Five things investors should ponder on crypto
ethereum
– a piece of the
crypto
ecosystem that acts as a distributed computing platform, using the ether token.
It initially looked likely to fail: the founding tribe imploded after bitter internal fights; ethereum suffered a large cyber hack; scandals erupted and, like bitcoin, ether's price became crazily volatile, surging from nothing to $5,000, before collapsing.
But this week something striking occurred: just as the White House was issuing a report about the Golden Age of Crypto, the Nasdaq exchange celebrated ethereum's 10th birthday. 'Ethereum has demonstrated itself ... as the definition of antifragile,' enthused Joe Lubin, one former inhabitant of that founding house, who presents the platform as 'a reliable trust layer for our fast-growing digital world'.
Cynics will undoubtedly wince in horror, while enthusiasts will cheer. No wonder: crypto is arguably the single most divisive issue in finance today.
[
Crypto investors need more detailed warnings about risks involved - Central Bank
Opens in new window
]
However, I would suggest that this anniversary should spark a more realistic – and subtle – judgment. For the past decade has revealed at least five key points about crypto that investors should ponder.
First, and most obviously, digital assets are not homogenous (even if detractors hate them all).
Bitcoin
is a one-dimensional phenomenon that fans liken to 'digital gold', while ethereum is a multifaceted infrastructure. Memecoins (like $TRUMP) only float on crazy hype, but stablecoins are supposed to be backed by assets, like treasuries. This matters.
Second, we need to move beyond black-and-white thinking with crypto.
The evangelists who declared a decade ago that distributed finance would transform the world were wrong – thus far digital assets are still too clunky, costly and energy-guzzling to displace most mainstream payment options, and too volatile to be a reliable store of value. Criminality has been rife. Just think of the saga of Sam Bankman-Fried, or regulatory censure of the tether stablecoin.
But doomsayers who predicted crypto's demise were equally wrong. Digital asset prices have just soared (again), pushing ethereum and bitcoin's market capitalisation up to $455 billion (€398.6 billion) and $2.3 trillion respectively.
And the $270 billion-odd worth of stablecoins in circulation are supported by as many transactions as the Visa credit card network in the last year, as Glenn Hutchins, a long-time tech investor, tells me.
Why? Greed (or speculation) is one factor. But crypto is founded on an interesting innovation (blockchain) that can sometimes be useful (say, for some cross-border payments).
Moreover, some key players and regulators are raising standards in response to past scandals and networks like ethereum are slashing energy usage.
[
A lesson from The Godfather as Wall Street backs crypto assets it once dismissed as a 'fraud'
Opens in new window
]
Third, mainstream finance is moving in. This is ironic, given that early crypto evangelists promised that distributed finance would depose incumbents. But it is driving the current boom.
Consider the fact that a top BlackRock executive has just joined an ethereum investment group; or that traditional asset managers like Fidelity, BlackRock and Vanguard are launching crypto funds; or how mainstream investors are increasingly using crypto as a diversification play, while banks such as JPMorgan are running their own blockchains and launching stablecoins.
Fourth, the geopolitics of crypto are shifting – fast. In the past decade, most innovation occurred outside the United States, in places such as Hong Kong. But this week Paul Atkins, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said he wanted to pull it onshore. Why?
One reason is that the Trump family itself is invested in crypto. Another is grubby politics: crypto groups were such big Trump donors in 2024 that luminaries tell me they won the election for him.
But geofinance matters too. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent hopes that dollar-based stablecoins will create a new source of demand for treasuries, and promote more dollar usage around the world. Consider this a new policy twist on Bretton Woods in the Silicon Valley age.
Finally, crypto's second-order effects could turn out to be even more striking than the digital assets themselves. For what the innovation does is enable us to imagine alternatives to the financial and geopolitical status quo – for instance, by asking if we need to rely on the Swift payment system, or dollar dominance.
Don't get me wrong: by making these five points, I am not downplaying the risks.
The Trump administration's conflicts of interest with crypto are shameful. The potential for consumer harm is real. There are financial stability risks due to crypto's growing links with mainstream finance, and the use of treasuries to back stablecoins. Criminality and grift exists.
