Day after Asim Munir, Pakistan PM rakes up Indus Waters Treaty abeyance with 'red line' threat
Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Friday said that Pakistan would not allow India 'to cross the red line' by holding the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance, PTI news agency reported, citing local media.
Speaking at a three-day International Conference on Glaciers' Preservation in Tajikistan's capital Dushanbe, Shehbaz Sharif said that India's move is deeply regrettable.
'India's unilateral and illegal decision to hold in abeyance the Indus Waters Treaty, which governs the sharing of the Indus Basin's water, is deeply regrettable,' Pakistani news portal Dawn quoted Sharif as saying.
'Millions of lives must not be held hostage to narrow political gains, and Pakistan will not allow this. We will never allow the red line to be crossed,' the prime minister said.
Also Read | 'India can no longer act on goodwill alone': Shashi Tharoor on Indus Waters Treaty suspension
His remarks came a day after Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir issued a similar warning to India, saying that 'water is Pakistan's red line' and that Islamabad would not allow any compromise.
India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty in April, following the Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 people were killed. New Delhi has maintained that the treaty will remain in abeyance until Pakistan stops sponsoring terrorism.
Brokered by the World Bank, the 1960 treaty defines a mechanism for water sharing and information exchange between the two nuclear-armed neighbour nations for the use of the Indus River water and its five tributaries Sutlej, Beas, Ravi, Jhelum, and Chenab.
Also Read | Indus Waters Treaty 'badly negotiated', says PM Modi in Gujarat; suspension making Pak 'feel the heat'
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has asserted that Pakistan will not get water from India's rivers and that "playing with the blood of Indians" will cost Islamabad.
"Pakistan will not get a single drop of water that belongs to India. Playing with the blood of Indians will cost Pakistan dearly. This is India's resolve, and no one in the world can deter us from this commitment," Modi has said.
India has also accused Pakistan of spreading disinformation over the Indus Water Treaty and reiterated its commitment to responsible water management even amid persistent cross-border terrorism.
Also Read | Pak has violated spirit of Indus Water Treaty by inflicting three wars, thousands of terror attacks: India tells UN
'Pakistan has violated the spirit of the treaty by inflicting three wars and thousands of terror attacks on India. In the last four decades, more than 20,000 Indian lives have been lost in terror attacks, the most recent of which was a dastardly targeted terror attack on tourists in Pahalgam last month. India has shown extraordinary patience and magnanimity throughout this period,' India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Parvathaneni Harish said last week.
(Inputs from PTI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Govt Favours Wealth Creation; Profit Not a Bad Word, says FM
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman Saturday said the Modi government promotes wealth creation and encourages entrepreneurs to earn profits through ethical practices without inhibitions. This is in stark contrast to the stance adopted by the votaries of socialism or communism, who looked down upon wealth creation in earlier decades, she said, indicating that resources can be distributed only when they are was addressing the National Commemorative Seminar on 60 Years of Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya's Integral Humanism Lectures.'Profit was a bad word (for socialists and communists), whereas that's not what we believe in. We would like to have profit created by genuine ethical practices, and that is what is going to create wealth for the nation,' she creation has never been considered a taboo in the long Indian tradition, the finance minister said, emphasising that 'wealth creators are not thieves'.Sitharaman said every government policy under former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee and PM Modi has been very reflective of this 'integral humanism'.Upadhyaya, leader of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the forerunner of the Bharatiya Janata Party, was a proponent of the philosophy of integral humanism.'Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya wanted that while planning, we must keep in mind the person at the very bottom of the system so that he can be uplifted keeping his dignity intact,' she also cited Upadhyaya's insistence on focusing on seven 'M's while making policies for employment generation with a view to building 'Bharatiya technology'— man, money, material, management, motive, market and finance minister also sought to distinguish between the economic model followed by former prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru in the immediate aftermath of independence and the vision of capital-intensive growth model was influenced by that of the USSR, Sitharaman said, but Upadhyaya—conscious of the fact that the Indian economy had been shaped for centuries by small and medium businesses and that 'we are a labour-intensive country'—believed it was a flawed model. So, he was in favour of an economic framework that would give due emphasis on labour-intensive industries, she said AI is set to improve productivity. The minister pointed out that AI poses some challenges in terms of training people, among others, but it also brings a lot of opportunities with it which need to be said young people inclined towards AI are being trained in it through various initiatives, she said. 'The government has announced four centres of excellence for AI in the fields of education, agriculture, health and cities of the future.'poses some challenges in terms of training people etc but it also brings a lot of opportunities. Alot of young people are being trained in AI through various govt initiativesFinance minister .
