MoD official responsible for catastrophic Afghan data breach that cost billions still works for government
The major breach happened in February 2022 after a member of the armed forces inadvertently shared a spreadsheet containing the names of thousands of people who said they were in danger from the Taliban and had applied for sanctuary in Britain.
The leak, which came to light when someone threatened to publish the whole list on Facebook, prompted thousands of Afghans to be evacuated to Britain under a top secret resettlement scheme which the government projected to cost billions. The details of the leak, and the subsequent evacuation, have been kept under wraps for almost two years as the result of an unprecedented superinjunction.
Asked whether the serviceman behind the leak was still employed by the government, defence secretary John Healey told the News Agents Podcast: 'They are no longer doing the same job on the Afghan brief and in the end.'
Asked for a second time whether the official was still employed by the government, Mr Healey refused to be drawn on the matter.
Instead, he added: 'This is bigger than the actions of a single individual.
'For me as defence secretary now in this government, my biggest concern and my first focus coming into government was to try and get a grip of something that was entirely unprecedented'.
Journalist Lewis Goodall asked for a third time whether the person is still a government employee and the defence secretary again avoided answering. Pushed for a fourth time, he responded: 'I'm actually not going to get into the personnel matters'.
Asked yet again, he went on: 'My first priority was not trying to conduct some sort of witch hunt on the defence official that released the spreadsheet that caused this profound data loss.
'My argument to you is that accountability can start today, accountability in due course, as the facts of this are properly scrutinised and examined that will come.'
Mr Goodall told Mr Healey that 'we can assume on the basis of your answers that noone has been fired'. When The Independent asked the MoD to clarify whether the serviceman was still employed by the government, a spokesperson said there was nothing to add.
The database contained 33,000 records and the confidential information of over 18,700 applicants to the Ministry of Defence 's Afghan resettlement scheme (Arap). It contained email addresses and phone numbers of applicants, as well as their father's names and their case status.
It also included the names of some British government officials.
It is understood that the unnamed official emailed the dataset while trying to verify information about the applications, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows.
The MoD only became aware of the breach more than a year after the release, when excerpts of the dataset were anonymously posted onto a Facebook group in August 2023, with officials fearing those affected by the breach could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data.
An unprecedented superinjunction was made at the High Court in September 2023 to reduce the risk of alerting the Taliban to the existence of the data, which banned any news about the leak being published or the order itself being discussed.
Ministers went on to create a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in a bid to help covertly relocate more than 16,000 Afghans to the UK. Around 8,000 more Afghans are still due to arrive in Britain.
Asked about the next steps, Mr Healey said that influential committees of MPs, such as the defence select committee, should 'absolutely' launch an 'in depth inquiry' in to what had happened.
He said he thought he would have been 'very, very unlikely' to have taken out a superinjunction if he had been in position at the time the data breach was discovered.
Senior MPs have warned about the precedent set by the super injunction to cover up the data breach. Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said: 'I am concerned the super injunction was applied as that is peculiar, it stopped any free speech or examination in Parliament and we are still none the wiser as to who was responsible or why it happened.'
The superinjunction, lifted on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest lasting order of its kind and the first time the government has sought such a restrictive measure against the media.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Victoria Starmer received £650 tickets for Royal Ascot - despite the Prime Minister paying back more than £6,000 worth of gifts just last year, reveals Richard Eden
She's been described as a 'reluctant' political spouse because of her rare public appearances, but Victoria Starmer is, it seems, anything but reluctant when it comes to accepting freebies. Her husband, Sir Keir Starmer, has disclosed that her attendance at a horse racing event last month was thanks to a gift from Ascot Racecourse. This week, the Prime Minister updated his entry in the parliamentary Register of Members' Financial Interests to record that he accepted £650 worth of tickets from the Berkshire racecourse. The entry states: 'Name of donor: Ascot Authority (Holdings) Limited. Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: Tickets and hospitality for three family members (value approximate), value £650.' Sir Keir did not join his wife at the King George Racing Weekend event. It is thought that he was preparing for his talks with Donald Trump, whom he was due to meet after the US President's trip to Scotland. Lady Starmer, 52, an NHS occupational health worker, was pictured enjoying the warm weather in a bright orange sundress as she attended The King George and Queen Elizabeth Stakes at the racecourse. Sir Keir's acceptance of the freebie is surprising as last October he paid back more than £6,000 worth of gifts and hospitality he had received since becoming Prime Minister, following a backlash over donations. That included nearly £2,000 for four tickets to Doncaster Racecourse, as well as six Taylor Swift tickets and a clothing rental agreement with a high-end designer favoured by Lady Starmer. It came after Sir Keir and other cabinet ministers faced weeks of criticism for accepting freebies from wealthy donors. The Prime Minister said it was 'right' for him to repay the cost of some gifts. Asked about the donations, he said his Government would bring forward new principles for donations 'as until now politicians have used their best individual judgement to decide'. He said: 'I took the decision that until those principles were in place it was right to repay these particular payments.' Sir Keir has committed to tightening the rules around ministerial hospitality and gifts to improve transparency. Earlier, a Downing Street spokesman confirmed that the ministerial code would be updated and will include 'a new set of principles on gifts and hospitality' commissioned by Sir Keir. MPs are allowed to accept gifts from donors but have to declare these on the register of MPs' interests. It's the spiritual home of cricket and now Lord's is for sale – well, at least small pieces of it. Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) is offering its members the chance to buy chunks of turf from the north London pitch for £50 each. 'At the end of the 2025 season, we will be resurfacing the famous outfield on the Main Ground at Lord's for the first time in 23 years,' explains an MCC email. 'To raise funds for the MCC Foundation, and to aid future development of the cricket field, we are offering all members the chance to own a piece of Lord's turf.' One louche member tells me: 'I normally buy my grass in Camden Town.' Anneka (and jumpsuit) is back in black Anneka Rice once revealed she had a 'shrine' to the jumpsuits she used to wear on 1980s hit TV show Treasure Hunt and even hired them out for hen parties. Clearly, the presenter has saved a few of them for her own nights out. Rice, 64, slipped into a black jumpsuit for the opening night performance of Secret Cinema's Grease: The Immersive Movie Musical at Evolution in London this week. The Welsh-born presenter returned to our screens last year for the revival of 1990s reality series Challenge Anneka, but it was cancelled after just three episodes due to low ratings. Dame Mary Archer is not just 'fragrant' – as a judge called her in her husband Jeffrey's 1987 libel trial – but extremely fit as well. I hear the 80-year-old is to join five other dames in running a charity relay race next month. 'The Great Dames are dusting off their trainers… and generally limbering up to run in Cambridge's famous Chariots Of Fire race,' she says, referring to their team name. Each woman will run a 1.7-mile loop before passing over the baton. 'The beneficiary is Roald Dahl's Marvellous Children's Charity,' she says. 'The funds raised will go directly towards establishing a new Roald Dahl Nurse.' Francesca saddles up in style ITV's perkiest presenter, horse racing pundit Francesca Cumani, is determined to prove she'd be a stylish dresser whichever century she happened to be born in. The mother of two attended the Goodwood Regency Ball – where guests were transported back to the 19th century – wearing a floor-length red dress from vintage fashion for hire store Constantine Rex. 'In full costume at the Goodwood Ball with this handsome pair,' Cumani, 42, wrote of fashion stylist Sarah Byrne, pictured left, and racehorse trainer Stephanie Easterby, pictured right, next to this photograph taken at Goodwood House, the Duke of Richmond's ancestral seat in West Sussex. Middleton's answer to ruff days at work Some might say he's barking, but James Middleton has called for companies to let employees bring their dogs to work. The Princess of Wales's brother claims it would boost productivity. 'Dogs in the workplace should be a generic 'yes' unless there is a very good reason to say 'no',' says James, 38, who runs dog food firm James & Ella, named after him and his late first dog. 'I started the business during the pandemic and the whole team works remotely. 'When we all get together, there are dogs everywhere and I really believe they increase productivity. Ideas come from those 15-minute breaks, taking them out to the garden.'
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bank of Korea governor says US trade deal removes 'huge burden'
SEOUL, Aug 7 (Reuters) - South Korea's trade deal with the U.S. will "take a huge burden off" monetary policymakers at their upcoming meeting later this month, the country's central bank governor said on Thursday. "I thought we would be in a difficult situation if things went wrong with tariffs before the policy meeting, and while there might be different opinions, I think you did a difficult job at a difficult time," Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong said at his first meeting with Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol, according to a media pool report of his opening remarks. Koo visited the U.S. last week, just a week after he took office, as head of South Korea's negotiation team and clinched a trade deal with U.S. President Donald Trump that set import tariffs on South Korean goods at 15%, on par with Japan and the European Union. Trump had earlier threatened a tariff of 25%. Rhee did not elaborate when asked by local reporters what he meant by saying the agreement had removed a "huge burden". At the meeting at the Bank of Korea, Rhee and Koo agreed to communicate closely on policy coordination as well as to cooperate on long-term structural reforms, Koo's ministry said in a statement. The Bank of Korea kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 2.50% last month, but a majority of board members signalled another rate cut in the next three months and warned of "significant" economic uncertainty from the U.S. tariffs. Later in July, the Bank of Korea said a trade deal similar to that of Japan's would be marginally worse than the central bank's base-case growth projection, after data showed Asia's fourth-largest economy grew in the second quarter at the fastest pace in more than a year. The central bank next meets on August 28.
Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
Returned and reeling: Afghans expelled from Iran struggle to start over
ISLAM QALA, Afghanistan, August 7 (Reuters) - Habiba, an Afghan woman who fled Taliban rule to pursue a master's degree in engineering in Iran, was deported in July just before she was about to complete her studies. The 31-year-old, who declined to give her family name for fear of repercussions, said she returned to her homeland with little more than her laptop and documents, the last traces of a future she nearly secured, one of hundreds of thousands forced to return in recent weeks as Iran ramped up expulsions of Afghans in the wake of its war with Israel. "I was so close," Habiba told Reuters at the Afghan border post of Islam Qala. She said she had just saved enough to complete her thesis, the final step before graduation, and now will have to start over in a country where women are barred from high school, let alone university. Aid agencies say accusations by Iranian authorities that Afghan nationals were spying for Israel triggered a surge in deportations, with the UN refugee agency UNHCR reporting nearly 700,000 Afghans expelled from Iran since the beginning of June. The two countries share a 920-km (550-mile) land border through a flat, arid landscape. Iranian officials maintain those deported were undocumented and most left voluntarily, citing security and resource concerns. Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni said in July that 70% of the 1 million who left since March did so by choice, local media reported. Local media quoted Nader Yarahmadi, an adviser to Iran's Interior Ministry and head of its Centre for Foreign Nationals and Immigrants Affairs, as saying that temporary census cards held by about 2 million Afghan nationals were invalidated from March and that they had until July to leave. An additional 2.1 million Afghans in Iran had no documents, he said. The number of Afghans returning exploded after Israel and Iran fought a 12-day war in June. UNHCR estimates Iran deported an average of more than 30,000 Afghans each day during the war, up 15-fold from about 2,000 earlier. But Iranian officials have downplayed espionage claims as isolated media reports. The crackdown is on illegal immigrants, Yarahmadi said. Aid workers at Islam Qala said some of the returnees arrived after days without food or water. Momeni said deportations were conducted with 'respect and dignity,' but admitted the war triggered rushed exits, leaving many without their wages or possessions. Reuters interviewed 26 Afghans who had recently returned from Iran, many of whom described coming home to a country that now feels unfamiliar and unlivable. Most of them denied they were illegal immigrants in Iran and said they had held some form of documentation. Rahela, 37, said she had built a steady livelihood in Tehran as a certified makeup artist and seamstress. Now back in the Afghan city of Herat with her two daughters, she says she sees no future. She says she separated from her husband several years ago after he struggled with drug addiction, and has been raising her daughters alone ever since. The Taliban's restrictions bar women from most forms of employment and from travelling long distances without a male guardian. 'I have no helper and no male guardian (mahram),' she said. Her father, although a mahram, is elderly and unable to accompany her or provide support, leaving her effectively confined, she said. The flood of refugees returning to Afghanistan from Iran and Pakistan is straining aid in a country already grappling with economic collapse, donor fatigue and a ban on girls' secondary education. But it is the post-conflict purge from Iran that has overwhelmed Afghan authorities and aid workers, many of whom say they were unprepared for the scale and speed of the deportations. The Taliban-led government has urged Iran to proceed gradually, and allow returnees time to settle financial affairs and retrieve personal property. While the women who have returned spoke of lost rights and opportunities, Afghan men described split families, derailed plans and an uncertain future. Rahim Uzbek, 59, said he was arrested at his job as a security guard, deported alone, and is now living in a mosque near the Islam Qala crossing, away from his two wives and seven children who remained in Iran, although they were also Afghan nationals. He said that he had some money tied up in an advance payment for rent in Iran, but the landlord did not return it. 'I have no assets or savings, nor do I have any shelter or place to stay,' he said, with tears in his eyes. 'I have no idea what to do.' Mansoor Ahmad, 21, a metalworker from Kabul, said he was arrested at work and deported without his family. He said Iranian officers accused him of helping someone escape a deportation camp and beat him when he denied it. 'When I spoke, they beat me. When I stayed silent, they beat me again,' he said. 'Then they put me in solitary.' Red marks and bruises were visible on his back and shoulders, consistent with being struck or kicked. Iranian officials deny systemic abuse. The Iranian chargé d'affaires in Kabul, Alireza Bigdeli, said there were no official reports of mistreatment but acknowledged 'some may be unhappy with the way they were treated, detained, or returned.' Iranian authorities say they tried to prevent family separations but admit the post-war rush split some families. Students were encouraged to leave with relatives under a voluntary return plan. While many of the Afghans said life in Iran was tough, marked by discrimination, high costs and a constant sense of being unwelcome, they still had goals. Some worked, others studied. 'The situation in Iran was very difficult,' said Rahela. 'People treated us harshly. They humiliated and insulted us. But at least there was security and work. Women could work... and that was good for us."
