logo
'Disaster waiting to happen': Fears carbon farming increases risk of wild fire

'Disaster waiting to happen': Fears carbon farming increases risk of wild fire

RNZ News3 days ago
James Hunter worries the huge cost of managing forestry pests and fire risk is falling on farmers.
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
The increasing number of farms
being planted in trees for carbon farming
is raising fears about the spread of pests and fire risk.
Some farmers are spending tens of thousands of dollars a year on pest control to prevent deer and pigs eating their crops, while also forking out for higher insurance premiums due to the risk of fire.
Out near Porangahau in Central Hawke's Bay, farmer James Hunter is worried about the future of his farm. His neighbour's 2000 hectare Motere Station has just been planted in pine trees, after it was sold last year to Chinese forestry company K&A Sustainability Ltd.
"If we think it's so good to offset our carbon by planting pine trees, why do I have to carry the cost with everything I hold precious being destroyed?" he asks.
The Hunter family has farmed Rangitoto Station for more than 170 years. The rolling to steep hill country offers unbeatable views of Pacific Ocean, while inland the farm's many valleys are filled with canopies of poplar trees to prevent erosion.
For the past 40 years, Hunter has been on a mission to create kilometres of wetlands on the farm, regenerate many hectares of native bush, and fence off special areas that are now protected under QEII National Trust covenants.
"It's such a buzz," said Hunter. His eyes lit up as he explained how the wetlands naturally filtered and cleaned what ran off the land, collecting sediment so the water that ran out to the rivers and oceans was clean.
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
The Hunter's farm early in the 1990's before wetlands and native bush were established, compared to today where the farm has about 15 hectares of wetlands filtering the run off.
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
It has taken countless hours of work and substantial investment, but he feared these precious habitats were at risk of pests from the new forestry plantation.
"What's bothering me is that all of this work that I've done - the deer are going to destroy it, and if it's not the deer, the pigs will come out and eat the lambs," he said.
Forest Owners Association chief executive Elizabeth Heeg told RNZ that pest control was part of regional council management plans. She said the association did not collect data on how much forestry owners spent on pest control, but it varied depending on the region and size of forest.
"They take these issues seriously for their communities. We are having more trouble with pigs in recent years than we'd had previously.
"Deer numbers in some places are expanding, we need to have good game management out there and think about where these populations have expanded to a point where they need professional intervention to be knocked back," she said.
James Hunter is worried his wetlands and native bush is at risk of being destroyed by forestry pests such as deer and pigs.
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
Another risk that farmers were worried about was wildfire. Hunter has lived through many severe droughts and told RNZ that with an increasing number of pines being planted in the area, he was seriously concerned about the fire risk.
He said there was a lack of responsibility from forest owners to mitigate them.
"The forest people are not putting in anything to control fires. If there's a big fire and the only good dam out here is my water supply dam, and it's the middle of a drought and they drain it, where does that leave me?
"Why should I have to carry the cost of firefighting, when they've done nothing other than plant every available inch, even though they were told not to plant the airstrip... they did," he said.
The entire stretch of hillside along the horizon was planted in pine trees this year.
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
It was rural communities like his that he had seen decimated by the forestry industry, as Hunter said once the trees were planted there was no employment opportunities until harvest, or if it was a carbon farm then it was locked up and left.
He is among many who are warning that this rural way of life - of living off the land and mustering stock with horses and dogs - is disappearing.
"It's the dream - and if we plant New Zealand, we're going to shut out people's dreams. We're going to shut out the opportunity to progress.
"There are so many issues attached to forestry and you can't unwind it," he said.
Fellow Hawke's Bay farmer Bruce Wills has had a lifetime of farming next to forestry.
His family farmed at Trelinoe Park in Te Pohua from 1955 to 2018 and witnessed the boom of forestry after Cyclone Bola in 1988, when pine trees were touted as the solution to controlling erosion.
Bit by bit his farm was surrounded in forestry, which Wills said resulted in a flood of pests eating his crops, costing him tens of thousands of dollars a year in pest control alone.
"We spent an enormous amount of time and effort and money controlling possums, goats, deer, pigs that poured in from the forestry and grazed on pastures overnight.
"These are the sort of challenges that New Zealand hasn't woken up to yet with the proliferation of carbon farms," he said.
