
Amanda Knox JRE: False imprisonment, friendship with prosecutor, and entire saga
Listen to article
Amanda Knox, who was wrongfully imprisoned in Italy for four years over the 2007 murder of Meredith Kercher, has revealed details of an unexpected connection with her former prosecutor during a recent episode of The Joe Rogan Experience.
Knox, an American student, was convicted alongside her then-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito in a case that captured global attention.
After years of legal battles, including an initial acquittal, a retrial, and a final exoneration by Italy's Supreme Court of Cassation in 2015, Knox was fully cleared of all charges in 2016.
During the podcast, Knox discussed how psychological insight helped her survive the ordeal and how she eventually reached out to Giuliano Mignini, the prosecutor who once sought to imprison her.
Knox described a deliberate approach to opening a dialogue with Mignini, acknowledging that both had experienced pain and trauma but emphasising the challenge in starting a non-adversarial conversation.
Knox said, 'What could I and my prosecutor have in common? I didn't know this man. I didn't know what his history was, what his background was. But I did know that he, like me, people who have been hurt… the challenge is that people who hurt other people don't like to be confronted with that fact. And so, how do you start a conversation that's not going to immediately become adversarial?'
Since returning to the United States, Knox has rebuilt her life as an activist, journalist and author.
Her memoir, Waiting to Be Heard, published in 2018, detailed her experience and attracted international attention. Now a mother of two, Knox has spoken openly about her ongoing communication with Mignini.
In a previous interview on NewsNation's Banfield, Knox revealed that Mignini had reached out to her with messages expressing a desire for friendship and concern for her wellbeing.
While he did not apologise or admit fault, he reportedly acknowledged, 'You are not the person that I thought I was prosecuting.'
The nature of Knox's relationship with her former prosecutor has sparked debate, with some suggesting it may be a case of Stockholm syndrome.
Knox has dismissed such claims, describing her outreach as an effort to understand why the events happened to her and to seek closure.
The 2007 murder of Meredith Kercher, a British student in Perugia, Italy, shocked the world.
Knox's four years in prison under a 26-year sentence was widely criticised, with US forensic experts pointing to inconsistencies in the evidence used to convict her.
Knox's recent revelations provide a rare insight into her psychological survival and the complexities of forgiveness in the face of trauma.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
20 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Migrants flee N Ireland unrest
Fireworks thrown at Riot Police illuminate the road during a third night of anti-immigration demonstrations in Ballymena, Northern Ireland. Photo: AFP Foreign nationals hid in wardrobes and attics to escape a wave of unrest which has rocked a Northern Ireland town, police said Thursday, calling for the protests to end and warning rioters they would face arrest. "Stop this violence," said Northern Ireland police chief Jon Boutcher. "We will come after you. We will arrest you. We will prosecute you successfully." He was speaking after three nights of unrest in the town of Ballymena, some 30 miles (48 kilometres) northwest of Belfast. The clashes erupted on Monday night after two teenagers were arrested for the alleged attempted rape of a young girl at the weekend. Police have not confirmed the ethnicity of the teenagers, who remain in custody and had asked for a Romanian interpreter in court. After another barrage of petrol bombs, bricks and bottles, the crowds eventually dispersed late Wednesday without a repeat of the chaotic scenes seen on Monday and Tuesday when houses and businesses in areas where Romanian families live were torched. A total of 13 people have now been arrested, and 41 police officers injured, though most of the injuries are not severe. Three teenage boys aged 15, 17 and 18 were due to appear in court on Thursday having been charged with rioting, said police. Boutcher described the riots as "wanton, disgraceful criminal behaviour that is absolutely race motivated", speaking at a news conference Thursday. Police had helped evacuate foreign national families hiding in attics and wardrobes in their homes "even though they had done nothing wrong", he said. "They are not criminals. They contribute positively to society here and are well integrated," he added. Clonavon Road, where most of the riots happened in a neighbourhood known for having a large population of eastern Europeans, was almost deserted on Thursday. Many of the houses were damaged, and British, English or Northern Irish flags hung from most windows, AFP reporters saw. Some had signs saying they were Filipino residents.
