G7 expresses support for Israel, calls Iran source of instability
Israel attacked Iran on Friday in what it called a pre-emptive strike to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. Since then the two Middle Eastern rivals have exchanged blows, with Iranian officials reporting more than 220 deaths, mostly civilians, while Israel said 24 civilians were killed.
Iran has denied seeking nuclear weapons and said it has the right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including enrichment, as a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Israel, which is not a party to the NPT, is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that.
US President Donald Trump planned to leave the G7 summit in Canada early to return to Washington due to the Middle East situation.
The US has so far maintained it is not involved in the Israeli attacks on Iran though Trump said on Friday the US was aware of Israel's strikes in advance and called them 'excellent'. Washington has warned Tehran not to attack US interests or personnel in the region.
'We urge the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza,' the G7 statement said, adding the nations were ready to co-ordinate on safeguarding stability in energy markets.
An Israeli strike hit Iran's state broadcaster on Monday while Trump said in a social media post 'everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran'.
Separately, US secretary of state Marco Rubio discussed the Israel-Iran war in phone calls with his British, French and EU counterparts on Monday.
Washington said Trump continued to aim for a nuclear deal with Iran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Trump says wants ‘real end' to Israel-Iran conflict, not ceasefire
Israel's intense air raids kill Iranian commanders as Tehran retaliates with missile strikes. Trump calls for peace but threatens overwhelming force. People take shelter in a parking lot in Tel Aviv amid a fresh barrage of Iranian rockets on June 17, 2025. Israel's military said air raid sirens sounded in several areas of the country on June 17 after identifying missiles launched from Iran, as AFP journalists reported booms over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. (Photo by Menahem KAHANA / AFP) US President Donald Trump said he wants a 'real end' to the conflict between Israel and Iran, not just a ceasefire, as the arch foes traded fire for a fifth day on Tuesday. The escalating clashes saw Israeli warplanes target military sites in Iran, killing a senior commander and drawing retaliatory missile fire from Iran. Explosions were heard over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem shortly after air raid sirens sounded in many parts of Israel following missile launches from Iran, the Israeli military said. The air force was 'operating to intercept and strike where necessary to eliminate the threat', the military said. About 20 minutes later, it said people could leave shelters as police reported debris fell in the Tel Aviv area and the fire brigade said it was tackling a blaze in the surrounding area. ALSO READ: MTN Group downplays Iran strife The Israeli military said it killed senior Iranian commander Ali Shamdani in an overnight strike on a 'command centre in the heart of Tehran', just four days after his predecessor, Golam Ali Rashid, was killed in a similar Israeli attack. It also said it targeted multiple missile and drone sites in west Iran, including infrastructure, launchers and storage facilities, with black-and-white footage showing some of them exploding. Despite mounting calls to de-escalate, neither side has backed off from the missile blitz that began Friday, when Israel launched an unprecedented aerial campaign targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities. A new wave of Israeli strikes on Tehran — including a dramatic hit on state television headquarters that the broadcaster said killed three people — prompted both sides to activate missile defence systems overnight. A cyberattack on Tuesday crippled Sepah Bank, one of Iran's main state-owned banks, the Fars news agency reported. ALSO READ: US warship reported heading toward Mideast as Iran, Israel fight 'Complete give-up' Trump said on Tuesday that he wanted a 'complete give-up' by Iran in return for peace. 'I'm not looking for a ceasefire, we're looking at better than a ceasefire,' he told reporters on the plane home after cutting short his attendance at a Group of Seven summit in Canada. Trump again warned Iran against targeting US troops and assets in the Middle East, saying 'we'll come down so hard, it'd be gloves off'. Trump had earlier issued an extraordinary warning on his Truth Social platform, saying: 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' Trump has repeatedly declined to say if the United States would participate in Israeli military action, although he has said Washington was not involved in initial strikes. ALSO READ: 'They never stopped' – Naledi Pandor continues to receive threats Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said the United States was deploying 'additional capabilities' to the Middle East. The aircraft carrier USS Nimitz left Southeast Asia Monday, scrapping a planned Vietnam port call, amid reports it was heading to the region. China accused Trump of 'pouring oil' on the conflict. 'Making threats and mounting pressure will not help to promote the de-escalation of the situation, but will only intensify and widen the conflict,' said foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun. After decades of enmity and a prolonged shadow war, Israel launched its surprise air campaign last week, saying it aimed to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons — an ambition Tehran denies. ALSO READ: UK moves warplanes to Middle East amid Iran crisis Iran has responded with multiple missile salvos. The Revolutionary Guards vowed Monday night the attacks would continue 'without interruption until dawn'. State television said the Tel Aviv headquarters of Israel's Mossad intelligence agency was among the Guards' targets. G7 urges de-escalation The escalation has derailed nuclear talks and stoked fears of broader conflict. At least 24 people have been killed in Israel and hundreds wounded, according to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. Iran said on Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not issued an updated toll since then. ALSO READ: Iran media reports 'massive explosion' after Israeli drone strike on refinery Netanyahu said Israel was 'changing the face of the Middle East, and that can lead to radical changes inside Iran itself'. Iran's ISNA news agency quoted a medical official saying all doctors and nurses had their leave cancelled and were ordered to remain at medical centres. International calls for calm have mounted. At the G7 summit, leaders including Trump called Monday for 'de-escalation' while stressing Israel had the right to defend itself. 