Delhi HC bins plea against demolition of tenements of Hindu refugees from Pakistan
Justice Dharmesh Sharma on Friday rejected the plea filed by a man named Ravi Ranjan Singh, seeking orders to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to allot the refugees a different spot in the city as per the provisions in the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015, before demolishing their tenements.
Mr. Singh argued that the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) was framed with the idea of providing Indian citizenship to non-Muslim refugees from the neighbouring countries, to help them escape religious persecution.
'Must be a citizen'
However, the court said that it 'has no hesitation in holding that the petitioner is not entitled to the reliefs sought by way of the present petition' because to be eligible to avail of the provisions of the Delhi government policy, the person seeking relief 'must first and foremost be a citizen of India'.
'On account of their nationality, the Pakistani refugees cannot be rehabilitated under the DUSIB policy,' it added.
The court asked the petitioner, as well as the other refugees, to first acquire Indian citizenship, adding that it could 'be done online with ease' and asked the Delhi State Legal Service Authority to help the refugees to comply with the necessary legal formalities.
Remarks against Centre
The court added that 'even Indian citizens cannot claim alternate allotment as an absolute right, particularly in cases where the land they occupy falls under specially prohibited areas like Zone 'O' of Delhi, i.e., the Yamuna floodplains'.
Justice Sharma also made observations regarding the court's attempts to engage with the concerned authorities to facilitate the rehabilitation and relocation of the refugees, saying all its 'efforts have been unfruitful, seemingly due to the classic case of bureaucratic buck-passing, particularly on the part of the Union of India'.
The judge added, 'Nevertheless, this court cannot undertake the exercise of framing a policy to ameliorate the plight of the refugees.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
8 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Untenable": Centre As Nepal Objects To India-China Trade Through Lipulekh
New Delhi: India on Wednesday rejected Nepal's opposition to the resumption of border trade with China through the Lipulekh Pass, calling Kathmandu's territorial claims "unjustified, untenable, and not supported by historical facts." The statement came after Nepal's Ministry of Foreign Affairs objected to the reopening of India-China trade through the Himalayan pass, a route that cuts through the Kalapani-Lipulekh-Limpiyadhura region. Kathmandu maintains the territory lies within Nepal, citing its map and historical treaties. Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India's position was "consistent and clear." "We have noted the comments of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nepal related to resumption of border trade between India and China through the Lipulekh Pass. Our position in this regard has been consistent and clear. Border trade between India and China through Lipulekh pass had commenced in 1954 and has been going on for decades. This trade had been disrupted in recent years due to Covid and other developments, and both sides have now agreed to resume it," he said in a statement. Mr Jaiswal called it a "unilateral act" and termed as "untenable" the "artificial enlargement" of the territorial claims by Nepal. India maintains Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura belongs to it. Addressing Nepal's objections, Mr Jaiswal said, "As regards territorial claims, our position remains that such claims are neither justified nor based on historical facts and evidence. Any unilateral artificial enlargement of territorial claims is untenable. India remains open to constructive interaction with Nepal on resolving agreed outstanding boundary issues through dialogue and diplomacy." Nepal shares a border of over 1,850 km with five Indian states - Sikkim, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. On Wednesday Nepal said that the territory is its inseparable part and also incorporated in its official map. "The Nepal government is clear that Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani, situated East of Mahakali river, are inseparable parts of Nepal. These are also officially incorporated in the Nepalese map, included in the Constitution as well," the Nepal foreign ministry said. A joint document released on Tuesday after wide-ranging talks in New Delhi between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, said both sides agreed to re-open border trade through the three designated trading points, namely Lipulekh Pass, Shipki La Pass and Nathu La Pass. The Nepal foreign ministry statement comes in response to questions raised by Nepalese media regarding the announcement by India and China to resume border trade through Lipulekh. "It is a well-known fact that the Nepal government has been requesting the government of India not to construct or expand roads and indulge in any kind of activity such as border trade in the territory," read the statement issued by spokesperson of the foreign ministry, Lok Bahadur Chhetri. "It is also well known that the Nepal government has already informed the government of China that the area lies in Nepalese territory," it added. "The Nepal government is committed to resolving the border issue between the two countries through diplomatic channels on the basis of historical treaty - agreement, facts, map and other evidence complying with the spirit of cordial and friendly relations existing between Nepal and India," read the statement. On June 18, 2020, Nepal completed the process to update the country's political map by incorporating three strategically important areas Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura areas by amending its Constitution.
India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
India and China are developing a special mechanism to tackle...,Trump should be worried because...
India china relations India-China relations: In a significant development between India and China, the two neigbours have agreed that like the Western Sector, a General Level Mechanism will also be set up in the Eastern and Central Sectors to address boundary issues. As a part of the mechanism, a meeting under will also be held soon in the Western Sector to discuss the border dispute. The update is seen as a step meant to strengthen dialogue between the two armies along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). What have India and China agreed for? In a news update that US's Donald Trump should see as a bad news, India and China have agreed for the set up of the General Level Mechanism which refers to Corps Commander level talks between the Indian and Chinese armies. How did India-China relations worsen? Notably, this format began after April 2020, when tensions escalated in Eastern Ladakh. Since the region comes under the 14th Corps of the Indian Army, its Commander represents India in these talks. What China said on boundary dispute with India? 'Regarding the boundary question, the two sides reached new consensus on conducting regular management and control, maintaining peace and tranquility in border areas, appropriately handling sensitive points, and initiating boundary negotiations in areas where conditions are met, Wang said on the boundary dispute with India. Story highlights: India and China have agreed for General Level Mechanism in the Eastern and Central Sectors. The two countries are planning to solve their border disputes. India-China tensions escalated in Eastern Ladakh in 2020. Recently, Chinese Foreign minister visited India. What PM Modi said on India-China relations? 'Glad to meet Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Since my meeting with President Xi in Kazan last year, India-China relations have made steady progress guided by respect for each other's interests and sensitivities. I look forward to our next meeting in Tianjin on the sidelines of the SCO Summit. Stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity,' PM Modi stated in a post on X.
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
ED arrests banned Maoist outfit's supremo Dinesh Gope in money laundering case
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) arrested Dinesh Gope, a self-styled supremo of a banned Maoist outfit, People's Liberation Front of India (PLFI), in connection with an ongoing money laundering investigation. The ED, in its official press note, said the arrest was made at the Palamu Central Jail, Jharkhand, under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. Following his arrest, Gope was produced via video conferencing before the Special Court (PMLA), Ranchi, which remanded him in judicial custody for 14 days. According to the federal agency, the ED initiated an investigation on the basis of several FIRs and chargesheets filed by the Jharkhand Police and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against Gope and other members of the PLFI. The ED further stated that the predicate offences include serious crimes such as murder, attempt to murder, extortion, and criminal activities, registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Forcible levy collection The ED investigation revealed that Gope, in his capacity as the head of PLFI, was running an extensive and organised extortion racket. 'He was instrumental in the forcible collection of illegal 'levy' from various contractors, businessmen, coal traders, and transporters operating in Jharkhand and adjoining States, generating proceeds of crime (POC) estimated to be approximately ₹20 crore,' the ED stated. It said the extorted money was then systematically laundered through a complex network of shell companies and firms. As per the ED, these entities were established in the names of his two wives and close associates with the specific intent to conceal the illicit origin of the funds and project them as untainted. 'Bought arms' The investigation has further revealed that the laundered funds were utilised to finance the operational activities of the PLFI, procure sophisticated arms and ammunition, and acquire numerous movable and immovable properties. Further investigation is in progress to trace the complete trail of the proceeds of crime and to identify other individuals and assets involved in the money laundering network.
