Edinburgh a hotspot for Americans looking to UK after 'Trump effect'
The effects of global economic uncertainty are being seen on the UK property market as Americans look for investment opportunities, following US President Donald Trump's announcements about tariffs, property website Rightmove has said. A jump in inquiries from US-based house hunters about homes for sale in the UK has been recorded. On April 2, Mr Trump, whose second term in office began in January, imposed a 10 per cent tariff on most countries, along with far higher rates on some, arguing the move would enrich the US and balance trade deficits. Days later, he issued a 90-day pause on tariffs for most countries. Mr Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week announced a "historic" deal to lower tariffs on some imports and give each nation access to the other's markets for agricultural goods. Meanwhile, the number of super-wealthy heading to the UK appears to be declining, as Britain suffered the biggest fall in billionaires on record, according to The Sunday Times Rich List. The number of inquiries stemming from the US about homes for sale in the UK since the start of the year (covering 2025 so far up to the first week of May) is nearly a fifth (19 per cent) higher than the same period last year, Rightmove said. Homes in Edinburgh are most commonly grabbing the attention of US-based buyers this year so far, Rightmove's figures suggest, followed by properties in various London locations. The number of US-based inquiries for the period is the highest Rightmove has recorded since 2017. The data includes people inquiring about relocating to the UK from the US or buying a second home or buy-to-let property in the UK. However, Rightmove said the US-based inquiries it is seeing are mainly related to smaller homes, with two bedrooms or fewer, suggesting Americans are seeing UK properties as a possible opportunity for an investment or holiday home, rather than a permanent relocation. The website also said US house-hunter focus on Scotland marks a departure from the longer-term trend, with London having typically generated the most interest from American buyers over the past 10 years. It suggested lower property prices in Scotland may be attracting potential buyers. As well as Edinburgh, Glasgow is also one of the most common locations for inquiries from the US. Glasgow currently sits above the London boroughs of Islington and Kensington and Chelsea for US house-hunter inquiries. Colleen Babcock, property expert at Rightmove, said: 'President Trump's tariff announcements have led to more economic uncertainty globally and we're starting to see some of the effects of this on the UK property market. 'Whether it's because the UK is seen as a more stable investment opportunity, or whether some buyers are considering a permanent move across the Atlantic, we're seeing an increase in inquiries from the US. While a really interesting trend, it's important to note that only a very small percentage of all UK inquiries come from the US.' Toby Leek, president of Propertymark, said parts of the UK 'come at an affordable price for many overseas buyers', as well as being picturesque. 'Scotland is likely to be particularly popular due to its scenic landscapes and the fact that the average home is around £100,000 [$133,070] less compared to that in England.' Glynn Gibb, regional director at property firm John D Wood & Co, said: 'We've certainly seen a steady rise in inquiries from American buyers in prime central London, particularly over the past 12 months. 'While it's not a dramatic uptick, there's a noticeable trend of high net worth individuals looking to move capital into what they see as a safe and stable market.' The latest publication of The Sunday Times Rich List reveals a third consecutive slump in the number of billionaires living in the UK. The number of billionaires slid to 156 this year from 165 in 2024, representing the sharpest decline in the Rich List's 37-year-history. 'Our billionaire count is down and the combined wealth of those who feature in our research is falling,' said Robert Watts, compiler of the Rich List. 'We are also finding fewer of the world's super-rich are coming to live in the UK.' He said he was also 'struck by the strength of criticism for Rachel Reeves's Treasury' when speaking to wealthy people for the publication. 'We expected the abolition of non-dom status would anger affluent people from overseas," Mr Watts said. 'But home-grown young tech entrepreneurs and those running centuries-old family firms are also warning of serious consequences to a range of tax changes unveiled in last October's budget.' Britain's Labour government last month abolished the non-dom tax status, referring to UK residents whose permanent home or domicile for tax purposes is outside the country. Last year, former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt revealed plans to scrap the tax status before successor Rachel Reeves sped up the process. The annual list of Britain's wealthiest people was once again topped by the Hinduja family, who are worth more than £35 billion. However, Gopi Hinduja and his family, who are behind the Indian conglomerate Hinduja Group, saw their wealth dipping to £35.3 billion from £37.2 billion. The Hindujas were followed on the list by property moguls David and Simon Reuben, who moved up to second after increasing their wealth to £26.9 billion. They were followed by investor Sir Leonard Blavatnik, entrepreneur Sir James Dyson and shipping tycoon Idan Ofer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
31 minutes ago
- Zawya