Bruce Wills says increasing forestry plantings resulted in a flood of pests eating his crops
Photo:
Having forestry neighbours on every boundary also carried a huge insurance cost because of the fire risk.
"Certainly towards the the latter years when we were fully surrounded and had the significant risk all around us... we doubled and sometimes more, our public liability insurance.
"So we were carrying $10 million plus of cover for public liability because of that pine tree risk to our business if a fire escaped from our property," he said.
Wills said in his experience, many forest owners were not prepared for fire and he believed many people underestimated the fire risk of forestry.
"Most New Zealanders are complacent to this risk and it will come and bit us now with this increased risk of pine tree fuel ready to be ignited.
"It worries me a lot, and in the climate that we've got. It's a disaster waiting to happen," said Wills.
File photo.
Photo:
Supplied / Fire and Emergency NZ
PF Olsen manages more than 160,000 hectares of forestry in New Zealand, including the K&A Sustainability Ltd owned block next to Hunter.
Managing director Scott Downs told RNZ that forest owners were working with Fire and Emergency to develop fire risk management plans.
However, he said what each forest spent on fire mitigation varied hugely depending on their location and size.
"I think fire is a few years away in terms of risk, so they haven't necessarily started thinking fully about that yet... but it will definitely be on the agenda," he said.
Downs said PF Olsen met regularly with landowners, such as farmers, and were always available to discuss their concerns.
"We're a local company so we have local people on the ground who can go out and visit these sites regularly. We're not a faceless corporation or entity that they have no contact with or struggle to get hold of," he said.
An area of farmland in Central Hawke's Bay that is being planted in pine trees.
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
As for pest control, PF Olsen said while it did not have exact figures on what its forest owners spent, it was a cost that was included in the forest management budgets.
"Obviously there is a lot more pest control in the first four years or so when the trees are growing, then it reduces after that.
"But there are still ongoing issues there that we need to manage, in terms of we don't want to be a harbouring site for pigs and deer that create havoc with neighbours, because we want to be a good neighbour," said Downs.
Figures from Fire and Emergency show the annual average for vegetation fires is about 4350. Between July 2023 and June 2025, Fire and Emergency attended 547 vegetation fires where some of the area burned was recorded as having land cover in exotic forest, and 78 of those fires were more than one hectare in size.
The Forest Owners Association said many of its members did take responsibility for managing their land properly.
Chief executive Elizabeth Heeg said $21 million a year was spent on fire protection.
"We really encourage all rural landowners that forests to engage with our guidelines on our website.
"It's really important we are all up to speed on what the current practice is," she said.
When asked if there were any mandatory requirements for forest owners to reduce the risk, Heeg told RNZ there were forest service levies and some legal requirements.
"If someone is not managing that risk effectively, then FENZ can come in with a range of responses.
"We are all concerned about increasing fire risk, and that's why it's really important that we are working together on how we are going to manage fires, and fire prevention," she said.
Fire and Emergency Hawke's Bay community risk manager Nigel Hall agreed that forestry was a big fire risk, and said FENZ was always talking to forestry owners. He said the fire service had extensive maps of forests which included the age and type of trees, topography of the land, access tracks, and water supply locations.
"They're doing all they can to mitigate fires within their own forests and they are putting fire breaks around key infrastructure , for example powerlines that go through forests," said Hall.
File photo.
Photo:
RNZ / Calvin Samuel
He said for carbon forests, which are usually not pruned like the timber production forests, the fire risk can be greater because there was more fuel.
"They are higher risk once they are going... but potentially they are lower risk to start with because they are greener underneath.
"But for any forest, the likelihood of us actually going in to the forest to extinguish it, we just won't be doing that. Once a fire has taken hold the only way we can fight it is with helicopters," he said.
Since 2017 Fire and Emergency has established Service Level Agreements with forest owners, and FENZ national manager risk reduction Jonathan Tan said there were currently 14 Service Level Agreements in place with forest owners, with four to be completed.
"Many forest owners either had wildfire capabilities prior to 2017 or have since invested in firefighting resources, including Forest Rural Firefighting appliances, water tankers, and trained personnel within their workforce," he said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thinking about solar? Here are questions to ask
Thinking about solar? Here are questions to ask

