
Portrait of an Accidental Art Collector
I don't aspire to the life of an art collector — and certainly not one dealing with altitudinous sums of money. I like art, but I'm just a dabbler popping in and out of museums and galleries to admire and attempt to keep current. I wish I could be artsy for art's sake, but the whirl — and lingo — can be bewildering. I've only just become aware that a huge and expensive mania for a generation of younger artists has come and gone. That speculative period is now called 'zombie formalism' because the paintings evoked the style of deceased modern masters without incremental inspiration. I'm fascinated but afraid to bring up the zombie apocalypse. It's so last decade.
Recently, there's been a patter on the sidelines of my news feed about galleries closing. Being the uncle of a couple of art school grads, I figured that isn't a good thing. How would they get their works into the world if the gallery system collapsed? Who'd introduce them to appreciative buyers and help them navigate the treacherous business? How would the world know they'd 'arrived' if there weren't prestigious showrooms to bestow that glory?
Still, it didn't strike me as particularly surprising that the industry was in a bad way. The market has crashed a number of times this century; most recently, after the financial meltdown and during the pandemic. According to the latest Art Basel & UBS Art Market Report, sales plummeted by 12% last year to $57.5 billion. The high end — involving objects at seven figures and up — was particularly badly hit. Are discounted de Koonings now a thing?
All that said, I've wandered back into the art world. In my perpetual pursuit of good food, I was at Rene Redzepi's Noma in Copenhagen in May and I was captivated by the lively paintings at the restaurant entrance. The same style was echoed in ceramic pieces within. As it turned out, I'd met the artist Jenny Sharaf at the wedding of mutual friends in Mexico City, but I'd never seen her work before. Sharaf was born in Los Angeles and lives in San Francisco, but — like me — she loves the Danish capital and was there for an extended stint, long enough to paint several panels. I loved them for the color and energy and how kaleidoscopic they could be — the image shifting with the angle at which you approached it. And, better yet, I could afford them.
However, more numbers were involved and they threw me. Calculating the costs of shipping the one I liked most to London plus insurance and the confusion over post-Brexit tariffs put me off sealing the deal. With US tariffs (and potential counter-tariffs) in the air, I didn't want to consider the alternative: sending any of her paintings over from America. It's a problem for the arts and antiques establishment as well: The arithmetic is antithetical to sales strategies and bottom lines. Who knows what those big beautiful duties might do?
As the UBS report notes: 'Economic nationalism chips away at the foundations of economic growth. Tariffs worsen inflation and can threaten job security. Restrictions on capital flows can limit investment and may hit higher-income groups, which are more global in their behavior, disproportionately.'
So I suggested to the artist, if you get a chance to come to London, why don't you create a painting for me using my apartment as a studio? In late July she did just that. It dovetailed, she said, with the way she was approaching her career, dealing directly with customers. 'Artists shouldn't hold back from forming relationships with collaborators and collectors.' She has several patrons, but she'd never painted for them in their own homes before.
For me, the process has been exhilarating. We discussed the artists influencing her direction on the project. As a hopeless dilettante, I appreciate being able to point to my art and name-drop Cy Twombly, Joan Mitchell, Lee Ufan, Hans Hoffman, Philip Guston, Ad Reinhardt and Gunter Forg. After helping shop for supplies, I set her up in my flat so she could create directly in the space where the art would reside. We figured out which wall in my apartment would potentially be the best for display. As she progressed, she gauged my reaction to what was on the canvas. 'I like the drippy bits,' I said. And, lo, more drippy bits appeared.
I won't quite say I was Pope Julius and Sharaf was Michelangelo — she didn't paint my ceiling — but I love what she produced after three sessions. In fact, I now have two Sharafs because her inspiration overflowed into a smaller piece.
My London flat now has metaphysical super-dimensions — intimations of Denmark and California with a resident-patron's smiling presence in the beautiful blobs of paint. It's art for my sake. And it's fun. As the UBS report says: 'The trend in consumer spending has recently skewed away from goods toward having fun.' Maybe fun is just what an art world in the doldrums needs.
And if you visit, you don't have to worry about barging into them. They're safely away from the front door.
More From Bloomberg Opinion:
(1) De Kooning originally sold the painting for $4,000 in 1955. It may sound like a steal but, after 70 years of inflation, that's more than $47,000 today.
