This is how we do it: ‘We broke up and started having the most amazing sex'
About four years into our relationship, Hester and I got to a point where we weren't being open with each other. She had reservations about the relationship and our future together, and I could sense her uncertainty, which had a knock-on effect on me. She was distant and I felt insecure. We would lie in bed, not having sex, and I'd roll over feeling unwanted.
We decided to break up, but this decision actually freed us. While we were apart, we'd have sex when we met up about once a month, but we also slept with other people. Hester saw me having sexual autonomy as attractive. I found my mojo and brought that back into our relationship. I wasn't jealous because I knew I had the power, so Hester sleeping with others didn't feel threatening. I felt secure in her desire in a way that I hadn't previously.
Two years ago, we got back together. We don't live together, and our sex life is quite erratic. Before, I saw sex as a barometer of how good our relationship was, but Hester wanting to be with me after time apart means I feel more secure.
I learned from my parents to offer comfort with physical affection – a pat on the back, rather than discussing emotions. But Hester has taught me to be still and just listen. I try to spend more time in difficult, uncomfortable places. I now feel closest to Hester after an argument.
We both expressed uncertainty about whether getting back together was the right thing, about whether we'll stay together for ever, which was freeing and took the pressure off. When I wasn't articulating those thoughts, I felt trapped. I was worried I might lose some of the power and feel unwanted again, but I'm now able to communicate those doubts.
I was a late bloomer; I didn't have much sex as a teenager, and part of me feels as if I haven't got it out of my system. We talk about opening up our relationship, which is a turn-on and often leads to us having sex. The more we talk about it, the stronger and more secure our relationship feels.
If you're keen to talk to us about your sex lives you can get in touch by filling in the form below. It is very important that both sexual partners are happy to participate.
Fred sleeping with other people sparked something in me. It made me desire him more
A few months into our break, Fred told me he was seeing someone else, which I found hot until he said he was into her. I felt possessive, like Fred was mine, and sobbed into his lap in a restaurant while the table next to us celebrated a birthday. He said we had to stop having sex when we saw each other, but we still went home together that night. There was a primitive sense of triumph, and the sex was amazing, probably because there was a feeling that we shouldn't be doing it.
Fred sleeping with other people sparked something in me. Him having sexual agency and being desired made me desire him more. Jealousy drives me, and I don't necessarily like that about myself. I feel as if I'm fulfilling negative stereotypes of the jealous woman. The risk is exciting, but I feel secure knowing he'd choose me.
The break was great for us because it gave us both the space to be on our own and start again. We're more honest with each other now and have frank discussions, like about opening up our relationship. Before the break, instead of talking about his feelings, Fred just tried to have sex. But I have fluctuating hormones, and sometimes I'm just not in the mood; it has nothing to do with how close I feel to Fred.
Now Fred's in a really good place. I'm enjoying watching him flourish and am proud of his bravery for quitting a comfortable job to pursue something more risky. His willingness to embark on something different makes me feel more attracted to him.
I'm at the age where friends are settling down, getting married and having children. It can feel prescribed and pressurising, especially when Fred and I don't even live together yet. I can overthink things, but talking openly about our fears has brought us closer. Whatever happens, we want to set our own parameters.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Children in Wales using screens for more than seven hours a day
One in five children spend at least seven hours a day using phones and tablets, initial findings of a survey have found. Two children aged 10 and 11 said they spent at least nine hours a day using screens during the weekend, according to the survey by the children's commissioner for Wales. Thirteen-year-old Kiishi is part of a digital guardians project to help protect children online and said some technologies were "almost controlling".New rules under the Online Safety Act, including age verification on certain sites and apps, will be enforced from Friday. The survey asked children and young people aged between seven and 18 in Wales about their use of devices such as phones, tablets and computers. More than half of the 340 respondents to date said they had rules at home to limit screen time and what apps they use, amid concerns time spent online will increase during the school holidays. A third of respondents said they had to leave their device downstairs at bedtime, and 47% said they were only allowed on certain three quarters who said they used TikTok admitted to switching off its one-hour limit function for under children's commisioner for Wales, Rocio Cifuentes, said: "The [Online Safety] Act must deliver on its promise of protecting children and improving their online experiences. And in such a quickly developing space, this means keeping pace with new challenges and responding to them effectively."Mechanisms protecting children from too much time on screens must be stronger." The UK government is reportedly looking at how it might be