
Wall Street, Main Street push for foreign tax rethink in US budget bill
Concerns over potential negative impact on U.S. investments and jobs
Senate Republicans may clarify impact on Treasuries to mitigate risks
Multinationals may shut U.S. operations, risking 8.4 million jobs, says association
By Carolina Mandl, Bo Erickson
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON, - Industry groups representing sectors including real estate, finance and multinational companies are pushing for the reduction or exclusion of a retaliatory tax targeting foreign investors in the U.S. in the Republican tax bill, as they see it as a threat to their businesses and to the broader markets and economy. The proposed tax, known as Section 899, applies a progressive tax burden of up to 20% on foreign investors' U.S. income as pushback against countries that impose taxes the U.S. considers unfair, such as digital service taxes. It could raise $116 billion in taxes over 10 years.
Some individual companies are also pushing for action, according to two lawyers familiar with their clients' plans, who did not name specific companies due to client confidentiality.
'Lobbying surrounding Section 899 is at peak levels,' said Jeff Paravano, a former Treasury Department official who is now chair of law firm BakerHostetler's tax group. The move comes as Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, the Republican in charge of the chamber's tax writing provisions, and other Republicans are in close coordination with President Donald Trump on the tax bill, having met on Wednesday.
The White House declined to comment. Crapo said he would not comment on ongoing discussions about the bill.
Global investors hold almost $40 trillion in U.S. assets, such as securities, loans and deposits, according to the U.S. Treasury International Capital Reporting System. This raises concerns about the ripple impact of the bill.
"It has the potential to be a very negative impact on the free flow of capital from the U.S. and through businesses that are multinational," said Gabriel Grossman, a U.S. tax partner at Linklaters, adding he has seen some clients put planned investments in the U.S. on pause until they have more clarity on the new levies. The broader bill itself is also creating much debate as it is forecast to add about $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt and has sparked an explosive feud between Trump and his erstwhile key ally Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla.
Industries across different sectors are on high alert.
The new levy could increase taxes from rents and real estate investment trusts, gains from property sales and securitized products.
"There is a legitimate fear among investors that, if this goes through, it could impact investments, and that it would create higher costs for real estate in terms of getting financing," said David McCarthy, managing director at the CRE Finance Council, a nonpartisan trade group. "It could depress the value of real estate if you don't have as much money to finance property purchases."
The asset management industry is concerned about outflows.
"We encourage the Senate to make this provision more targeted to respond to unfair foreign taxes and other concerning measures rather than disincentivizing beneficial foreign investment in the U.S.," a spokesperson for the Investment Company Institute said.
The investment community is also working to clarify whether Treasuries and corporate bonds will remain exempt as they are currently subject to a portfolio interest exception that applies no taxation, lawyers and industry sources said.
"There's reason to believe that fixed-income assets wouldn't be in scope, but there's still considerable uncertainty about this point," Morgan Stanley strategist Michael Zezas said in a note to clients.
A footnote part of the Budget Committee report, which provides direction to taxpayers, courts and the Treasury in interpreting the statute, says that Section 899 "does not apply to portfolio interest."
Foreigners' equity investments, however, do not count with the portfolio interest protection and could be taxed, lawyers and banks said.
Multinational companies could face a new tax burden on dividends and inter-company loans, potentially reducing profit, according to Section 899.
Jonathan Samford, president of the Global Business Alliance, a lobbying group for international companies in the U.S., said many multinationals could decide to shut down operations in the U.S., risking 8.4 million jobs in the country.
"Those companies will not be paying U.S. tax whatsoever because they will not be able to operate in that punitive, high-tax environment," he said.
Morgan Stanley said in a note to clients a repatriation of profits out of the U.S. and pressure on the U.S. dollar.
Corporate loans could also become more expensive, as loans extended by foreign banks might be subject to the new tax burden if section 899 overrides current treaties, lawyers said, adding that companies could end up paying more for the debt to make up for the tax increase.
Investors are hoping for some changes in the Senate.
Senator Steve Daines, a Montana Republican on the Finance Committee, said it may be necessary to clarify the language in Section 899.
'We want to make sure we don't have tax policies that in some way would diminish the fact that we are the gold standard in the world,' Daines said.
Morgan Stanley said in a note that it expects "sufficient Senate Republicans to take notice and clarify the policy to mitigate this risk" of increasing the cost of capital for the U.S.
"It actually is pretty much of a nuclear bomb," said Pascal Saint-Amans, partner at Brunswick Group, who is also the former tax chief of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, who led the 2021 global tax treaty. "The coverage seems extremely broad and the terms are not extremely well-defined."