But it is possible to worry about these risks – and want better regulation – but at the same time to recognise that the underlying technology can be useful as a geopolitical and financial diversification tool.
For these reasons, ethereum's 'birthday' should prompt enthusiasts and doomsayers alike to realise that neither of them is entirely right. Life is rarely black and white – in finance or anywhere else. That will not change even if (or when) ethereum turns 20. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Oireachtas Committee recommends government take action to stop the approval of Israeli bonds
THE GOVERNMENT HAS been urged by TDs and Senators to engage with the EU to amend the law so the Irish Central Bank can refuse to facilitate the sale of Israeli State bonds. The Oireachtas Finance Committee, whose membership includes government TDs and senators, published a review today on Israeli bonds , which included recommendations for both the Irish government and the Central Bank. Commenting on the publication of the review, committee chair Sinn Féin TD Mairéad Farrell said: 'The Committee is united in the position that the Central Bank of Ireland should desist insofar as is possible from the facilitation of Israeli bonds.' In recent months, the government and the Central Bank have been under mounting pressure to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli State bonds in the EU. Advertisement Under EU law, government bonds from countries outside of the EU must have their prospectus ( a legal document setting out the details of the bond) approved by the Central Bank of a country that is in the EU. In Israel's case, Ireland's Central Bank is the authority that approves the document that allows for their sale. Pro-Palestine activists in Ireland, alongside most opposition parties in the Dáil, have been pushing for the Irish Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli State bonds because of the fact they are used to fund Israel's military operations in Gaza. Explainer: Why are pro-Palestine groups calling for Ireland to prevent the sale of Israeli 'war bonds'? The Oireachtas Finance Committee sought to find out if there is a legal avenue open to the Central Bank to refuse the approval of a prospectus. The committee made 15 recommendations following its investigation. It recommended that ahead of the Israeli bond prospectus's renewal next month that the Irish Central Bank conduct an internal review to check that the application complies with existing requirements in relation to the level of disclosure, accuracy and transparency. Related Reads Gary Gannon launches legal action against Central Bank over approval of Israeli bonds Government rejects motion calling on it to stop sale of 'Israeli war bonds' Other recommendations were: That the government engage at EU level to amend the EU Prospectus regulations to permit individual Central Banks to refuse to act as a Competent Authority. That the Irish Central Bank engage with other central banks to develop a mechanism that would allow them to refuse to process any new prospectus certification requests. That the government considers what it can do on a national level to ensure that the approval of any prospectuses complies with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) opinion in July 2024. Chair Mairéad Farrell said that as part of its review, the Central Bank should seek further information from the Israeli authorities. 'This should take into account the nature of the case taken by South Africa against Israel under the Genocide Convention and the interim findings of the ICJ in that regard, the ICJ Advisory Opinion of July 2024 in respect of the illegal situation created by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and any other pertinent matters in respect of international law,' she said. Farrell added that the committee believes an amendment to the Prospectus Regulation to allow individual European Central Banks to refuse to act as Competent Authority is required in order to allow individual Member States to make decisions which align with their stated position and obligations under international law. 'The Committee further believes that the Central Bank is vested with powers that it has not yet exercised and makes a number of recommendations identifying areas which may provide the Central Bank with the opportunity to desist from facilitation of the prospectus. The Joint Committee encourages the Central Bank to exercise the powers available to it in this regard,' she said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Oireachtas committee calls for rules to allow Central Banks to refuse Israeli war bond sales