This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Howard Chua-Eoan is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion covering culture and business. He previously served as Bloomberg Opinion's international editor and is a former news director at Time magazine.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com/opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump's 50% tariff: Beginning to get foothold in US market, Agra's leather belt takes a hit
US Tariffs Impact on Indians: In a sprawling shoe manufacturing unit in Agra, men in sweat-soaked vests move along the assembly lines in a choreography honed over the years — working in perfect rhythm, their hands following the machine's pace. As each shoe travels down the conveyor belt, it pauses briefly at each station dedicated to a specific task, such as removing wrinkles, cotton brushing, seat lasting, sole heat activation — a display of how a hundred small acts turn the raw leather into products destined for sale in international markets, including the US. However, US President Donald Trump's decision to raise tariffs on Indian goods — hiking duties on leather footwear from 5-8% to 25%, with a further 25% increase threatened by August 27 — has cast a shadow over the unit. India's leather exports across the world rose from $3,681 million in 2020-21 to $4,828 million in 2024-25 — a 31% rise. In the same period, exports to the US rose from $645 million to $1,045 million — a 62% jump. For manufacturers who had only recently begun gaining a foothold in the US market, the move has come as a significant setback. 'There will definitely be an impact. We only have three US-based customers, as most of Agra's exports have traditionally gone to Europe. But the US was a major market we were trying to enter. It's a huge consumer base, and any success there would have changed the scale of our business. This is going to slow that push down,' said Sushant Dhapodkar of Tej International Pvt Ltd. Agra is one of India's largest footwear manufacturing hubs, alongside Kolkata, Kanpur and Chennai. The city has around 10,000 micro-units apart from 150 small-, 30 medium-, and around 15 large-scale industries. Many use leather imported from Turkey, which takes 45–50 days to arrive via road, along with Indian leather sourced mainly from Kanpur and Chennai, and some from Jalandhar. While Europe remains the mainstay for Agra's leather shoe exporters, the US market, the largest consumer base in the world — accounting for 24% of global consumption despite just 4% of the population — has been developing fast. In the last quarter alone, nearly half of Agra's export business, worth about $594 million, went to the US. The growth was so sharp that many manufacturers had invested heavily in expanding production capacity. 'Those who were earlier working on six assembly lines are now running 14,' said Puran Dawar, chairman of the Development Council for Footwear and Leather Industry and president of the Agra Footwear Manufacturers and Exporters Chamber. 'We ourselves had set up a unit bigger than our existing one to tap into the US market. That's definitely out of the question now.' The tariff announcement has also come at the peak of production for autumn and winter collections — the busiest for Agra's export factories. Orders for leather boots, closed-toe shoes, and high-end formal wear are typically placed months in advance by American buyers. These are now in the final stage of production or ready for shipment — but buyers have been calling to put the stock on hold. According to manufacturers, some buyers are ready to look towards China for an alternative. Dawar said: 'This is the peak season for autumn and winter orders, and buyers are already telling us to hold shipments, even for goods ready to go. They want us to share the tariff loss. But the US is a price-sensitive market — nobody can afford to share even 12.5% of the burden, let alone 50%. Some buyers have already cancelled and are looking to China because their tariff is 30%, and to Vietnam, where it's just 20%. We can't compete at those rates.' Nazir Ahmed, owner of Park Exports, said the problem goes far beyond price competition. 'Now with the initial 25%, it's going to be a disaster unless Trump goes back to the original tariff,' he said. 'This won't just be a problem for India, but for the US as well… the higher the duty, the more expensive their product will be. In countries where lower tariffs are imposed, they will have the advantage, and we wouldn't be able to compete with them,' said Ahmed. He also highlighted the potential impact back home. 'If orders aren't placed, factories will be without work. And if factories are without work, workers will be without work. This industry is labour-intensive, so unemployment could run into millions if this continues. And I'm not just talking about manufacturing — textiles, tools, every industry linked to this process will take a hit,' he said. Manufacturers said the setback is particularly bitter because of the efforts they made to break into the US market. 'It's a setback to our plans to double or triple exports to the US,' Ahmed said. 'The government increases targets every year, and the American market has the potential to match our exports to Europe. Now all that planning is on hold.' Others, like Dawar, believe the hike is a 'pressure tactic' and will eventually be rolled back. 'The government is in touch with us to see how they can help. We were called to meet Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal last week to discuss relief. One idea discussed was that the government could bear a part of the hike, and the remaining could be between the manufacturer and the US importer.' The current uncertainty, meanwhile, is already triggering ripple effects beyond Agra. Naseem Khan, a Kanpur tannery owner whose leather is supplied to manufacturers linked to US exports, said clients have begun cancelling or freezing orders. 