Sharing an elected Louisiana leader's personal info could soon result in fines, jail time
A legislative proposal originally intended to provide an additional layer of security to judges and prosecutors who deal with violent criminals has been altered to shield a broad range of personal information about state elected officials in Louisiana.
Free speech and good government advocates are concerned officials could use the law, which will take effect unless the governor vetoes the proposal, to silence critics, punish journalists and keep unfavorable information out of the public's hands.
Last week, the legislature gave final approval to House Bill 681 by Rep. Marcus Bryant, D-New Iberia, after Sen. Caleb Kleinpeter, R-Port Allen, added last-minute amendments to include statewide elected officials, members of the Public Service Commission and state lawmakers under an existing state law that shields their personal information from being made public.
The amended version of the bill passed the Senate on a 36-0 vote and the House on an 89-0 vote.
The law prevents the elected officials' home addresses, phone numbers, personal email addresses, Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, federal tax identification numbers, bank account numbers, credit and debit card numbers, license plate numbers from being published in government records or on a public website. Also protected under the law are marital records and birthdates.
An official's church, the school or daycare their child attends and the employment location of their spouse, children or dependents would also be shielded.
'It's incredibly concerning and broad … in a way I cannot describe because I don't yet know how bad it's going to be,' said attorney Scott Sternberg, who works on First Amendment cases, adding that such prosecutions would likely be unconstitutional.
If Gov. Jeff Landry allows the proposal to become law, the newly included elected officials could request their personal information be removed from public records. It could also be used to force someone to remove an online post with personal information about the elected officials.
For example, the law could be wielded against somebody who raises concerns about conflicts of interest pertaining to the employment of an elected official's spouse or child.
If that person does not comply, they can be sued and face misdemeanor charges that carry up to 90 days in prison, a $1,000 fine or both.
The bill could allow the sealing of marital records to prevent the public from learning of allegations of abuse in a divorce proceeding.
'In Louisiana's constitution … we have decided the people are entitled to certain information, because … the people have learned to check up on the government every now and then,' Sternberg said.
'Whenever an exception [to public records law] passes … it limits the public's right to access,' Sternberg added.
Broadening the scope of the bill without public debate troubles good governance advocates.
'Slipping such a significant public records exemption into a bill with little acknowledgment and no debate raises questions about what people are trying to hide and undermines transparency,' said Steven Procopio, president of Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana.
Lawmakers and other individuals involved in Bryant's legislation have not been willing to say how the last-minute amendments got into the bill.
'These bills are not mine. I'm just bringing them,' Bryant said in an interview, referring questions to Zach Daniels, executive director of the Louisiana District Attorneys Association, who declined to comment for this report.
Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple said he asked to have statewide elected officials added to the bill but not state lawmakers or Public Service Commission members. Temple said billboards bearing his home address have been put up around the state, prompting his request.
Senate President Cameron Henry, R-Metairie, said he did not ask for the amendments but supports them.
Public Service Commissioner Davante Lewis, D-Baton Rouge, posted on social media he had 'no clue' how PSC members were added, adding he did not support the legislation.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Schumer taps controversial JFK scion Jack Schlossberg for America 250 Commission
US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer tapped Kennedy heir Jack Schlossberg – known for his attention-seeking social media tirades — to sit on the committee prepping America's 250th birthday bash Tuesday. Schlossberg will get one of the seats slotted for private citizens on the America 250 Commission as Schumer, a Brooklyn Democrat, claimed 'there's no better person' to go toe-to-toe with President Trump and his supporters on the panel. 'Why am I putting Jack there? We know that Donald Trump will try to aggrandize the whole thing and make it part of him and his ego,' the New York senator claimed in a social media video next to the 32-year-old political scion. 'There's no better person to push back on that than you, Jack.' Advertisement 3 Sen. Chuck Schumer and Jack Schlossberg appeared in a video Tuesday. Chuck Schumer / X 'And I know you will be there to make sure when we celebrate our 250th birthday we remember that America's a nation of justice, equal justice, of unity, E Pluribus Unum, of treating everyone with dignity.' The commission is supposed to be non-partisan and comprised of members appointed by House and Senate leadership from both political parties. Advertisement Trump administration cabinet leaders including US Attorney General Pam Bondi, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are all part of the commission. Four US Reps and four US senators are also among the group. Schlossberg, the son of former diplomat Caroline Kennedy, shook Schumer's hands and thanked him for the appointment. 'I wanna make sure we celebrate our country for all of its colors, there's no more important task than celebrating our history for the same of our future,' he said. Advertisement 3 Schlossberg arrives at the JFK Library, Sunday, May 4, 2025. AP A Schumer spokesperson confirmed the senator used his private citizen selection on Schlossberg. The sole grandson of JFK has grabbed attention over the past year for myriad bizarre and vulgar statements. He's questioned if Vice President JD Vance's wife, Usha Vance, is 'hotter' than his late grandmother Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis and mocking his own cousin, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his wife, actress Cheryl Hines. Advertisement 'I have never met Cheryl Hines but if I did I'd tell her she looks super dehydrated,' he said on X late last month. 3 The commission allows for private citizens. Chuck Schumer / X Following his plush appointment, he took a shot at conservative CNN commentator Scott Jennings. 'Scott Jennings rumor I heard – not sure if true – drinks own pee,' he said Wednesday morning.


Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Where Social Security Field Office Staff Has Been Reduced
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some states have experienced more than 10 percent staffing losses at Social Security field offices, according to a new report. Newsweek has contacted the SSA for comment via email. Why It Matters The Social Security Administration (SSA) pays out benefits to tens of millions of Americans, and the agency's field offices provide vital in-person services. But the agency has undergone various changes since President Donald Trump's second administration began in January. In tandem with various other federal departments, staffing culls have taken place, with the agency announcing in February that it planned to cut staff numbers from 57,000 to 50,000. What To Know Between March 2024 and March 2025, Social Security field offices lost nearly 5 percent of their staff, according to union data from the AFGE Social Security General Committee, and the number of union-represented employees fell from 21,627 to 20,593. Over the year, 46 states and Washington, D.C., saw staffing declines, two states saw no change and only Nebraska and Alaska added staff—just seven union-represented positions combined. States that saw staffing losses of 10 percent or more during this period include Wyoming, with a 17 percent loss; Montana, with a 14 percent loss; and West Virginia, with an 11 percent loss. The report also said that this is unlikely to be the full range of positions lost at field offices since January. "This [report] analysis utilizes bargaining unit staff numbers dated March 2025, prior to the largest mass departures at the agency, suggesting that current year-over-year staff losses may be even larger," the Strategic Organizing Center said. "Further, the main impact of the Trump administration's mass buyout and early retirement programs came after March 2025, suggesting that current staff losses are likely larger than this data shows." The agency announced in February that it planned to cut staff numbers from 57,000 to 50,000. Prior to the second Trump administration, the SSA was already experiencing a decline in staff, from nearly 63,000 workers in 2014 to about 57,000 in 2024. According to the SSA, field office wait times have been reduced to 23 minutes so far this year, compared to 30 minutes last year—a 23 percent reduction. What People Are Saying A representative for Social Security Works, which fights to preserve benefits, told Newsweek: "This report shows the catastrophic damage the Trump administration is doing to Social Security. They've pushed out thousands of staff at the Social Security Administration. That includes many of the most experienced, highly qualified public servants. Others have been forcibly reassigned to roles they are not trained for." SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano, in a July press release: "Our vision is centered on providing outstanding service that works for everyone we serve—whether they call, walk into a field office, or choose to manage their benefits online." What Happens Next Bisignano said the SSA is "transforming the customer experience, investing in technology to build frontline capacity, and using real-time data to monitor performance across the board. "We are delivering higher levels of customer service—and this will continue," he said.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Pick To Oversee Social Security COLA Says 'Need To Sunset' Program
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's pick for commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics has argued for "sunsetting" Social Security, calling it a "Ponzi scheme." Trump nominated Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to lead the BLS less than two weeks after firing the agency's former commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, in response to weaker-than-expected job numbers. The dismissal has fueled concerns that upcoming BLS reports could be altered to advance Trump's political agenda. Newsweek has contacted Antoni for comment via his profile on the Heritage Foundation's website. Why It Matters Social Security provides benefits to more than 70 million Americans every month, paying out retirement, survivor and disability benefits. Often referred to as the "third rail" of American politics for its enduring popularity, advocating against the program is considered politically perilous to members of either party. The BLS is the federal agency responsible for producing essential inflation data, including the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers—the official index used to calculate Social Security Cost of Living Adjustments. As commissioner, Antoni would oversee how that data is produced and published. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., on August 7. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., on August 7. Win McNamee/GETTY What To Know Speaking on KTRH's Houston's Morning News in December, Antoni said Social Security was set up as a "Ponzi scheme" where "today's investors are—their funds are being used to pay yesterday's investors." A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment setup where money from new investors is used to pay existing ones. Social Security payments are financed from a dedicated payroll tax collected from current workers. Any excess that is not used is kept in dedicated trust funds: the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund and the Disability Insurance trust fund. These trust funds are scheduled to reach depletion in 2034 unless Congress acts, according to the 2025 Social Security Trustees report. "And unless you are going to grow the number of investors at an exponential rate, that system is eventually going to collapse. Well, since we can't grow the workforce at an exponential rate, especially today when our population is actually in a state of decline, you're not going to be able to sustain a Ponzi scheme like Social Security," Antoni continued. "Eventually you need to sunset the program." Antoni said current benefits need not be touched, but future retirees should not rely on the program. He advocated for transitioning to a system that uses private accounts "for just them." "There's plenty of money available to pay for folks who are already retired," he said. "But the people who are going to retire 10, 20, even 30, or certainly 40 years from now—I'm sorry, but the program is not going to be viable at that time." Antoni argued for "some kind of transition program where, unfortunately, you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes but never actually receive any of those benefits," he continued. "And that sounds harsh, but unfortunately that's the price to pay for unwinding a Ponzi scheme that was foisted on the American people by the Democrats in the 1930s." Who Is E.J. Antoni? Antoni is the chief economist for the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, which published Project 2025. According to his bio on its website, he was previously "an economist at Texas Public Policy Foundation and has taught courses ranging from labor economics to money and banking." He also holds master's and doctoral degrees in economics. Writing on Truth Social regarding Antoni's appointment to the BLS, Trump said, "E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE." In a statement on X, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said Antoni would "provide the American people with fair and accurate economic data they can rely on." What People Are Saying White House assistant press secretary Taylor Rogers told Newsweek: "President Trump selected Dr. E.J. Antoni III to restore America's trust in the jobs data that has had major issues, without any real attempt at resolution, for years. Antoni's education and vast experience as an economist has prepared him to produce accurate public data for businesses, households, and policymakers to inform their decision-making." Democratic Representative John B. Larson of Connecticut said in a news release on August 11: "It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position. I call on every Senate Republican to stand with Democrats and reject this extreme nominee—before our seniors are denied the benefits they earned through a lifetime of hard work." Jason Furman, a Harvard economist and former chair of Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, posted on X: "I don't think I have ever publicly criticized any Presidential nominee before. But E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner. He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise. He would be a break from decades of nonpartisan technocrats." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether the Senate will confirm Antoni's nomination to lead the BLS, which is an independent agency under the Labor Department.