The Central Bank should review the process for approving the prospectus of the sale of Israeli bonds, an Oireachtas committee has found. The Joint Committee on Finance on Tuesday published its Report on the Israeli Bonds Programme and says the Central Bank here and other EU Central Banks should develop a mechanism whereby an individual Central Bank can refuse to process any new prospectus certification requests. Under the EU Prospectus Regulation, a prospectus must be drawn up, approved and published when securities are to be offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market in the EU. Third Country issuers must choose one of the EU competent authorities in the EU as their Home Member State, subject to certain criteria set out in the EU Prospectus Regulation. The Central Bank last month came under mounting pressure to reject the prospectuses of Israeli bonds, which are largely being used to fund the country's war efforts in Gaza, though it has argued because Ireland's central bank is designated as the competent authority to approve prospectuses for Israeli bonds sold in the EU, it has no legal authority to do so. Third Country issuers of bonds must choose the central bank of a country within the EU as their home member state, a choice which is up to that country and not the chosen home member state. In his appearance at the committee, Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf said the bank is required to approve a prospectus where it meets the standards of completeness, consistency, and comprehensibility under the legislation. File photo: Paulo Nunes dos Santos/Bloomberg Before 2021, Britain was the EU home member state for Israel, but following its exit from the bloc, Ireland was chosen by Israel as the new home member state. The Central Bank of Ireland approved the first prospectuses for the bond issuance programme in 2021, with the currently approved prospectus due to expire on September 1, 2025. Committee Cathaoirleach Mairéad Farrell said: 'The facilitation by the Central Bank of Ireland of the Israeli Bond prospectus arose as a matter of concern for the Joint Committee in the previous Dáil, during which the committee initiated contact with the Central Bank to ascertain more detail around the process of prospectus approval. "In line with these engagements, the committee understands that the Central Bank may only refuse the approval of a prospectus where the Central Bank has legal basis to do so. 'Ireland has been to the forefront and steadfast in its position of support and solidarity with the people of Palestine, but we must ask ourselves are we doing everything we can. The issuing of bonds by the State of Israel is seen to assist in the financing of Israel's continued violations of human rights." The Joint Committee makes 15 recommendations in its report, including: The Government engage at EU level with a view to amending the EU Prospectus regulations to permit each individual European Central Bank to refuse to act as a Competent Authority; The Central Bank as the competent authority conduct an immediate internal review in advance of any renewal in September of the Israeli bond prospectus; The Central Bank should seek legal advice and make information available which clarifies that their decision in approving a prospectus is not in breach of international law. In his appearance at the committee, Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf said the bank is required to approve a prospectus where it meets the standards of completeness, consistency, and comprehensibility under the legislation. "Our legal obligations are clear and we do not need guidance to follow them," he is due to tell the Oireachtas Finance Committee on Wednesday. "The law is also clear that, by approving a prospectus, the Central Bank does not endorse the issuer and does not endorse the securities."
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Central Bank should review Israeli war bonds sale
The Central Bank should conduct an internal review into whether it can turn down a request from Israel to continue to facilitate the sale of its war bonds, an Oireachtas committee has said. The cross-party Oireachtas Finance Committee has made the recommendation in a report published today, saying the potential review should take place "in advance of any renewal [of the bonds] in September". While the Central Bank is independent of the Oireachtas, its facilitation of Israeli war bonds has been the subject of significant public and political debate in recent months due to the violence in Gaza. In a number of committee hearings in early summer, Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf and other senior officials argued that the Central Bank must accept a request to facilitate the sale of the war bonds unless there is a breach of prospectus rules. Among these rules are those in relation to transparency, accuracy and humanitarian matters. The Oireachtas Finance Committee has been meeting privately in recent days to conclude its report on the issue. While it is a cross-party committee and includes both Opposition and Government TDs and senators, it has made 15 unanimous recommendations, including: The Central Bank "shall conduct an immediate internal review in advance of any renewal in September of the Israeli bond prospectus" to determine if "it is in compliance with the prospectus regulation"; The Central Bank "engage with other EU central banks to develop a mechanism whereby an individual Central Bank can refuse to process any new prospectus request"; Government "engage at EU level with a view to amending the EU prospectus regulations to permit each individual European Central Bank to refuse to act as a competent authority"; And that "as part of a review seek supplementary information from the issuer and include an examination with regard to" the recent International Court of Justice case by South Africa and "any other pertinent matters in respect of international law". The report is non-binding, meaning it can only include recommendations. It will now be sent to the Department of Finance for further examination.
