Israel-Iran ceasefire: A fragile pause
Notwithstanding its fragility, the ceasefire between Israel and Iran is a promising development. When the US bombed Iran's nuclear facilities on June 22, a big concern was the absence of an off-ramp — a face-saver for Iran, after which de-escalation could become a serious possibility. Yet, US President Donald Trump's declaration of a ceasefire came just hours after Iran announced a missile attack on a US base in Qatar. Remarkably, the US President thanked Iran on social media for giving advance notice — a move he claimed helped avoid the loss of any Qatari or American lives. While tensions between Washington and Tehran appear to be easing, the actual signatories of the Trump-brokered deal have continued to exchange fire. Each belligerent, however, may now have a victory story to sell to its domestic audience: The US has said it has 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear programme, Israel can say it has weakened a major regional adversary, and Iran can say it pushed back against stronger countries.
Even though both Iran and Israel have confirmed it, the future of the ceasefire remains uncertain. Both Tel Aviv and Tehran would do well to consider the high costs of failing to contain the conflict. Iran, in particular, has suffered extensive losses — its air force and air defences have been severely damaged, oil depots burned, and key military leadership eliminated. Though Tehran refrained from closing the Strait of Hormuz, the global economy remains hostage to the stability of the region. With Gaza still under siege, a failure to de-escalate risks the conflict spilling into neighbouring countries like Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq, potentially fuelling a rise in militancy and extremism. A surge in displacement and refugee flows would deepen instability in a world strained by wars in Africa and Eastern Europe.
The case for peace could hardly be stronger. In the long term, Iran should prioritise transparency and diplomacy over clandestine activities with respect to its nuclear programme. In light of how easily its air defences were overwhelmed, the worst scenario is that Iran — like North Korea — may now conclude that the best way to protect itself is a nuclear deterrent. Israel, on its part, should resort to diplomacy, and not military adventurism, to have its security concerns addressed in any lasting way.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
NATO leaders meet for what could be a historic summit or a divided one
The two-day summit has been overshadowed by Trump's decision to order the bombing of nuclear installations in Iran. In 2003, the U.S.-led war on Iraq deeply divided NATO, as France and Germany led opposition to the attack, while Britain and Spain joined the coalition. A short summit, decades of mutual security The summit in The Hague involved an informal dinner Tuesday and one working session Wednesday morning. A very short summit statement has been drafted to ensure the meeting is not derailed by fights over details and wording. Indeed, much about this NATO summit is brief, even though ripples could be felt for years. Founded in 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed by 12 nations to counter the threat to security in Europe posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, notably via a strong U.S. presence on the continent. Dealing with Moscow is in its DNA. Keeping the peace outside the Euro-Atlantic area is not. NATO's ranks have grown to 32 countries since the Washington Treaty was signed 75 years ago. Sweden joined last year, worried by an increasingly aggressive Russia. NATO's collective security guarantee — Article 5 of the treaty — underpins its credibility. It's a political commitment by all countries to come to the aid of any member whose sovereignty or territory might be under attack. Trump has suggested he is committed to that pledge, but he has also sowed doubt about his intentions. He has said the U.S. intends to remain a member of the alliance. Asked again on Tuesday whether he would abide by NATO's security guarantee, Trump said: 'There's numerous definitions of Article 5, you know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friends.' He added only that he is 'committed to life and safety.' A civilian runs NATO, but the U.S. and its military hold power The United States is NATO's most powerful member. It spends much more on defense than any other ally and far outweighs its partners in terms of military muscle. Washington has traditionally driven the agenda but has stepped back under Trump. The U.S. nuclear arsenal provides strategic deterrence against would-be adversaries. NATO's day-to-day work is led by Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister. As its top civilian official, he chairs almost weekly meetings of ambassadors in the North Atlantic Council at its Brussels headquarters. He chairs other 'NACs' at ministerial and leader levels. Rutte runs NATO headquarters, trying to foster consensus and to speak on behalf of all members. NATO's military headquarters is based nearby in Mons, Belgium. It is always run by a top U.S. officer. Ukraine's role at the summit is unclear With Trump demanding greater defense spending, Ukraine's role has been downgraded, compared to previous summits. Zelenskyy attended a royal dinner that Trump also attended Tuesday. He will not have a seat at NATO's table for its one working session. But nor will any other non-NATO leader. More broadly, NATO itself is not arming Ukraine. As an organization, it possesses no weapons of any kind. Collectively, it provides only nonlethal support — fuel, combat rations, medical supplies, body armor, and equipment to counter drones or mines.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
