Sheikh Abdullah sets out UAE's vision as ‘beacon of compassion' on World Humanitarian Day
'As we commemorate this occasion, we reaffirm our commitment to upholding the UAE's role as a beacon of compassion, a bridge of hope, and an active partner in promoting international co-operation to build a more just, peaceful and humane world,' he said.
The UN-led World Humanitarian Day is observed each year on August 19, the date of a 2003 suicide bombing in Baghdad that killed 22, including Sergio Vieira de Mello, then UN high commissioner for human rights and head of the UN mission in Iraq.
The date is marked to recognise the work of humanitarian agencies and workers and highlight the importance of offering a helping hand to people affected by crises.
'Since its founding, the UAE has firmly believed that humanitarian action is not a temporary or a reactive response, but a noble mission that we translate into developmental projects that uphold dignity, foster hope, and ensure a stable, sustainable and dignified life for future generations,' Sheikh Abdullah added.
A national effort for international good
While aid from the Emirates has been distributed to several corners of the world, its efforts in Gaza are perhaps the most notable.
The UAE has provided more than $1.5 billion in financial support to the enclave since the start of the conflict between Hamas and Israel in October 2023, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said this month.
The comprehensive assistance has included more than 80,000 tonnes of aid to help alleviate the suffering of Gazans facing chronic food shortages and limited access to health care.
Reem Al Hashimy, Minister of State for International Co-operation, added: 'In the face of today's global challenges, the UAE reaffirms the importance of upholding international humanitarian law, protecting civilians and relief workers, and safeguarding their dignity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Iraq's Development Road project to boost Turkey's exports to GCC
When Iraq unveiled its biggest integrated rail and road project traversing most of its territory up to Turkey's border in the north, Ankara was the first investor to respond to Baghdad's appeal for partners. Turkey apparently was aware that the gains from the project, dubbed 'The Development Road,' far outweigh its large costs. The multimodal project involves the construction of a 1,200-kilometre rail line and a parallel motorway from the southern Iraqi Faw port through 11 governorates to the Turkish border at a total estimated cost of over $17 billion. 'As you know, the Development Road will create a land route to the Gulf….this will offer a much faster and more cost-effective alternative to sea travel,' said Nabil AL-Marsoumi, an economics professor at Basra University in South Iraq. 'Studies have shown that this project is expected to significantly increase trade between Turkey on one side and Iraq and Gulf states on the other side…I believe the main beneficiary is Turkey's exports to the region.' Turkey is already a major trading partner of Iraq and the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), with the value of its exports of goods to these countries standing at around $127 billion during 2020-2024, according to Turkey's statistical institute. Iraq emerged as the largest market for Turkey's exports, with a value of nearly $60 billion during that period. Turkey's exports to the UAE soared from around $2.8 billion in 2020 to $8.3 billion in 2024. The figures showed Turkey's imports from Iraq and the GCC stood at around $83 billion during that period, with the balance remaining largely in favour of Ankara. Turkey's exports to all Arab countries totaled around $40 billion during the first 10 months of 2024, an increase of about eight percent over the same period of 2023. Turkish transport minister Abdul Qadir Oglu said this year that after it is commissioned in late 2028, the development road would boost Turkey's trade with Iraq from around $20 billion to $30-40 billion per year. Iraq's transport ministry said in December that the Development Road would generate annual earnings of at least $four billion to shareholders, who also include the governments of Iraq, Qatar and the UAE. The earnings exclude the investments and incomes expected from nearly 20 economic and industrial zones to be constructed all along the road and around Faw, which will be one of the world's largest container terminals when commissioned in 2026. "In 2024, Iraq suffered from a trade deficit with Turkey of around $10.7 billion due to its large imports from that country and its limited exports to Turkey,' well-known Iraqi economist Manar Al-Obaidi said. 'I think that the gap could widen after the development road is completed unless Iraq tries to take advantage and increase exports to Turkey…anyway, there is no doubt that this project will benefit Turkey most as it will allow it to expand its export markets and also boost investments in Iraq and the Gulf.' (Reporting by Nadim Kawach; Editing by Anoop Menon) (
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
UAE, Jordan and eight other Middle East countries with mandatory military service