RNZ News

time2 days ago

  • RNZ News

Thinking about solar? Here are questions to ask

Photo: lighthunter/123RF If you're wondering solar power is a good option for your house , there are a few questions to work through, the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) says. It has produced a new checklist that offers guidance. EECA lead adviser Gareth Gretton said any decision should start with a basic assessment of the house's roof. "Is your roof suitable for solar? The number one other thing, I think, is really the condition of your roof. "You really wouldn't want to put a new solar panel on to an old roof that needed replacement or a significant amount of maintenance within a 10-to-15-year period. "Ideally, you're really putting it on a pretty new roof that's not going to need any attention for the entire life of the solar system, which would be about 30 years. "You should expect these solar panels to be up on your roof for really quite a long time and not require any maintenance other than a bit of cleaning." The system should also be sized to match a household's energy use, he said. New Zealand households typically have anything from eight or nine solar panels through to about 20, but heavy users can have more if roof space and house orientation permits. A system with 10 panels might cost about $12,000. "The question there is really, how much energy you use and when you use it and that will influence whether you should go for a slightly bigger or a slightly smaller system." Gretton said people would also need to check their electricity meter could handle exporting power. Most systems export power that is not used back to the grid . Power companies pay for that power, although they currently pay less than a household would pay for power it consumers. "That's kind of a chance thing at the moment, whether the meter that you currently have is going to be suitable," Gretton said. "If it's not suitable, then that's something that you want to get sorted before you go and install a solar system that then can't actually be connected." He said households should also look at whether their hot water system was controlled. It would be important to check that quotes they received were offering the same thing, he said. Some houses have multiple-phase power that can be dealt with in different ways. "The easiest thing really is if you just have single phase, because then you install a single phase inverter and that inverter will be able to put the power directly into your household circuits and you'll be able to use as much as you can. But if you've got three phases, then it's kind of a question of do you still have a single phase inverter and one phase gets loaded up more or do you go for a three-phase inverter that can put it onto different phases and does that three phase inverter have the capacity to do different things on different phases? So it's it's getting really into details, but you know these are the kind of things that make a bit of difference and good installers will be able to guide homeowners through these kind of decisions." Dr Gareth Gretton, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority Photo: SUPPLIED/EECA People should also check the inverter in a system would be able to work with demand flexible systems. "We think the future is going to be increasing flexibility, which basically means that we get to use the grid to its best advantage. Having smart inverters is a big part of that. It's essentially ensuring that we get more and more devices on the grid that are capable of behaving in a smart way." To maximise the return, people could consider including a battery in their systems so they could store and use more of their own solar power, especially in the evening, EECA said. It said households could improve the return they received from a solar energy system with smart energy use, such as instaling timers on hot water systems, and using apps and home energy management systems. Generally, the best return on investment is when power can be used as it is generated. Gretton said for most households right now, batteries would not improve their return on investment but that was expected to change over time. Other things to think about were whether a house was in a wind zone, whether the roof would need scaffolding to have panels installed and whether there could be corrosion if a house was next to the sea. Gretton said panels were usually suitable up to very high or extra high wind zones. "But there are wind zones even above that where you basically have to consult an engineer. So it's just making sure that your installer has actually looked at what wind zone you're in and has therefore taken that into account when designing the system." Meanwhile, Westpac released a report on Tuesday looking at the future for solar power. It noted that New Zealand had adopted solar later than its peers. "In part that reflects the historical dominance of other renewable energy sources in electricity generation in New Zealand. The opposite is true in the EU, US and Australia, where fossil fuels (and nuclear) have historically dominated. "In many of these countries, solar adoption has been supported by generous government subsidies and support measures that have allowed local manufacturers to gain scale. That was not a consideration in New Zealand." The report noted that power demand in New Zealand tended to peak in the morning and evening, when solar was not available. "Contrast that to Australia, which also has a mid-day peak during summer, when solar is most prevalent." But New Zealanders were now getting into solar quickly, it noted. Data indicated that solar accounted for 1.3 percent of electricity in 2023 but that had probably risen to more than 2 percent in the first quarter of this year. "The accelerated uptake of solar in New Zealand more recently reflects falling costs and the increased viability of installing it, despite a comparatively low average solar irradiance or surface power density … Growth of adoption in New Zealand reflects declining costs, rapid advances in solar technology, and our ongoing efforts to reduce carbon emissions." The report said solar would be critical if the electricity system was to cater for more demand as transportation and heating electrifies and new industries, such as hyperscale data centres expand. "The cost of residential installations continues to fall, but at around $12k for a 5KW system, it's still expensive for most households. However, electricity prices have risen by an average 23 percent since 2019 with the average New Zealand household now paying $2400 per year. That means that the payback for solar has now fallen to between five to seven years. "According to Rewiring Aotearoa, borrowing against a mortgage to install solar means the average household will pay 13c/kWh. That falls to 7c without a mortgage. By comparison, the wholesale price of electricity is about 17c/kWh. "Falling upfront installation and declining battery costs should make solar more attractive to households. How much though depends on whether wholesale electricity prices rise or fall. "Other factors include buy-back rates for surplus electricity sold back into the grid. These currently range from 8c per kWh to 17c depending on the electricity retailer, but should rise with the introduction of new rules by the Electricity Authority. " Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

