
Phantom cows and missing millions spark financial scandal in Uruguay
She has traveled 600 kilometers (370 miles) from the capital, Montevideo, to find 61 cattle she owns, at least on paper. The missing bovines were part of a 'cow bond' scheme that has collapsed, causing one of Uruguay's biggest ever financial scandals.
By Lucinda Elliott ARTIGAS, Uruguay (Reuters) – Sandra Palleiro is on the hunt for her lost cows. The 60-year-old accountant is standing in a muddy field at the end of a farm track in Uruguay's remote border region with Brazil.
'Hello moo-moo! Could one of you be mine?' Palleiro called out hopefully into a paddock in the border region of Artigas, her jeans caked in mud as she approached a wire fence to get a closer look at the cows.
Palleiro – like hundreds of other investors – is unable to find the animals she owns or prove they even exist, making them part of a herd of 'phantom cows' that could number over 700,000 head of cattle.
So far, the losses have mounted to some $350 million, roiling the stable farming nation, home to just 3.4 million people – but 12 million cows. It has also sent shockwaves through bigger ranching neighbors Argentina and Brazil, which looked to Uruguay's cattle-tracking system as a model and where similar livestock investment schemes operate.
In March 2024, Palleiro put her life savings of over $50,000 into the livestock investment scheme offered by a local firm named Conexión Ganadera, lured by promises of fixed 7-10% dollar returns and investment materials with bucolic pictures of brown-and-white Hereford cattle.
Savers could own cows directly that would be reared and sold for profit by livestock firms, or take an investment stake in the overall scheme. Palleiro, an urban professional, liked the idea of owning a tangible asset. It seemed a safe bet.
She could track the cows via a state-backed online portal – for years an example globally for cattle tracking – which set out breed, age and location. Each cow was supposed to be branded with a symbol assigned by the government and documents listing her assets carried the crest of the agriculture ministry, which oversees the cattle registry.
Uruguay's national cattle registry declined to comment on the cases.
When she went in search of her cows, Palleiro carried print copies from the cattle registry to see if she could match the 53 tracking numbers linked to this ranch with the tags of the cows staring at her on the opposite side of the fence.
Using her smartphone camera, she zoomed in on the tracking numbers pinned to their ears. It soon became clear few of the numbers matched. Then the cows started backing away. She couldn't get close enough. The exercise felt hopeless.
'It feels like falling into a nightmare,' said Palleiro.
TESLA CRASH
Three of the biggest firms under investigation for fraud are Conexión Ganadera, República Ganadera and Grupo Larrarte, which between them persuaded nearly 6,000 people or investor pools to buy into the program, investing millions of dollars.
Similar investment schemes exist throughout South America, in Argentina, Brazil and Colombia. Many are legitimate.
Martín Fablet, a local radio presenter in Montevideo, said he invested several times in Conexión Ganadera and other livestock schemes in Uruguay over the past 12 years: 'This system of receiving fixed dollar returns worked fantastically well for at least 11 years. They paid me on time.'
The first hint of the scandal at Conexión Ganadera came on November 28 last year, when a Tesla Model 3 car crashed at 211 kilometers per hour in the small central Uruguayan city of Florida. Behind the wheel was Gustavo Basso, one of the co-owners of Conexión Ganadera, which had boomed since opening in 1999.
Weeks after he drove his car into a parked construction vehicle, investors started reporting their payments from the cattle scheme were late, and by January the company confirmed it was short of nearly $250 million. A coroner concluded in April that Basso had died by suicide.
Conexión Ganadera was one of the three funds that started to warn late last year that they were unable to fulfill obligations to investors. They were short of cash, which they blamed on adverse weather (there had been a drought in 2022-23) and tough market conditions.
By late January, investors were scrambling to withdraw savings amid reports of fraud. Some filed suits for fraud, leading to bankruptcy proceedings and an official investigation by Uruguay's Prosecutor's Office for Money Laundering Crimes, which remains ongoing. The prosecutor declined to comment to Reuters.
