Chinese, US officials meet for 2nd day of trade talks in Stockholm
AFP journalists saw officials from both sides, led respectively by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, enter the Swedish government building serving as the talks venue.
Neither side has so far made public any information about what has gone on in the talks, which started on Monday.
The negotiations are happening in the wake of a US-EU trade deal struck over the weekend that set US tariffs on most EU imports at 15 per cent, but none on US goods going to the EU.
The truce between China and the United States, the countries with the worlds two top economies, has temporarily set US duties on Chinese goods at 30 per cent, and Chinese levies on US ones at 10 percent.
That accord, reached in Geneva in May, brought down triple-digit tariffs each side had levelled at the other after a trade war sparked by US President Donald Trump spiralled into a tit-for-tat bilateral escalation.
The 90-day truce is meant to end on August 12. But there are indications both delegations want to use the Stockholm talks to push the date back further.
The South China Morning Post, citing sources on both sides, reported on Sunday that Washington and Beijing are expected to extend their tariff pause by a further 90 days.
Trump has threatened to hit dozens of other countries with stiffer tariffs from Friday this week unless they agree to trade deals with Washington.
Among them are Brazil and India, which he has warned could be targeted for 50-per cent tariffs.
The US leader has already announced deal outlines with five countries —Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines — as well as the one with the 27-nation EU.
Beijing says it wants to see "reciprocity" in its trade with the United States. Foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said dialogue was need "to reduce misunderstandings".
The previous round of of China-US talks was held in London.
Analysts said many of the trade deals Trump has been publicising were leaning more on optics than on details.
Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management, a firm that advises on currency exchange and commodities, said an extension of the 90-day truce between China and the United States could reinforce that view.
"That truce could set the stage for a Trump – (President) Xi (Jinping) handshake later this year — another risk-on carrot for markets to chew," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
Trump announces $100 billion new investment pledge from Apple
7 Aug 2025 10:27 WASHINGTON (Reuters) US President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that Apple will invest an additional $100 billion in the United States, a move that could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. The new pledge raises Apple's total domestic investment commitment in the US to $600 billion over the next four years. Earlier this year, the company announced it would invest $500 billion and hire 20,000 workers across the country in that announcement centres on expanding Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing footprint in the US, but still falls short of Trump's demand that Apple begin making iPhones domestically. "Companies like Apple, they're coming home. They're all coming home," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, moments after Apple CEO Tim Cook gave him a US-made souvenir with a 24-karat gold base."This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhones sold in America also are made in America," Trump if Apple could eventually build entire iPhones in the US, Cook noted that many components such as semiconductors, glass and Face ID modules are already made domestically, but said that final assembly will remain overseas "for a while."While the investment pledge is significant, analysts say the numbers align with Apple's typical spending patterns and echo commitments made during both the Biden administration and Trump's previous term. In May, Trump had threatened Apple with a 25% tariff on products manufactured overseas, a sharp reversal from earlier policy when his administration had exempted smartphones, computers and other electronics from rounds of tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump's effort to reshape global trade through tariffs cost Apple $800 million in the June quarter."Today is a good step in the right direction for Apple, and it helps get on Trump's good side after what appears to be a tension-filled few months in the eyes of the Street between the White House and Apple," said Daniel Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities."A Savvy Solution"Apple has a mixed track record when it comes to following through on investment 2019, for instance, Cook toured a Texas factory with Trump that was promoted as a new manufacturing site. But the facility had been producing Apple computers since 2013, and Apple has since moved that production to continues to manufacture most of its products, including iPhones and iPads, in Asia, primarily in China, although it has shifted some production to Vietnam, Thailand and India in recent political pressure, analysts widely agree that building iPhones in the US remains unrealistic due to labour costs and the complexity of the global supply chain."The announcement is a savvy solution to the president's demand that Apple manufacture all iPhones in the US," said Nancy Tengler, CEO and CIO of Laffer Tengler Investments, which holds Apple shares. Partners on Apple's latest US investment effort include speciality glass maker Corning, semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials, and chipmakers Texas Instruments, GlobalFoundries, Broadcom and said Samsung will supply chips from its production plant in Texas for its products, including iPhones, while GlobalWafers said it would be supplying 300mm silicon wafers from its Texas plant. Apple shares closed up 5% on Wednesday. Shares of Corning rose nearly 4% in extended trading, while Applied Materials gained almost 2%.
