
Phantom cows and missing millions spark financial scandal in Uruguay
The co-owner of one Uruguayan firm that took money from savers to invest in cows has died by suicide. Three companies have gone bust and are under investigation for fraud.
She has traveled 600 kilometers (370 miles) from the capital, Montevideo, to find 61 cattle she owns, at least on paper. The missing bovines were part of a 'cow bond' scheme that has collapsed, causing one of Uruguay's biggest ever financial scandals.
By Lucinda Elliott ARTIGAS, Uruguay (Reuters) – Sandra Palleiro is on the hunt for her lost cows. The 60-year-old accountant is standing in a muddy field at the end of a farm track in Uruguay's remote border region with Brazil.
'Hello moo-moo! Could one of you be mine?' Palleiro called out hopefully into a paddock in the border region of Artigas, her jeans caked in mud as she approached a wire fence to get a closer look at the cows.
Palleiro – like hundreds of other investors – is unable to find the animals she owns or prove they even exist, making them part of a herd of 'phantom cows' that could number over 700,000 head of cattle.
So far, the losses have mounted to some $350 million, roiling the stable farming nation, home to just 3.4 million people – but 12 million cows. It has also sent shockwaves through bigger ranching neighbors Argentina and Brazil, which looked to Uruguay's cattle-tracking system as a model and where similar livestock investment schemes operate.
In March 2024, Palleiro put her life savings of over $50,000 into the livestock investment scheme offered by a local firm named Conexión Ganadera, lured by promises of fixed 7-10% dollar returns and investment materials with bucolic pictures of brown-and-white Hereford cattle.
Savers could own cows directly that would be reared and sold for profit by livestock firms, or take an investment stake in the overall scheme. Palleiro, an urban professional, liked the idea of owning a tangible asset. It seemed a safe bet.
She could track the cows via a state-backed online portal – for years an example globally for cattle tracking – which set out breed, age and location. Each cow was supposed to be branded with a symbol assigned by the government and documents listing her assets carried the crest of the agriculture ministry, which oversees the cattle registry.
Uruguay's national cattle registry declined to comment on the cases.
When she went in search of her cows, Palleiro carried print copies from the cattle registry to see if she could match the 53 tracking numbers linked to this ranch with the tags of the cows staring at her on the opposite side of the fence.
Using her smartphone camera, she zoomed in on the tracking numbers pinned to their ears. It soon became clear few of the numbers matched. Then the cows started backing away. She couldn't get close enough. The exercise felt hopeless.
'It feels like falling into a nightmare,' said Palleiro.
TESLA CRASH
Three of the biggest firms under investigation for fraud are Conexión Ganadera, República Ganadera and Grupo Larrarte, which between them persuaded nearly 6,000 people or investor pools to buy into the program, investing millions of dollars.
Similar investment schemes exist throughout South America, in Argentina, Brazil and Colombia. Many are legitimate.
Martín Fablet, a local radio presenter in Montevideo, said he invested several times in Conexión Ganadera and other livestock schemes in Uruguay over the past 12 years: 'This system of receiving fixed dollar returns worked fantastically well for at least 11 years. They paid me on time.'
The first hint of the scandal at Conexión Ganadera came on November 28 last year, when a Tesla Model 3 car crashed at 211 kilometers per hour in the small central Uruguayan city of Florida. Behind the wheel was Gustavo Basso, one of the co-owners of Conexión Ganadera, which had boomed since opening in 1999.
Weeks after he drove his car into a parked construction vehicle, investors started reporting their payments from the cattle scheme were late, and by January the company confirmed it was short of nearly $250 million. A coroner concluded in April that Basso had died by suicide.
Conexión Ganadera was one of the three funds that started to warn late last year that they were unable to fulfill obligations to investors. They were short of cash, which they blamed on adverse weather (there had been a drought in 2022-23) and tough market conditions.
By late January, investors were scrambling to withdraw savings amid reports of fraud. Some filed suits for fraud, leading to bankruptcy proceedings and an official investigation by Uruguay's Prosecutor's Office for Money Laundering Crimes, which remains ongoing. The prosecutor declined to comment to Reuters.
Pablo Carrasco of Conexión Ganadera denies fraud allegations. Lawyers representing Conexión Ganadera said they were unable to comment on legal proceedings until testimony was given in court. Grupo Larrarte's lawyer said the firm was fully cooperating with the authorities. República Ganadera did not respond to a Reuters request for comment.
