
Wall Street, Main Street push for foreign tax rethink in US budget bill
Concerns over potential negative impact on U.S. investments and jobs
Senate Republicans may clarify impact on Treasuries to mitigate risks
Multinationals may shut U.S. operations, risking 8.4 million jobs, says association
By Carolina Mandl, Bo Erickson
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON, - Industry groups representing sectors including real estate, finance and multinational companies are pushing for the reduction or exclusion of a retaliatory tax targeting foreign investors in the U.S. in the Republican tax bill, as they see it as a threat to their businesses and to the broader markets and economy. The proposed tax, known as Section 899, applies a progressive tax burden of up to 20% on foreign investors' U.S. income as pushback against countries that impose taxes the U.S. considers unfair, such as digital service taxes. It could raise $116 billion in taxes over 10 years.
Some individual companies are also pushing for action, according to two lawyers familiar with their clients' plans, who did not name specific companies due to client confidentiality.
'Lobbying surrounding Section 899 is at peak levels,' said Jeff Paravano, a former Treasury Department official who is now chair of law firm BakerHostetler's tax group. The move comes as Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, the Republican in charge of the chamber's tax writing provisions, and other Republicans are in close coordination with President Donald Trump on the tax bill, having met on Wednesday.
The White House declined to comment. Crapo said he would not comment on ongoing discussions about the bill.
Global investors hold almost $40 trillion in U.S. assets, such as securities, loans and deposits, according to the U.S. Treasury International Capital Reporting System. This raises concerns about the ripple impact of the bill.
"It has the potential to be a very negative impact on the free flow of capital from the U.S. and through businesses that are multinational," said Gabriel Grossman, a U.S. tax partner at Linklaters, adding he has seen some clients put planned investments in the U.S. on pause until they have more clarity on the new levies. The broader bill itself is also creating much debate as it is forecast to add about $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt and has sparked an explosive feud between Trump and his erstwhile key ally Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla.
Industries across different sectors are on high alert.
The new levy could increase taxes from rents and real estate investment trusts, gains from property sales and securitized products.
"There is a legitimate fear among investors that, if this goes through, it could impact investments, and that it would create higher costs for real estate in terms of getting financing," said David McCarthy, managing director at the CRE Finance Council, a nonpartisan trade group. "It could depress the value of real estate if you don't have as much money to finance property purchases."
The asset management industry is concerned about outflows.
"We encourage the Senate to make this provision more targeted to respond to unfair foreign taxes and other concerning measures rather than disincentivizing beneficial foreign investment in the U.S.," a spokesperson for the Investment Company Institute said.
The investment community is also working to clarify whether Treasuries and corporate bonds will remain exempt as they are currently subject to a portfolio interest exception that applies no taxation, lawyers and industry sources said.
"There's reason to believe that fixed-income assets wouldn't be in scope, but there's still considerable uncertainty about this point," Morgan Stanley strategist Michael Zezas said in a note to clients.
A footnote part of the Budget Committee report, which provides direction to taxpayers, courts and the Treasury in interpreting the statute, says that Section 899 "does not apply to portfolio interest."
Foreigners' equity investments, however, do not count with the portfolio interest protection and could be taxed, lawyers and banks said.
Multinational companies could face a new tax burden on dividends and inter-company loans, potentially reducing profit, according to Section 899.
Jonathan Samford, president of the Global Business Alliance, a lobbying group for international companies in the U.S., said many multinationals could decide to shut down operations in the U.S., risking 8.4 million jobs in the country.
"Those companies will not be paying U.S. tax whatsoever because they will not be able to operate in that punitive, high-tax environment," he said.
Morgan Stanley said in a note to clients a repatriation of profits out of the U.S. and pressure on the U.S. dollar.
Corporate loans could also become more expensive, as loans extended by foreign banks might be subject to the new tax burden if section 899 overrides current treaties, lawyers said, adding that companies could end up paying more for the debt to make up for the tax increase.
Investors are hoping for some changes in the Senate.
Senator Steve Daines, a Montana Republican on the Finance Committee, said it may be necessary to clarify the language in Section 899.
'We want to make sure we don't have tax policies that in some way would diminish the fact that we are the gold standard in the world,' Daines said.
Morgan Stanley said in a note that it expects "sufficient Senate Republicans to take notice and clarify the policy to mitigate this risk" of increasing the cost of capital for the U.S.
"It actually is pretty much of a nuclear bomb," said Pascal Saint-Amans, partner at Brunswick Group, who is also the former tax chief of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, who led the 2021 global tax treaty. "The coverage seems extremely broad and the terms are not extremely well-defined."
