Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month has only grown in 5 decades
It has been almost 50 years since the U.S. government established that Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders and their accomplishments should be recognized annually across the nation.
What started as just one week in May has evolved over the decades into a monthlong tribute of events in cities big and small. The nature of celebrations also evolved. Asian American and Pacific Islander or Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month is not just about showcasing festive fare like food and fashion, but hard subjects like grief and social justice. The rise of anti-Asian hate during the pandemic only heightened that effort.
'I think the visibility and the level that the increased participation of organizations in Asian Pacific Heritage Month activities is also an indication of the increasing voice of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in civic life more generally,' said Karen Umemoto, director of the UCLA Asian American Studies Center. 'And also an indication of the spaces that we've come to collectively enter to be able to create those.'
Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month celebrations are not relegated just to ethnic enclaves or culturally-specific venues. Across the U.S., events are planned at public libraries, parks and museums either highlighting a specific Asian culture or a myriad of them.
This year, the occasion is happening as President Donald Trump has curtailed diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in federal government. The president's anti-DEI executive orders appear to have prompted the mistaken removal of Defense Department website content honoring Japanese American service members (it was later restored). In February, during Black History Month, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced that his department would no longer participate in "identity-based observances.'
The White House did, however, host a well-attended Black History Month celebration that Trump attended alongside golf legend Tiger Woods. The White House did not immediately respond to questions about plans for an AAPI Heritage Month celebration.
How did AAPI Heritage Month start?
Many credit the observance's origin to Jeanie Jew, a co-founder of the Congressional Asian-Pacific staff Caucus. In 1977, the Chinese American shared a moving story with New York Republican Rep. Frank Horton about how her grandfather had helped build the transcontinental railroad in the 1800s and then was killed amid anti-Asian unrest.
Jew believed Asians should appreciate their heritage and 'Americans must know about the contributions and histories of the Asian-Pacific American experience,' Horton said in 1992, according to congressional archives. At that time, Black History Month and Hispanic Heritage Month had already been instituted. Yet, Asian Americans were considered the fastest growing racial group.
Horton and California Democratic Rep. Norm Mineta proposed President Jimmy Carter issue a proclamation that the first week of May be 'Asian/Pacific American Heritage Week.' Hawaii Senators Daniel Inouye and Spark Matsunaga, both Democrats, brought up a similar bill in the Senate. Carter signed a joint resolution establishing the celebration in 1978.
Why is it in the month of May?
May was chosen because of two significant events. The first Japanese immigrants to the U.S. arrived on May 7, 1843. Then on May 19, 1869, the final spike for the transcontinental railroad track, in which Chinese laborers played a crucial role, was embedded.
Umemoto recalls hearing talk of Asian Pacific Heritage Week as a college student. But it wasn't something that was mainstream.
'I think it was more of a kind of cultural celebration in the early days,' she said. 'And so a lot of student groups, I remember as doing programming around the different histories, cultural traditions and issues in the community.'
In May 1990, President George H.W. Bush expanded the designation to the entire month. In 2009, President Barack Obama changed the name to Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. President Joe Biden's administration referred to it as Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.
In his first term, Trump issued proclamations in celebration of the month. 'This month, we recognize the more than 20 million Americans of Asian and Pacific Islander descent who make irreplaceable contributions to our Nation's economy, security, and culture,' read a proclamation the Trump White House issued in May 2020.
'Together, we will continue to live out the promise of our founding and build a better future for all Americans,' Trump's proclamation said.
How has the heritage month grown in significance?
Asian American and Pacific Islander advocacy groups have long used the month as a platform to bring resources to underserved communities and educate the public. But, the one-two punch of COVID-19 and assaults on Asian people in the U.S. really gave some a new appreciation for the heritage month's purpose.
Pre-pandemic, Amber Reed, of Montclair, New Jersey, didn't really think about Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. A Korean American adoptee who grew up one of few Asian children in rural Michigan, she said she didn't feel a strong connection to her Asian ancestry. That changed after the March 2021 Atlanta spa shootings that left eight dead, including six Asian women.
'Certainly it jolted me out of thinking that my family could be safe and that we could just sort of muddle through without sort of reckoning with some of the very vicious currents of racism in our culture,' Reed said. 'And I take no pride in having needed that moment to wake me up.'
In response to the shootings, Reed and around 50 others started the nonprofit AAPI New Jersey — originally AAPI Montclair. They will be hosting a Lantern Festival for Justice and Unity for a fifth year. The Chinese custom of lighting lanterns honors victims of hate or injustice.
'I think one thing Asian cultures do so well is provide these rituals, including for collective grief,' said Reed, who still finds it surreal that the group continues to grow.
What events mark the heritage month?
