
Chinese warship crashes into own coastguard vessel while chasing Philippine boat in South China Sea
The incident occurred near the contested Scarborough Shoal on Monday as the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) escorted vessels distributing aid to fishers in the area, Philippine authorities said.
'Their [the Chinese vessels'] actions not only posed a grave danger to Philippine personnel and vessels, but also resulted in the unfortunate collision between the two Chinese vessels,' the Philippine foreign ministry said on Tuesday, accusing the Chinese crew of 'dangerous manoeuvres and unlawful interference' in the resupply mission.
Video released by Manila showed a Chinese coastguard ship and a much larger vessel bearing the number 164 on its hull colliding with a loud crash in the wake of the Philippine vessel.
Additional footage and photos released later by the PCG showed the stricken Chinese vessel still afloat but with its entire bow crumpled inward.
The PCG spokesperson Commodore Jay Tarriela said in a statement: 'The [Chinese coastguard vessel] CCG 3104, which was chasing the [PCG vessel] BRP Suluan at high speed, performed a risky manoeuvre from the [Philippine] vessel's starboard quarter, leading to the impact with the PLA [People's Liberation Army] navy warship.
'This resulted in substantial damage to the CCG vessel's forecastle, rendering it unseaworthy.'
Earlier in the confrontation, the BRP Suluan was 'targeted with a water cannon' by the Chinese but 'successfully' evaded it, Tarriela's statement said.
At a later press briefing, Tarriela said crew members onboard the smaller Chinese vessel had been visible in its front section shortly before the collision. 'We're not sure whether they were able to rescue those personnel who were in front prior to the collision. But we are hoping that these personnel are in good condition,' he told reporters.
Tarriela said the Chinese crew did not respond to the Philippine ship's offer of assistance.
Gan Yu, a Chinese coastguard spokesperson, confirmed that a confrontation had taken place, without mentioning the collision. 'The China coastguard took necessary measures in accordance with the law, including monitoring, pressing from the outside, blocking and controlling the Philippine vessels to drive them away,' he said in a statement.
China has neither confirmed or denied the incident, only saying that it 'lawfully' took measures to drive away Philippine vessels that had 'forcibly intruded' into its waters.
'The China coastguard will continue to carry out rights-protection law enforcement activities in the waters of Huangyan Dao in accordance with the law, and will resolutely safeguard China's national territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests,' said the coastguard spokesperson Gan Yu, using China's name for the shoal.
Monday's incident is the latest in a series of confrontations between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea, which Beijing claims almost entirely despite an international ruling that the assertion has no legal basis.
More than 60% of global maritime trade passes through the disputed waterway.
Speaking at a news conference, the Philippine president, Ferdinand Marcos Jr, said the country's patrol vessels would 'continue to be present' in the area to defend, as well as exercise Manila's sovereign rights over, what it considers to be part of its territory.
The Scarborough Shoal – a triangular chain of reefs and rocks – has been a flashpoint between the countries since China seized it from the Philippines in 2012.
Marcos has also warned that the Philippines risks confrontation with China over another issue – Taiwan, which China's rulers are preparing to annex as territory. With US backing of Taiwan, any attempt threatens to spiral into a broader conflict, and on a recent trip to India, Marcos said 'there is no way that the Philippines can stay out of it'.
The Philippines lies on the other side of a crucial sea passage past Taiwan – the Bashi channel – and there are more than 100,000 Philippine nationals living in Taiwan who would need to be evacuated in the event of a conflict.
On Monday, Beijing accused Marcos of 'playing with fire' with his comments, drawing a rebuke from the president that they had misinterpreted his comments 'for propaganda purposes'.
'War over Taiwan will drag the Philippines kicking and screaming into the conflict. That is what I was trying to say,' Marcos said.
