logo
An El Greco Is Pulled From an Auction as Romania Objects

An El Greco Is Pulled From an Auction as Romania Objects

New York Times07-02-2025

Christie's pulled from its old masters auction this week a painting by El Greco that the Romanian government says is part of its national art collection but was removed from the country in 1947. That year, the country's last king, Michael I, went into exile after being forced from power by Communist forces.
The painting, 'Saint Sebastian,' depicting the body of its subject pierced by arrows, was created in the early 1600s and was estimated by Christie's to fetch $7 million to $9 million at auction.
It now joins decades of legal battles waged by Romanian government officials who have said Michael removed cultural patrimony in the form of dozens of valuable paintings when he was forced to abdicate after World War II. The government regards the paintings as state property, not the former king's personal possessions.
Christie's said in its catalog that the work was transferred to Michael in 1947 'with the accord' of the Romanian government.
'Christie's takes these matters seriously and out of an abundance of caution is withdrawing the lot at this time,' the auction house said in a statement. 'We look forward to selling this unique and spectacular work at a later date.'
News of the painting's withdrawal was earlier reported by Romania Journal. In response to questions, an official at the Romanian Embassy in Washington pointed to a statement that the country's prime minister, Marcel Ciolacu, had posted on Facebook in Romanian.
Ciolacu said Romania was pursuing the recovery of the El Greco, which was scheduled for an auction in New York, through litigation in Paris. The painting was 'of inestimable value' and 'unequivocally the property of the Romanian state,' he wrote.
'After decades, it's time for this irreplaceable painting to return to where it belongs, to the national art collection and to the Romanian people,' he added.
According to the Christie's catalog, 'Saint Sebastian' was possibly in El Greco's studio in Toledo, Spain, at the time of his death in 1614. The provenance said it was then in possession of the artist's son before being acquired by King Carol I of Romania, probably by 1898.
The following year, the provenance said, Carol I bequeathed the work to the institution of the Romanian Crown, which received the painting after the king's death in 1914 and held on to it until 1947. That year, according to the provenance, the Romanian government allowed possession of the painting to transfer to Michael, who had ascended to the throne at the age of 18 amid the chaos of World War II.
Michael altered history in 1944, at 22, when he arrested Ion Antonescu, the fascist dictator of Romania and an ally of Hitler's. Antonescu was then locked in a vault where Michael's father, King Carol II, who was forced into abdication by General Antonescu in 1940, had once kept the royal stamp collection.
Soon afterward, Michael renounced Romania's connection to the Axis powers and turned Romanian divisions against the Nazis, inflicting severe losses. Some historians believe that those actions helped shorten the war and saved tens of thousands of lives.
By 1947, however, Communists tied to Stalin controlled Romania. Michael said the country's prime minister, Petru Groza, threatened to execute 1,000 imprisoned students if he did not give up the throne.
On Dec. 30, 1947, Michael left Romania via train with more than 30 family members and friends, issuing a decree that said the monarchy was an obstacle to the country's future. While in exile, Michael and his wife, Princess Anne of Bourbon-Parma, lived mainly in Geneva.
The Romanian government eventually came to believe that six weeks before he abdicated, Michael removed 40 paintings from the country on a trip on the Orient Express to attend the wedding in Britain of his cousin Philip to Princess Elizabeth, the future queen. He deposited some at a Swiss bank and left others in Florence, the lawyers for the government maintained.
Michael sold 'Saint Sebastian' in 1976, according to the Christie's provenance, and the painting was acquired by its present unnamed owner in 2010 through the art dealers Giraud Pissarro Segalot.
By that time Romanian officials had already begun efforts to obtain works they said Michael had taken.
In 1985, the country's Communist regime filed a lawsuit against the art dealers Wildenstein & Co. in Federal District Court in Manhattan seeking two El Greco paintings that it said were sold by Michael through the gallery. That case was dismissed when Romania did not comply with discovery orders from the court.
A successor government sued Michael in State Supreme Court in Manhattan in 1993, asking for the return of works by El Greco, Rembrandt, Caravaggio, Breughel and others. That suit, too, was dismissed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harvard's long history of leftist support
Harvard's long history of leftist support