'Disaster waiting to happen': Carbon farming stokes pest, fire fears
'Disaster waiting to happen': Carbon farming stokes pest, fire fears

Otago Daily Times

time3 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

'Disaster waiting to happen': Carbon farming stokes pest, fire fears

By Alexa Cook of RNZ The increasing number of farms being planted in trees for carbon farming is raising fears about the spread of pests and fire risk. Some farmers are spending tens of thousands of dollars a year on pest control to prevent deer and pigs eating their crops, while also forking out for higher insurance premiums due to the risk of fire. Out near Porangahau in Central Hawke's Bay, farmer James Hunter is worried about the future of his farm. His neighbour's 2000 hectare Motere Station has just been planted in pine trees, after it was sold last year to Chinese forestry company K&A Sustainability Ltd. "If we think it's so good to offset our carbon by planting pine trees, why do I have to carry the cost with everything I hold precious being destroyed?" he asks. The Hunter family has farmed Rangitoto Station for more than 170 years. The rolling to steep hill country offers unbeatable views of Pacific Ocean, while inland the farm's many valleys are filled with canopies of poplar trees to prevent erosion. For the past 40 years, Hunter has been on a mission to create kilometres of wetlands on the farm, regenerate many hectares of native bush, and fence off special areas that are now protected under QEII National Trust covenants. "It's such a buzz," said Hunter. His eyes lit up as he explained how the wetlands naturally filtered and cleaned what ran off the land, collecting sediment so the water that ran out to the rivers and oceans was clean. It has taken countless hours of work and substantial investment, but he feared these precious habitats were at risk of pests from the new forestry plantation. "What's bothering me is that all of this work that I've done - the deer are going to destroy it, and if it's not the deer, the pigs will come out and eat the lambs," he said. The Hunters' farm early in the 1990s (above) before wetlands and native bush were established, compared with today (below) where the farm has about 15 hectares of wetlands filtering the run off. Photos: RNZ Forest Owners Association chief executive Elizabeth Heeg told RNZ that pest control was part of regional council management plans. She said the association did not collect data on how much forestry owners spent on pest control, but it varied depending on the region and size of forest. "They take these issues seriously for their communities. We are having more trouble with pigs in recent years than we'd had previously. "Deer numbers in some places are expanding, we need to have good game management out there and think about where these populations have expanded to a point where they need professional intervention to be knocked back," she said. Another risk that farmers were worried about was wildfire. Hunter has lived through many severe droughts and told RNZ that with an increasing number of pines being planted in the area, he was seriously concerned about the fire risk. He said there was a lack of responsibility from forest owners to mitigate them. "The forest people are not putting in anything to control fires. If there's a big fire and the only good dam out here is my water supply dam, and it's the middle of a drought and they drain it, where does that leave me? "Why should I have to carry the cost of firefighting, when they've done nothing other than plant every available inch, even though they were told not to plant the airstrip... they did," he said. It was rural communities like his that he had seen decimated by the forestry industry, as Hunter said once the trees were planted there was no employment opportunities until harvest, or if it was a carbon farm then it was locked up and left. He is among many who are warning that this rural way of life - of living off the land and mustering stock with horses and dogs - is disappearing. "It's the dream - and if we plant New Zealand, we're going to shut out people's dreams. We're going to shut out the opportunity to progress. "There are so many issues attached to forestry and you can't unwind it," he said. 'It's a disaster waiting to happen' Fellow Hawke's Bay farmer Bruce Wills has had a lifetime of farming next to forestry. His family farmed at Trelinoe Park in Te Pohua from 1955 to 2018 and witnessed the boom of forestry after Cyclone Bola in 1988, when pine trees were touted as the solution to controlling erosion. Bit by bit his farm was surrounded in forestry, which Wills said resulted in a flood of pests eating his crops, costing him tens of thousands of dollars a year in pest control alone. "We spent an enormous amount of time and effort and money controlling possums, goats, deer, pigs that poured in from the forestry and grazed on pastures overnight. "These are the sort of challenges that New Zealand hasn't woken up to yet with the proliferation