US investors caught off-guard by depth of tariffs are braced for more pain
April 3 (Reuters) - Investors had been prepared for a shock heading in to U.S. President Donald Trump 's announcement of sweeping new tariffs on Wednesday, but many said that what played out was the worst-case-scenario for markets. Their message: Buckle up and brace yourself.
In the run-up to what Trump had billed as "Liberation Day," investors had sought to remain optimistic that clarity about the administration's tariff policies would help the volatile U.S. stock market stabilize.
But following Trump's unveiling of what some said were larger-than-anticipated tariffs - and in the midst of the market selloff that followed - many of the same individuals said their main takeaway was a sense of heightened risk and plenty of unanswered questions.
"This is bigger than I expected; bigger than anyone really expected," said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer of Potomac River Capital. "And the market is reacting accordingly."
Global markets tumbled on Thursday, with the dollar and U.S. stocks among the hardest hit on fears that a broadening trade war would push an already fragile world economy into recession.
Reuters talked to a range of investors over the last week, before and after the announcement. Here are some of their views:
MARK MALEK, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, SIEBERT FINANCIAL:
Before the tariffs announcement: 'There's more potential downside than upside right now.'
After the tariffs announcement: "Brace yourself, because here comes the downside. This is a lot more than the market was expecting, if you look at the size of the tariffs. This is going to have a material impact on corporate earnings. I can't imagine any company isn't recalibrating earnings expectations for the full year."
MICHAEL ARONE, CHIEF INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, STATE STREET GLOBAL ADVISORS:
Before: 'There is potential for more volatility on April 2 and post that deadline. I am still skeptical we will get clarity.'
After: "Clearly, markets are still unhappy with the current trade policy. And everyone is still on hold - businesses, consumers, the Fed - to see how things play out. I think anything that offers a hedge against inflation risk should do better, such as gold and hard assets."
ANGELO KOURKAFAS, SENIOR INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, EDWARD JONES
Before: April 2 will probably not 'completely really clear out all the uncertainties that potentially still remain.'
After: "The takeaway is that the tariffs announced are closer to the more aggressive side of the spectrum. The uncertainty will remain. How will other countries respond? Some uncertainty will linger in the weeks to come as this plays out. It just is reinforcing the benefits of a diversified portfolio."
MARK SPINDEL, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, POTOMAC RIVER CAPITAL:
Before: "I think the market is really holding its breath and ... trying to convince itself, maybe incorrectly, that we've seen the lows."
After: "The market's initial reaction just underscores the fact that the tariffs are huge. If we thought this was the end of having to think about tariffs, we were wrong. We don't know what went into Trump's spreadsheet calculations of these rates. But the bottom line is that this is inflationary, and the odds of a recession have gone up."
JASON BRITTON, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, REFLECTION ASSET MANAGEMENT:
Before: "Whatever comes next may lack detail and specificity and that will drive the market crazy. But there's a chance we'll end up with a sigh of relief in spite of more volatility."
After: "If you really parse the information, I think people will digest this and see it as a mixed bag, probably not as bad as it has been portrayed. If the big tech companies sitting on enormous amounts of cash are going to get pinched, I'm a buyer on weakness. It's just the market over-reacting and I'm happy."
ROBERT PAVLIK, SENIOR PORTFOLIO MANAGER, DAKOTA WEALTH:
Before: 'I think they're going to start shifting gears and move from tariffs … There will be more emphasis on the tax talk.'
After: "Taxes may be the next thing he (Trump) thinks about. But tariffs unfortunately don't seem to be going away soon as an issue. What will other countries do in retaliation? How will this affect U.S. corporations and U.S. consumers? It's going to be difficult for investors going forward; I expect the (volatility index) to starting moving even higher, possibly above 30."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan wholesale inflation slows in May
TOKYO, June 11 (Reuters) - Japan's wholesale prices rose 3.2% in May from a year earlier, data showed on Wednesday, slowing from April in a sign falling import costs for raw materials were easing price pressures for companies. The rise in the corporate goods price index (CGPI), which measures the price companies charge each other for their goods and services, compared with a median market forecast for a 3.5% annual increase and follows a revised 4.1% increase in April. The yen-based import price index fell 10.3% in May from a year earlier after a revised 7.3% drop in April, the data showed, indicating the currency's rebound was pushing down the cost of raw material imports.
BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
Tariffs: US-China talks end with plan for Trump and Xi to approve
The US and China say they have agreed in principle to a framework for de-escalating trade tensions between the world's two biggest Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the deal should result in restrictions on rare earths and magnets being sides said they would now take the plan to their country's presidents - Donald Trump and Xi Jinping - for announcement came after two days of negotiations in London between top officials from Beijing and Washington. Chinese exports of rare earth minerals, which are crucial for modern technology, were high on the agenda of the month, Washington and Beijing agreed a temporary truce over trade tariffs but each country has since accused the other of breaching the deal."We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus," Lutnick told reporters."Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it," he added."The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting," Li said.
Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. appeals court decides
June 10 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.