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Donald Trump is pushing cash for all American babies. What are ‘Trump Accounts'? Explained
US President Donald Trump wants to make a significant but limited investment in newborn babies through his 'Big Beautiful Bill'. On Monday, the president touted a provision in his tax cut bill that proposes opening investment accounts for all American babies born during Trump's current term as President. These accounts have been dubbed "Trump Accounts", and families of all income levels could receive them. The 'Trump Accounts' pilot program is included in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. Simply put, these are new tax-exempt investment accounts to benefit all American children. An earlier version of the bill called them MAGA Accounts, referring to the president's Make America Great Again campaign slogan. During a roundtable on Monday, Trump said, "For every US citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock accounts will be private property controlled by the child's guardians. This provision means that every US citizen born between the start of 2025 and the end of 2028 would receive $1,000 initially from the federal government in a tax-deferred account. The accounts would, over the course of a child's first 18 years, be linked to a mutual fund or index fund tied to the performance of the stock market. The initiative further allows parents to contribute additionally — up to $5,000 tax-free each year to "Trump Accounts". The money would only be accessible to the child upon reaching adult status at 18. At age 18, children could withdraw the money to put toward a down payment for a home, education or to start a small business. If the money is used for other purposes, it'll be taxed at a higher rate. The full balance would be available at age 30, USA Today reported. With about 3.6 million babies born in the US each year, the cost could exceed $3 billion annually, the Washington Post reported. Republicans have yet not released any cost estimates for the program. Amid criticism from several people, including former aide Elon Musk, Trump is trying hard to get his 'Big, Beautiful' tax and spending bill approved by the Senate. On Monday, Trump worked the phones and took to social media to try to sway Republican holdouts on his multi-trillion-dollar tax bill. Trump further promoted the program as a pro-family, pro-child initiative at a time when his administration and congressional Republicans are facing criticism over cuts that the tax, spending and immigration bill would make to programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. It's feared that the tax and spending cut package will add more than $3 trillion to the US national debt over the next decade. The House of Representatives approved the bill by one vote last month. It now faces opposition from both moderates and ultra-conservatives in the Senate. Many in favour of this provision say that it doesn't distinguish between the rich and the poor. The Trump program is similar to 'baby bond' programs run in California, Connecticut and Washington, D.C, according to the Washington Post. The report says that while those local programs were created to reduce the wealth gap by supporting children in need or lower-income families, Trump accounts will be made available to Americans regardless of their socioeconomic status. Moreover, USA Today reported that the program serves as a counter to Democratic arguments that the bill helps the nation's wealthiest Americans. Meanwhile, a statement from the White House said, "The One Big Beautiful Bill will change the lives of middle-class families across America" — 'together with historic tax cuts, an increased child tax credit, higher wages, and monumental economic growth.' President Trump said on Monday that the mega bill would 'make it possible for countless American children to have a strong start at life at no cost to the American taxpayer.' Meanwhile, Dell CEO Michael Dell said, "With these accounts, children will be much more likely to graduate from college, to start a business, to buy a home, and achieve lifelong financial stability.' Amid the buzz over "Trump Accounts", Donald Trump gathered corporate leaders at the White House Monday to highlight a provision in his tax bill that would deposit $1,000 into an investment account for babies born in the next few years. Dell Technologies, Salesforce, Uber and Goldman Sachs were among the companies the White House said would be participating. 'They'll really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economy," the US President said.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Musk-Trump spat entangles MAGA prince JD Vance
Musk-Trump spat: The fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has ignited a MAGA civil war, with JD Vance caught in the crossfire. Musk's call for Trump's impeachment and suggestion of Vance as a replacement has reportedly fueled Trump's paranoia. Vance now walks a tightrope, balancing loyalty to Trump with his Silicon Valley connections, as Trump demands unwavering allegiance. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Vance, the MAGA prince in Trump's cross hairs Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Vance does a tightrope walk Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a presidency already defined by internal volatility and external shockwaves, the recent falling out between President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk marks a significant rupture in the power structure. But the MAGA civil war , which flared up with an open spat between Trump and Musk on social media is still smouldering even though Musk has deleted the controversial posts he aimed at Trump. Vice-President JD Vance has emerged as a target in the Trump-Musk Michael Wolff, who has written several books on Trump, has said on the Daily Beast Podcast that Trump is getting paranoid after Musk turned Vance into an existential threat to his power. During their explosive spat last week, Musk called for Trump's impeachment and urged that Vance take his place. Wolff, the best-selling Trump biographer, suggests that Musk's demand struck fear into Trump and made him even more suspicious of is a fascinating political figure. Once a critic of Trump, he pivoted hard during his Senate run, aligning himself fully with the MAGA movement and earning Trump's coveted endorsement. His 'Hillbilly Elegy' background gives him working-class appeal, while his Silicon Valley experience (as a venture capitalist funded by Peter Thiel, a tech billionaire) makes him a rare bridge between conservative populism and tech-world Musk, Vance may