
The 10 dumbest cars of all time
The 10 dumbest cars of all time
There are many kinds of dumb, especially when talking about cars. Automakers are prone to questionable design and engineering decisions and can occasionally push the envelope in places they shouldn't. Buyers can take what would be excellent vehicles in one arena and use them almost exclusively in another where their talents are completely wasted. There are times when technologies aren't invested in enough or are pushed too hard, to comical extremes. And then there are vehicles built for such a specific niche that they're doomed to commercial failure no matter how charming they are. These are our editors' picks for the dumbest automobiles.
Tesla Cybertruck - Kristen Lee, Scott Evans
Designed to offend and made in a way that maims, the Cybertruck has succeeded in gathering more haters than fans, empirically so considering the dueling subreddits dedicated to the truck. One look at the vehicle, even from a distance, is enough to catalyze an unbreakable perspective on whether or not the pickup is worthy of existence. Its impressive performance numbers and fresh technology are only important to those who can get past its looks. Those body lines include enough near-razor-sharp edges to rip clothing or tear open skin if you're unfortunate enough to encounter the end of almost any exterior panel (including the doors, which don't have handles). A general lack of reliability and high cost provide further ammo for the Cyberbeast's numerous haters, but as our Scott Evans noted, 'Cybertruck is up there, but it's gotten slightly less dumb as Tesla has activated the rest of the feature set.'
Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet - Tom Rosquin, Aaron Gold
Many automotive genre benders are celebrated, but the Murano convertible is not one of them. While far from the first vehicle with SUV proportions to feature an open top , this Murano variant stands out for a crossover cabrio with a hubris-huffing lack of self-awareness. The styling of the CrossCabriolet has been derided by MotorTrend staff for over a decade , but worse than that, very little was done to ensure the newly minted convertible was structurally sound. Even driving down a mildly bumpy road reveals a shocking lack of rigidity, hurting both ride and handling. Any utility the variant had was also tossed out, as the rear doors and effectively all the cargo space of the vehicle were left on the cutting room floor. After all that, the most shocking thing about the Murano is that something so badly thought out could be greenlit at all. As Aaron Gold noted, 'You could feel the cowl shake just by getting into the car.'
Mazda MX-30 - Billy Rehbock
As the first wave of electric SUVs swept through the automotive landscape, bringing practical EV motoring into the mainstream, the MX-30 ... didn't. With barely 100 miles of EPA-rated range (and thus less on the freeway and much less in the cold), the MX-30 was never taken seriously as a practical electric vehicle. Even as just about every other electric crossover blew past the 200-mile mark in the real world, the MX-30 couldn't reach half that on the optimistic EPA rating cycle. Priced and marketed like an equal to far superior rivals, the MX-30's agile handling and fun interior couldn't save it from an early grave .
Toyota Mirai - Christian Seabaugh, Aaron Gold, Scott Evans
Hydrogen used to be the fuel of the future, but as battery electric vehicles came onto the scene and cut out the middleman, that future became the past. With much of the already tenuous filling station network shutting down , we've come to the apparent end of using H2 to fuel cars. That once-rosy outlook also ends the now ironically named Mirai. Named for 'future' in Japanese, the Mirai went from ugly duckling to beautiful sedan in its two generations , dutifully supported by a Toyota initially skeptical of BEVs. But all the cool factor and styling in the world couldn't keep hydrogen from falling under the pressure of more practical and less expensive methods of locomotion. As Aaron Gold said, 'Mirai is awesome if you don't have anywhere to go.'
Honda CR-V FCEV - Christian Seabaugh
Similar negatives apply to the CR-V FCEV, though at least this everyday crossover turned hydropunk showcase can run as a battery electric vehicle for an EPA-rated 29 miles . That enhances its practicality a little bit, but just a little. (All-up range with a full battery charge and a full tank of hydrogen is 270 miles.) The high cost of producing it means it is only available for lease, just as GM's EV1 was before BEV technology advanced to the point of practicality. Besides the rather annoying noises made by the hydrogen system, the CR-V FCEV tries its best to seem like a normal CR-V, but it's unlikely you'll ever be able to go outside Southern California (or, perhaps, very far within Southern California) in one.