In recent years, several Middle Eastern states have introduced or reintroduced military conscription, particularly in the Gulf, motivated by goals of national cohesion, identity, and addressing unemployment. This week, Jordan became the most recent nation to announce its intention to reintroduce mandatory military service 34 years after it was abolished in 1991. So, which countries have military conscription in the region, and what are the conditions for each? UAE: 9 – 24 months Introduced in 2014 under a 44-article law, Emirati men aged 18–30 must serve nine months if they hold a secondary education and 24 months if they do not. Women may volunteer. Kuwait: 12 months Kuwait reinstated conscription in 2017 after having it from 1961 to 2001. The government reintroduced mandatory military service to strengthen national identity and enhance military readiness. Qatar: 4 – 12 months In 2013, Qatar passed a law introducing mandatory military service, primarily to foster national identity and civic engagement among its citizens. The programme, implemented in 2015, aims to instil a sense of patriotism and belonging. In 2018, the programme was expanded to include women. Egypt: 12-36 months One of the most established conscription systems in the Mena region, in place since 1955. It also has one of the largest in the Arab world. All men between the ages of 18 and 30 are required to serve, with the duration depending on education level: 36 months for those without a high school diploma, 24 months for high school graduates, and 12 months for university graduates. Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia: Minimum 12 months Mandatory conscription was reintroduced in Morocco in 2019 for men and women aged 19-25. In Tunisia, conscription is compulsory for men and women between 20-25 and in Algeria all citizens over the age of 19 must also serve a mandatory period of 12 months. The primary motivation for reinstatement across these three North African nations has officially been to encourage social cohesion and ameliorate unemployment. Turkey: 6-12 months Military conscription in Turkey has existed continuously since 1927, making it one of the longest-standing in the region. Today, the service is typically 6-12 months, but may be shortened with a substantial financial contribution, and deferments are permitted for some students and professionals. Although women in Turkey have never been required to serve, they can do so voluntarily. Iran: 18-24 months Military conscription in Iran has existed since 1924 and is mandatory for men. Service usually lasts 24 months, with exemptions for students, medical conditions, only sons, and families of "martyrs". Women are not drafted, but may volunteer. Proof of service is critical for many aspects of daily life, making it one of the most binding conscription systems in the region. Israel: 24-32 months Israel has the most comprehensive and long-standing conscription system, covering both men and women. Introduced with the establishment of the state in 1948, the system requires Jewish men and women, as well as Druze men, to serve in the Israeli army. Men typically serve 32 months (reduced from the previous 36), while women serve 24 months (though some combat roles require 32). After active duty, all conscripts enter the reserves and may be called up for years. Certain groups are exempt: Israeli Arabs (with the exception of Druze and some Bedouin volunteers) and most ultra-Orthodox Jews, although this exemption has been fiercely contested in Israeli politics recently. Iraq: Abolished 2003 Iraq had compulsory military service for about 70 years from the 1930s until 2003. Since the US-led invasion and the fall of Saddam Hussein, Iraq has had no conscription system. Its armed forces are volunteer-only, though the idea of reinstating a draft has occasionally resurfaced in Iraqi politics. Syria: Abolished 2024 Mandatory conscription was abolished as of December 2024, and service is now voluntary under the new transitional authorities. Previously, Syria had a long and often brutal history of compulsory conscription rules and service was often extended beyond the standard 12-21 months. During the country's civil war, many were forced to serve well beyond official terms, with some exceeding a decade. Jordan: Abolished in 1991 with plans to reinstate in 2026 Jordan had a long history of military conscription, with compulsory service from 1966 to 1991, during which time men aged 18-40 had to serve a minimum of two years. In light of recent events in the region, Jordan's Crown Prince Hussein bin Abdullah II announced on Sunday that the programme would strengthen national identity and young people's connection to their homeland. Lebanon: Abolished 2007 Conscription was abolished in 2007 after the end of the country's civil wars. Before that, men aged 18 and over served 12 months (reduced to six months in 2005 before abolition). The Lebanese army is now volunteer-only. Libya: Rules unclear Although military conscription in the country has a long history dating back to the 1950s, and was firmly in place during Muammar Qaddafi's 42-year rule, since Qaddafi's fall, Libya has had no unified or consistently enforced conscription system. Different authorities (the Tripoli-based Government of National Unity, the eastern Libyan National Army, militias) have announced plans for national service at different times, but implementation has been weak or purely local. Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Bahrain, Oman, Yemen These countries never implemented compulsory conscription; military services for Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Bahrain, Oman and Yemen are voluntary. In the case of Saudi Arabia this is due to the large number of volunteer recruits, with the government reporting volunteer numbers that far exceed the capacity of its military training facilities.
