
Stephen Colbert has been a civic-minded voice of reason in troubled times
an important message for younger viewers.
That innate grasp of the big picture is part of what has set Colbert apart from other late-night TV hosts. And that is what we will miss, now that
Colbert is rivaled only by his good friend Jon Stewart in perfecting a blend of comedy-as-commentary. For years, Colbert and Stewart functioned, essentially, as running mates in an opposition party. Both knew that nothing takes the air out of a demagogue's balloon better than mockery.
Advertisement
For all of the many, many times he made us laugh, Colbert often serves as a civic-minded voice of reason. Especially in an era when our political system sometimes appears to be coming apart at the seams, Colbert offers a nightly bit of catharsis and, in a weird way, comfort, without being smarmy or self-congratulatory about it in the least.
Advertisement
The president who was so often Colbert's target wasted no time opining on the news, posting Friday morning on Truth Social: 'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings.' Trump added: 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert!'
That predicable broadside is not likely to throw Colbert. Think of his
In his crisp blue suit, with his carefully parted hair, there is an old-timey air about Colbert. For all of his anarchic stunts — there is almost no place he will not go, comedically speaking — it was always clear how much he valued tradition. He was a proud, practicing Catholic.
There was a bumpy period when Colbert transitioned from his persona on Comedy Central's 'The Colbert Report,' where he played as a Bill O'Reilly-inspired right-wing blowhard, to his perch on CBS, where he could be his full, very liberal self.
But Colbert figured it out, along with his crack team of writers, who are the most creative and original on late-night TV. Any random five minutes of a Colbert monologue are often funnier than an entire month of 'Saturday Night Live.'
Over the years he has unabashedly described himself as a company man. It clearly mattered to him that his surname was arranged in large letters vertically along the Ed Sullivan Theatre. When he told his audience Thursday about the cancellation, he affectionately referred to CBS as 'the Tiffany Network,' an archaic nickname that no doubt sent many of his younger audience members hurrying to Wikipedia.
Advertisement
Off the air, he is widely known for his personal decency in an industry that is not exactly overflowing with the milk of human kindness.
Indeed, just last month, in a commencement address at Northwestern University, his former fellow 'Daily Show' correspondent Steve Carell described Colbert as 'a famous, powerful person who is also kind,' adding: 'Stephen is a brilliant, wonderful person. Talented, generous, better than I am in almost every way. If he were here today, he'd probably be giving a better speech. An innovator, an icon, a family man, and friend.'
But Colbert was also capable of pure fury, and that is what he unleashed when a pro-Trump mob rampaged through the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, as part of an effort to overturn the presidential election results.
Using his bully pulpit in a manner that would have seemed inconceivable to an earlier generation of late-night hosts such as Johnny Carson, Colbert called Trump 'a violence-inciting fascist'' and denounced the 'coordinated and planned attempt to terrorize, if not kill, our nation's elected leaders.'
For a long time afterwards, Colbert refused to say Trump's name on the air. Even in chyron text, it was rendered only as 'T****.'
Now that name is inescapable again, 24 hours a day. Colbert has another 10 months on the air, and he has work to do.
Don Aucoin can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Over half of Americans say ‘big, beautiful bill' going to raise health care costs: Poll
More than half of Americans — 57 percent — said in a new survey that they think the GOP's sweeping package extending tax cuts and slashing welfare services will increase their health-care costs. Thirteen percent in the CBS/YouGov poll released Sunday said that the 'big, beautiful bill' will lower their health-care costs and 33 percent said there will be no impact. While the Congressional Budget Office has not yet released a final estimate for the measure as enacted, it projected that 16 million people would lose their health insurance by 2034 under an earlier House-passed version of the bill. This analysis has been the basis for many Democrats' messaging around health care, and health-care advocates have still warned that the final version could be devastating to communities relying on Medicaid. The sprawling package permanently extends many of the temporary tax cuts passed by Republicans during President Trump's first term, alongside making deep spending reductions to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and other welfare programs. The measure would primarily benefit wealthy Americans, an analysis by the Yale Budget Lab found last month. Democrats have assailed the legislation as a historic transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich and are looking to message around its cuts to health care for the 2026 midterms — even if some of the package's most significant changes don't kick in until 2028. Overall, six in 10 questioned in the CBS/YouGov survey disapprove of the GOP megabill. A similar percentage said that it will help wealthy people and hurt poor people. A separate AP-NORC poll released Saturday found that nearly two-thirds of Americans think the legislation will do more to help wealthy people. In the CBS/YouGov poll, 40 percent of respondents said they thought the measure will increase their taxes. Another 32 percent said they thought their taxes will not be impacted either way. A majority — 56 percent — said that they tied issues regarding the megabill significantly to how they evaluate President Trump's second term. A plurality of Americans, 44 percent, said they had a 'general sense' of the content of the legislation alongside some specifics. Meanwhile, roughly two in 10 — 22 percent — said they had a general idea of it but lacked specifics. The CBS/YouGov poll was conducted between July 16 and July 18, with a sample of 2,343 and a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points.


USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Ellen DeGeneres confirms Trump provoked UK move: It's 'just better'
Ellen DeGeneres is making a rare political comment regarding the motivation behind her move from the United States – and it's about President Donald Trump. The former talk show host, in her first public event since leaving the U.S., confirmed Trump was the catalyst for her move with wife Portia de Rossi to the English countryside, according to the BBC and the Guardian. "We got here the day before the election and woke up to lots of texts from our friends with crying emojis, and I was like, '(Trump) got in,'" DeGeneres said during a conversation event in South West England on Sunday, July 20. "And we're like, 'We're staying here.'" DeGeneres and de Rossi bought a house in Cotswolds, England, in 2024, following her Last Stand…Up Tour, according to the outlets. The couple had originally planned for the home to be a "part-time house" where they would spend three to four months out of the year, but made the move permanent after the 2024 election. "It's clean. Everything here is just better – the way animals are treated, people are polite. I just love it here," she added. DeGeneres joined fellow comedian Rosie O'Donnell in a move from the U.S. post-Trump election. O'Donnell announced in late 2024 that she had moved to Ireland, and her comments regarding her exit have reignited her longstanding feud with Trump. Donald Trump threatens to revoke longtime foe Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship In a Truth Social post July 12, Trump said that "because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship." The president does not have constitutional power to revoke citizenship. In response, O'Donnell posted a picture of Trump and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, asking if he is "rattled again? 18 years later and I still live rent-free in that collapsing brain of yours." Rosie O'Donnell slams Donald Trump as 'tangerine Mussolini' as feud escalates And in November, Eva Longoria revealed she no longer lives in America full-time, telling Marie Claire in an interview: "I'm privileged. I get to escape and go somewhere. Most Americans aren't so lucky. They're going to be stuck in this dystopian country, and my anxiety and sadness is for them." Contributing: Jay Stahl, Edward Segarra and Anna Kaufman


Politico
39 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump's trade deals leave industry in ‘paralysis'
Presented by Autos Drive America With help from Doug Palmer and Grace Yarrow QUICK FIX — As President Donald Trump rushes to finalize new trade deals before the end of the month, American companies operating abroad are still waiting for clarity on existing agreements. — A top South African official tells Morning Trade the country will not accept a trade deal with the United States that eliminates all tariffs on American goods. — Republican lawmakers from farm states are beginning to lose patience with Trump's tariff strategy as harvest season approaches. It's Monday, July 21. Welcome to Morning Trade! Got news tips? Suggestions? Want to grab a coffee? Hit us up at: ahawkins@ ddesrochers@ and dpalmer@ Follow us on X: @_AriHawkins, @drdesrochers and @tradereporter. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. Driving the day WHERE ARE THE PAPERS? Trump is under growing pressure from the business community to clarify the terms of his new trade agreements, amid warnings that the uncertainty is rattling investor confidence and leaving millions of dollars' worth of goods stuck in limbo. Sean Stein, the president of the U.S.-China Business Council, which represents more than 270 American companies that do business in China, said the confusion created for industry is clashing with Trump's goal of courting foreign investment. 'So far, these deals are not creating an environment that's going to lead to more investment in the U.S.,' Stein told Morning Trade in an interview, saying Trump's approach to trade and tariffs have introduced risk into the investment environment, leaving companies in 'paralysis.' One step back: Despite pledging '90 deals in 90 days' back in April, the U.S. has announced 'deals' with just four countries — including the United Kingdom, China and Vietnam — more than 180 days into the president's second term. The recent deals have not been accompanied with the release of completed texts, and diplomats say talks over the toughest terms are still dragging on. Trump most recently announced a new agreement with Indonesia on Truth Social, later telling reporters its new tariff rate would be at 19 percent but providing no further details. Trump is eyeing an Aug. 1 deadline for new tariffs on countries that fail to strike a deal with the U.S., which Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called a 'hard deadline' on Sunday in an interview with CBS News' 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.' The administration also set an Aug. 12 target to reinstate sky-high tariffs on China unless the countries can reach a new arrangement, threatening yet another round of disruption for industries scrambling to keep up with shifting duty rates. It's complicated: Stein pointed to the lack of clarity about the terms of the deal with Vietnam as an example of the stress companies are under: Trump claimed he would slash tariffs on the country to 20 percent, or a 40 percent tariff if a product originated in a different country, but the administration has yet to clarify terms of the deal related to transhipment — leaving some companies with completed orders in limbo. The government of Vietnam has also not officially confirmed the terms of the deal, which people familiar with the discussions told POLITICO were altered at the eleventh hour. 