'We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza', G7 leaders said in a joint statement that also affirmed 'Iran can never have a nuclear weapon'. ALSO READ: Iran launches fresh wave of attacks on Israel The United States and Iran had engaged in several rounds of indirect talks on Tehran's nuclear programme in recent weeks, but Iran said after the start of Israel's campaign that it would not negotiate while under attack. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Monday that 'absent a total cessation of military aggression against us, our responses will continue'. 'It takes one phone call from Washington to muzzle someone like Netanyahu. That may pave the way for a return to diplomacy,' he wrote on X. – By: © Agence France-Presse
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
G7 leaders urge Trump to ease off trade war
At a summit where host Canada worked to avoid stoking Trump's anger, and with attention on events in the Middle East, leaders still urged the US president to reverse course on his plans to impose even steeper tariffs on countries across the globe as early as next month. Image: Brendan Smialowski/AFP World leaders at the Group of Seven summit in Canada on Monday pushed US President Donald Trump to back away from his punishing trade war, arguing that it poses a risk to global economic stability. At a summit where host Canada worked to avoid stoking Trump's anger, and with attention on events in the Middle East, leaders still urged the US president to reverse course on his plans to impose even steeper tariffs on countries across the globe as early as next month. Most countries represented at the G7 are already subject to a 10 percent baseline tariff imposed by Trump, with European countries and Japan also hit with additional levies on cars, steel, and aluminum. G7 leaders used the meeting to sit down with Trump one-on-one to make their case for the US leader to seal agreements that would eliminate the worse of the US tariff threat. In official sessions, the leaders also warned Trump that the tariffs could bring serious harm to the world economy. "Several participants asked to end the tariff dispute as soon as possible," a senior German official told reporters on condition of anonymity. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading They argued that the dispute weakens the G7's economies and "in the end will only strengthen China," the official said. Trump used the meeting to officially sign a deal already announced in May with Britain, the first country to secure a trade pact with the US to avoid Trump's threat of the crushing levies. "I like them. That's the ultimate protection," Trump told reporters after a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on the G7 sidelines. At a media conference marking the deal, Trump opened a folder to display the signed agreement, only for the paperwork to slide out and spread across the ground. "Oops, sorry about that," he said as Starmer scrambled to gather up the loose sheets and stuff them back in the folder. 'Get it done' The trade issue is of urgent interest to Canada after the Trump administration announced several additional levies on Canadian imports in recent months, throwing the economic future of America's northern neighbor into deep uncertainty. After a meeting between Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney, the Canadian government indicated that the two sides could reach a trade truce deal within the next 30 days. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told reporters in Canada that he spoke to Trump for 30 minutes and discussed ways they could find a solution "in a manner that is in line with Japan's national interests," according to Japanese public broadcaster NHK. "As there are still some points where both sides disagree, we have not reached an agreement on the package as a whole," Ishiba said. There were hopes that non-G7 countries expected at the meeting on Tuesday would also have their time with Trump, but this was dashed by the US leader's decision to cut his attendance short due the Iran crisis. Leaders from South Korea, India, Brazil, and South Africa will arrive at the gathering at a resort in the Canadian Rockies with Trump already gone. Dozens of countries are locked in negotiations with Washington to clinch some sort of trade deal before the US imposes stinging reciprocal tariffs, threatened for July 9. Mexico, whose president Claudia Sheinbaum was also expected, is meanwhile seeking to renegotiate its three-way North American free trade agreement that also includes Canada. While there was little expectation that the summit would deliver a breakthrough in the trade negotiations between the US and the rest of the world, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer was part of Trump's delegation. A source at the summit said that French President Emmanuel Macron urged the American leader to quickly end the trade conflict once and for all. The European Commission handles trade negotiations for the 27-country bloc, and the EU's trade chief Maros Sefcovic was also attending the summit, accompanying the delegation of EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen. The EU institutions are official members of the G7, and during the morning session, von der Leyen argued to the leaders that "tariffs -- no matter who sets them -- are ultimately a tax paid by consumers and businesses at home."
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
From tariffs to talks: Can Washington and Beijing sustain this fragile truce?
