logo
Kenton restaurant must pay $125K in discrimination suit

Kenton restaurant must pay $125K in discrimination suit

Yahoo02-05-2025
May 2—KENTON — Ralphie's Sports Eatery Company will pay $125,000 among other relief to settle a race, disability and retaliation discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, according to a press release from the commission.
A direct supervisor at the Kenton restaurant, 995 N. Detroit St., used racial slurs and other derogatory terms to a former server with a disability.
According to the release, after the restaurant learned of the server's disability, the employee was denied a promotion, suspended and fired.
The server filed a discrimination charge with the EEOC, which later led to Bennett Enterprises refusing to hire the server at a different Ralphie's location due to an active EEOC claim, violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
"Employers cannot violate multiple anti-discrimination statutes and then retaliate against employees for enforcing their rights under those laws," said Philadelphia District Office Regional Attorney Debra Lawrence in a press release.
Bennett Enterprises is required to pay $125,000 and provide regular reporting and live training for management, human resources and non-supervisory employees to ensure compliance with Title VII and the ADA as part of a two-year consent decree, according to the release.
"The EEOC is committed to preventing and remedying race and disability harassment, discrimination and retaliation," Lawrence said.
Reach Cade Higgins at 567-242-0351
Featured Local Savings
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Your Face Could Cost You The Job: The Dangerous Rise Of Facial Recognition At Work
Your Face Could Cost You The Job: The Dangerous Rise Of Facial Recognition At Work

Forbes

time16 hours ago

  • Forbes

Your Face Could Cost You The Job: The Dangerous Rise Of Facial Recognition At Work

The Covid-19 pandemic ushered in a new era of remote work. Many employers desperate to track and monitor employees working away from the office implemented different technology tools to surveille employees. According to one 2025 report, more than half of fortune 100 employees were required to return back to the office fulltime. With many back-to-office mandates in place, remnants of surveillance culture have remained. Many companies are using facial recognition software to manage employees. A recent survey by ExpressVPN indicated that 74% of U.S. employers are using online monitoring and surveillance tools with 67% using biometric tracking like facial recognition and fingerprint scans. Employers use facial recognition software in a number of different ways: to track employee attendance, to identify employees, to interview and screen job candidates, to reduce the number of employee touchpoints, and to track employees (this is common for delivery and gig workers). What are the vulnerabilities and limitations of using facial recognition software in the workplace and how does it reinforce biases? There have been several different cases where facial recognition software has caused harm, reinforcing biases in the workplace. In 2025, a complaint was filed with the Colorado Civil Rights Division and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against the software company Intuit and the human resources assessment software vendor HireVue. The complaint alleges that the AI used by HireVue resulted in an Indigenous and Deaf woman being denied a promotion based on her race and disability. In a separate case, a makeup artist at a leading brand claimed to have been fired in 2020 because of a video interview through HireVue, where the facial recognition software marked her poorly for her body language during the interview. In 2024, an Uber Eats driver won a case where he alleged that that company fired him because of racist facial recognition software. The former employee claimed that he was fired after the company's verification checks, which use facial recognition software, failed to recognize his face. Scholar and writer Dr. Joy Buolamwini has focused much of her research on the flaws with facial recognition technology discussing in her book Unmasking AI as well as the documentary Coded Bias how the technology is less accurate at identifying darker skin tones. There is a wealth of evidence that indicates that facial recognition technology disproportionately impacts marginalized communities. This technology frequently misidentifies Black people leading to wrongful arrests. One 2025 study indicated that facial recognition tools had higher error rates for adults with Down syndrome. Researchers also note that facial recognition tools are less accurate for transgender individuals and these tools struggle to identify non-binary folks. Integrating facial recognition tools into the workplace can have deleterious effects on employees. A 2023 assessment of feedback shared with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy indicated that digital surveillance in the workplace creates a sense of distrust among employees, making them feel constantly monitored and leading to a decline in productivity and morale. Workers also noted that digital surveillance could limit unionizing, deterring this type of behavior in the workplace. There were also employee concerns about data privacy and how the data collected would be used. Employers should think twice about implementing facial recognition software in the workplace. Not only is the type of technology prone to bias, but it can also erode employee trust and morale. If organizations have this type of technology in place already, they should request more information from the vendor about audits and what accountability measures are in place to ensure accuracy and mitigate bias. Employees should know their rights and there must be transparency around how data is collected, stored, and used. We must deeply consider the future we are creating when our face holds the key to whether we praised or punished.