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Starvation in Gaza is met with humanitarian theatre, not intervention
Following repeated warnings by the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), Unicef and others of a risk of famine throughout 2024, Israel's systematic denial of food, water and medicine to Gaza has reached its inevitable conclusion: mass starvation, with hundreds already killed as a direct result of intentional deprivation. Condemnation of Israel's use of starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza has grown in recent weeks. And yet all this moment has revealed is the exceptional threshold for even the most basic display of liberal concern. Palestinians must be starved to death on camera, in full view of the world, before the western political class shows a modicum of unease. Even then, it is only suffering inflicted on Palestinian children that appears to evoke discomfort. In the UK, both Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have placed particular emphasis on hunger and malnutrition among children. Lammy has described "innocent children holding out their hand for food", while Starmer has expressed that "images of starving children in particular are revolting". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Listening to their latest performance of selective concern, I am reminded of the Palestinian writer Mohammed El-Kurd, who reflects in Perfect Victims that "we practice a politics of appeal, transforming our children into persuasive talking points, hoping to pull at the heartstrings of the heartless". As Israel's genocide against the Palestinian people continues unabated, only the most barbaric crimes have elicited fleeting condemnation or brief coverage in the mainstream media. Western appetite By December 2024, Israel had committed more than 9,900 massacres against Palestinians in Gaza. A single one of these crimes committed against white people anywhere in the world would have been enough to swiftly end all military, political and economic support to the perpetrator. At first glance, it might appear that the West will permit Israel to kill Palestinians in any manner of ways except by starvation It is not simply global indifference and apathy that led us to this moment - an ambivalent audience would eventually tire of Israel's violence and respond to public dissent. Rather, 680 days of unrelenting genocide stands as testament to the West's bloodlust for Palestinian death. Western powers are captivated by, and dependent on, Israel's spectacle of violence. There is profit to be made from the genocide too, with some already speaking openly of building theme parks and casinos atop the mass graves of the Palestinian people. Is Israel's starvation of children a step too far? At first glance, it might appear that the West will permit Israel to kill Palestinians in any manner of ways except by starvation. Air strikes on homes, hospitals and schools can be denied, downplayed or eventually blamed on Palestinians themselves. After all, the so-called "fog of war" is thickest when it is an Israeli soldier whose finger is on the trigger. Deny, downplay, deflect In response to growing recognition of starvation, Israel and its allies have deployed the same tried and tested strategy: deny, downplay, deflect. First, they say there is no starvation. Then they insist it is not as severe as Palestinians and countless public health experts attest. And when that fails, they blame the UN or the Palestinian armed resistance. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of Israel's genocide in Gaza In a particularly grotesque display of their irredeemable inhumanity, the host and guest on a far-right British TV show recently tried to excuse Israel's weaponisation of hunger by claiming that children were malnourished due to underlying medical conditions, and not for want of food. Have new footnotes been appended to the Geneva Conventions that now make it acceptable to starve children to death as long as they have another health problem, such as cerebral palsy? As political scrutiny has briefly intensified, several states have issued statements of condemnation or reiterated calls for humanitarian access, repeating the same ineffective demands for compliance with international law and the delivery of aid. Yet history should have taught us that you cannot appeal to the benevolence of a genocidaire. This rhetoric of supposed humanitarian concern only functions to deflect attention from the absence of meaningful political intervention, and by extension the deepening culpability of states in Israel's ongoing genocide. Speaking from his golf course on the west coast of Scotland on 28 July, US President Donald Trump announced that the State Department had committed $60m in food aid in June to Gaza (later revealed as $30m, of which only $3m had actually been dispensed as of early August). "Nobody said thank you," Trump complained, while avoiding mention of the unprecedented value of US military aid to Israel during the genocide, overshadowing humanitarian aid with $17.9bn as of October 2024. The sum total of what the West considers politically possible is mouldy food thrown from airplanes, a PR stunt eagerly publicised by the very governments complicit in the slaughter. Starvation as political violence With starvation, there can be no ambiguity of intent. It is impossible to accidentally starve someone, and certainly not to the point of death. Starvation is always an act of intentional deprivation, perpetrated by one group against another. Given the established charge of genocide, Israel's exterminatory intent could not be clearer. Contrary to the suggestion that it is more politically palatable to speak of starvation or famine than of genocide, all are always intentional, always premeditated, and always violent in the most extreme way. No wonder Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has again kicked the hasbara machine into full swing. Israel is starving Gaza to death, and still the world does nothing Read More » While experts still dither over acknowledging hundreds of clear instances of genocidal intent from Israeli officials, the evidence of starvation in Gaza reveals the depths of the Zionist logic of elimination. It should be no surprise that Michael Fakhri, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food, was among the first to declare that Israel's actions in Gaza constitute genocide. To this end, starvation must not be framed as a physiological condition that can be remedied with food alone. It is the end stage of the most grotesque form of calculated political violence. The only effective intervention is to stop those who use starvation as a weapon to kill. Anything less is little more than the latest act in Israel's protracted theatre of cruelty, what British writer and rapper Akala has ridiculed as "false charity that gives with one hand and bombs with the other". The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
