Minister pans 'nonsense' Tory claim SNP are punishing Unionist voters
In response, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray claimed 'the whole of Scotland voted against independence in 2014' and accused the SNP of 'starving' the country's public services.
Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee has hit back at Mundell's claims calling them 'completely false'.
READ MORE: Ross Greer calls for Scotland to pivot towards wealth taxation
'These claims are total nonsense and completely false. The needs-based formula used to distribute the funding available for local government is agreed with Cosla on behalf of all 32 local authorities each year,' he said.
"The Scottish Government has provided councils with a record £15 billion this year, a real terms increase of 5.5%.
'In 2025-26, NHS Boards will receive increased investment in their baseline funding, bringing total investment to over £16.2 billion.''
The Conservatives have previously faced their own allegations of 'pork-barrel politics' – where Tory-supporting areas are given more government support than opposition-supporting ones in a bid to shore up votes.
Writing in 2020 of Boris Johnson's 'Towns Fund', professor of politics Chris Hanretty said: 'There is robust evidence that ministers chose towns so as to benefit the Conservatives in marginal Westminster seats.'
In 2023, the SNP also raised concerns that levelling up funding in Scotland had disproportionately gone to Tory-supporting areas.
Dumfries and Galloway council is currently controlled by the SNP, after the Tory administration collapsed before a no-confidence vote in June.
The Scottish Borders council is also controlled by the Conservatives.
In May, the Accounts Commission warned that all of Scotland's councils were facing a combined budget shortfall of £647 million in 2025/26.
'Whilst councils have partly met this shortfall through service savings and increased charges for services, continuing to use reserves and make one-off savings isn't sustainable,' the commission said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
27 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Thousands of Scots set for payment of nearly £300 this year – check if you're eligible
Anyone who qualifies does not need to apply as payments are made automatically CASH IN YOUR POCKET Thousands of Scots set for payment of nearly £300 this year – check if you're eligible Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THOUSANDS of people in Scotland will be able to receive a free payment worth nearly £300 this year. The extra money comes via Social Security Scotland, which is issued to households across the country. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Some Scots are eligible for a payment worth £290 Credit: PA The supplement is paid biannually to those on Carer Support Payment, which replaced Carer's Allowance last year, and each instalment is worth £293.50. The first payment was made in June to those receiving one of the qualifying benefits on April 14. The second instalment will be made from December to those receiving either of the two benefits on October 13. If you're due a payment later this year, you'll get a letter from Social Security Scotland letting you know you're eligible. Anyone who qualifies does not have to apply, as payments are made automatically. If you don't get Carer Support Payment or Carer's Allowance because you receive other "underlying" benefits - you don't get a Carer's Allowance Supplement. Around 90,000 were issued a Carer's Allowance Supplement in June, meaning a similar amount can expect payments this December. What if I don't live in Scotland? You might be able to get Carer's Allowance Supplement if you have a "genuine and sufficient link" to Scotland but live outside the UK, in the European Economic Area (EEA), Switzerland or Gibraltar. Some of the factors the Scottish Government considers when deciding whether you have a genuine and sufficient link to the country include: You have spent a significant part of your life in Scotland You have worked, or have previously and paid social security or tax contributions You have Scottish bank accounts or other financial products You have the right to any rented or owned property in Scotland You have any family members living in Scotland You have frequent contact with family members in Scotland I trawl car boots for goodies and once picked up a retro 50p toy I sold for £236... here's what you need to look out for Some of the countries that fall into the EEA are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Spain and Norway. For Social Security Scotland to determine whether you're eligible for Carer's Allowance Supplement while living outside of the UK, it goes over some residency details before making a decision on your application. More information on what types of details it will ask for, visit - Other available help It's worth checking if you're eligible for benefits - it could boost your bank balance by thousands of pounds a year. Some benefits come with added advantages as well, like Pension Credit, which can unlock a free TV licence for those aged 75 or older. Meanwhile, if you're struggling with the cost of food, check where your nearest food bank is. The Trussell Trust has hundreds of food banks across the UK- you can find your nearest one here - The Trust's food banks issue emergency parcels to people who cannot afford to cover costs themselves. If you have fallen behind on your energy bills, you might be able to get a grant to wipe any debt. British Gas and Octopus Energy, the UK's two biggest energy firms, both run schemes offering customers grants worth up to £2,000. Some energy firms will debt match any repayments as well.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain urged to follow Norway as it restarts North Sea drilling licences