US stock futures dip on lack of details from China trade talk, CPI in focus
U.S. stock index futures edged lower on Wednesday after U.S.-China trade talks offered little sign of a durable resolution to their longstanding trade tensions, while investors turned their focus to a key inflation reading. The May consumer prices report (CPI) is due at 8:30 a.m. ET, with economists polled by Reuters expecting a 0.2% rise month-over-month and a 2.5% increase on an annual basis, slightly higher compared with April as tariffs potentially raised underlying price pressures. "Markets appear to be shifting their focus - at least temporarily - away from headline-driven tariff risk and back to the macro data that really matters," said Jeff O'Connor, head of market structure at Liquidnet in emailed comments. "Investors are bracing for the first hard evidence of how recent trade policies may be filtering into inflation." Traders are pricing in 44 basis points of rate cuts by year-end, penciling in a 50% chance of a 25 bps cut in September, according to the CMEGroup's FedWatch tool. Policymakers are widely expected to keep rates unchanged next week. U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday at the conclusion of two days of intense negotiations in London. The negotiations, which are pending reviews from President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, were aimed at mitigating tit-for-tat tariffs between the two superpowers that have roiled global markets for much of the year. But the talks did little to lift sentiment among investors, who had priced the deal in to some extent. The U.S. stock market has rallied in recent weeks, recovering from a slump in April sparked by Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs. The S&P 500 remains about 1.7% below all-time highs touched in February, while the Nasdaq is 2.3% below its record peaks reached in December. At 06:01 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 88 points, or 0.21%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 12.5 points, or 0.21%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 44.25 points, or 0.2%. Among stocks, Tesla advanced 1.8% premarket after CEO Elon Musk also said he regrets some of the posts he made last week about Trump, opening the way to a healing of an abrupt rift that has roiled its shares. Software development platform provider GitLab fell 13% after it reported quarterly results. Shares of videogame retailer GameStop fell 4.7% after it reported a decline in first-quarter revenue. (Reporting by Kanchana Chakravarty in Bengaluru)
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
States would struggle to administer food stamp benefits under Republican tax bill
U.S. states will not be able to fully administer food stamp benefits for millions of the nation's poor if a proposal in the Republican tax bill forcing them to shoulder billions of dollars in new costs is signed into law, according to state officials, local government associations and policy experts. More than 41 million people receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the nation's largest food aid program, which cost about $100 billion in 2024. The tax bill passed on May 22 by the U.S. House of Representatives and backed by President Donald Trump would shift some $22 billion in administrative and benefit costs to state and local governments, according to a Reuters analysis. Supporters of the move say it will promote accountability and reduce waste in the program. But states fear it will backfire. "No state is going to be able to simply absorb that," Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, told Reuters. Officials from North Carolina, Oregon and Michigan also said their states did not have the resources to easily take on the spending requirements in the proposal, which is now before the Senate. Some states could be forced to shrink SNAP eligibility or to leave the program altogether, according to letters sent in May to Congressional and agriculture committee leadership from state and county legislatures and health officials. "Shifting the financial burden of SNAP onto states is fiscally unsustainable and risks harming the very individuals and families the program is designed to support," said one letter from the National Conference of State Legislatures. Other letters were sent by the National Association of Counties, National Association of County Human Services Administrators and the American Public Human Services Association. A USDA spokesperson said that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins supports Trump's agenda and that the agency will continue to provide technical assistance to states. Republicans have long supported reduced spending on SNAP, arguing that the program creates a dependence on federal support and should be more narrowly targeted to the most vulnerable. Reuters could not reach a representative from the Republican Governors Association or from Texas, Florida or Georgia, the Republican-led states facing the highest SNAP costs. STATES WOULD STRUGGLE The House bill would require states for the first time to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits beginning in 2028, with their payment share from 5% to 25% tied to the state's error rate, a USDA measure of how accurately states determine eligibility and benefit levels. Nationwide, that would amount to more than $20 billion in spending, according to a Reuters analysis of data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The bill would also require states to immediately pay 75% of the cost of administering the SNAP program, up from their existing 50% obligation, adding another $2 billion to