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US military evaluating options to prevent nuclear-armed Iran, general says
The top US general overseeing American forces in the Middle East said on Tuesday there were a range of options when asked if the military was prepared to respond with overwhelming force to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. 'I have provided the secretary of defense and the president with a wide range of options,' US Army General Michael 'Erik' Kurilla, the head of US Central Command (CENTCOM), told a congressional hearing. Kurilla was responding to Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama, the chairman of the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, who asked if CENTCOM was prepared to respond with overwhelming force if Iran does not permanently give up its nuclear ambitions. 'I take that as a yes?' the Alabama Republican asked, after Kurilla responded. 'Yes,' Kurilla said. Iran said on Monday it would soon hand a counterproposal for a nuclear deal to the United States in response to a US offer that Tehran deems unacceptable, while US President Donald Trump said talks would continue


News18
31 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Unveils '$1,000 Savings Account' For Every Baby Born During His Second Term
Last Updated: The proposal mandates the Treasury Department to fund the $1,000 initial investment, with newborns automatically enrolled in the program. US President Donald Trump unveiled a new federal program proposing government-funded $1,000 investment accounts for American babies, which he called 'Trump savings accounts'. The US President said that the initiative is one of the 'most important" components of his new proposed bill, despite immediate warnings from the Congressional Budget Office regarding its impact on national debt. During a White House roundtable- that included Dell CEO Michael Dell, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon and Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi- Donald Trump revealed specifics of the proposed savings accounts. These would be tax-deferred investment accounts designed to track overall stock market performance, benefiting children born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, he said. 'For every US citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock market," Donald Trump said. The proposal mandates the Treasury Department to fund the $1,000 initial investment, with newborns automatically enrolled in the program. These accounts would be administered by parents or legal guardians, allowing for an additional private investment of up to $5,000. Donald Trump said that the initiative is 'a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation." Legislative Hurdles For Donald Trump's Bill While the 'Big Beautiful Bill" has cleared the House, its journey through the Senate is expected to face stiff competition. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued a report last week warning that the 'Big Beautiful Bill" is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade- indicating that such an increase would necessitate cuts to existing federal programs, including Medicaid and food assistance. The 'Trump savings accounts' cannot be passed as a standalone program and would require the successful passage of the broader bill. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published:


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Harvard probed by US House committee for hiring discrimination
A congressional committee is investigating Harvard University over potential discrimination in its hiring and employment practices, adding to scrutiny of the school amid a showdown with the Trump administration over billions of dollars in federal funding. Publicly available documents 'suggest that Harvard may have been and may still be unlawfully discriminating' on the basis of criteria such as race and sex, nine Republican members of the Education and Workforce Committee said in a letter to university President Alan Garber. For example, the lawmakers cited a document called 'Best Practices for Conducting Faculty Searches' that says administrators should ensure that early applicant lists include women and minorities. The committee members said reports of discrimination are especially concerning after a 2023 Supreme Court ruling that race couldn't be considered in admissions, a case in which Harvard was a named defendant. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 착용했을 때, 더 뿌듯한 팔찌 유니세프 지금 기부하기 Undo Harvard is currently embroiled in a high-stakes fight with the White House , which has accused the school of failing to curb antisemitism on campus and discriminating in hiring and admissions. The federal government has cut about $3 billion in grants and contracts with the university this year, and is trying to ban international students from enrolling. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) A spokesperson for Harvard referred to a statement that Garber wrote last month to Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, in which he said employment at the university is based on merit and achievement. Harvard doesn't use diversity, equity, and inclusion statements in hiring decisions, he said. Live Events MORE STORIES FOR YOU ✕ Why Harvard is easier to crack than IITs or IIMs for Indian students Harvard prepares emergency plans as Trump's policies threaten international students Harvard university scores legal win against Trump's international student ban « Back to recommendation stories I don't want to see these stories because They are not relevant to me They disrupt the reading flow Others SUBMIT The committee's letter to Garber was signed by US representatives including Tim Walberg of Michigan, the panel's chair, and former chair Virginia Foxx. Also signing was New York's Elise Stefanik, whose questioning of former Harvard President Claudine Gay at a 2023 committee hearing contributed to her resignation weeks later. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission already opened an investigation into Harvard's hiring practices earlier this year. The Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services are also probing the university and the Harvard Law Review, a separate entity, for race-based discrimination.