Britain must follow Norway's lead and lift an embargo on drilling licences, opposition parties have urged, after the oil-rich nation reopened exploration licences in the North Sea. The Conservatives and Reform UK said Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, should rethink a ban on new oil and gas licences as Norway opens the basin to exploration for the first time since 2021. Norway became Britain's primary source of gas last year as UK output shrank in the wake of the windfall tax and a ban on new licences. The latest move is likely to see Norway sell even more supplies to the UK after its energy minister, Terje Aasland, said new licences would allow it to be 'a long-term supplier of oil and gas to Europe'. Announcing the licencing round – which will cover the northernmost Barents Sea, the Norwegian Sea and the North Sea – Mr Aasland said: 'The Norwegian continental shelf will continue to create value and jobs for our country. 'The oil and gas industry is knowledge, expertise and technology intensive. Increased activity in this industry also has positive effects on other industries and parts of our society. 'It means oil and gas are the engine of the Norwegian economy, and I am convinced that the Norwegian continental shelf has a bright future. There are many exciting development projects underway and there is great interest in the licencing rounds. This contributes to new investment opportunities and profitable jobs.' The decision represents a reversal of the oil-rich nation's previous policy of pausing new exploration in frontier regions. These will be its first new licences in such locations since 2021. The Norwegian ministry of energy said it was now consulting with energy companies on which 'frontier' areas would be opened for exploration. Under the scheme, companies which already have licensees will be allowed to nominate new exploration areas anywhere on the Norwegian continental shelf – including the North Sea, only excluding areas already in production. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said the Government must follow its Nordic neighbour to boost the economy, bring down bills and create more jobs.
The National
38 minutes ago
- The National
Highlanders have the right to be angry over explosion of wind farms
Quite a result for a never previously convened group of volunteers sitting on powerless community councils. But was it a step back for the green transition, a step forward for local democracy or a bit of both? Five hundred people from 56 community councils – representing almost half the Highland population – gathered to highlight the 1305 wind-related infrastructure projects that are either built or going through planning in the Highlands. No-one's denying that's a small avalanche. The big questions are: who is the energy for? (probably not Scots); who benefits financially? (certainly not Scots); who gets to decide? (absolutely not Scots), and how much does net-exporting Scotland or the energy-hungry UK actually need? (Fa kens). READ MORE: Pro-Palestine protesters greet JD Vance as he lands in Scotland It seems Labour and the SNP are bodyswerving all these vital questions, and Highlanders, despite their reputation for feudal cap-doffing and learned silence, have finally snapped, got angry and got organised. So, are they just a bunch of climate-crisis-denying Nimbys? I've been making a film about this unprecedented revolt over the last week and visited folk in straths and glens from Strathdearn near Tomatin to the Dornoch Firth near Strath Oykel. I'm sure there are people who simply hate turbines and are opposed to net zero. I didn't meet any of them. I did meet people from glens with five, seven, or even 13 wind farms already in place who are being told to accept the same again. Without any say. Without any meaningful income. And without the highest energy bills in Europe getting one penny cheaper. They must also watch while those existing wind farms switch off in high wind because the grid can't take their energy. We pay for those constraint payments, and if they are common for existing turbines, how will the new wind farms deliver? (Image: Getty Images) Furthermore, wind farm applications go through planning piecemeal, with complex documents that take hours for community councillors to download and a lawyer's mind to dissect. So far, every application has been approved by the Scottish Government – despite occasional rejection by Highland Council and even a Scottish Government reporter. It feels like a total fait accompli and normally calm people have become stressed, angry, upset and determined not to let this pass. I'm sure some distant pointy heids