able to limit how much time children spend on social 15, from Llantwit Major, Vale of Glamorgan, is part of a digital guardians project run by Platfform, a mental health charity and the NSPCC, to give young people a voice in the debate around online safety."I think there needs to be more restrictions," he said. "Not in the way of restricting time because most young people believe adults that restrict time are restricting their fun and enjoyment."Kiishi, 13, from Swansea, said she wanted to share her experiences of being online as a young person to help improve protections for other said: "Technologies are advancing and becoming more complex and almost controlling. Some people could be brainwashed into thinking some things that are not real."Ada, 12, from Cardiff said: "I wanted to become a digital guardian so I can help keep children like me, older or younger, safe given the rise of things like AI to steel data, to spread misinformation because it's so common these days to take information from things like AI that may be inaccurate which may be dangerous to our physical and mental health."While the internet can be bad, there are also lot of positives that help you grow and understand things. "It can be educational but there needs to be more restrictions on the negatives like on social media and disinformation." The UK's communications regulator, Ofcom, will enforce new rules which will require social media platforms to check a user's age and change their algorithms affecting what is shown in order to filter certain types of the Online Safety Act, firms are also required to remove illegal content and new laws have been introduced around sending unsolicited sexual imagery Sowemimo, NSPCC associate head of public affairs for child safety online, said: "Young people bring unique perspectives that help us understand the true impact of online harm, enabling us to identify the support needed to keep them safe."That's why it is crucial that children's voices are included in conversations about child safety online."But the onus for protecting children from the harm they face online, including on social media platforms, should not be put on young people themselves, but rather tech companies need to design and put in place safety features on their sites to tackle the risks."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
NTSB: Heavy plane, drag from antlers contributed to crash that killed ex-Rep Mary Peltola's husband
A small plane that crashed in 2023 while carrying moose meat for hunters in remote western Alaska, killing the husband of former U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, was overweight for takeoff and encountered drag from a set of antlers mounted outside, federal investigators said in a report released Tuesday. The National Transportation Safety Board, in its final report on the crash that killed Eugene Peltola Jr., who was the only person on board the aircraft, listed several factors among its probable cause findings. They included decisions by Peltola to fly the plane above its maximum takeoff weight and affix a set of moose antlers on the right wing strut that caused a drag, along with turbulent flight conditions in the area. Downdrafts, 'along with the overweight airplane and the added drag and lateral weight imbalance caused by the antlers on the right wing, would likely have resulted in the airplane having insufficient power and/or control authority to maneuver above terrain,' the report states. The Piper PA-18-150 Super Cub crashed Sept. 12, 2023, northeast of the small western Alaska community of St. Mary's. Peltola had days earlier taken five hunters, a guide and equipment from the community of Holy Cross to an airstrip at St. Mary's. The group set up camp next to the runway, which was near hilly terrain and about 70 miles (113 kilometers) northwest of Holy Cross, the agency said. The day before the crash, the group got a moose and made plans with Peltola, via satellite messaging devices, for him to transport the meat, the NTSB said. On the day of the crash, Peltola had already picked up a load of meat and had returned for another. He did not use scales to weigh the cargo, the agency said. Two hunters were at the site when the crash occurred and provided aid to Peltola, the agency previously reported. Peltola died of his injuries within about two hours, the agency said. 'Given the remote location of the accident site, which was about 400 miles from a hospital, and accessible only by air, providing the pilot with prompt medical treatment following the accident was not possible,' Tuesday's report states. The agency said carrying antlers on the outside of a plane is a common practice in Alaska but requires formal approval from the Federal Aviation Administration, with a notation in the plane's logbooks. 'There was no evidence that such approval had been granted for the accident airplane,' the report states. Peltola was a former Alaska regional director for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and worked for decades for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He had received his commercial pilot's license in 2004, requiring him to use corrective lenses at all distances, according to an FAA database. His death came almost exactly a year after Mary Peltola was sworn in as Alaska's lone U.S. House member, following a special election for the seat. Mary Peltola, who is Yup'ik, was the first Alaska Native in Congress. She won a full, two-year term in November 2022 but lost her reelection bid last November. She has kept a relatively low public profile since then.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Wales' papers: Tributes to 'Mr Wrexham' and hope for missing man
Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