Aston Martin Cygnet - Scott Evans
'Talk about brand dilution,' Scott Evans remarked on this so-called Aston Martin. As one of the worst examples of badge engineering in recent memory, the Cygnet claims many firsts and superlatives for the famed British brand. But are they worth bragging about? Under the not-that-different bodywork, this Aston was a Toyota/Scion iQ , a tiny city car that was admirable for its price but not known for luxury, refinement, or … well, anything but its miniscule size, really. Built to bring up Aston Martin's average fuel economy ratings for the sake of government regulations, the Cygnet received a dramatic interior and the same 97-hp economy-focused engine as the Scion. For $37,000 in 2010 dollars, it may have served its purpose for the brand, but it didn't exactly serve up a real Aston Martin experience for owners.
2025 Mercedes-Benz G-Class - Alex Leanse
The Mercedes-Benz G-Class is a controversial choice for the list among the MotorTrend staff, but consider this: What other vehicle commands so much money while being so compromised for the daily-driver duty it is universally pressed into? Ubiquitous on posh main streets and reality TV shows while being utterly absent from ORV parks and trails, the G-Wagen's formidable off-road capabilities are a complete mismatch for its use case, and swaddling a military-inspired 4x4 in luxury trappings seems dumb indeed. All that said, in response to these charges, all Christian Seabaugh had to say to our on-staff G-Wagen haters was, 'Booo, go home.'
Chevrolet SSR - Erik Johnson
Dumb doesn't mean bad. Did anyone ask for a convertible truck that couldn't actually tow or haul like Americans expect a pickup to? No. Is the SSR still awesome? Yes. But this real-life Hot Wheels car's cool factor and very unique combination of features didn't result in anything but the most tepid of sales figures. To be fair, the SSR now has a cult following, decades after it ended production. And yes, it was watered down from the concept and lacked the dynamics to match its looks , but none of that keeps it from being very, very cool. Nor does it keep it from being dumb.
Reliant Robin - Erik Johnson
While dumb doesn't have to mean bad, it certainly can mean bad. The Robin is undeniably bad, in every sense of the word, and that makes it undeniably dumb. For one, its three-legged layout leads to terminal instability, making the Robin infamous for rolling over (even though much of that fame is down to somewhat disingenuous Top Gear stunts). A car with a single narrow wheel up front is a dumb car, full stop. Nor was the Robin anything but a rolling (forward, or over) indictment of the quality control and reliability struggles of the British auto industry at the time, which struggled mightily for most of the Robin's remarkable (and horrifying) three-decade production run.
Chrysler TC by Maserati - Erik Johnson
Chrysler executives were convinced that a second-gen K-car sold as a Maserati was a good idea, but hindsight clearly proves otherwise. In what universe is building a late 1980s Chrysler on a Maserati production line in Italy anything but a dumb idea? Astronomical costs and the blindingly obvious and undeniable truth that the TC was a kind of lousy American car built by a kind of lousy Italian automaker made it an exceedingly stupid move. That the TC has a cult-classic appeal to modern car enthusiast weirdos is beside the point. The TC was dumb.
