a general election?' one of Newsom's strategists told CNN, asking the question they know he'll confront and speaking anonymously to discuss the internal thinking about how this would reverberate. 'He just helped us take back the House. If this wins, and the Democrats win, he's a winner: a leader of the opposition, and an effective leader.' Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the San Francisco-based former House speaker who has long been a Newsom booster and is already helping him fundraise for the ballot initiative campaign, said that after Trump started the unusual mid-decade redistricting push, 'you throw a punch, you better be ready to take punch — for the children, as I always say, and for our democracy.' 'When this came along, it provided a vehicle like none other,' Pelosi said. 'And people who had been saying, 'Give me something to do, what can I do?' or, 'Why aren't we doing more?' are now really very excited about the leadership that is being provided by California under the leadership of Gavin.' Just a few months ago, after calling a post-election special session of the legislature to pass several 'Trump-proofing' laws, Newsom began to reach out to the president. First came the devastating Los Angeles wildfires. Newsom, exhausted and frantic by the scale of the destruction and what rebuilding would entail, spent days in a command center managing the response but also apoplectic about the misinformation he saw spreading on social media, often from the Trump directly and with signal-boosting from Elon Musk. Still, he showed up at the airport to greet the newly inaugurated president and kissed the first lady on the cheek, then spent 90 minutes in the Oval Office, pleading for disaster aid. Then was what came off to many allies and rivals as a journey of self-exploration via podcasting. He seemed to switch his position on transgender rights to better match the Democratic backlash that set in after those questions helped take down his old rival Kamala Harris. He invited on MAGA celebrities Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon, saying he was looking for common ground. Many Democrats felt betrayed. Others dismissed Newsom as being purely opportunistic. Even people who worked for him said that he seemed adrift, following his own sense of what he wanted to do, and he needed to decide whether he wanted his future to be on the iTunes charts or in the White House. Weeks before standing up to the president's June immigration enforcement crackdown in Los Angeles, Newsom introduced massive social services cuts for the state budget, which he said were the only way to deal with the coming shortfalls under Trump. At the time, Lorena Gonzalez, a Democratic former member of the State Assembly and now powerful California Labor Federation president, told CNN that Newsom was behaving like 'a San Diego Republican of the 2000s or 2010s.' Responding to Trump that way, Gonzalez told CNN in June, 'is a choice. It's not a choice I would make.' Gonzalez was one of the speakers at Thursday's redistricting kickoff in Los Angeles, introducing Newsom in lionizing terms, while Sen. Alex Padilla called him 'the person who has brought us together for this fight of all fights.' A few minutes later US Rep. Maxine Waters said he was showing 'the kind of leadership that's going to determine the future of this country.' And underscoring both the Trump administration's crackdown in California and Newsom's feeling that retaliation is coming, Border Patrol agents arrived outside the rally to detain people with cameras rolling. For those who wanted more pushback right away in Trump's second presidency, Newsom is ringing a little hollow now. 'I'm very glad that Gavin Newsom has abandoned the 'sit down with our mortal enemies for podcasts' phase of his political career,' said one top Democratic strategist starting to think through the 2028 race, asking for anonymity to not speak directly toward a candidate's calculations. 'But his turnabout here speaks to the fundamental problem he has with the Democratic electorate: He says and does what he thinks is right for him in the moment as opposed to what is right for the country.' Newsom's response: 'Give me a goddamn break. What a bulls*** comment.' He was riled up, calling himself 'the guy who's done more progressive policy than anybody,' ticking through his record on expanding health care, raising the minimum wage, building housing, and enacting a wide range of larger social, racial and economic justice initiatives. 'They can't be serious, because they're not serious, because they don't know what the hell they're talking about,' Newsom said, saying he's still the same man who as San Francisco mayor first made headlines 20 years ago for officiating the first legal gay marriages in the country. 'I've been hiding in plain sight. It's, like, really? You've now discovered something that's been there the whole time,' Newsom said. 'I think it's maybe a secret power because, you know, get ready.' Many Democratic governors who tangled with Trump through the pandemic walked away chastened, believing they could never work with him again. Newsom said he got everything he asked for even after the last intense wildfires. He said he started out wanting to believe that he could work with Trump again until that meeting in the Oval Office in February, when it quickly hit him that the president is 'a different person.' Trump, Newsom said, kept talking about himself, pointing to a picture of Franklin Roosevelt and talking about running for a third term like Roosevelt did before the US Constitution was amended with a two-term limit. 'It was maniacal,' Newsom said. 'You felt those authoritarian tendencies coming in a way that even — when I say even, in quotes — even in the first term, were not as present.' As for hosting Kirk or Bannon on his podcast, Newsom said it's ridiculous to argue he was doing anything to platform people who already have huge followings. 'Just because you turn your back, they're going to disappear? How naïve is that? How stupid? Give me a break,' Newsom said. 'We need to understand what makes them tick, what motivates them.' Plus, Newsom said, there are areas of agreement, like when he felt Bannon seemed in favor of California's tax system. Maybe there's some opportunity for Democrats there, too. Newsom's podcast, for all the snickering it caused, is at breakthrough levels of listeners. His email list is generally considered the second-best in Democratic politics, only after Harris' from the presidential campaign. His press office's social media account has become a multi-aide operation itself and shifted to a Trump-aping full-time troll, complete with schoolyard nicknames and 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!' sign-offs. Asked last week by a reporter to defend the tone he's adopted online, Newsom said, 'If you have issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns with what he's putting out as president,' decrying what he said was the 'normalization' of that approach even as he noted he was 'pleased with the attention.' Newsom is fundraising. He will campaign hard through November. He will hope that a combination of Democratic turnout, a pitch about giving voters the voice in redistricting, and the reaffirmation of the independent redistricting commission for future cycles will get him to victory. The next fight is already on his mind, as he says he will make sure the University of California, Los Angeles, does not agree to a settlement with the Trump administration – 'we'll never settle out, like Harvard appears to be selling out,' he said. But Newsom said he already knows what he will say if he loses this one. 'I'll tell people: I put it all on the line. Did what I thought was right. And you know what? I value your opinion. I value your point of view. And I pray for all of us,' Newsom said. 'Because, you know, God help us if we're not successful. And I mean it. You may have enjoyed one of your last free and fair elections. And it will be a free and a fair election, despite these guys showing up in masks.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store