of carbon farms," he said. Having forestry neighbours on every boundary also carried a huge insurance cost because of the fire risk. "Certainly towards the the latter years when we were fully surrounded and had the significant risk all around us... we doubled and sometimes more, our public liability insurance. "So we were carrying $10 million plus of cover for public liability because of that pine tree risk to our business if a fire escaped from our property," he said. Wills said in his experience, many forest owners were not prepared for fire and he believed many people underestimated the fire risk of forestry. "Most New Zealanders are complacent to this risk and it will come and bit us now with this increased risk of pine tree fuel ready to be ignited. "It worries me a lot, and in the climate that we've got. It's a disaster waiting to happen," said Wills. 'There are still ongoing issues we need to manage' - forestry management company PF Olsen manages more than 160,000 hectares of forestry in New Zealand, including the K&A Sustainability Ltd owned block next to Hunter. Managing director Scott Downs told RNZ that forest owners were working with Fire and Emergency to develop fire risk management plans. However, he said what each forest spent on fire mitigation varied hugely depending on their location and size. "I think fire is a few years away in terms of risk, so they haven't necessarily started thinking fully about that yet... but it will definitely be on the agenda," he said. Downs said PF Olsen met regularly with landowners, such as farmers, and were always available to discuss their concerns. "We're a local company so we have local people on the ground who can go out and visit these sites regularly. We're not a faceless corporation or entity that they have no contact with or struggle to get hold of," he said. As for pest control, PF Olsen said while it did not have exact figures on what its forest owners spent, it was a cost that was included in the forest management budgets. "Obviously there is a lot more pest control in the first four years or so when the trees are growing, then it reduces after that. "But there are still ongoing issues there that we need to manage, in terms of we don't want to be a harbouring site for pigs and deer that create havoc with neighbours, because we want to be a good neighbour," said Downs. 'We are all concerned about increasing fire risk' Figures from Fire and Emergency New Zealand (Fenz)show the annual average for vegetation fires is about 4350. Between July 2023 and June 2025, Fenz attended 547 vegetation fires where some of the area burned was recorded as having land cover in exotic forest, and 78 of those fires were more than one hectare in size. The Forest Owners Association said many of its members did take responsibility for managing their land properly. Chief executive Elizabeth Heeg said $21 million a year was spent on fire protection. "We really encourage all rural landowners that forests to engage with our guidelines on our website. "It's really important we are all up to speed on what the current practice is," she said. When asked if there were any mandatory requirements for forest owners to reduce the risk, Heeg told RNZ there were forest service levies and some legal requirements. "If someone is not managing that risk effectively, then Fenz can come in with a range of responses. "We are all concerned about increasing fire risk, and that's why it's really important that we are working together on how we are going to manage fires, and fire prevention," she said. Fenz Hawke's Bay community risk manager Nigel Hall agreed that forestry was a big fire risk, and said Fenz was always talking to forestry owners. He said the fire service had extensive maps of forests which included the age and type of trees, topography of the land, access tracks, and water supply locations. "They're doing all they can to mitigate fires within their own forests and they are putting fire breaks around key infrastructure , for example powerlines that go through forests," said Hall. He said for carbon forests, which are usually not pruned like the timber production forests, the fire risk can be greater because there was more fuel. "They are higher risk once they are going... but potentially they are lower risk to start with because they are greener underneath. "But for any forest, the likelihood of us actually going in to the forest to extinguish it, we just won't be doing that. Once a fire has taken hold the only way we can fight it is with helicopters," he said. Since 2017 Fenz has established Service Level Agreements with forest owners, and Fenz national manager risk reduction Jonathan Tan said there were currently 14 Service Level Agreements in place with forest owners, with four to be completed. "Many forest owners either had wildfire capabilities prior to 2017 or have since invested in firefighting resources, including Forest Rural Firefighting appliances, water tankers, and trained personnel within their workforce," he said.