China's Presdent Xi Jinping. 'We made a great deal with China. We're very happy with it.' So declared President Donald Trump in his familiar tone of triumphant ambiguity on 11 June, fresh off what was touted as a breakthrough agreement to restore a trade truce between the US and China. But if history has taught us anything, it is that 'done deals' in the Trumpian lexicon tend to be either dangerously fragile or conveniently fungible. The latest accord, emerging from two days of intense talks in London, follows an alarming spiral in trade tensions that had once again threatened to upend global markets and rekindle the tit-for-tat tariff warfare that haunted the latter years of Trump's first term. According to Trump, China has committed to lifting its restrictions on the export of rare earths — materials critical to the global technology and defence sectors — while the US has agreed to a calibrated rollback of punitive measures, including the threatened revocation of visas for Chinese students. As ever, the devil is not just in the details, but in their implementation. Much like the May Geneva agreement that this deal purports to reinforce, the London framework is conditional, tentative and, crucially, subject to 'final approval' by both Trump and President Xi Jinping. That qualifier alone renders the euphoria premature. Still, to be charitable, the very fact that Washington and Beijing are speaking the language of dialogue rather than confrontation is an encouraging sign. After a phone call between the two leaders earlier this month, there appears to be a renewed willingness — albeit under duress — to keep diplomacy afloat. For a world economy battered by uncertainty, this resumption of talks is, if nothing else, a stabilising force. Yet, Trump's boastful framing — that the US walks away with a 55% tariff shield while China gets 10% — betrays a zero-sum worldview that continues to inform his trade doctrine. The truth is far less tidy. Tariffs have proved to be a double-edged sword, inflicting damage on American consumers, industries and allies as much as they have squeezed Chinese exports. The World Bank's recent downward revision of global growth forecasts points to tariffs and unpredictability as 'significant headwinds', underlining the global costs of such brinkmanship. Beijing, for its part, has projected a more measured tone. Chinese Vice-premier He Lifeng, in remarks following the London consultations, emphasised mutual benefit, calling on the US to 'honour their words with actions'. The Chinese side welcomed the 'principled consensus' as a foundation for predictability and stability in bilateral economic relations. While Beijing's rhetoric may be couched in diplomatic platitudes, it signals a strategic patience that stands in stark contrast to Trump's performative deal-making. Indeed, despite facing considerable pressure — both domestic and international — China has remained consistent in its emphasis on dialogue, reciprocity and multilateralism. It is no secret that Beijing is playing a longer game. From its support for a multilateral trading system to its efforts in promoting South-South cooperation, China has positioned itself as a steady hand amid a turbulent global order. In this light, the reestablishment of a US-China economic and trade consultation mechanism should be viewed as more than a temporary fix. It offers a framework through which recurring disputes can be ironed out, interests aligned and trust slowly rebuilt. Importantly, it provides a venue for strategic communication — something sorely missing during the height of tariff wars in 2018-19. However, for this framework to bear fruit, both sides must resist the urge to revert to maximalist posturing. The US must accept that unilateralism — whether in tariffs or technology controls — cannot substitute for a sustainable policy. Likewise, China must be prepared to meet the US halfway, especially on issues of market access, intellectual property and transparency. The elephant in the room, of course, is the technological cold war that continues to simmer beneath the surface. While rare earths and tariff percentages dominate headlines, it is the battle over semiconductors and AI supremacy that threatens to define the next phase of US-China relations. Washington's decision to maintain restrictions on high-end AI chips — particularly those from Nvidia — while easing others, reveals both the complexity and the stakes involved. Beijing, not surprisingly, has responded with innovation. The resurgence of Huawei, once a poster child of American sanctions, stands as testament to China's determination to chart its own technological path. As Huawei's founder Ren Zhenfei put it bluntly last week, China may still be a step behind, but it is catching up — by stacking and clustering if necessary. In the short term, these dynamics will continue to fuel friction. But in the long term, they offer a compelling reason for structured cooperation. For neither side can afford the costs of sustained decoupling. The global economy — still reeling from inflationary shocks, supply-chain disruptions and climate-induced volatility — desperately needs the world's two largest economies to find common ground. To that end, the inclusion of Chinese students in American universities, affirmed in this deal, is more than a diplomatic gesture. It is a recognition that people-to-people ties remain a cornerstone of bilateral engagement. Academic exchanges, research collaboration and cross-cultural education build bridges that tariffs and bans cannot destroy. They plant the seeds of mutual understanding in a landscape too often scorched by suspicion. The road ahead remains bumpy. Structural trade conflicts persist, strategic mistrust abounds and electoral politics — particularly in the US — can derail even the most promising of frameworks. But the London agreement offers a glimpse of what is possible when mutual interest outweighs mutual animosity. This development not only helps stabilise US-China relations but also injects much-needed momentum into the global economy. It serves as a reminder that even amid intensifying geopolitical rivalry, there is still space — indeed, an urgent need — for pragmatic cooperation. Trump may brand it a win, but real victory lies not in tariffs or trophies, but in the hard, unglamorous work of sustained diplomacy. For now, both sides have stepped back from the precipice. The challenge will be to keep walking forward — together. Dr Imran Khalid is a freelance columnist on international affairs based in Karachi, Pakistan.