'MAYBE THE COWS WERE FAKES'
Politicians, radio hosts, pensioners and even priests are among the thousands now attempting to recover their savings – and their missing 'phantom' cattle, the number of which is proving hard to pin down.
An inventory of the biggest firm, Conexión Ganadera, carried out by a bankruptcy trustee estimated that as few as 70,000-80,000 of the 804,604 cattle the company claimed to manage actually existed.
In another court case into fraud allegations, Uruguay's Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MGAP) said in March that one of Conexión Ganadera's main cattle holding firms, Pasfer, had only 49 of the 3,740 cows that it put up as collateral to secure a loan.
'We don't know if the cows were ever bought, whether they're alive or dead,' Palleiro said during a drive along country lanes to the Artigas ranch. 'Maybe the cows were fakes, or sold, moved somewhere or their tags were changed.'
Victims want to know how authorities failed to spot the problems despite the cattle registry.
Three lawyers for victims said it was possible that the government-issued tags were never attached to the animals because the animals were never purchased, and the investments were used for other purposes. Two other lawyers representing investors in bankruptcy and fraud cases alleged that cows owned by investors were sold off illegally, without their consent.
Each company was responsible for applying the tags and in-putting data to the national registry. 'The registry reflects what the company provided. The problem is that there was no control over what the company provided,' said one of the lawyers, Nicolás Hornes, who represents 98 victims.
Hornes said he went to several farms and found that the number of cattle did not match the registry. Two other investors Reuters spoke to told similar stories of trying to find their cows.
Uruguay's livestock ministry did not respond to Reuters questions about whether the registry system failed.
COMPANIES UNDER INVESTIGATION
An executive from Grupo Larrarte, the first firm to receive formal complaints from investors, is already in prison as part of an ongoing criminal investigation, which is separate from bankruptcy proceedings. Jairo Larrarte was placed in preventive detention by a judge in April for alleged crimes of misappropriation, fraud and issuing bad checks.
In a response to Reuters, his lawyer Enrique Möller said that his client had fully cooperated with the authorities and that cattle had already been returned to some investors.
República Ganadera filed for voluntary bankruptcy in November, which the courts rejected in March because authorities opened an investigation into the company's accounts. Negotiations with creditors continue and the firm said in a March 25 statement that it was 'prioritizing the best possible solution' for those affected. The company did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
There are several open investigations into Conexión Ganadera, the biggest of the three. The company's co-owner, Pablo Carrasco, his wife Ana Iewdiukow and Basso's widow, Daniela Cabral, are being investigated for fraud and embezzlement. In February all three were temporarily barred from leaving Uruguay without court authorization and their passports confiscated. Carrasco's lawyer Jorge Barrera said there would be no comment to the media.
SNAKE CHARMER
Basso, whose high-speed crash presaged the company's downfall, lived in grand style in the city of Florida, which has a small-town feel, home to 30,000 people surrounded by farmland.
Fablet, the local radio presenter, said he met Basso some 50 times over the course of a decade, socially and while covering agriculture events for radio.
'(Basso) was a snake charmer,' said Fablet, a longtime investor in Conexión Ganadera. 'He could never simply lose $250 million… he could've made a loss, but that money must be somewhere.'
Back at the Artigas farm, Reuters drone footage showed around 80 animals compared to what should have been several hundred belonging to Palleiro and other investors.
Farmhands at the ranch explained that more animals were out in other fields. Several mentioned delays to salary payments since the scandal broke and they said there was no easy way of checking which, if any, belonged to Palleiro.
Palleiro herself was angered at the way the case was hurting so many hard-working Uruguayans. She had at times taken on three jobs to put together a nest egg for her retirement.
'We put in all our savings that cost us a lot of effort,' she said with emotion. 'Now we want justice.'
(Reporting by Lucinda Elliott. Additional reporting by Ana Mano in Sao Paulo and Manuela Andreoni in Para, Brazil; Editing by Adam Jourdan and Claudia Parsons.)
Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
42 minutes ago
- First Post
China clears rare earths export applications, not clear if Indian companies included
China's decision in April to halt exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets disrupted global supply chains, affecting industries from automotive and aerospace to semiconductors and defence read more Miners are seen at the Bayan Obo mine containing rare earth minerals, in Inner Mongolia, China. File image/ Reuters China said Saturday (June 7) it is prepared to accelerate the approval process for rare earth exports to European Union companies and will issue a final ruling on its trade probe into EU brandy imports by July 5. The developments come amid broader efforts to resolve ongoing trade tensions between Beijing and Brussels. Talks were held earlier this week in Paris between Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic, China's Commerce Ministry said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Price commitment discussions on Chinese-made electric vehicles exported to the EU have also reached the final phase. 'Efforts from both sides are still needed,' the ministry said. The ministry added that China 'was willing to establish a green channel for qualified applications to speed up the approval process' for rare earth exports. It also noted that Beijing recognised rising demand for rare earth materials across sectors including electric vehicles and robotics and that it 'was willing to further strengthen communication and dialogue with relevant countries' on the matter. Rare earths and trade friction China's decision in April to halt exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets disrupted global supply chains, affecting industries from automotive and aerospace to semiconductors and defence. The move has become a flashpoint in EU-China trade relations. The ministry said it 'attached great importance to the EU's concerns' and indicated it would work to resolve the bottleneck in a timely manner. Brandy duties under review China's anti-dumping duties of up to 39 per cent on European brandy, particularly French cognac, were implemented shortly after the EU imposed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. The Chinese measures have impacted major French producers including LVMH's Hennessy, Pernod Ricard's Martell, and Remy Cointreau. French President Emmanuel Macron previously accused Beijing of 'pure retaliation' over the duties. Beijing had initially planned to announce a final decision on the brandy investigation in January, later postponing it to April and now July 5. On Saturday, the Commerce Ministry confirmed that French firms and industry associations had submitted price commitment proposals and that investigators had reached agreement on key terms. 'Chinese authorities are now reviewing the complete text on those commitments and will issue a final announcement before July 5,' the statement said. Electric vehicle negotiations ongoing The European Commission said in April it was working with Beijing to consider a minimum price framework for Chinese electric vehicles in lieu of the tariffs imposed in 2023. China's Commerce Ministry said the EU also proposed examining 'new technical paths' related to electric vehicles, and that China was now evaluating those ideas. Wang also told Sefcovic that China hoped the EU would 'meet us halfway and take effective measures to facilitate, safeguard and promote compliant trade in high-tech products to China.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Musk's Father In Moscow Sparks Russia Asylum Rumours Amid Trump Feud
Last Updated: Musk-Trump fallout began after Musk strongly criticised Trump's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill calling it a 'disgusting abomination'. Elon Musk's father, Errol Musk, reportedly arrived unannounced in Moscow on Sunday amid the ongoing feud between the Tesla owner and US President Donald Trump. Amid this backdrop, speculation has arisen that Moscow may have extended an offer of asylum to Musk as a political gesture, possibly in response to his escalating clashes with Trump. Dmitry Novikov, First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma's Committee on International Affairs, earlier told Russian agency TASS that Russia 'could provide" asylum to Musk. 'Musk has a completely different game; he won't need any political asylum, although, if he did, Russia could, of course, provide it," Novikov said. His remark came amid the ongoing tension between Trump and Musk, with the latter threatening to shut down SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which carries astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Musk-Trump Feud Once close allies, Donald Trump and Elon Musk are now locked in a public feud that has rapidly escalated. The fallout began after Musk strongly criticised Trump's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination". What began as a policy disagreement quickly became personal, with both sides exchanging insults online and in private meetings. Musk even resurfaced old quotes from Trump and GOP leaders about spending and deficits, further fuelling tensions. In response, Trump suggested severing federal ties with Musk's companies. Just weeks ago, Musk was still being honoured as a trusted advisor to the administration; now, the relationship appears to have completely broken down. VP Vance Says Musk Making Huge Mistake US Vice President JD Vance reacted to the ongoing row, stating that Elon Musk was making a 'huge mistake" by attacking President Donald Trump in a series of acrimonious social media posts after a falling out between the two men. However, in an interview released Friday after the very public dispute between the world's richest man and arguably one of the world's most powerful, the Vice President also attempted to downplay Musk's scathing attacks, describing him as an 'emotional guy" who got frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear," Vance said. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : Moscow, Russia First Published: June 08, 2025, 18:06 IST