The variety of subjects and cultures feted during Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month has flourished.
There are events happening this month that include more narrow topics, such as Asian Comedy Fest in New York City. And in Wisconsin, the state will celebrate May 14 as Hmong-Lao Veterans Day, which was signed into law in 2021. Thousands of Hmong-Lao soldiers fought alongside U.S. forces during the Vietnam War. Many Hmong and Laotian families resettled in Wisconsin.
These heritage month celebrations are helping to erode the notion that the whole population is a monolith, Umemoto said.
'I think it's important for people to visibly see from a wide range of groups that fall under the category Asian American and Pacific Islanders. There are over 70 different ethnic and national groups and over 100 languages spoken within those communities,' Umemoto said. 'And they're very different.'
___
Terry Tang is a Phoenix-based member of AP's Race and Ethnicity team.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon to review US role in AUKUS submarine pact
The Pentagon is reviewing America's role in a historic, multibillion-dollar pact among Washington, the United Kingdom and Australia to ward off China's growing influence. The widely supported deal calls on the three countries to jointly develop hypersonic weapons and nuclear-powered submarines, a unique security partnership that could strengthen seapower gaps in the Pacific and produce transformative new weapons. Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby — who has expressed skepticism about the program's worth — is running the review, according to two defense officials, granted anonymity to discuss internal policy talks. 'This is an opportunity for the [Defense Department] to ensure the effort is in alignment with the Trump administration's priorities,' one of the officials said. The Biden administration inked the deal, known as AUKUS, four years ago. The people did not say how the Trump administration could tweak the massive package of cooperative efforts or when officials would make a decision. But the agreement appears to have the backing of numerous lawmakers and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who expressed support for it during his confirmation hearing. The Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment. The Financial Times first reported the review. Such assessments aren't entirely unusual. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer initiated a review of AUKUS after his election last year. A U.K. government spokesperson, granted anonymity to discuss the situation, said the review was 'understandable' and that London would continue to work closely with the U.S. and Australia on the deal. But the development was met with frustration from congressional Democrats, especially on the Eastern Seaboard, which houses some of America's largest shipyards. Australia has committed to investing $3 billion in modernizing U.S. shipyards that produce nuclear-powered submarines, a massive influx in cash that would benefit American industry and bulk up its ability to produce submarines. New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said news of the review 'will be met with cheers in Beijing.' She added that scrapping the partnership would 'further tarnish America's reputation and raise more questions among our closest defense partners about our reliability.' Colby has challenged major parts of the AUKUS deal, including a plan for the U.S. to sell three Virginia-class submarines to Australia, citing the need for the U.S. to maintain a robust undersea presence in the Pacific. The Virginia sales would come in three-year intervals starting in 2032 and would replace the retiring Collins-class submarines in the Australian arsenal. But Colby appeared more open to the project during his Senate confirmation hearing in March. 'It should be the policy of the United States government to do everything we can to make this work,' he said. Colby did note he was concerned that selling submarines to Australia, or using U.S. shipyards to help build them, could put the U.S. Navy in 'a weaker position' since they weren't going to American submarine development. The agreement would also mean closer cooperation among the three nations in building quantum computers and hypersonic weapons. And it has largely moved forward without controversy. Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles met with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon in February and pledged the first $500 million of a $3 billion investment. President Donald Trump 'is very aware, supportive of AUKUS, recognizes the importance of the defense industrial base,' Hegseth said at the meeting. The three nations already have poured millions into training to operate nuclear-powered vessels. Australia has funneled even more into expanding its base in Perth on the country's western edge. Connecticut Rep. Joe Courtney, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services seapower subcommittee, questioned why the administration would launch the review when so much is underway. 'To walk away from all the sunk costs invested by our two closest allies, Australia and the United Kingdom, will have far-reaching ramifications on our trustworthiness on the global stage,' he said. 'It is a direct contradiction to the administration's 'America first, but not alone' goal of countering aggression from China, Russia and other adversaries.' Joe Gould and Esther Webber contributed to this report.