'Disaster waiting to happen': Fears carbon farming increases risk of wild fire
'Disaster waiting to happen': Fears carbon farming increases risk of wild fire

RNZ News

time3 days ago

  • RNZ News

'Disaster waiting to happen': Fears carbon farming increases risk of wild fire

James Hunter worries the huge cost of managing forestry pests and fire risk is falling on farmers. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook The increasing number of farms being planted in trees for carbon farming is raising fears about the spread of pests and fire risk. Some farmers are spending tens of thousands of dollars a year on pest control to prevent deer and pigs eating their crops, while also forking out for higher insurance premiums due to the risk of fire. Out near Porangahau in Central Hawke's Bay, farmer James Hunter is worried about the future of his farm. His neighbour's 2000 hectare Motere Station has just been planted in pine trees, after it was sold last year to Chinese forestry company K&A Sustainability Ltd. "If we think it's so good to offset our carbon by planting pine trees, why do I have to carry the cost with everything I hold precious being destroyed?" he asks. The Hunter family has farmed Rangitoto Station for more than 170 years. The rolling to steep hill country offers unbeatable views of Pacific Ocean, while inland the farm's many valleys are filled with canopies of poplar trees to prevent erosion. For the past 40 years, Hunter has been on a mission to create kilometres of wetlands on the farm, regenerate many hectares of native bush, and fence off special areas that are now protected under QEII National Trust covenants. "It's such a buzz," said Hunter. His eyes lit up as he explained how the wetlands naturally filtered and cleaned what ran off the land, collecting sediment so the water that ran out to the rivers and oceans was clean. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook The Hunter's farm early in the 1990's before wetlands and native bush were established, compared to today where the farm has about 15 hectares of wetlands filtering the run off. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook It has taken countless hours of work and substantial investment, but he feared these precious habitats were at risk of pests from the new forestry plantation. "What's bothering me is that all of this work that I've done - the deer are going to destroy it, and if it's not the deer, the pigs will come out and eat the lambs," he said. Forest Owners Association chief executive Elizabeth Heeg told RNZ that pest control was part of regional council management plans. She said the association did not collect data on how much forestry owners spent on pest control, but it varied depending on the region and size of forest. "They take these issues seriously for their communities. We are having more trouble with pigs in recent years than we'd had previously. "Deer numbers in some places are expanding, we need to have good game management out there and think about where these populations have expanded to a point where they need professional intervention to be knocked back," she said. James Hunter is worried his wetlands and native bush is at risk of being destroyed by forestry pests such as deer and pigs. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook Another risk that farmers were worried about was wildfire. Hunter has lived through many severe droughts and told RNZ that with an increasing number of pines being planted in the area, he was seriously concerned about the fire risk. He said there was a lack of responsibility from forest owners to mitigate them. "The forest people are not putting in anything to control fires. If there's a big fire and the only good dam out here is my water supply dam, and it's the middle of a drought and they drain it, where does that leave me? "Why should I have to carry the cost of firefighting, when they've done nothing other than plant every available inch, even though they were told not to plant the airstrip... they did," he said. The entire stretch of hillside along the horizon was planted in pine trees this year. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook It was rural communities like his that he had seen decimated by the forestry industry, as Hunter said once the trees were planted there was no employment opportunities until harvest, or if it was a carbon farm then it was locked up and left. He is among many who are warning that this rural way of life - of living off the land and mustering stock with horses and dogs - is disappearing. "It's the dream - and if we plant New Zealand, we're going to shut out people's dreams. We're going to shut out the opportunity to progress. "There are so many issues attached to forestry and you can't unwind it," he said. Fellow Hawke's Bay farmer Bruce Wills has had a lifetime of farming next to forestry. His family farmed at Trelinoe Park in Te Pohua from 1955 to 2018 and witnessed the boom of forestry after Cyclone Bola in 1988, when pine trees were touted as the solution to controlling erosion. Bit by bit his farm was surrounded in forestry, which Wills said resulted in a flood of pests eating his crops, costing him tens of thousands of dollars a year in pest control alone. "We spent an enormous amount of time and effort and money controlling possums, goats, deer, pigs that poured in from the forestry and grazed on pastures overnight. "These