NYC district attorneys will get $17M in new funding to beef up staffing, investigations: Adams
NYC district attorneys will get $17M in new funding to beef up staffing, investigations: Adams

New York Post

time18 hours ago

  • New York Post

NYC district attorneys will get $17M in new funding to beef up staffing, investigations: Adams

City district attorneys' offices are getting a $17 million influx of cash to beef up staffing and investigations, including on cybercrime, Mayor Eric Adams said Wednesday. Adams highlighted the record-breaking $633 million total in funding for the five DAs and the office of the special narcotics prosecutor earmarked as part of the city's roughly $116 billion budget for the 2026 fiscal year, which was approved in June. 'I heard from all my DAs that we're having a real personnel issue,' Adams said from the City Hall rotunda alongside four of the district attorneys. Advertisement 'AI can never give way to a good ADA,' he quipped. The boost adds to the $616 million previously allocated for the DAs and special narcotics prosecutor. The district attorneys had said they desperately needed extra money in the already record-breaking fiscal plan — which Adams has dubbed the 'Best Budget Ever' — to hire and retain more prosecutors. Advertisement 3 Funding for district attorneys has increased 23% since the beginning of the Adams administration, according to city hall. REUTERS 'They are the real law and order,' Adams said. 'They are front and center in dealing with public safety, and we are going to make sure we give them the resources to do their job.' Bronx DA Darcel Clark said the new funding, of which her office is getting $6.08 million, will allow her overworked office to hire 24 new assistant district attorneys and to fully staff a Youth Justice Bureau to help address gun violence and recidivism among young people. 'These funds are a game changer for the criminal justice system,' Clark said. Advertisement 3 Bronx DA Darcel Clark said the money will be used to hire more prosecutors and to fully staff a youth diversion program. James Messerschmidt Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, whose office is getting a $2.98 million boost, said the windfall will be a 'critical piece' of keeping assistant district attorneys on the job, 'in particular the mid-level prosecutors, those that are really carrying a very important part of our docket.' 'We have attrition in that area, so this will really help us with those ranks,' Bragg said. Queens DA Melinda Katz was 'happy and grateful' for the extra $1.75 million her office was allocated to build a new crime lab to process digital evidence, she said. Advertisement Staten Island DA Michael McMahon said his office was given $970,000 to hire more staff to deal with rising cyber crime. 'Just two days ago, a 76 year old woman scammed out of $209,000 — her lifetime savings — and it was through a cyber scam,' McMahon noted. 'This will allow all kinds of technological abilities to go after those who are taking advantage of too many.' 3 Staten Island DA Michael McMahon said his office will use the money on new technology to help prosecute cyber criminals. Michael McWeeney Brooklyn DA Eric Gonzalez couldn't make the news conference because of a planned vacation, Adams said, but his office is getting an extra $5.6 million to hire 20 new ADAs and six paralegals to reduce case backlogs and help meet discovery evidence requirements. 'A strong city is a safe city and that is why our city is strong right now. Because we focus on it being safe,' Adams said as he held up The Post's Tuesday front page about shootings in New York City hitting at an all-time low so far this year. The Adams administration allocated the largest share of the $633 million — $180 million — to the Manhattan DA's office. Brooklyn received $157.9 million; the Bronx received $128.3 million; Queens received $108.1 million; Staten Island received $27 million; and the Special Narcotics Prosecutor's office received $31.7 million. Adams held the press conference the day before revamped state discovery laws take effect. Advertisement The new laws, which are designed to make discovery requirements less burdensome by reducing the scope of materials prosecutors have to provide, also came with more money from the state, McMahon said. 'We also received additional funding for discovery from the state, and working that with the money from the mayor today, that will allow our offices to have the tools and the resources and the personnel to get that voluminous (discovery) material,' McMahon said.

Cardano's Midnight Begins NIGHT Airdrop Across Eight Chains in Privacy-Powered Rollout
Cardano's Midnight Begins NIGHT Airdrop Across Eight Chains in Privacy-Powered Rollout

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Cardano's Midnight Begins NIGHT Airdrop Across Eight Chains in Privacy-Powered Rollout

Midnight Network, a privacy-focused sidechain in the Cardano ecosystem, has initiated its first token distribution phase for NIGHT, targeting users across eight major blockchains to reframe cross-chain value allocation. Dubbed the 'Glacier Drop,' the airdrop is live as of Wednesday and available to wallets that held at least $100 in native tokens on Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Cardano, Avalanche, XRP Ledger, or Brave as of a June 11 snapshot. Cardano holders are receiving the bulk of the NIGHT airdrop, with 50% of total supply allocated to ADA wallets. Bitcoin (BTC) holders follow with 20%, while the remaining 30% is distributed proportionally among ether (ETH), XRP (XRP), Solana's SOL (SOL), BNB (BNB), AVAX (AVAX), and BAT (BAT) holders based on USD value at the snapshot. Unlike typical airdrops, NIGHT tokens won't be tradable immediately. Instead, after Midnight mainnet goes live, tokens will unlock over four randomized events within a 360-day window, aiming to prevent speculative dumping and enforce staggered engagement. The drop is structured in three phases: Claim Phase – current 60-day window Scavenger Mine – a 30-day post-claim period rewarding on-chain engagement for unclaimed NIGHT Lost-and-Found – a four-year window for late claims after launch Midnight positions itself as a zero-knowledge smart contract network with selective disclosure, blending privacy and transparency in regulated use cases. The NIGHT rollout marks a rare coordinated, non-EVM-native airdrop targeting multiple Layer 1 ecosystems, and could shape future distribution mechanics for privacy-focused chains. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store