Photos by Manufacturer, Ryan Lugo
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
8 Years Later: Tesla Semi Delayed Again, Production Now Expected to Begin in Late 2025
Ask yourself: how many times can a production date slip before you question the entire project? Elon Musk first unveiled the Tesla Semi in 2017 with a promised 2019 launch. Today, eight years later, that launch remains a mirage. Musk's original pledge to start building in 2019 vanished without a single factory-built Semi rolling off the line. A handful of pilot trucks appeared at a PepsiCo event in December 2022, yet no volume production followed. Tesla's own quarterly update now pushes the first assembly to late 2025, with meaningful volume still scheduled for 2026. The biggest recent news on the Semi? The walls were up at the Nevada plant. That's a seven-year gap between unveiling and projected mass manufacturing. Early prices-$150,000 for a 300-mile version, $180,000 for 500 miles-never held firm. Ryder, an early launch partner, slashed its order from 42 to 18 trucks and requested a 28-month extension, blaming "dramatic changes to the Tesla product economics." Simple math suggests each Semi now costs upward of $350,000-double the original quote-undermining the Total Cost of Ownership pitch that once dazzled fleet operators. Meanwhile, BYD's Class 8 8TT is hauling freight across North America. Customers like Anheuser-Busch, GSC Logistics and Golden State Express operate them on regional routes in California, demonstrating true highway operation (e.g. Port of Oakland to Tracy, CA, including an 8 % grade) with ample range remaining for return trips. Freightliner's eCascadia (a production Class 8 electric tractor designed for regional and highway applications) sees daily highway duty, offering up to 230 miles of range on a full charge and a gross combined weight rating of 82,000 lbs. Meanwhile, Volvo, Mack, Kenworth, and Peterbilt all have electric Class 8s on the road in the US; leaving Tesla way out in the cold. Tesla's promised 50,000 units per year by 2026? Too little, too late. Nine years overdue, it looks more like a press-release fantasy than an achievable target. Each new "update"-steel beams up! chargers installed!-serves as a rallying cry for hopeful investors. Yet slide decks and photo ops don't haul cargo or pay off loans. As recently as three weeks ago, facing a shareholder rebellion, Musk was assuring shareholders that he'd "deliver the Semi this year, and it will be huge". For Tesla devotees and shareholders alike, broken timelines transform into a test of faith: miss one deadline, reset the countdown, and wait for the next miracle. How long before investors demand proof over promises? The Semi's saga underscores a hard truth: grand reveals don't equal delivery. If it were only the Semi, one might give him the benefit of the doubt. But Elon Musk's other undelivered promises include Level 5 full self-driving by end-2020, a $25,000 mass-market Tesla, on-schedule Cybertruck deliveries, next-generation Roadster production in 2020, a fully automated robotaxi network by 2022, human Neuralink clinical trials in 2024, commercial Hyperloop service by 2021, and publicly accessible Boring Company tunnels by 2022. Musk's gifts lie in hype, not heavy haul. Until Semis exit the prototype hangars en masse, this program remains a stock-price prop, not an industry disruptor. Watch for disappointed and rebellious shareholders at the end of 2025. Fleet managers-and investors-should insist on steel on wheels, not steel beams in Nevada. Plenty of other brands are out there. Bookmark December 2025 and scope public delivery data. Then ask yourself: will Tesla finally roll real Semis off the line, or will the next slideware date simply become another bullet point in a growing ledger of unmet promises? Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Tesla's robotaxi rollout is alarming the public, new report shows
As the calendar turns to June, many people are focused on a key event that Elon Musk has been touting all year: the Tesla (TSLA) robotaxi rollout. After a volatile and complicated start to the year, marked by a disappointing earnings report and declining sales across multiple key markets, the electric vehicle (EV) producer has put investors through many motions. This prompted investors and analysts to call for Musk to refocus his energy on the company. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Now the CEO seems to be doing that, after announcing he will be ceasing his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and returning to his responsibilities at Tesla and SpaceX. This comes at a pivotal time, as the automaker prepares to roll out its self-driving robotaxi fleet in Austin, Texas. Despite the positive momentum surrounding this key event, though, a recent report shows that public perception toward Tesla's new technology isn't positive. The rise of self-driving vehicles has become a defining trend over the past few years, as companies like Tesla and Waymo have worked to outmaneuver each other. While the latter has already established a presence in several major U.S. cities, Elon Musk has made sure the world knows Tesla's launch is coming soon. Related: Analyst sets eye-popping Tesla stock price target A true master of hype, Musk has successfully kept the nation's focus on Tesla's historic