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Harvard's long history of leftist support

When President Trump first began imposing restrictions on Harvard's share of federal largesse in May, it seemed to be simply more of his petulance against political enemies real and perceived. He has denied that he was ever rejected for admission to Harvard, so personal resentment on that score is not motivating him. But Harvard, a liberal icon and academic leader in the U.S, has opposed much in Trump's personal and political history. The antipathy deepened over his strong identification with Benjamin Netanyahu after the horrific October 7 Hamas slaughter of men, women, and children. In the aftermath, the Harvard community shamed itself by its disgraceful display of anti-Israel vitriol and tacit endorsement of violent messaging, which then-president Claudine Gay refused to condemn, leading to her eventual resignation. Trump was only too glad to seize the opportunity to bash Harvard, 90 percent of whose student body and faculty supported his Democratic opponents in all three recent presidential elections. Trump's political indictment of Harvard further broadened when Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the U.S. would begin revoking the visas of students from China with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or 'studying in critical fields.' Later, Trump issued an official proclamation limiting the entry of international students entering the United States to attend Harvard for study, research and related academic pursuits. Harvard has more than once shown a soft spot for leftist leaders. In 1959 it hosted the young Cuban revolutionary Fidel Castro, who had just seized power in Havana by overthrowing right-wing dictator Fulgencio Batista. When Castro arrived, my friends and I were part of the huge crowd gathered outside Harvard Stadium as he gave one of his long, fiery speeches extolling the virtues of his revolution. In the Q&A session afterward, an audience member asked about reports of summary executions of political opponents by firing squads without trials or due process. Castro vehemently denied that any such extra-judicial killings had occurred. Less than two years later, after repeatedly saying 'I am not a Communist,' Castro announced his Marxist-Leninist ideology and Cuba's alliance with the Soviet Union. During the Vietnam War, despite its origins in the administration of Harvard alumnus John F. Kennedy, the faculty and student body turned gradually but decisively against the escalating U.S. intervention under Lyndon Johnson. Despite abundant evidence to the contrary, it increasingly viewed North Vietnam's Communist dictator, Ho Chi Minh, as merely an 'agrarian reformer' and the Communist Vietcong as oppressed democrats rather than as sponsored agents in North Vietnam's protracted invasion of South Vietnam. In May 1965, when Johnson's secretary of State, Dean Rusk, called out the academic community for 'its stubborn disregard of plain facts,' Harvard led the way in organizing the multitude of colleges and universities in Boston and Cambridge to draft a response to Rusk. The war in Vietnam demonstrated that Harvard and other U.S. universities offered fertile ground for communist influence operations, and China, North Vietnam's main supporter, took full advantage of the opportunity over the ensuing decades. The House Select Committee on China issued a report detailing the range of activities the Chinese Communist Party engages in to exploit the openness of American society, especially the availability of technical and scientific information. In 2021, Harvard professor Charles Lieber was convicted of selling classified information to university colleagues in China and lying about it to Federal investigators. That incident and others have cast a cloud of suspicion over the many Chinese and other international scholars working and studying in the U.S. University officials and government investigators need to find ways of cooperation to counter malign activities on U.S. campuses without damaging the reputation of America as a model for free speech and the open exchange of ideas — which itself would be a win for Beijing. The dilemma is not confined to the academic realm. For decades, the U.S. Defense Department has engaged in military-to-military exercises with the People's Liberation Army to build mutual respect and understanding and, as the head of a Washington think tank once told an audience, to 'professionalize' China's military according to Western standards. The problem with all these well-intentioned initiatives is that they ignore the underlying reality — that in China's totalitarian system, everything in academia, economics and the military is subservient not to the needs and interests of the Chinese people but to the Chinese Communist Party. Changing China for the better remains as daunting a challenge today as it was when Richard Nixon launched his ill-fated opening to China in 1972. The wishful thinking of unconditional engagement has proved both futile and increasingly perilous. Harvard and the U.S. government will have to turn their best minds to the project. Joseph Bosco served as China country director for the secretary of Defense from 2005 to 2006 and as Asia-Pacific director of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief from 2009 to 2010. He is a nonresident fellow at the Institute for Corean-American Studies, a member of the advisory board of the Global Taiwan Institute and member of the advisory board of the Vandenberg Coalition.