With Agence France-Presse
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tulip Siddiq brands Bangladesh trial a ‘farce'
Tulip Siddiq says her corruption trial in Bangladesh is a 'farce' driven by a 'political vendetta'. The former City minister, who is being tried in her absence, accused authorities in Dhaka of 'peddling false and vexatious allegations' and said the case was ' built on fabricated accusations ' Ms Siddiq, along with her mother Sheikh Rehana and sister Azmina Siddique, and brother Radwan Mujib Siddique, known as Bobby, are facing multiple corruption charges in relation to the allocation of plots in one of the largest housing projects in the country. The Labour MP is the niece of Sheikh Hasina, Bangladesh's authoritarian former prime minister, who fled the country after she was ousted last year following a violent crackdown on student protesters. As the trial began on Wednesday, Ms Siddiq launched a fresh attack on the Bangladesh government headed by interim leader Prof Muhammad Yunus, and the legal proceedings, saying she had not even received a court summons. 'False and vexatious' allegations 'The so-called trial now under way in Dhaka is nothing more than a farce – built on fabricated accusations and driven by a clear political vendetta,' she posted on X. 'Over the past year, the allegations against me have repeatedly shifted, yet I have never been contacted by the Bangladeshi authorities once. 'I have never received a court summons, no official communication, and no evidence. If this were a genuine legal process, the authorities would have engaged with me or my legal team, responded to our formal correspondence, and presented the evidence they claim to hold. 'Instead, they have peddled false and vexatious allegations that have been briefed to the media but never formally put to me by investigators.' Ms Siddiq, 42, said that Prof Yunus had refused her offer to meet when he recently visited London and claimed he was smearing her name to 'score political points'. 'Even my offer to meet … Muhammad Yunus during his recent visit to London was refused,' she wrote. 'Such conduct is wholly incompatible with the principles of a fair trial that we uphold in the UK. 'I have been clear from the outset that I have done nothing wrong and will respond to any credible evidence that is presented to me. Continuing to smear my name to score political points is both baseless and damaging.' On the first day of the trial, it was claimed Ms Siddiq 'exerted pressure and influence' on Sheikh Hasina to illegally hand land to her mother and siblings. Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) alleges Sheikh Hasina, in collusion with senior officials, unlawfully obtained six plots of 7,200sq ft each in the diplomatic zone of Sector 27 of the Purbachal New Town project for herself and her family. Muhammad Salahuddin, the ACC deputy director, who heads the investigation, recorded his statement before Judge Muhammad Rabiul Alam, of Dhaka Special Judge Court-4, saying the former prime minister concealed ownership of housing facilities in Dhaka in violation of existing laws. The ACC has filed six separate cases with Hasina accused in each, while Ms. Siddiq has been named as an abettor in three corruption cases also involving her mother and two siblings. Ms. Siddiq 'manipulated and influenced Sheikh Hasina, who by virtue of her direct influence and under the special powers granted to her, abused the authority vested in her in breach of public trust to attain the property', claimed Mr Salahuddin. 'A perusal of the records collected during the course of the investigation also reveals that the accused, Sheikh Hasina, influenced the allotment of the plots in the Purbachal New City Project in favour of the accused Sheikh Rehana, in violation of the rules,' he added. The court has set the next hearing as Aug 28. The ACC has opened several investigations into Ms Siddiq, alleging corruption in connection with the government of Sheikh Hasina, who fled to India last year after a mass uprising against her dictatorial rule. The ACC has listed all accused as fugitives and on July 31, charges were framed against 28 people, including Ms Siddiq, Sheikh Hasina and other family members, as well as several current and former officials of the ministry of housing and public works. Ms Siddiq has not appeared at any of the pre-trial hearings so far. The court previously issued a warrant for her arrest in April.


Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Labour MP Tulip Siddiq hits out at 'farce' anti-corruption trial in Bangladesh
Labour MP Tulip Siddiq has called her anti-corruption trial a "farce" which is "driven by a clear political agenda" as proceedings began on Wednesday in Bangladesh. In a statement seen by Sky News, Ms Siddiq has said the case was "built on fabricated accusations". Ms Siddiq was formerly the UK government's anti-corruption minister but stood down over accusations she illegally received a plot of land in a new high-end development on the outskirts of Dhaka, Bangladesh's capital. This came after her aunt, Sheikh Hasina, was ousted as prime minister last year and replaced by the current government. Hundreds of protesters were killed during the uprising and Ms Hasina now faces charges including crimes against humanity. Ms Siddiq previously denied all the allegations against her through lawyers, saying the prosecution is politically motivated. Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) claims the Labour MP received a 7,200-square-foot plot in a diplomatic zone through "abuse of power and influence". The trial in Dhaka began in the early hours of UK time, with Ms Siddiq on trial alongside her mother and siblings. The family are being tried in absentia as they have not returned to Bangladesh for the proceedings. The court opened with ACC prosecutors laying out the case against Ms Siddiq. In her statement, Ms Siddiq said: "The so-called trial now under way in Dhaka is nothing more than a farce, built on fabricated accusations and driven by a clear political vendetta. "Over the past year, the allegations against me have repeatedly shifted, yet I have never been contacted by the Bangladeshi authorities once. I have never received a court summons, no official communication, and no evidence. "If this were a genuine legal process, the authorities would have engaged with me or my legal team, responded to our formal correspondence, and presented the evidence they claim to hold. "Instead, they have peddled false and vexatious allegations that have been briefed to the media but never formally put to me by investigators. "Even my offer to meet Bangladesh's chief adviser Muhammad Yunus during his recent visit to London was refused. Such conduct is wholly incompatible with the principles of a fair trial that we uphold in the UK. "I have been clear from the outset that I have done nothing wrong and will respond to any credible evidence that is presented to me. Continuing to smear my name to score political points is both baseless and damaging." Responding to Ms Siddiq's statement, Bangladeshi Prosecutor Mohammad Sultan Mahmud highlighted the difference between the British and Bangladeshi legal system. This includes Ms Siddiq only being able to receive a court summons if she returns to Bangladesh. Sky News understands the MP's lawyer requested to attend the trial in Bangladesh on her behalf but was denied access. We also understand the Bangladeshi authorities did not tell Ms Siddiq of a date change for the trial, and she only found out when Sky News contacted her lawyer about it. On the other points, Mr Mahmud denied there was any political motivation to the case. He added that Mr Yunus likely rejected meeting Ms Siddiq due to a busy schedule and not wanting to interfere in the proceedings. The prosecutor went on to claim he had "a lot of evidence" against Ms Siddiq and her family, and intends to bring further cases against her. A separate anti-corruption allegation into Ms Siddiq's family has also been launched, with allegations they were involved in brokering a 2013 deal with Russia for a nuclear power plant in Bangladesh, in which large sums of money were said to have been embezzled. Ms Siddiq's aunt, Ms Hasina, was ousted last year following student protests, having been in power for more than a decade. She has since fled to India. Hundreds of protesters were killed during the uprising, and Ms Hasina now faces charges including crimes against humanity. Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over as interim leader and vowed to prosecute Ms Hasina. Allegations have also been made about Ms Siddiq and a house she rents in north London, which is owned by a businessman reportedly linked to Ms Hasina's Awami League Party.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Myanmar junta arrests children as young as two and uses ‘systematic torture', says UN
Myanmar junta detained children as young as two years old and subjected them to torture, sexual abuse, and beatings to often use them as proxies for their parents, a United Nations-led investigation has found. The Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM) – covering a period from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025 – has found evidence of ' war crimes and crimes against humanity committed' in Myanmar with an increasing frequency since the 2021 military coup. The investigation covering a one-year period draws on more than 1,300 sources, including nearly 600 eyewitness testimonies, photographs, videos, documents, maps and forensic evidence. The report found evidence of a rise in mass imprisonment without due process, indiscriminate airstrikes and artillery and drone attacks causing civilian deaths, burning of homes, hospitals, schools, religious sites and widespread torture, including sexual violence in detention. It said gathered evidence from eyewitnesses indicating that children – aged ranging from two to 17 years – have been detained and subjected to 'torture, ill treatment or sexual and gender-based crimes'. These children are often detained in place of their parents, who are suspected to be associated with opposition groups or movements but remain absconding. The report uncovered a pattern of intensifying 'systematic torture' in Myanmar's military-run detention facilities using methods of electric shocks, strangulations and gang rapes. 'We have uncovered significant evidence, including eyewitness testimony, showing systematic torture in Myanmar detention facilities,' said Nicholas Koumjian, head of the mechanism formed in 2018 to analyse evidence of serious violations of international law. 'We have made headway in identifying the perpetrators, including the commanders who oversee these facilities and we stand ready to support any jurisdictions willing and able to prosecute these crimes.' It comes as the nationwide fighting between the military and armed pro-democracy forces as well as ethnic armed militias, has intensified in the country since military coup of February 2021, when the army overthrew the civilian-run government of Aung San Suu Kyi and the detained civilian leaders, including president Win Myint. Tens of thousands of people have been displaced since as fighting continues between the junta and the resistance forces in many areas, with both sides accused of using civilians as informants, forced conscriptions and targets. The report said investigators had made progress in identifying individual members and units of the security forces linked to operations at specific detention sites, including direct perpetrators of sexual and gender-based crimes as well as senior commanders. But the names were being withheld to avoid alerting those under investigation. 'It's very important that perpetrators believe that somebody is watching, somebody is collecting evidence,' said Mr Koumjian said. 'Our report highlights a continued increase in the frequency and brutality of atrocities committed in Myanmar,' he added. 'We are working towards the day when the perpetrators will have to answer for their actions in a court of law.' The military-ruled government has consistently denied carrying out attacks on civilians. A spokesperson for Myanmar's military-backed government did not immediately respond to the UN's requests for comment. The military-backed government has not responded to over two dozen requests by the UN team for information about the alleged crimes and requests to access the country, the UN report said.