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Why Musk, Trump relationship is breaking down
It is not a good break-up. These were always two big beasts used to getting their own way. Two alpha males, if you like the evolutionary metaphor, trying to get along. And now the Donald Trump and Elon Musk relationship is in meltdown. Who could forget that iconic image from just a few short weeks back? Elon Musk standing behind the seated US president, Donald Trump, in the Oval Office, towering over him. Trump, his hands clasped, having to turn awkwardly to look up at him. That silent language of the body. Musk accompanied by his four-year-old, a charming and informal image, or that great evolutionary signal of mating potential and dominance, depending on your point of view. These were also clearly two massive narcissistic egos out in their gleaming open-top speedster. Musk was appointed special advisor to Trump, heading the Department of Government Efficiency, cutting excess and waste. The backseat driver for a while. There were a lot of bureaucratic casualties already, road kill at the side of the highway as the sports car roared on with frightening speed. But things were always going to be difficult if they hit a bump in the road. And they did. Perhaps, more quickly than many had imagined. There were differing views on what caused the crash. Many pointed to the dramatic fall in Tesla's sales – a 71 per cent fall in profits in one quarter – and the inevitable impact on Musk's reputation. Since the break-up, Tesla's share price has also dropped sharply, as investors have panicked. The attacks on Tesla showrooms couldn't have helped either. Others pointed to Trump's proposed removal of the tax credit for owners of electric vehicles, or the political backlash in Washington over Space X's potential involvement in Trump's proposed 'golden dome' anti-missile defence system. However, according to former White House strategist Steve Bannon, what really caused the crash was when the president refused to show Musk the Pentagon's attack plans for any possible war with China. There's only so far being the president's best buddy can get you. Bannon is reported as saying: 'You could feel it. Everything changed.' That, according to Bannon, was the beginning of the end. So now we watch Trump and Musk stumbling away from the crash scene. One minute Trump is putting on a show for the cameras. He's beaming away and introducing the 'big, beautiful bill', a budget reconciliation bill that rolls together hundreds of controversial proposals. Next, he is accusing Musk of 'going crazy' and talking about withdrawing government contracts from the Musk empire. Musk is unhappy too. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' he wrote on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' He says he's disgusted by the bill. Disgust is one of the most primitive of all the emotions. A survival mechanism – you must avoid what disgusts you. He's social signalling here, alerting others, warning them that there's something disgusting in the camp. Musk is highly attuned to public perception, perhaps even more so than Trump (which is saying something). With his acquisition of X (formerly Twitter), Musk was able to direct (and add to) online discourse, shaping public conversations. Psychologically, Musk's rejection of Trump is an attempt to simultaneously elevate himself and diminish the man behind the bill. He can call out the president's action like nobody else. He is positioning himself anew as that free thinker, that risk taker, innovative, courageous, unfettered by any ties. That is his personality, his brand – and he's reasserting it. But it's also a vengeful act. And it's perhaps reminiscent of another political insider (and geek), former Downing Street adviser Dominic Cummings, who was sacked by the then UK prime minister, Boris Johnson, in 2020. Cummings was accused of masterminding leaks about the social gatherings in Downing Street. He went on to criticise Johnson as lacking the necessary discipline and focus for a prime minister as well as questioning his competence and decision-making abilities. The revenge of a self-proclaimed genius. And revenge is sweet. In a 2004 study, researchers scanned participants' brains using positron emission tomography (PET) – a medical imaging technique that is used to study brain function (among other things) – while the participants played an economic game based on trust. When trust was violated, participants wanted revenge, and this was reflected in increased activity in the reward-related regions of the brain, the dorsal striatum. Revenge, in other words, is primarily about making yourself feel better rather than righting any wrongs. Your act may make you appear moral but it may be more selfish. But revenge for what here? That's where these big narcissistic egos come into play. Psychologically, narcissists are highly sensitive to perceived slights – real or imagined. Musk may have felt Trump was attempting to diminish his achievements for political gain, violating this pact of mutual respect. This kind of sensitivity can quickly transmogrify admiration into contempt. Contempt, coincidentally, is the single best predictor of a breakdown in very close relationships. Disgust and contempt are powerful emotions, evolving to protect us – disgust from physical contamination (spoiled food, disease), and contempt from social or moral contamination (betrayal, incompetence). Both involve rejection – disgust rejects something physically; contempt rejects something socially or morally. Musk may be giving it to Trump with both barrels here. Break-ups are always hard, they get much harder when emotions like these get intertwined with the process. But how will the most powerful man in the world respond to this sort of rejection from the richest man in the world? And where will it end?