thought wind farms accepted since 2007 meant Highlanders would be a soft touch. Au contraire. It's a case of once bitten twice, not just shy, but adamant – enough's enough. We met one veteran community councillor who wanted a conversation with the companies, SSEN and the Scottish Government about the totality of wind farms planned for each glen: 'We could negotiate and approve the ones that are completely uncontroversial and try to change or just veto the ones everyone opposes.' If something as reasonable as that isn't even thinkable, what are we saying about local democracy? If Scotland is to house practically all the wind infrastructure for the whole of Britain without any benefit in bills, what does that say about the supposed union of equals? And if all of this happens without opposition by the planning authority, the Scottish Government, we can only assume that they are 100% on side. Or that they worry more about denting the high levels of inward investment to Scotland by placing any restrictions on electricity infrastructure? Or that their green targets and position ahead of the UK will be dented? If so, well done. Every Tom, Dick and Harry (the spivs and speculators from Alex Salmond's era) has a wind company and land on the east coast of the Highlands – near the grid upgrades and the freeports – sitting pretty for the moment when the contracts for difference are awarded and the wind bonanza really begins. No wonder British Energy Minister Michael Shanks declined the invitation to attend the Inverness Convention along with Scottish Energy Minister Gillian Martin and SSEN – the private power company charged with deciding pylon routes and the location of turbines, battery plants and sub-stations. Labour's Western Isles MP Torcuil Crichton did attend and argued for councils to become co-developers of wind cash thereby making money for local services. If it can be done in Stornoway, he argued, why not on the mainland? But he also made no apologies for the huge wind energy targets his government will push through whether local communities like it or not. The audience was not amused. SNP MP Graham Leadbitter drew grumbles for sidestepping responsibility, saying planning is a Holyrood matter and the SNP don't run Westminster. True but unhelpful. SNP MSP Maree Todd prompted snorts of exasperation when she said she was furious about the size of local energy bills and fuel poverty. Fine – why did the SNP not support locational pricing then? And her MSP colleague Emma Roddick was almost shouted down after saying she felt as powerless as the audience and declared the main problem is pitifully low levels of community benefit. They certainly are inadequate – but local opposition has moved way beyond that. Tory MSP Edward Mountain received a roar of approval for saying: 'We in the Highlands are being sacrificed on the altar of net zero. And we need to stop energy companies trying to bribe local communities.' It's supremely ironic. THE Tories are getting ready to clean up in Highland seats in 2026, even though the current situation is almost 100% their fault. Who privatised the energy industry in the 1980s, placing strategic decisions in the hands of private companies like SSE and private operators (many of them the state-owned companies of our European neighbours) – the Tories. Who created a wind energy desert in England that will now be filled with Highland-produced energy – the Tories and their decade-long turbine moratorium south of the border. Who created a devolved settlement that handed energy to Westminster, not Holyrood, unlike every other devolved or federal system – Labour. Who created massive, remote councils like Highland, which has the biggest landmass in the world – the Tories. Who created toothless community councils as a sop to towns, villages and islands when their genuinely local councils were abolished – the Tories. And who's been the implacable opponents of 'Mugabe-style land raids' or for anyone else the overdue process of real land reform that would stop absentee millionaires owning land and taking land use decisions over the heads of local communities – be that for the green transition or any other 'worthy' cause. Yip – the Tories. They've produced chronic disempowerment. Labour have produced the 'ambitious' green energy targets – now set in law – driving the Highland windfarm expansion. And yet it's the SNP who are taking the pounding. Why? Because voters expected them to reverse the tide, stand up for communities, argue, wheedle, deal and protect – and they haven't. Doubtless, some will argue the Scotland Act means they can't. That answer may be right. It may be good law. Great accounting. Satisfactory box-ticking – but it's terrible politics. The Scottish Government believes it must rubber-stamp whatever energy demands the British Government makes of rural Scotland or ... what? If it's a fight where the Scottish Government backs Highland communities, starts a long-overdue process of decentralisation, produces and share an actual strategy and challenges Westminster to do the same and forces Keir Starmer to own an unreconstructed broken, Thatcherite energy market where Scots will never, ever get cheaper bills – then bring it on. Meantime, c'mon the communities.
