logo
Wilson Park to open with riverfront bash

Wilson Park to open with riverfront bash

Axios11 hours ago
Ralph C. Wilson Jr. Centennial Park on Detroit's west riverfront will open to the public with a big party Oct. 25-26.
Why it matters: The landmark $80 million, 22-acre park in the works since 2017 is unlocking substantially more of the city's iconic waterfront for public use.
State of play: The leaders of the nonprofit Detroit Riverfront Conservancy pledged last year to finish the park without delay as they grappled with the fallout from the conservancy's former CFO stealing more than $40 million from the organization.
Conservancy CEO Ryan Sullivan said last September that the park would be complete by fall 2025 — and as of now, it's on track.
The latest: A press conference and grand opening at 10am on Saturday, Oct. 25 will kick off a weekend of celebration, including the conservancy's popular Harvest Fest. More details are forthcoming.
The park's layout will include a sports structure, a playground with animal-shaped play structures, a water garden and a green space for events.
What they're saying:"This is a huge opportunity for the west side of the city," Sullivan tells Axios of the park's significance.
Wilson Park and the nearby Southwest Greenway add significant west-side green space to the existing riverwalk — which stretches from Belle Isle on the east side through downtown.
"We're really thrilled to deliver a park that has something for all Detroiters to enjoy," Sullivan says.
Between the lines: As the conservancy has rounded out work on the park over the last year, it's contended with a federal investigation into embezzlement by former CFO William Smith.
A $35 million philanthropic fund was established to help the conservancy complete riverfront work.
Smith was sentenced this April to 19 years in prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud and money laundering.
Smith is asking for more time to report to prison, per the Free Press, for reasons that aren't being made public.
The conservancy's civil suit to recover stolen money is still ongoing, Sullivan tells Axios.
Zoom out: After the crisis, the conservancy undertook a top-to-bottom review of its operations.
It's "had record turnout for different events and different programs over the last year-plus, which I think really speaks to the importance of the riverfront to the city," Sullivan says.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RI federal judge blocks Trump administration's restrictions on grants from Office on Violence Against Women
RI federal judge blocks Trump administration's restrictions on grants from Office on Violence Against Women

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

RI federal judge blocks Trump administration's restrictions on grants from Office on Violence Against Women

Advertisement A group of 17 state coalitions, led by the Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence, filed a lawsuit in June in US District Court in Rhode Island against US Attorney General Pamela Bondi, the Department of Justice, and the acting director of the Office on Violence Against Women. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up They argued that the restrictions were unlawful and that the administration had overstepped its authority and violated the statutory requirements in the After hearing arguments on July 29, US District Court Judge William E. Smith issued his decision Friday, siding with the Coalition that the restrictions ran afoul of the prohibition against 'arbitrary and capricious' actions by the federal agency. Advertisement Smith decided that the coalition was likely to succeed in its lawsuit finding that the new restrictions violated the Administrative Procedure Act, the federal law that governs how agencies develop regulations. He wrote that he found that the federal Office's decision to impose those conditions was 'in such a vague and haphazard manner to be arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion.' Smith criticized the process that the Office used as 'wholly under-reasoned and arbitrary.' He noted that the federal office provided 'a single declaration' from a supervisory official as the basis for its decisions. The judge was unimpressed. He wrote that the office couldn't 'plausibly claim' that it examined any relevant data and that it 'completely failed to consider' the impacts of its decisions. Smith also looked at the coalitions' fears and confusion over what the changes in the grants would mean for their work. For one thing, many who provide services to victims who are transgender questioned whether they would be permitted to provide the same quality of services — even using their preferred pronouns and training staff on serving people who are transgender or binary. And some also feared they wouldn't be able to give victims of sexual assault and domestic violence any options other than reaching out to law enforcement, which not all victims are prepared to do. Smith wrote that the coalitions were faced with a difficult choice: If they accepted the grants with the new conditions, it would require them to guess what 'formerly unobjectionable activities' were now not allowed, and therefore risk prosecution under the False Claims Act. Without the money, though, the organizations couldn't do their work. Advertisement The coalitions applauded the judge's order. 'This order is a critical step toward protecting survivors and ensuring that communities across the country can continue to provide the services Congress mandated,' the Coalition said in a statement. 'The administration's attempt to politicize essential funding that supports survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault was not just unlawful, it was cruel. We will continue to be alongside survivors in fighting for justice and accountability.' The Violence Against Women Act, which passed in 1994, specifically addressed concerns about incidents of violent crimes against women such as domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, and dating violence. In May, the office issued new restrictions on the grants, with a list of new categories that the money couldn't be used for. Those included: to promote or facilitate 'the violation of federal immigrations law,' promote 'gender ideology,' promote 'discriminatory programs or ideology' including 'illegal ... diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility' programs, and also any activities that 'frame domestic violence or sexual assault as systemic social justice issues rather than criminal offenses.' In June, the office required all grant applicants to submit a letter certifying the grants wouldn't be used for those out-of-scope activities. It also required that all award recipients certify that they do not 'operate any programs (including any such programs having components relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion) that violate any applicable federal civil rights or nondiscrimination laws.' The Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence, which includes 10 member agencies, has an annual budget is about $5.3 million, with about $1 million in grants from the Office on Violence Against Women. The other groups in the lawsuit include: the California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, Colorado Coalition Against Sexual Assault, DC Coalition Against Domestic Violence, End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin: The Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Idaho Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence, Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Jane Doe Inc. (the Massachusetts Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence), Kansas Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence, Montana Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence, North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Oregon Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence, Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence, ValorUS, Violence Free Minnesota, Virginia Sexual and Domestic Violence Action Alliance, and the Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault. Advertisement Amanda Milkovits can be reached at