the sum, according to USDA data. The states facing the most new spending would be California ($3.7 billion), New York ($2.1 billion), Florida ($1.7 billion) and Texas ($1.2 billion). The state spending requirements would push 1.3 million people off of SNAP in an average month, because some states would modify eligibility requirements or stop administering SNAP, according to a May 22 letter from the Congressional Budget Office to House and Senate agriculture committee leadership. Michigan does not have the ability to support $850 million in new SNAP spending and may need to restrict eligibility or reduce benefits if the House bill passes, said Elizabeth Hertel, director of the state Department of Health and Human Services. Oregon would struggle to absorb more than $477 million and the state is planning for what they would do if forced to take on the spending, said Claire Seguin, director of the division of the Oregon Department of Human Services that administers SNAP. North Carolina is already budget constrained and "there isn't really a way to backfill" more than $650 million in new SNAP spending, said Department of Health and Human Services secretary Dev Sangvai, who did not provide details on what steps the state would take if the provision passes. New York also cannot absorb its projected costs, Barbara Guinn, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, told Senators during a June 4 forum on the SNAP proposal. Because most states must balance their budgets and cannot accrue debt to offset new spending like the federal government can, shifting SNAP spending to states risks drawing down resources from other public programs like Medicaid, said Eric Mitchell, president of the Alliance to End Hunger. The bill would also expand work requirements for some SNAP recipients and restrict states' ability to waive those requirements when unemployment ticks up, which together would push another 3.2 million people off of SNAP in an average month, according to the CBO. (Reporting by Leah Douglas in Washington; Editing by Alistair Bell)
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Stocks and dollar cautiously welcome latest US-China trade detente
LONDON/SYDNEY - Stock markets and the dollar gave a guarded welcome on Wednesday to the latest signs of progress in trade talks between the United States and China, while waiting for more detail of what was decided and whether it would stick for long. Bond investors were also hunkered down for a reading on U.S. inflation that could show the early impact of tariffs on prices, and a Treasury auction that will test demand for the country's debt. In London, negotiators from Washington and Beijing said they had "agreed a framework on trade" that would be taken back to their leaders. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the implementation plan should result in restrictions on rare earths and magnets being resolved, but again offered no specifics. "Even though details are scant, as long as the two sides are talking, I think markets will be happy," said Carol Kong, a currency strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. "It will still be very hard and it will take a long time for both sides to reach a comprehensive trade agreement," she said. "That sort of comprehensive deal usually takes years to be reached, so I'm sceptical that a framework reached at the meeting in London will be comprehensive." The law was another hurdle as a federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them. Billionaire Elon Musk also said he regrets some of the posts he made last week about Trump, opening the way to a healing of an abrupt rift that has roiled Washington and hurt shares in Musk's Tesla. Investors in U.S. stocks, who have been badly burned by trade turmoil before, remained cautious, with S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures both down 0.2%. Asian and European shares were slightly more positive, with MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan up 0.6% and the STOXX benchmark for major European shares gaining 0.14%. AUCTION ANGST The reaction in currency markets was equally muted, with the dollar strengthening slightly against the Japanese yen to trade at 145.05. The euro edged down 0.1% to $1.1422 , nudging the dollar index up to 99.091. Bond investors also waited for an auction of $39 billion in 10-year notes later in the day, anxious to see if foreign buyers turn up. 10-year Treasury yields were little changed at 4.4898%. Concerns about huge U.S. budget deficits and debt have combined with unease over the White House's erratic trade policies to make investors demand a higher term premium for holding Treasuries. Data on U.S. consumer prices for May might also show some initial upward pressure from tariffs, though analysts assume it will take a few months to fully show in the series. Median forecasts are for the headline consumer price index to rise 0.2% and the core 0.3%, which would nudge the annual rates up to 2.5% and 2.9%, respectively. Anything higher would be a setback to hopes for more rate cuts from the Federal Reserve and could see bonds sell off. Markets imply little chance the Fed will ease at its meeting next week or in July, but have priced around a 60% chance of a move in September. In commodity markets, gold gained 0.6% to $3,345 an ounce . Oil prices edged up towards a seven-week high as markets assessed the outcome of the U.S.-China trade talks. Brent crude futures rose 9 cents to $66.96 a barrel, while U.S. crude was up 18 cents to $65.16. (Reporting by Wayne Cole and Lawrence White; Editing by Christopher Cushing, Kim Coghill and Tomasz Janowski)