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Oman: Khazaen Port joins CMA CGM network as a'final destination'
Khazaen Dry Port, a subsidiary of Asyad Group, has joined the global shipping network "CMA CGM," enabling the port to become an approved final destination for receiving containers. This move enhances the port's integration with international shipping lines and opens broader horizons for local importers and exporters to benefit from a more efficient and flexible global distribution network. The port recently received its first container shipment under this global network, arriving from international ports via Sohar Port as a transit hub. Customs clearance and handling procedures were completed directly at Khazaen Port, thanks to its advanced operational readiness and cutting-edge technical infrastructure. Khazaen Dry Port offers numerous operational advantages that support local and international trade, including free storage periods of up to 14 days for loaded containers and 21 days for empty containers. It also provides advanced services for refrigerated containers, including electrical hookup and pre-trip inspection, as well as on-site food and agricultural inspection facilities, accelerating the entry of goods into local markets and enhancing supply chain efficiency. This achievement reflects the success of a strategic partnership between Asyad Group, represented by Asyad Ports and Free Zones, and the global "CMA CGM" Group. The service was activated through a flexible customs corridor developed in collaboration with the Royal Oman Police (ROP) Customs Department. This corridor allows containers to be transported using a "shipping agent's seal" without traditional customs sealing procedures, with the option of a "written financial guarantee" as an alternative to bank guarantees. This reduces costs for operators, encourages direct connectivity, and improves logistical efficiency. 2025 © All right reserved for Oman Establishment for Press, Publication and Advertising (OEPPA) Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Web Release
an hour ago
- Web Release
Digital Sovereignty is far more than compliance
I have honed my expertise in digital sovereignty in recent years largely as a result of it being one of the things our EMEA-based partners and customers always ask about. There is no one unifying reason for this increased interest in digital sovereignty, but rather several converging factors are accelerating its urgency. The most obvious is geopolitical instability. Sanctions and trade wars continue to disrupt global business operations. As reported, a coalition of nearly 100 organisations has urged European Commission leaders to establish a dedicated fund for building technological independence. In a joint letter addressed to President Ursula von der Leyen and Digital Commissioner Henna Virkkunen, the group advocated for strategic investments in homegrown infrastructure to reduce reliance on non-European tech giants. Another concern is that seemingly neutral cloud providers can become liabilities. One example is the high profile move of a major hyperscaler to cut off the International Court of Justice's email access following political pressure, highlighting that vendor obligations can sometimes override customer needs. In addition to geopolitical concerns, regulatory pressure is also mounting, with regulations like DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) and NIS2 in Europe requiring financial institutions and critical infrastructure providers to ensure operational resilience. While it is true that geopolitical dynamics have put digital sovereignty into the spotlight, it would be a misconception to think of this as a fresh challenge, as at its core digital sovereignty is about resilience and autonomy. Organisations need to prove they can operate independently, even when global political shifts or vendor decisions disrupt their operations. Prepare for unintended consequences In April 2022, the Amsterdam Trade Bank (ATB), a financially stable Dutch institution, was forced into bankruptcy. This wasn't due to poor management or insolvency, but rather because of sanctions imposed on its Russian parent company, Alfa Bank. When the US, the EU and UK enacted sanctions against Russian entities in spring 2022, the ripple effects were catastrophic for ATB. Despite ATB being fully compliant with Dutch and EU laws, service providers, again being respectful with the same laws and sanctions, were obliged to abruptly terminate critical cloud services, including email and core banking operations. Without access to cloud-based workspaces and business software suites, ATB lost the ability to communicate internally or with customers, leading to its sudden collapse. While the sanctions against Alfa Bank have been implemented in a different context this case nevertheless underscores a critical distinction when it comes to the question of sovereignty: Own compliance does not guarantee autonomy. Even legally sovereign organisations can fail if they lack operational resilience. ATB's total dependence on their service providers left it defenceless when they withdrew support, a stark warning against vendor lock-in. While 'digital sovereignty' refers to government-mandated control, such as GDPR or data localisation laws, 'digital autonomy' is about an organisation's ability to operate independently, regardless of whether disruptions originate at the geopolitical or vendor level. This distinction has now been officially defined in the Netherlands by the Dutch government. ATB was sovereign (regulated under Dutch law) but not autonomous, so when its cloud providers pulled the plug, it had no backup plan. And, of course, ATB is not alone, in Australia another major hyperscaler accidentally deleted superannuation fund UniSuper's online account. Thankfully for UniSuper and its half a million members, they had taken the wise step of having a third party back-up. Building true autonomy takes a strategic approach To avoid ATB's fate, organisations need to take proactive steps towards technology and systems resilience. First, they should eliminate single points of failure by adopting multi-cloud or hybrid cloud strategies including on-premise solutions, reducing reliance on any single provider. Open source solutions, such as Red Hat OpenShift, offer portability across environments, helping businesses avoid lock-in to a single vendor's ecosystem, and providing customers with the flexibility, privacy and portability required to adapt to future regulations and sovereign requirements. In addition to this, specific technologies such as Confidential Computing can help you to continue using your current investments in cloud technologies while protecting your data from third party operations. Open source software, being a neutral decentralised way to develop software, delivers access and transparency while not relying on a single vendor, instead leaning on the decentralised community as the real back up. Next, organisations must control their exit strategy, for a smooth migration of data and applications if vendors change policies or face geopolitical restrictions. Lastly, they should invest in community-driven resilience that can provide an additional safety net. The CVE database, a cornerstone of global cybersecurity, nearly collapsed after US funding cuts but was saved by international collaboration, demonstrating the need for decentralised solutions and also the need to be able to keep innovating while protecting global collaboration and contributions. Innovating is costly and if you are only a consumer you may miss important advances and security. While digital autonomy is needed, we also must protect global collaboration and innovation with open source communities at its centre. Open source provides transparency and control of code while at the same time accelerating innovation, making it a key strategic investment for local/sovereign talent development. Organisations cannot afford to take a wait-and-see approach when it comes to establishing their digital future. Sovereignty laws will evolve, but resilience is permanent. Digital sovereignty isn't just a regulatory obligation, it's a strategic imperative for survival. The ATB and UniSuper cases showcase that legal compliance alone is insufficient, and that true autonomy requires technical resilience and independence from vendor lock-in.