Pablo Carrasco of Conexión Ganadera denies fraud allegations. Lawyers representing Conexión Ganadera said they were unable to comment on legal proceedings until testimony was given in court. Grupo Larrarte's lawyer said the firm was fully cooperating with the authorities. República Ganadera did not respond to a Reuters request for comment.
'MAYBE THE COWS WERE FAKES'
Politicians, radio hosts, pensioners and even priests are among the thousands now attempting to recover their savings – and their missing 'phantom' cattle, the number of which is proving hard to pin down.
An inventory of the biggest firm, Conexión Ganadera, carried out by a bankruptcy trustee estimated that as few as 70,000-80,000 of the 804,604 cattle the company claimed to manage actually existed.
In another court case into fraud allegations, Uruguay's Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MGAP) said in March that one of Conexión Ganadera's main cattle holding firms, Pasfer, had only 49 of the 3,740 cows that it put up as collateral to secure a loan.
'We don't know if the cows were ever bought, whether they're alive or dead,' Palleiro said during a drive along country lanes to the Artigas ranch. 'Maybe the cows were fakes, or sold, moved somewhere or their tags were changed.'
Victims want to know how authorities failed to spot the problems despite the cattle registry.
Three lawyers for victims said it was possible that the government-issued tags were never attached to the animals because the animals were never purchased, and the investments were used for other purposes. Two other lawyers representing investors in bankruptcy and fraud cases alleged that cows owned by investors were sold off illegally, without their consent.
Each company was responsible for applying the tags and in-putting data to the national registry. 'The registry reflects what the company provided. The problem is that there was no control over what the company provided,' said one of the lawyers, Nicolás Hornes, who represents 98 victims.
Hornes said he went to several farms and found that the number of cattle did not match the registry. Two other investors Reuters spoke to told similar stories of trying to find their cows.
Uruguay's livestock ministry did not respond to Reuters questions about whether the registry system failed.
COMPANIES UNDER INVESTIGATION
An executive from Grupo Larrarte, the first firm to receive formal complaints from investors, is already in prison as part of an ongoing criminal investigation, which is separate from bankruptcy proceedings. Jairo Larrarte was placed in preventive detention by a judge in April for alleged crimes of misappropriation, fraud and issuing bad checks.
In a response to Reuters, his lawyer Enrique Möller said that his client had fully cooperated with the authorities and that cattle had already been returned to some investors.
República Ganadera filed for voluntary bankruptcy in November, which the courts rejected in March because authorities opened an investigation into the company's accounts. Negotiations with creditors continue and the firm said in a March 25 statement that it was 'prioritizing the best possible solution' for those affected. The company did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
There are several open investigations into Conexión Ganadera, the biggest of the three. The company's co-owner, Pablo Carrasco, his wife Ana Iewdiukow and Basso's widow, Daniela Cabral, are being investigated for fraud and embezzlement. In February all three were temporarily barred from leaving Uruguay without court authorization and their passports confiscated. Carrasco's lawyer Jorge Barrera said there would be no comment to the media.
SNAKE CHARMER
Basso, whose high-speed crash presaged the company's downfall, lived in grand style in the city of Florida, which has a small-town feel, home to 30,000 people surrounded by farmland.
Fablet, the local radio presenter, said he met Basso some 50 times over the course of a decade, socially and while covering agriculture events for radio.
'(Basso) was a snake charmer,' said Fablet, a longtime investor in Conexión Ganadera. 'He could never simply lose $250 million… he could've made a loss, but that money must be somewhere.'
Back at the Artigas farm, Reuters drone footage showed around 80 animals compared to what should have been several hundred belonging to Palleiro and other investors.
Farmhands at the ranch explained that more animals were out in other fields. Several mentioned delays to salary payments since the scandal broke and they said there was no easy way of checking which, if any, belonged to Palleiro.