First Nations leaders provide national response to King's Speech
First Nations leaders provide national response to King's Speech

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

First Nations leaders provide national response to King's Speech

(ANNews) – First Nations leaders from across Canada gathered in Ottawa to provide a unified response to the May 27 Speech from the Throne delivered by King Charles III, with a statement from some of the leaders highlighting the 'profound gap between ceremonial gestures and the reality of unfulfilled Treaty obligations.' Prime Minister Mark Carney asked the King to deliver this year's Speech from the Throne, normally delivered by the governor general as the King's representative in Canada, as a symbol of Canada's independence from the United States. A small group of First Nations leaders were invited to the Senate for the King's speech as dignitaries, including Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs (AMC) Grand Chief Kyra Wilson. In a joint news release from the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), Confederation of Treaty 6 First Nations, Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations (FSIN), Southern Chiefs' Organization (SCO) and AMC, Wilson said she finds it 'concerning that not all First Nations leadership were present or included in this historical moment.' Grand Chief Wilson struck a more optimistic tone at an Ottawa news conference responding to the Speech from the Throne, noting that it's a positive development that the King mentioned Indigenous rights and reconciliation in his speech. 'That makes me hopeful [for] the renewed relationship that we can have as First Nations people with the Crown,' she said. 'Going forward, my hope is that Canada can respect our Treaties, respect who we are as First Nations people and work together, because we are not going away.' FSIN Vice Chief David Pratt of Muscowpetung First Nation, located 65 km northwest of Regina, called on Carney 'to meaningfully engage our chiefs.' 'Don't just placate us with nice words. That day and age is over,' said Vice Chief Pratt. 'Don't come and try to take resources out of our backyards without sitting first with our Elders and treating us with the respect that we deserve.' Carney has come under criticism from First Nations leaders , as well as labour, climate and faith groups, for legislation enabling projects deemed to be in the 'national interest' to receive approval before moving through regulatory and consultation processes. In the Throne Speech, which is written by the government but delivered by the Crown, King Charles said the government wants to reduce the average timeline for approving major projects to two years from five. Pratt called it 'a shame' that not a single Cabinet minister or representative of the Crown attended the First Nations' pipe ceremony on Parliament Hill. He added that it would be a meaningful gesture for the King to return to Canada to visit Treaty First Nations, with the 150th anniversary of Treaty 5 coming up in the fall and Treaty 6 occurring next year. Confederacy of Treaty 6 First Nations Grand Chief Greg Desjarlais, who also serves as the chief of Frog Lake First Nation in eastern Alberta, said he was 'very disappointed' that the King spoke of reconciliation without any mention of the Treaties. 'I'm grateful to be here to share some words, to encourage each and every one of you, the chiefs, to keep pushing, for the people to get behind the chiefs, the leadership, and not to fight,' said Desjarlais. Chief Derek Nepinak of the Minegoziibe Anishinabe, located on the western shore of Lake Winnipegosis in Manitoba, was another chief invited to the Senate to hear the Speech from the Throne. He told First Nations people to 'get ready' for the government fast-tracking resource projects. 'This is the time for us to be prepared for what's next. Some of you can participate, some of us won't, but let's protect the water first,' said Chief Nepinak. 'That's the most important thing we have.' Chief Kelsey Jacko of Cold Lake First Nations in Treaty 6 said he was one of the First Nations leaders who 'travelled across Turtle Island hoping to speak to the King of the nation we entered into Treaty with.' 'I know he is busy, but imagine if you haven't seen your business partner in 150 years,' said Jacko. He called on King Charles to collaborate with Prime Minister Carney to establish a Royal Commission on Treaty in the 21st Century to uphold and affirm Treaty rights in the face of changing biodiversity and growing loss of water. Grand Chief Trevor Mercredi of Treaty 8 First Nations in Alberta, in which the oil sands are located, noted the amount of 'resource revenue … coming from our lands each and every day while our people are suffering.' 'Our people come here in duress today. We don't come here with peace on our minds,' said Mercredi, the former chief of Beaver First Nation. He added that it was 'unacceptable' that most Treaty First Nations leaders were forced to stand 'outside here on the sidewalks' while King Charles spoke in the Senate. When the King spoke of 'barriers and red tape removal, he's talking about us,' said Mercredi. National Dene Chief George Mackenzie, who represents five First Nations in the Northwest Territories, contrasted the 'modern infrastructure' in downtown Ottawa with the 'broken windows' and poverty on First Nations reserves. 'Our young people should be strong in their culture, language, can survive on the land and be proud of it, [and] at the same time, be the best they can be in education,' said Chief Mackenzie. 'We need to be given that opportunity.' Chief Billy-Joe Tuccaro of Mikisew Cree First Nation in Treaty 8 noted that there are few things all Treaty First Nations leaders can agree on. 'Among the chiefs, we all have different agendas, but one thing we have in common is the Treaty, and we must fight for that for the future generations to come,' he said. He said the government's promise to reduce project approval timelines by 60 per cent is 'very alarming' for members of his community, given the impact of tar sands mining on their health. Addressing the federal government, Dene Tha' First Nation Chief Wilfred Hooka-Nooza emphasized the 'shared journey' of reconciliation. 'It requires more than promises. It requires action. It requires you to listen to our stories, understand our struggles and work with us to address the wrongs of the past and present,' he said. 'It requires you to honour the Treaties, not as historical documents but as living agreements that are vital to our collective future.' To his fellow First Nations leaders, Hooka-Nooza offered a message of hope, 'for it is hope that sustains us and guides us towards the future generation.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump heads to Fort Bragg while facing criticism for deploying military at Los Angeles protests
Trump heads to Fort Bragg while facing criticism for deploying military at Los Angeles protests