event, making it clear that it is proceeding as planned. However, a market research initiative that tracks consumer sentiment toward EVs recently published a detailed report with some statistics that may concern Musk. In the May 2025 edition of the Electric Vehicle Intelligence Report (EVIR), its authors highlight some potential problems both for Tesla and any automakers seeking to venture into the autonomous driving space. However, much of the negative sentiment seems to center on Tesla. It adds, though, that younger, higher-income individuals who live in urban areas are more open to autonomous driving technology than other groups. Those are the type of consumers Musk is likely targeting with the new robotaxi fleet. Even so, the authors also flag another concerning element for Tesla. They note that the former EV leader has been declining in areas such as brand positivity and trust but add that its rivals, such as Lucid and Rivian, have recently made progress in these areas, indicating that consumers are increasingly shifting away from Tesla. More Tesla News: Billionaire fund manager dumps Tesla in favor of other tech stockElon Musk, Tesla send bold message to Washington, DCElon Musk's robotaxi ambitions hit with major roadblock Other experts have also raised concerns regarding Tesla's robotaxi launch. TheStreet's Tony Owusu reports that Wall Street analyst Alexander Pots of Piper Sandler has speculated that the company's FSD technology isn't advanced enough to handle the challenges that the launch will pose. With the robotaxi launch drawing closer by the day, investors and consumers are watching closely to see how the event will turn out. Musk has described himself as being "extremely paranoid" about it, even after Tesla reported that its FSD system has almost tripled the cumulative miles it has driven over the past year. Related: Fund manager has shocking Elon Musk and Tesla prediction Evan Roth Smith, head of research for the EVIR, spoke to TheStreet about the report's statistics and their potential implications for Tesla and Musk. While he sees damage to the brand's reputation as a likely problem, he states: As Roth Smith sees it, Tesla is likely facing an uphill battle as it bets big on robotaxis. The report's data makes it clear that many consumers don't trust the technology behind them and therefore aren't likely to embrace it, which could severely compromise Tesla's growth prospects. Related: Tesla decision reveals a major demand problem The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Miami Herald
9 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Surplus Teslas Flood Parking Lot in Detroit Suburb
In the Detroit suburb of Farmington Hills, a vacant Bed Bath & Beyond parking lot has quietly transformed into a holding zone for dozens of unsold Tesla vehicles, mostly Cybertrucks. The unusual sight caught local attention when an Instagram video surfaced showing unregistered EVs sprawled across the asphalt. Since then, the number of Teslas has only grown, drawing concern from city officials. While the vehicles aren't abandoned, city leaders say they shouldn't be there. "Storage of vehicles is not a permitted use" of the land, Farmington Hills' director of planning and community development said in a statement. The city has notified the landlord and is pursuing enforcement, though it admits the process takes time. The swelling number of Cybertrucks parked on the lot is indicative of bigger problems at the electric vehicle maker. Tesla's angular, stainless steel pickup was once the most popular electric truck in the country, but sales are slipping fast. In the first quarter of this year, Tesla delivered only 6,400 to 7,100 Cybertrucks - a sharp drop from about 13,000 in the previous quarter. While some seasonal decline is expected after Q4, the plunge was steep enough for Ford's F-150 Lightning to reclaim the title of best-selling electric pickup. Tesla has a long history of using unconventional overflow lots. It has parked surplus vehicles in everything from mall lots to vacant land near its showrooms. That's likely the case here, as the company opened a nearby store just a mile away late last year in a former Barnes & Noble. The store is one of only a few in Michigan, where Tesla previously faced legal barriers to direct-to-consumer sales. A 2016 lawsuit helped overturn that ban. While Tesla's ability to sell directly to consumers in Michigan marks a big shift, the company is now facing a more localized challenge: what to do with a growing fleet of unsold trucks. The suburban sprawl of unclaimed Cybertrucks may be a symptom of waning interest or overproduction, but to Farmington Hills officials, it's a code violation either way. Whether Tesla will find a new place to store its excess inventory or manage to sell off the lot full of Cybertrucks remains to be seen. Tesla's overflow of unsold Cybertrucks into a suburban Detroit parking lot is more than just an eyesore - it's a snapshot of the company's growing pains. As demand shifts and logistics get messier, even the most disruptive automakers have to play by local rules. Farmington Hills may just want its lot back, but the scene also raises bigger questions about how Tesla will manage its supply, demand, and reputation as it enters a more competitive and less forgiving EV market. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.