1634752114-0%2FZahir-Jaffer-(1)1634752114-0.jpg&w=3840&q=100)

Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Zahir Jaffer's death sentence upheld as Supreme Court releases detailed verdict
A file photo of 30-year-old Zahir Jaffer talking to the media outside a courtroom in Islamabad. SCREENGRAB: EXPRESS Listen to article The Supreme Court of Pakistan has released its detailed written verdict in Noor Mukadam murder case, upholding the death sentence of convict Zahir Jaffer. The judgment spans 13 pages and reiterates the court's stance that Jaffer, who was found guilty of the brutal killing, is 'a ruthless killer' and 'not worthy of sympathy.' According to the verdict, the Supreme Court upheld the rulings of both lower courts, terming them correct and unanimous. A key element of the court's reasoning was based on the Silent Witness Theory—a legal principle that allows for video evidence to be accepted even in the absence of an eyewitness. Read: 'This is for every woman' The court noted, 'Authentic footage can serve as self-sufficient evidence, and recorded video or images can be presented as testimony.' The apex court stressed that footage obtained through a reliable system could be admissible on its own, citing a precedent from a bank robbery case where video footage was accepted without any eyewitness. It added that American courts have widely recognised the Silent Witness principle. In Jaffer's case, the court noted that CCTV footage, the DVR, and the hard disk were all admissible forms of evidence. The court stated that there was no indication of tampering in the video recordings, the identification of the accused was accurate, and the DNA report confirmed the rape. The murder weapon was also found to have the victim's blood on it. The verdict observed, 'The convict failed to provide any explanation for Noor's presence. Digital evidence is now considered primary testimony. If CCTV footage meets the set standards, no further verification is necessary.' Further, the court upheld Jaffer's death sentence for murder but converted his sentence for rape into life imprisonment. He was acquitted of the abduction charge, while his sentence for unlawfully confining Noor was maintained. The Supreme Court also ruled that the punishments for co-accused Muhammad Iftikhar and Muhammad Jan would stand. However, in a show of leniency, it ordered their release on the grounds that they had already served sufficient time. The judgment concluded with a note that Justice Ali Baqar Najafi would add a supplementary note to the verdict. Read More: 'Noor was kept in captivity for 3 days' Noor, 27, was brutally murdered on July 20, 2021, at a residence in Islamabad's F-7/4 sector. An FIR was lodged the same day, leading to the arrest of Jaffer at the crime scene. In February 2022, a district and sessions court handed Zahir the death penalty for murder and sentenced him to 25 years of rigorous imprisonment for rape. Two domestic staff members, Mohammad Iftikhar and Jan Mohammad, were each sentenced to 10 years in prison for their involvement. Zahir's parents, Zakir Jaffer and Asmat Adamji—both prominent business figures—were indicted in October 2021 but later acquitted. Similarly, six employees of Therapy Works, who arrived at the scene before the police, were also cleared of charges by the trial court. Read More: Noor Mukadam's killer claims insanity Previously, a three-member bench headed by Justice Hashim Kakar, and comprising Justices Ishtiaq Ibrahim and Ali Baqar Najafi, had dismissed Jaffer's appeal. The court upheld the Islamabad High Court's (IHC) previous ruling, which had affirmed the trial court's death sentence verdict and replaced Zahir's jail term for rape with an additional death penalty. During those hearings, Jaffer's defence counsel, Salman Safdar, argued that the prosecution's case rested heavily on CCTV footage and DVR recordings. He questioned the chain of custody of the digital evidence and contended that the footage could not be considered conclusive without full verification. His objections included claims that the footage, when presented to the IHC on a USB, could not be played, and therefore should not qualify as definitive proof. Despite these arguments, the apex court found the digital evidence reliable and legally admissible.


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
French antiques expert convicted
PARIS: A French court on Wednesday sentenced a top antiques expert to jail for duping the Palace of Versailles and wealthy collectors into buying furniture he had helped build, claiming it dated from the 18th century. The ruling from the court in Pontoise, north of Paris, caps one of the biggest forgery scandals to rock the rarified world of France's top museums. Bill Pallot, 61, along with five other people as well as a prominent gallery, stood trial in the spring. Pallot and woodcarver Bruno Desnoues were convicted of having produced and authenticated chairs they sold, which they passed off as historic pieces that once adorned the rooms of the likes of Madame du Barry, the mistress of Louis XV, or of Queen Marie-Antoinette. Customers duped by the pieces included the Palace of Versailles and wealthy collectors including a member of the Qatari royal family. Pallot was sentenced to a four-year term including four months behind bars, fined 200,000 euros ($230,000) and handed a five-year ban on working as an expert. He will not go to jail having spent time in detention after his arrest. Known for his distinctive long hair and three-piece suits, Pallot has been described by magazine Vanity Fair as "the world's leading expert on the works of 18th-century France." Paris Match branded him "the Bernard Madoff of art", referring to the late American financier who devised a notorious pyramid scheme. - 'A little harsh' - Pallot said the sentence was "a little harsh financially," although he was satisfied that his apartment would not be seized, contrary to the prosecutor's demand. "We thought we'd do it for fun, to see if the art market would notice or not," Pallot has told the court. "It went without a hitch," he added. Desnoues, a prominent woodcarver, was sentenced to a three-year term including four months behind bars, and fined 100,000 euros. In court, he presented himself as a humble artisan uninterested in money and motivated only by his love of art and "the pleasure of working, of making beautiful things". A lawyer for the Palace of Versailles implied the men got away too easily, denouncing "the particularly diabolical manoeuvres" of the two main defendants and pointing to "clean, white-collar trafficking." "When you are caught red-handed, you are not sentenced to very long prison terms," said Corinne Hershkovitch. "We feel that we are not protected for the future," she added. - 'Pallot's blessing' - The pair pocketed nearly 1.2 million euros in commissions. Galleries and auction houses made even more, selling fake furniture pieces to the Palace of Versailles and billionaire collectors. After the French Revolution, the Palace of Versailles was completely emptied, with thousands of royal furniture pieces and other items dispersed at revolutionary sales. Nearly half of Pallot and Desnoues' fakes were acquired through various channels by the Palace of Versailles, which has since the 1950s sought to refurnish the former home of French royalty. "Indeed, Versailles's decision to purchase the chairs hinged on Pallot's blessing," Vanity Fair said in 2018. "And based on Pallot's imprimatur, the government classified two of his fake lots as national treasures." Accused of failing to carry out sufficient checks, the prestigious Kraemer antique gallery was acquitted. The public prosecutor had sought a fine of 700,000 euros. Intermediaries between the forgers and the final buyers believed they had been misled by Pallot's reputation, and charges for most of them were dismissed during the eight-year-long investigation. Unnoticed for years, the scam caused an estimated 4.5 million euros in damage. The fraud was discovered by accident during an investigation into the lavish lifestyle of a Portuguese couple who were laundering Desnoues' money. When the scandal erupted in 2016, the ministry of culture swiftly ordered an audit of Versailles's acquisitions policy.