represent the ideal vessel: loyal to Trumpism's nationalist message but not bound to Trump's personal baggage. This may explain why he would reportedly float Vance's name as a successor, or alternative, to says that Trump has always been ambivalent about Vance, an 'unlikely Republican' whose 'hardcore support is in the tech bro community". Trump chose Vance as his running mate, Wolff said, in part because Musk made his backing of Trump, worth hundreds of millions of dollars, conditional on that in Trump's world, loyalty is everything. The president would view any attempt to discuss succession as an act of betrayal. If Vance is perceived, rightly or wrongly, as fit to replace Trump, he risks being sidelined from Trump's inner circle. According to Wolff, Trump now wants to put Vance through a 'loyalty test' — a familiar ritual for those within the MAGA president's high-profile fallout with Musk -- a 'central pillar' of the tech world's incursion into right-wing politics -- leaves him vulnerable and will push him to scrutinize his Vice President ever more closely, Wolff said. 'He will set up what we will see as a set of tests that Vance is going to have to endure and pass,' Wolff told host Joanna Coles. '(Vance has) got to profess his absolute loyalty to Trump, or he will just be marginalized within the administration.'In a statement to the Daily Beast, White House Communications Director Steven Chung slammed Wolff as 'a blithering idiot who has been widely discredited due to his blatant lies and fabrications".'He is an imbecile of the highest order and his Trump Derangement Syndrome-addled brain has caused him to lead a miserable existence devoid of reality,' he continued. 'Nothing he says is the truth and he resorts to outlandish falsehoods in order to stay relevant since Father Time has passed him by 20 years ago.'For Vance, it's a tightrope walk. If he alienates Trump, he will be sidelined from everything important in Trump's inner circle. If he distances himself from Musk, he could lose his future prospects and a significant stream of Silicon Valley-aligned a podcast appearance with comedian Theo Von posted on Saturday, Vance said, 'First of all I'm the Vice President to President Trump; my loyalties are always going to be with the President. Elon is an incredible entrepreneur. I think DOGE was really good. The effort to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in our country was really good.''I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear. I hope it is,' Vance tried to downplay Musk's blistering attacks as an "emotional guy" who got frustrated. "Look, it happens to everybody," Vance said during the podcast. "I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours."Vance told Von that as Musk for days was calling on social media for Congress to kill Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," the president was "getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon, but I think has been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk." "I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine," he the interview, Von showed Vance Musk's claim that Trump's administration hasn't released all the records related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, "Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein." "This stuff is just not helpful," Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. "It's totally insane. The president is doing a good job."If Wolff's claims are accurate, the implications go beyond tabloid drama. Trump can increasingly feel lonely and cornered as he alienates his close aides. What's worse for him, he can also end up losing support of certain sections of his MAGA base as the emergence of Musk and Vance means there are now other popular conservative leaders too.


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Elon Musk Forced To Correct Grok After It Claims He "Took" Stephen Miller's Wife
Elon Musk was forced to correct the record on Sunday after his own artificial intelligence chatbot on X, Grok, falsely claimed that the Tesla CEO "took" Stephen Miller's wife. It all started after an X user posted a doctored screenshot that appeared to show an awkward exchange between Musk and Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff. "We will take back America," Miller wrote, to which the billionaire replied, "Just like I took your wife". When the X user asked Grok to confirm if the post was real, the AI chatbot claimed it "likely existed and was deleted". The AI bot further claimed that the photoshopped screenshot's "engagement metrics and context align with Musk's behaviour, but its deletion means direct verification is unavailable." "While a fabricated screenshot is possible, the evidence leans toward the post being real but removed, consistent with Musk's pattern of deleting controversial posts," Grok's post concluded. Replying to the thread, Elon Musk clarified that it's fake. "No, it's fake ffs. I never posted this," he wrote. No, it's fake ffs 🤦♂️ I never posted this. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 9, 2025 Notably, Katie Miller is Stephen Miller's wife. She is a former spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security and Vice President Mike Pence. She had been an advisor for Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). However, she departed from the Trump administration after Musk made a dramatic exit by tearing down the president's "Big Beautiful Bill" on social media. Katie Miller played a key role in DOGE and was seen as a major force behind Musk's political messaging and media presence. Her brief time in the White House also meant she worked adjacent to her husband, who is a longtime Trump ally. According to reports, the Millers and Musk were close and spent time together outside of work. But this has changed now that the relationship between Musk and Trump has deteriorated. Amid this feud, Musk has reportedly unfollowed Stephen Miller on X. Trump-Musk feud The feud between Trump and Musk started when the US President told a reporter in the Oval Office that he was "disappointed in Elon" for coming against his "Big Beautiful Bill". Trump said that Musk is only looking out for himself and "went CRAZY" because the bill slashes electric vehicle credits, and he misses the access to the Oval Office. Reacting to this, Musk posted on X that Trump would've lost the election without him, and Democrats would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49. Musk also said that Trump is the Epstein files, which is the real reason why "they have not been made public". In another post, the billionaire stated that the "truth will come out" in the future.