Palleiro herself was angered at the way the case was hurting so many hard-working Uruguayans. She had at times taken on three jobs to put together a nest egg for her retirement.
'We put in all our savings that cost us a lot of effort,' she said with emotion. 'Now we want justice.'
(Reporting by Lucinda Elliott. Additional reporting by Ana Mano in Sao Paulo and Manuela Andreoni in Para, Brazil; Editing by Adam Jourdan and Claudia Parsons.)
Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
5 minutes ago
- First Post
This Week in Explainers: Did Putin convince Trump not to slap additional tariffs on India?
United States President Donald Trump held talks with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska in a momentous summit in Alaska. After the meeting, Trump hinted that he may not impose additional secondary tariffs on countries purchasing Russian crude oil, which includes India. All this and more in our weekly roundup from around the globe US President Donald Trump looks on next to Russian President Vladimir Putin during a press conference following their meeting to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, in Anchorage, Alaska. Reuters The world witnessed the much-awaited summit between United States President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15. All eyes, including India's, were on the meeting as the two leaders discussed the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Pakistan has ramped up its nuclear threats against India. After the country's Army Chief Asim Munir, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto warned New Delhi over the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's announcement of additional 25 per cent tariffs on India for purchasing Russian oil stands in stark contrast to his handling of China, which is among the top buyers of crude from Russia. What explains the different treatment? Here's all this and much more in our weekly wrap from the world. 1. US President Trump hosted his Russian counterpart at the American military's Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. This was Putin's first visit to the US in a decade, as well as the first-ever visit of a Russian leader to Alaska. Ahead of the high-stakes summit, Trump had described it as a 'feel-out' meeting and threatened Moscow with 'serious consequences' if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire. The two leaders met to find common ground to ensure a lasting ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine after a three-year-long war, albeit in the absence of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. So what came out of it? This story explains. 2. The world was glued to the high-stakes summit, which held a special interest for India. On Friday, Donald Trump claimed that Russia lost India as one of its oil clients. But after meeting Putin, the US president indicated that he may not impose secondary tariffs on countries like India that procure crude oil from Russia. Here is what this could mean for New Delhi. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD US President Donald Trump walks to shake the hand of Russia's Vladimir Putin during a joint press conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, on Friday. After a three-hour meeting, Trump said 'we didn't get there' on a Ukraine deal. AP 3. Pakistan is back at its war rhetoric against India. After Pakistan Army chief Munir's nuclear threat to India on US soil, PM Sharif and politician Bilawal Bhutto also issued warnings to New Delhi. Targeting India for pausing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), Sharif said that Pakistan will teach a 'lesson' to the 'enemy' that 'you will never forget.' Bilawal Bhutto also threatened India with war if New Delhi continues making changes to the decades-old pact with Islamabad. Do these threats hold weight, or are they hollow? Read our story to know more. 4. Trump has earlier publicly hit out at India for buying Russian crude oil even as trade talks continue between Washington and New Delhi. He has also imposed 25 per cent tariffs on Indian imports to the US, while threatening an additional 25 per cent levy (which he says he may now reconsider). The discussions to reach a bilateral trade agreement have hit a stalemate over India's reluctance to open its markets to US agriculture and dairy products. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Moreover, the US president has not attacked China, similarly, for purchasing Russian oil. Instead, this week, he granted a 90-day extension to the existing tariff pause between Washington and Beijing. What's behind Trump's starkly different approaches toward two of America's largest trading partners? We explain here. 5. Israel killed Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, along with four other journalists, while they were resting inside a tent for the press outside Al-Shifa Hospital's main gate in Gaza. Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif was killed by a targeted Israeli airstrike. Image Courtesy: Al Jazeera/X After the strike, the Israeli military claimed Anas was a 'terrorist' and 'served as the head of a terrorist cell in Hamas'. Al Jazeera vehemently rejected these claims, calling their reporter 'one of Gaza's bravest journalists.' So, was he a 'terrorist' or a journalist? Here's our story. 6. The young, unemployed people in China are paying to pretend to have jobs. Like any regular worker, they get up in the morning, dress up and leave for their 'offices'. However, no one is paying them, and they don't have to produce any results. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There has been a rise in companies offering a 'pretend to work' service in China. Some say they prefer this popular trend to being stuck at home until they get a job. However, others have called it 'escapism'. Why are the young, jobless Chinese paying to pretend to be employed? We take a look here. 7. A video has gone viral on social media of a killer whale purportedly attacking and killing a marine trainer named Jessica Radcliffe during a live show. The incident sparked a flood of reactions online, with netizens expressing shock, outrage, and grief. I have jessica radcliffe video orca, jessica radcliffe orca attack video, video jessica accident orque!! 6 minutes video 👇 — Burhan Khizer (@MeerKp20450) August 11, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, here's the twist: none of it was real. The video was all an elaborate hoax. Read our story to find out the truth behind the viral clip. This is all we have for you this week. If you like how we explain the news, you can bookmark this page to stay informed.

Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Elon Musk's stern warning to short sellers after Tesla Senior VP dumps 82% of shares: Here's what he said
Tesla's Senior Vice President, Xiaotong Zhu (also known as Tom Zhu), has sold more than 82% of his Tesla holdings. The stock sales occurred between 2023 and 2024 at prices ranging from $174 to $323 per share, according to securities filings. This major sale by a top executive has raised questions about insider confidence in the company. Amidst the news of the stock sale, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has issued a strong warning to short sellers. In a post on X (formerly twitter), he stated that short sellers would be 'obliterated' if they do not exit their short positions before Tesla reaches 'autonomy at scale.' Musk's comment was a direct response to a list of current net short sellers of the Electric Vehicle (EV) manufacturer. Short selling isa trading strategy where an investor profits from a decline in a stock's price. The process involves: Borrowing: An investor borrows shares of a company from a broker Selling: The borrowed shares immediately sold at the current market price. Buying back: Later, if the stock price drops, the investor buys back the same number of shares at a lower price. Profit: The shares are then returned to the broker and the difference between selling price and buy-back price is the investor's profit. Short selling is considered a high-risk strategy because potential losses are unlimited if the stock price rises instead of falls, as the investor must still buy back the shares at a higher price to return them to the broker. Elon Musk has a history of clashing with short sellers, including Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. Their feud stems from Gates' reported short positions against Tesla stock. According to Walter Isaacson's 2023 biography of Musk, this short position has allegedly resulted in a $1.5 billion loss for Bill Gates. In an earlier post on X, Musk had warned that 'If Tesla does become the world's most valuable company by far, that short position will bankrupt even Bill Gates.'


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
OpenAI staff looking to sell $6 billion in stock to SoftBank, others
Current and former employees of OpenAI are looking to sell nearly $6 billion worth of the ChatGPT maker's shares to investors including SoftBank Group and Thrive Capital, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday. The potential deal would value the company at $500 billion, up from $300 billion currently, underscoring both OpenAI's rapid gains in users and revenue, as well as the intense competition among artificial intelligence firms for talent. SoftBank, Thrive and Dragoneer Investment Group did not immediately respond to requests for comment. All three investment firms are existing OpenAI investors. Bloomberg News, which had earlier reported the development, said discussions are in early stages and the size of the sale could change. The secondary share sale investment adds to SoftBank's role in leading OpenAI's $40 billion primary funding round. Bolstered by its flagship product ChatGPT, OpenAI doubled its revenue in the first seven months of the year, reaching an annualized run rate of $12 billion, and is on track to reach $20 billion by the end of the year, Reuters reported earlier in August. Microsoft-backed OpenAI has about 700 million weekly active users for its ChatGPT products, a surge from about 400 million in February.