Influencer Who Sold Fart Jars Plans To Move Abroad After Breakup With US Senator: ‘I Do Not Feel Safe'
She didn't name the senator, but her comments suggest he is affiliated with the Republican party.
Stephanie Matto, a social media influencer and former reality TV star, says she is preparing to leave the US out of fear for her safety. Known for once selling her farts in jars, Matto has now revealed that her decision to move is linked to a breakup with a US senator she was involved with for over a year. In a video shared on Instagram earlier this month, Matto said she no longer feels safe in the country and plans to move to the Czech Republic.
'This is my last video I'm making in response to my relationship with a US senator," Matto said on Instagram. She went on to explain what kind of relationship it was, saying, 'It's an online relationship where he pays me lots of money to watch me eat food."
Matto said they had been romantically involved for the past year and a half. She had first gone public about the senator last year and revealed details of their online arrangement. At the time, many accused her of fabricating the story for publicity. But Matto has continued to stand by her claims.
Over the months, she dropped hints about his identity and she believes that led people to figure out who he was. 'It kind of sent this man into a tailspin," she continued.
According to Matto, the situation grew more serious when threats reportedly extended to her family. She said there were warnings of deportation aimed at her loved ones though she didn't go into further detail. On top of that, she claimed the senator hired a company to try and remove all content from the internet that linked him to her. 'Not to mention he sent me 3 cease and desist letters from his lawyers," she added.
Matto said the pressure was especially high during the election period. She admitted she came close to revealing his identity at the time. 'Honestly during the elections, I was so close to leaking his name," she said. But she held back out of fear.
'I was fearing for my life and my family's safety, so I chose to wait until after the election to see which political party would be in power," she said.
Now, with the elections over, Matto has decided to leave the country. 'In the next month or so, I'm going to the Czech Republic and seeking some alternative living options because I do not feel safe right now," she said.
'Everybody is wondering if this story is real, I have one thing to tell you – I know that in the online eating food community, I am not the only person who has dealt with this person and I know that some of these people are not afraid to come forward," she concluded.
Matto didn't name the senator but her comments suggest he is affiliated with the Republican party.
First Published:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US court pauses ruling allowing Venezuelans to challenge deportations to El Salvador
-A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday temporarily paused a judge's ruling holding that hundreds of Venezuelans the Trump administration deported to El Salvador under an 18th century wartime law must be given the chance to challenge their detentions. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an administrative stay to give itself more time to consider an appeal filed by the government earlier on Tuesday. Washington-based U.S. District Judge James Boasberg on June 4 also ruled that the Trump administration must facilitate their legal challenges, though he stopped short of expressly ordering the government to bring the Venezuelan migrants currently being held at a mega-prison in El Salvador back to the U.S. Boasberg, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, gave the government one week to detail how it would facilitate the deportees' challenges, known as habeas corpus petitions. The Venezuelans were deported in March after President Donald Trump, a Republican, invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang without going through normal immigration procedures. The appellate court panel that paused Boasberg's ruling included U.S. Circuit Judges Gregory Katsas, Neomi Rao and Justin Walker, all of whom were appointed to the court by Trump during his first term in office. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the Venezuelans in the case, did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Will liberate Los Angeles,' Trump defends troop deployment amid protests; says city has become ‘trash heap'
During a tribute to soldiers on Tuesday, President Donald Trump defended his decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles amid tensions over his immigration policy saying, 'LA has gone from being one of the cleanest, safest and most beautiful cities on earth, to being a trash heap' 'Within the span of a few decades, Los Angeles has gone from being one of the cleanest, safest and most beautiful cities on earth, to being a trash heap with entire neighbourhoods under the control of transnational gangs and criminal the entire world can now see, uncontrolled migration leads to chaos, dysfunction, and disorder.' "What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and on national sovereignty, carried out by rioters bearing foreign flags." 'Very simply, we will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean, and safe again,' he goes on to add. Trump's visit to Fort Bragg, home to some 50,000 active-duty soldiers, followed his move to deploy 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in an escalating response to street protests over his immigration policies. The Republican president said the military deployment was needed to protect federal property and personnel. California's Democratic-led government has sued to block Trump's move, calling it an abuse of power and an unnecessary provocation. Street demonstrations have been underway since Friday, when activists clashed with sheriff's deputies. Los Angeles officials have said the unrest has been limited to a few downtown blocks and that the majority of demonstrators are protesting peacefully in support of immigrants. In North Carolina, Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth took part in long-scheduled commemorations of the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, watching soldiers demonstrate a special forces assault and use a long-range missile launcher. It was the first in a series of celebrations of the Army anniversary involving Trump, ahead of a major parade in Washington on Saturday. Speaking to reporters earlier on Tuesday in the Oval Office, Trump warned against demonstrators at that parade, saying "they're going to be met with very big force." He made no distinction between peaceful and violent protesters. The FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department have said there are no credible threats to the event.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Arizona governor vetoes bill to ban teaching antisemitism in Arizona's public schools
PHOENIX — Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would ban teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and expose educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. On Tuesday, the Democratic governor said the bill is not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits," she said in a statement. Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff." The measure cleared the Legislature on Wednesday on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. The proposal would prohibit teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would bar public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Educators would personally be responsible for covering the costs of damages in lawsuits for violating the rules. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with 'unlawful discrimination' to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, has said his proposal would create accountability when educators fail to protect students from the rise in antisemitism since the start of the Israel-Hamas war. Opponents say the bill aims to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opens up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would be able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. The proposal would create a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate for a second offense and a revocation of the certificate for a third offense. At colleges and universities, violators would face a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would require colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.