The saga of the Richmond gym stuck on port-a‑potties for over 100 days
The saga of the Richmond gym stuck on port-a‑potties for over 100 days

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

The saga of the Richmond gym stuck on port-a‑potties for over 100 days

For more than 100 days, Jake Rowell's gym has been without working toilets because of damage to a sewer pipe during construction at the nearby Diamond District project. Why it matters: Rowell's saga is proof that being the next-door neighbor to a shiny new development in a rapidly changing city can really stink. The big picture: Rowell moved his 18-year-old RVA Performance Training gym to Hermitage Road in 2017. Construction on the $2.4 billion Diamond District Development — the largest development deal in the city's history — began last year. How it happened: The gym's toilets stopped working in April because Dominion Energy crews hit a sewer pipe when relocating some power poles, according to Rowell, developer Diamond District Partners, and a representative for the out-of-state owner of the building the gym is in. "There are multiple parties involved including the landowners and contractors," a Dominion Energy spokesperson tells Axios. "We have an ongoing dialogue and are working toward an agreeable solution." Friction point: Who should pay to fix the johns? The gym property owner's rep says Diamond District Partners should, because it owns the land and hired Dominion to dig. DDP says it offered to, but the gym property owner asked instead for a new, more expensive sewer line. The proposed fix wasn't a long-term solution, per the gym property owner's rep. Zoom in: Rowell took to Instagram at the end of May to vent about the delay, and the headache that the massive construction project brought to his door. He hoped the post would get his plumbing working again. Instead, it got him a set of double-wide, high-end port-a-potties plus an accessible single unit, courtesy of DDP. Behind the scenes: DDP tells Axios it's spent $5,600 on these "air-conditioned portable restrooms," and it's about to shell out another $2,800 for a third month. Yes, but: As anyone who's used them can attest, there's a difference between port-a-potties and indoor toilets with working plumbing, and that difference has everything to do with one being indoors and having working plumbing and the other not. What they're saying: Rowell tells Axios the lack of plumbing-reliant amenities (the gym's showers are also unusable) has cost him clientele and other headaches. In addition to the gym, he runs the nonprofit LiftPD, which provides free training to people with Parkinson's disease. It's these clients, especially, who Rowell worries about because the disease affects their mobility. Many of these clients use walkers or wheelchairs and, for them, the extra steps needed to go outside to use the restroom can feel impossible. "This is more than just an inconvenience," Rowell says. He says it feels like he's getting pushed out of his longtime business home to make way for new development. But at the same time, he feels stuck. He knows another 15,000 square feet of warehouse space in the heart of the city at a reasonable price won't be easy to find again. What's next: Once all the parties agree to a resolution, Powell says, it's his understanding that it'll take six to eight weeks to get the plumbing working again.

Beasley getting evicted from luxury Detroit high-rise
Beasley getting evicted from luxury Detroit high-rise

Axios

time3 hours ago

  • Axios

Beasley getting evicted from luxury Detroit high-rise

Former Piston Malik Beasley is being evicted from a $7,000-per-month apartment in The Stott, a 38-story Art Deco skyscraper overlooking downtown's Capitol Park, court records show. The big picture: His eviction case is just one of several financial problems that have come to light since ESPN reported in late June that Beasley is the subject of a federal gambling probe. He has not been charged with wrongdoing. The investigation has shelved negotiations between the Pistons and Beasley on a new multimillion-dollar contract. He played for Detroit last season on a 1-year, $6 million deal, setting the franchise record for most three-pointers in a season (319). Zoom in: Despite earning nearly $60 million as an NBA player, Beasley's financial problems amount to more than $8 million for debts owed to a marketing company, to a lender that specializes in loans to pro athletes and to others, the Detroit News reported. He owes $23,220 to The Stott in unpaid rent and other costs, court records obtained by Axios show. State of play: Beasley's landlord initially sued him for unpaid rent in March. That case was dismissed less than a month later and the landlord again filed suit in Detroit's 36th District court in June, court records show. The court entered a default judgment against Beasley on July 15 and the eviction order was filed Aug. 6. What they're saying:"Obviously he's going through some tough times now," Beasley's attorney in the federal investigation, Steve Haney, tells Axios. Haney stressed that Beasley has not been charged. He said that people in Detroit should remember what a great Piston and teammate Beasley was. "It's unfortunate an allegation can have such dire consequences," said Haney, who is not representing Beasley in civil matters such as the eviction case. Context: Dan Gilbert's Bedrock bought The Stott in 2015 and converted it into a high-rise apartment building. It was built in 1929 for the Stott flour mill company. The latest: Beasley said in a social media post last week that he's getting ready for the upcoming season.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store