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump heads to Fort Bragg while facing criticism for deploying military at Los Angeles protests

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump plans to speak at Fort Bragg on Tuesday to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army as he deploys the military in an attempt to quiet immigration protests in Los Angeles. Fort Bragg, located near Fayetteville, North Carolina, serves as headquarters for U.S. Army Special Operations Command. Highly trained units like the Green Berets and the Rangers are based there. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll will also be at Tuesday's event, along with service members, veterans and their families. Trump has promoted the Army's anniversary as a reason to hold a military parade in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, which is also his 79th birthday. Tanks and other vehicles will roll down city streets in a reminder of how the Republican president is reshaping the armed forces after returning to the White House this year. Trump, who sees the military as a critical tool for domestic goals, has used the recent protests in Los Angeles as an opportunity to deploy the National Guard and U.S. Marines to quell disturbances that began as protests over immigration raids. Trump has authorized the deployment of 4,000 National Guard soldiers to the city over the objections of Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom. About 700 Marines were also due to formally deploy to Los Angeles. California sued Trump over the deployment, with the state attorney general arguing that the president had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. California leaders accused Trump of fanning protesters' anger, leading crowds to block off a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire. 'We're gonna have troops everywhere,' Trump said over the weekend. 'We're not going to let this happen to our country.' Fort Bragg has been in the middle of a cultural tug-of-war over the military. It was named after a Confederate general, then renamed to Fort Liberty two years ago. Hegseth brought back the Bragg name but said it was being used to honor an Army paratrooper who served in World War II. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store