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Prashant Kishor slams Modi govt's ‘ceasefire' with Pakistan: 'Can't achieve anything by distributing sindoor boxes'
Jan Suraaj founder Prashant Kishor has questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Union government's decision to agree to a cessation of hostilities with Pakistan after four days of military action post Operation Sindoor last month. The political consultant-turned-politician suggested by halting action India may have been a missed opportunity for the Indian Army to push its advantage further. Kishor said, going by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's statement, Pakistan wanted the the cessation, indicating that neighboring country was under pressure and fearful of defeat. "I'm thinking, if Pakistan wanted a ceasefire, as our Foreign Minister is saying, that means our army was doing a good job, we were defeating Pakistan. It must have been out of fear that Pakistan wanted a ceasefire. So if Pakistan wanted a ceasefire, why did we agree to it? The Army should have let it go on for two more days," Kishor said during a press conference in East Champaran on Saturday. Kishor priased Jaishankar calling him 'very educated and sensible.' "Regarding the issue of the ceasefire, our country's EAM Jaishankar is a very educated and sensible person. I have great respect for him. I read his statement where he said the ceasefire was done at Pakistan's initiative," he added. India carried out precision strikes under Operation Sindoor on nine terror infrastructures in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, on 7 May in response to the22 April Pahalgam terror attackthat killed 26 people, mostly tourists in Jammu and Kashmir. Following the Indian action, Pakistan attempted to attackIndian military baseson 8, 9 and 10 May. The Pakistani attempts were strongly responded to by the Indian side by inflicting heavy damages to a number of key Pakistani military installations including air bases, air defence systems, command and control centres and radar sites. The two nations, however, agreed on an understanding to halt military action on 10 May. Kishor said the situation on the ground suggested that India's military was in control. "That's exactly what our army personnel are saying, what the citizens of this country are saying, that during the fight, we had them on the back foot, sirens were going off, people were hiding, Pakistan was on the defensive, begging for a ceasefire." Kishor was referring to External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar's comments in which he had said that it was the militaries of the two nations that negotiated directly and resolved the conflict through agreement and understanding for a cessation of fire and military action. 'Then why did you halt the action? It should have continued for a few more days. And if you did go for a ceasefire, why mislead the public? It's clear that what he's saying is wrong… You can't achieve anything by simply distributing boxes of sindoor (vermillion),' he said Kishor also challenged claims made by foreign leaders about who led peace efforts. "Although, Trump said something else, that he did it and that he deserve da Nobel Peace Prize, from brekenring peace. But why should we believe what Trump said? We will believe our own Foreign Minister," Kishor said On May 23, days after United States President Donald trump claimed that he played a role in settling the escalating tensions between India and Pakistan, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar reiterated that it was the militaries of the two nations that negotiated directly. You can't achieve anything by simply distributing boxes of sindoor. Kishor's statement comes ahead of the Bihar Assembly election to be held in October-November this year wherein the NDA, which consists of the BJP, JD(U), and LJP, will be once again looking forward to returning to power. In contrast, the INDIA Bloc will be giving competition to the incumbent Nitish Kumar government. Kishor's party Jan Suraaj is contesting first Bihar assembly election this year.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
With US grudging visas, students veer to EB-5; applications for Green Card category up by more than 100%
The events in the past few weeks that have led to this panic-like situation include a stop on new F-1 visa appointments — a tussle between the Trump administration and Harvard University; tightening of F-1 visa rules; heightened scrutiny of students' records, including social media posts; student and exchange visitor information system (SEVIS) record glitches; and increased scrutiny at ports of entry. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Following the crack-down on student visas, many Indians currently in the US and those considering colleges there are exploring the EB-5 route. The EB-5 visa programme provides a path to a Green Card , or permanent residency , to foreign investors putting in $800,000 (about Rs 7 crore).In the past four to five months, in Donald Trump 's second term as US President, immigration lawyers have seen more than 100% jump in EB-5 applications from Indian students, they told ET.A limited number of visas, however, are available each year under the category about 700 for India. With the US the most popular destination for higher studies 86,000 Indians there in 2024-experts see a scramble for EB-5 this year."There is a sharp jump in EB-5 applications," said Rajneesh Pathak, founder of Global North Residency and Citizenship, an immigration law firm. "But unlike previous years, when we had most-ly H-1B visa holders applying, the interest from F-1 visa holders has risen by 100% over the last few months."F-1 is a non-immigrant visa that allows international stu-dents to enter and stay in the US to pursue full-time academic studies, with limited work do not want to take any chances in the current political environment in the US, said experts. 'They are willing to invest in EB-5 to secure the future of their children,' said events in the past few weeks that have led to this panic-like situation include a stop on new F-1 visa appointments — a tussle between the Trump administration and Harvard University; tightening of F-1 visa rules; heightened scrutiny of students' records, including social media posts; student and exchange visitor information system (SEVIS) record glitches; and increased scrutiny at ports of entry.'The F-1 visa, once as a bridge to opportunity, now feels like a tightrope,' said Akshat Gupta, head of India & UAE, US Immigration Fund (USIF), an EB-5 Regional Centre has seen a 100% rise in F-1 visa holders seeking the EB-5 visa so far this year since January, as against idea that international students, even at globally respected universities, are finding themselves in the middle of political or administrative disputes is unsettling, experts say. Earlier, adjustment of status would allow students to stay in the US, apply for work and travel authorisation, they with the Trump administration discouraging international students, those between 19- 24 years of age, especially in competitive fields like computer science, biotech and finance, are mostly applying for EB-5. US law firm Chugh LLP has seen a sharp uptick in EB-5 requests in the past few months from Indian students on F-1 visas.'Roughly one-third of my new immigration consultations now involve students worried about how US politics could affect their status,' said Navneet S Chugh, attorney, who runs the firm. Last year, Chugh's firm was handling one or two EB-5 inquiries a quarter from students but this spring, it is fielding five to seven a month.'The Harvard dispute simply reminds them how quickly rules can change,' said another and Associations, another immigration law firm in the US, is also seeing a significant interest from Indian students and H-1B holders to pursue the EB-5 visa current I-526E adjudication timelines are significantly faster than in previous years.'In some instances, what once took three years is now being processed in as little as three months,' said its founder and chairman, Mark Davies. This flexibility allows applicants to live and work freely in the US while their Green Card cases are pending, said holding a Green Card have legal protection that F-1 visa holders do not have. 'We are advising students to maximise their time within the US and avoid unnecessary foreign travel or extended breaks,' said Sukanya Raman, country head, Davies and Associates.