'Whatever the stage of production, they're saying stop immediately. Even though we don't directly export to the US, we are deeply connected; the leather we produce is approved by those who manufacture finished goods for the US,' Khan said. Meanwhile, exporters are brainstorming alternatives. Russia, once a major market for Agra, is being considered for revival. Others are looking inward to India's growing middle class — a customer base whose purchasing power has risen in recent years. Until now, much of the footwear sold domestically was made locally from scraps and leftovers of the export process. But with international orders in limbo, manufacturers are weighing whether to redirect their best designs and full-scale production to the home turf. Chairman, Council for Leather Export, Rajendra Kumar Jalan said, 'Currently, the dispatches have come to a standstill. All US buyers and Indian manufacturers exporting finished goods to the US have put their orders on pause because of the 50% tax. When the tax was raised to 25%, there was still some hope — we were still on par with competing nations like Bangladesh, Indonesia, Vietnam, and, to some extent, China. But now, we are completely out of the picture. China, in fact, is gaining an advantage because the additional Russian oil tariffs do not apply to them, and they also enjoy a 90-day moratorium.' 'That being said, the US purchases from us are in large volumes, and for these bulk buyers, getting an alternative source of production for these huge orders, and that too in a short period, will be extremely difficult,' said Jalan 'At present, the reaction is one of panic. But we remain hopeful of finding alternative markets. There will be competition from other leather manufacturing nations, but our focus will be on countries where India has signed or is about to sign an FTA — countries such as Chile, Peru, and some European nations,' he said. — With inputs from Nirbhay Thakur


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
US sanctions Congo militia tied to forced labour, smuggling in key mining zone
The US government on Tuesday sanctioned an armed group accused of illicit trading in minerals in eastern Congo as Washington tries to spearhead peace efforts there while pushing for US access to the region's minerals. The US is also sanctioning the Congolese mining company CDMC, saying it sold minerals which were sourced and smuggled from mines near Rubaya.(Representational Image/AP) A senior US government official who spoke on condition of anonymity ahead of the formal announcement said the State and Treasury departments are sanctioning the CODECO armed group, which controlled the key coltan mining site of Rubaya from 2022 to early 2024. 'During this period, CODECO generated revenue by overseeing mining operations, collecting illegal fees and taxes for miners and engaging in mineral smuggling. It also imposed forced labour and executed civilians in mining areas under its control,' the official said in Washington. The US is also sanctioning the Congolese mining company CDMC, saying it sold minerals which were sourced and smuggled from mines near Rubaya, and two Hong Kong exporters, East Rise and Star Dragon, that purchased minerals from the mining area. The State Department said it is freezing the assets of the armed group and companies in the US or under US control and banning all transactions with them. Rubaya is currently under the control of the M23 rebel group, which is already targeted by US sanctions. The mining site lies in the heart of eastern Congo, a mineral-rich part of the Central African nation, which for decades has been ripped apart by violence from government forces and different armed groups, including the Rwanda-backed M23, whose recent resurgence has escalated the conflict, worsening an already acute humanitarian crisis. In June, Congo and Rwanda signed a peace deal facilitated by the US to help end the conflict while helping the US government and American companies gain access to critical minerals in the region. Congo and the M23 rebels have also agreed to sign a permanent peace deal by August 18, but renewed fighting has threatened this effort. On Tuesday, Congo and M23 both accused each other of violating the agreement by attacking each other's forces.


News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Sergey Lavrov, Marco Rubio discuss Putin-Trump summit over phone call
Moscow [Russia], August 13 (ANI): Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio held a phone conversation on Tuesday (local time) to discuss the upcoming meeting between President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump in Alaska on August 15. According to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Lavrov and Rubio 'discussed certain aspects" of the Friday summit. 'On August 12, Russia's FM Sergey #Lavrov & US Secretary of State @MarcoRubio spoke over the phone, discussed certain aspects of the upcoming meeting between President Vladimir #Putin & President @realDonaldTrump in Alaska on August 15," the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs wrote on Trump said while addressing the White House briefing on Monday, 'We're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin. And at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made," he asked if he sees a time when there could be normal trade between the US and Russia, Trump said, 'I do. Russia has a very valuable piece of land. If Vladimir Putin went toward business instead of toward war, you know, it's a warring nation. That's what they do. They fight a lot of wars. A friend of mine said Russia is tough because they just keep on fighting."Further, Trump expressed optimism about the meeting and said, 'I'd like to see a ceasefire. I'd like to see the best deal that could be made for both parties."On the same day, Trump said that American tariffs on India over its purchase of Russian oil had delivered a 'big blow" to Moscow, saying, 'No one would have been so tough and I haven't stopped there."US President Donald Trump on Monday claimed that American tariffs on India over its purchase of Russian oil had delivered a 'big blow" to Moscow, saying, 'No one would have been so tough and I haven't stopped there."He said Russia has been 'heavily impacted" by global pressure, including US trade actions on multiple countries. (ANI)