'A day does not go by that I don't have two or three companies asking me, 'What does it mean?'' Stein said, referring to provisions of the Vietnam deal. ''What are they talking about?' Nobody knows. When you talk to people in the administration, they can't give you a clear answer about what they mean, either.' A right-leaning lobbyist from a major industry group, who frequently meets with administration officials and some of the country's largest multinational companies, said corporate leaders in all four countries have not yet received clear guidance — resulting in millions of dollars' worth of goods stranded at ports as businesses await clarity. 'The administration is not being transparent. They are not being open. There are just so many questions,' said the corporate lobbyist, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'The president sees being non-transparent, being unpredictable as a real strength. He wants to keep everybody off balance. But for an administration that says, well, 'we're all about business,' it's been generally totally unresponsive and totally non-transparent.' Let's Make a Deal WHERE A ZERO-TARIFF DEAL WON'T FLY: There is no chance that South Africa would accept a trade deal with the United States that eliminates all tariffs on American goods, like the Trump administration says Vietnam and Indonesia have agreed to do, a top official at the Congress of South African Trade Unions told Morning Trade. If that's the best the United States can offer, South Africa will just live with the 30 percent tariff that Trump has threatened to impose effective Aug. 1 and try to develop new markets elsewhere, said Matthew Parks, parliamentary coordinator for the trade union group, after the annual USTR hearing on country eligibility for duty-free treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act on Friday. 'There's no South African company who could compete with a 30 percent tariff,' meaning 'thousands' of South African workers could lose their jobs, Parks said. Trump's earlier decision to impose a 25 percent tariff on autos and auto parts has already caused South Africa's auto exports to the United States to plummet 85 percent in recent months, he added. AGOA time running out: Friday's AGOA hearing was premised on the idea that the program will continue to exist, despite its pending expiration on Sept. 30. However, with that date less than three months away, there appears to be no chance of Congress passing a full 10- or 15-year renewal, as program supporters would like. Parks, who said he spent several days meeting with lawmakers last week, expressed hope Congress could at least approve a one- or two-year renewal before the program expires. That would provide a bridge past the 2026 congressional elections, when it might be easier to do more comprehensive reform, he said. However, spokespeople for Senate Finance and House Ways and Means did not provide any information Friday on that possibility. REGULATORY REVIEW WILL 'WAIT AND SEE' LAST? Farmers' patience with Trump could be waning as they scramble to understand and brace for a looming trade war ahead of harvest season, according to interviews conducted by POLITICO agriculture reporter Samuel Benson. Senate Ag Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) said farmers have had a 'wait and see' attitude towards the tariffs, trusting the Trump administration's work to get new trade deals done to open new markets. But he said farmers are 'anxious' in light of Trump's slew of new tariff threats. 'Our farmers are in trouble,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) said last week. 'They're in bad trouble. I don't know whether there's anything we can do to save them, unless these tariffs work, and I hope we can. We're going to do everything we possibly can.' Background needed: Trump's farm state allies on Capitol Hill have stood by his ultimate goal of securing new markets for farmers — but it's not clear how long their patience will last. The push comes as a growing number of mostly House Republicans start to gently push back on Trump's targeting of critical sectors with tariffs. Is time running out? One agriculture industry lobbyist, granted anonymity to discuss concerns about the administration's tariff approach, said that Trump has about a month and a half to prove his trade plans are working before farmers start harvesting and selling their products. 'We're getting closer to harvest time,' the person said. 'We're getting to the point where those sales numbers are really going to matter, the prices are really going to matter.' TO THE LAND OF THE MAPLE LEAF: Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is leading a bipartisan group of senators to Ottawa this week to meet with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and other senior officials, according to an advisory. The delegation — which includes Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) — aims to reaffirm U.S.-Canada ties as Ottawa faces 35 percent tariffs, effective Aug 1. TRADE OVERNIGHT — Trump and Xi Jinping tipped to meet ahead of or during Apec summit in South Korea, writes the South China Morning Post. — Tariff anxiety grips defense elites at Aspen conference, POLITICO reports. — Former ambassador to China: Beijing hasn't 'outplayed' Trump on trade, POLITICO Pro reports. — Meta rebuffs Brussels over AI rules, per POLITICO Pro. — Taiwan-US tariff deal will only impact import of cars from US, Taiwan News reports. THAT'S ALL FOR MORNING TRADE! See you again soon! In the meantime, drop the team a line: dpalmer@ ddesrochers@ and ahawkins@ Follow us @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Trade.