China 1 strategy gains momentum in pharma, but full monetisation still 2-3 years away: Goldman Sachs
New Delhi [India], : Indian pharmaceutical and biotech sectors have started witnessing tangible benefits from the global shift away from China, as early signs of the China 1 strategy materialising emerge, according to a recent Goldman Sachs report. Some pharmaceutical and biotech companies report that they have started witnessing the conversion of earlier enquiries and Requests for Quotations into pilot projects and small contracts. The 'China Plus One' strategy is a business technique in which corporations diversify their manufacturing and supply chains by expanding into countries other than China while still keeping a presence in China. The report was prepared based on the outcome of the '2nd annual India CRO/CDMO trip' event in Bengaluru and Hyderabad. The credit rating firm, in its equity report, added that Indian companies witnessed a major uptick in RFQs from global clients looking to diversify supply chains away from China. While these developments indicate progress, the report also noted that large-scale financial gains from these shifts will take time, possibly a three- to five-years. "After seeing a significant influx of enquiries/ RFQs over the past 1-1.5 years, management of some companies like Syngene, Neuland, Divi's, etc. have now started highlighting instances of conversion of RFQs to pilot projects/contracts, although large financial benefits will still take time to materialise," the report added. The report further added, "We expect the geographic supply chain diversification theme to play out over a 3-5 year period, if not more." The report also speaks about BIOSECURE Act of the United States, an evolving policy which directs to reduce American dependence on Chinese biotech suppliers. "While investor discussion around the BIOSECURE Act is relatively light as there have been limited updates on this topic, most corporates acknowledged that their clients are actively building strategies to reduce their dependence on China," Goldman Sachs added in the report. Interestingly, the report observes that this trend is being led by large pharmaceutical and biotech companies, which are more willing and able to bear the switching costs involved. Contrary to the big players, smaller companies, in the US and Europe, are still hesitant due to funding constraints and the capital-intensive nature of moving suppliers. While there is little immediate investor focus on the act due to limited updates, corporates across the sector confirmed that their clients are proactively preparing for a post-China sourcing strategy.
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
China's premier warns global trade tensions 'intensifying'
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tianjin: Chinese Premier Li Qiang warned on Wednesday that global trade tensions were "intensifying" as he addressed the opening ceremony of the World Economic Forum Officials including Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong are among those attending this week's gathering in the northern port city of Tianjin, known colloquially as the "Summer Davos".Li said the global economy was "undergoing profound changes" -- a thinly veiled reference to swingeing tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump."Protectionist measures are significantly increasing and global economic and trade frictions are intensifying," Li added."The global economy is deeply integrated and no country can grow or prosper alone," Li said."In times when the global economy faces difficulties, what we need is not the law of the jungle where the weak fall prey to the strong, but cooperation and mutual success for a win-win outcome," Li number two official also painted a bullish picture of the Chinese economy, the world's second-largest, which has been beset by slowing growth and a lull in consumer spending. China 's economy continues to grow steadily, providing strong support for the accelerated recovery of the global economy," he he added, was "stepping up our efforts to implement the strategy of expanding domestic demand".This was "promoting China's growth into a major consumption powerhouse based on the solid foundation of a major manufacturing powerhouse".Beijing is eyeing growth this year of around five percent -- a target viewed as ambitious by many have since late last year rolled out a series of steps intended to boost spending, including key interest rate cuts and steps to encourage results have been varied, just as added pressure on trade from US tariffs threatens to hit the country's vast manufacturing sector."We expect the (Chinese) economy to continue to slow over the coming months," wrote Leah Fahy , China Economist at Capital Economics, in a note on speech at the WEF gathering sought to portray China as a staunch defender of a rules-based international trading system that is now under attack by the Trump comments echoed remarks Tuesday by President Xi Jinping to Singapore's Wong during a meeting in Beijing in which he called for the countries to resist a "return to hegemony" and President and CEO Borge Brende told AFP Tuesday it was "too early to say" what impact Trump's tariff blitz will have on the world economy."The traditional globalisation we saw is now changed into a different system," he said, warning of a possible "decade of lower growth".