are the sort of challenges that New Zealand hasn't woken up to yet with the proliferation of carbon farms," he said. Bruce Wills says increasing forestry plantings resulted in a flood of pests eating his crops Photo: Having forestry neighbours on every boundary also carried a huge insurance cost because of the fire risk. "Certainly towards the the latter years when we were fully surrounded and had the significant risk all around us... we doubled and sometimes more, our public liability insurance. "So we were carrying $10 million plus of cover for public liability because of that pine tree risk to our business if a fire escaped from our property," he said. Wills said in his experience, many forest owners were not prepared for fire and he believed many people underestimated the fire risk of forestry. "Most New Zealanders are complacent to this risk and it will come and bit us now with this increased risk of pine tree fuel ready to be ignited. "It worries me a lot, and in the climate that we've got. It's a disaster waiting to happen," said Wills. File photo. Photo: Supplied / Fire and Emergency NZ PF Olsen manages more than 160,000 hectares of forestry in New Zealand, including the K&A Sustainability Ltd owned block next to Hunter. Managing director Scott Downs told RNZ that forest owners were working with Fire and Emergency to develop fire risk management plans. However, he said what each forest spent on fire mitigation varied hugely depending on their location and size. "I think fire is a few years away in terms of risk, so they haven't necessarily started thinking fully about that yet... but it will definitely be on the agenda," he said. Downs said PF Olsen met regularly with landowners, such as farmers, and were always available to discuss their concerns. "We're a local company so we have local people on the ground who can go out and visit these sites regularly. We're not a faceless corporation or entity that they have no contact with or struggle to get hold of," he said. An area of farmland in Central Hawke's Bay that is being planted in pine trees. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook As for pest control, PF Olsen said while it did not have exact figures on what its forest owners spent, it was a cost that was included in the forest management budgets. "Obviously there is a lot more pest control in the first four years or so when the trees are growing, then it reduces after that. "But there are still ongoing issues there that we need to manage, in terms of we don't want to be a harbouring site for pigs and deer that create havoc with neighbours, because we want to be a good neighbour," said Downs. Figures from Fire and Emergency show the annual average for vegetation fires is about 4350. Between July 2023 and June 2025, Fire and Emergency attended 547 vegetation fires where some of the area burned was recorded as having land cover in exotic forest, and 78 of those fires were more than one hectare in size. The Forest Owners Association said many of its members did take responsibility for managing their land properly. Chief executive Elizabeth Heeg said $21 million a year was spent on fire protection. "We really encourage all rural landowners that forests to engage with our guidelines on our website. "It's really important we are all up to speed on what the current practice is," she said. When asked if there were any mandatory requirements for forest owners to reduce the risk, Heeg told RNZ there were forest service levies and some legal requirements. "If someone is not managing that risk effectively, then FENZ can come in with a range of responses. "We are all concerned about increasing fire risk, and that's why it's really important that we are working together on how we are going to manage fires, and fire prevention," she said. Fire and Emergency Hawke's Bay community risk manager Nigel Hall agreed that forestry was a big fire risk, and said FENZ was always talking to forestry owners. He said the fire service had extensive maps of forests which included the age and type of trees, topography of the land, access tracks, and water supply locations. "They're doing all they can to mitigate fires within their own forests and they are putting fire breaks around key infrastructure , for example powerlines that go through forests," said Hall. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Calvin Samuel He said for carbon forests, which are usually not pruned like the timber production forests, the fire risk can be greater because there was more fuel. "They are higher risk once they are going... but potentially they are lower risk to start with because they are greener underneath. "But for any forest, the likelihood of us actually going in to the forest to extinguish it, we just won't be doing that. Once a fire has taken hold the only way we can fight it is with helicopters," he said. Since 2017 Fire and Emergency has established Service Level Agreements with forest owners, and FENZ national manager risk reduction Jonathan Tan said there were currently 14 Service Level Agreements in place with forest owners, with four to be completed. "Many forest owners either had wildfire capabilities prior to 2017 or have since invested in firefighting resources, including Forest Rural Firefighting appliances, water tankers, and trained personnel within their workforce," he said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store