CBS News
40 minutes ago
- CBS News
Minnesota Legislature approves increased electric vehicle fee to shore up funding for roads and bridges
Electric vehicle owners aren't paying at the gas pump, but they'll soon see higher fees in Minnesota, thanks to a new law doubling the surcharge for those cars to shore up funding for roads and bridges. The current $75 annual fee will double to at least $150. How much someone pays could be steeper if they have a more expensive, newer vehicle, similar to how the state calculates registration fees, which EV owners must still pay. For example, a new EV with a $50,000 retail price would mean a $250 fee based on that calculation, which is more than three times the current rate. The provision was part of a bipartisan transportation package that the divided Legislature approved during Monday's special session and the objective was to find a sustainable path forward for transportation at a time when gas tax revenue — a large source of that support — is declining, according to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. More electric vehicles on the road, which is the state's goal, will mean even fewer dollars flowing into that account in the future. "There's kind of an irony where we want more fuel-efficient vehicles, but that decreases the amount of money that's going into our roads and bridges to maintain them," said Rep. Jon Koznick, R-Lakeville, the Republican co-chair of the House Transportation Committee. "We have about a billion dollars a year funding gap just to maintain our roads and bridges. And so that's why electric vehicles were getting a really good deal before — they're still going to get a pretty good deal." Koznick explained he would have preferred to make the fee flat across the board and not use the formula that would increase the costs for newer vehicles, which he called "convoluted." But it was part of a compromise with Democrats in a divided Capitol, where bipartisan support was required to advance any legislation. EV owners should be paying higher fees because those cars are heavier and do more damage to the roads, he said. The new surcharge takes effect for car registrations after Jan. 1. There is also a new five-cent fee per kilowatt hour of electricity at public charging stations set to take effect in July 2027, at which point the annual surcharge minimum would drop from $150 to $100. Meanwhile, EV advocates are worried increased fees will make consumers pump the brakes on buying one when it's better for the environment. "We do have concerns that we could be discouraging adoption at this point, at a time when the state has said it really wants to support electrification and get more EVs on the roads," said Carolyn Berninger with Drive Electric Minnesota Coalition in a March interview. Only 1% of cars in Minnesota are electric today, Berninger said, but sales are increasing. Seven percent of cars purchased in 2023 were electric, according to the Minnesota Department of Commerce. The state's goal is that 20% of all cars are electric by 2030. "We feel like now is not the time to hike up EV fees because the market is still emerging," Berninger said. Pat O'Brien of St. Paul told WCCO Wednesday that he loves his electric vehicle that he's had for the last few years. He estimates he has saved thousands in that time by not having to pay for gas. He said he isn't quite sure how he feels about the changes. "I understand the reasoning behind why there should be a surcharge, but I'm not sure about this extra—this is news to me that there's yet two more charges," he said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Baldwin ‘disappointed' Hegseth focused on renaming of USNS Harvey Milk over global threats
Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) on Wednesday questioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over his decision to choose Pride Month as the time to direct the Navy to rename a ship named for gay rights activist Harvey Milk. Speaking during a Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing, Baldwin said she was 'disappointed' Hegseth was choosing to focus his time on renaming a John Lewis class of oil replenishment ships named for civil rights leaders, including the USNS Harvey Milk. 'I think we can all agree that we are at a critical point in our history with respect to global threats, the need to counter adversaries like China and Iran — you've gotten a number of questions along those lines — and I'm disappointed that you are instead focusing on a class of ships named for civil rights leaders,' Baldwin said. 'This committee will continue to pursue serious work in the interests of American national security, and I ask you to choose to join us in that endeavor,' she added. Hegseth replied that the Defense Department is 'not interested in naming ships after activists. That's the stance we're taking.' A former Navy lieutenant who served during the Korean War, Milk in 1977 became the first openly gay man elected to public office in California. He was assassinated a year later and posthumously was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2009. But Hegseth has ordered the Navy to strip USNS Harvey Milk of its moniker, prompting outcry from Democrat lawmakers and former Navy officials, who have called the move 'spiteful' and 'shameful.' Other ships could also soon see their names stripped — including the John Lewis class vessels named for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Harriet Tubman — as part of Hegseth's dismantling of any military program or reading material dealing with or referencing diversity, anti-racism or gender issues. Baldwin, who was the first openly gay candidate to be elected to the Senate, also questioned Hegseth over the analysis used to justify booting transgender service members from the military. President Trump in a Jan. 27 executive order sought to remove transgender people from the military, stating they cannot satisfy the 'rigorous standards' needed to serve, and that allowing their participation threatens military readiness and unit cohesion. But that argument has long been used to keep marginalized groups — including Black, gay or female Americans — from serving. Transgender active-duty service members on Friday had to decide whether to leave the military on their own or be forced out under a 30-day deadline announced last month by Hegseth. Baldwin wanted to know the specific assessment the Defense Department conducted on the ban's impact on U.S. national security prior to its implementation, which Hegseth could not immediately name. 'The department is planning to separate several 1,000 service members due to your partisan beliefs about troops who are transgender,' Baldwin. 'Mr. Secretary, I've seen your speeches and social media posts, but what I'm interested in is the sound policy analysis that we would expect from the Secretary of Defense and how this misguided decision will impact military readiness.' 'We did extensive analysis,' Hegseth replied. 'We agree with the assessment of the executive order that was issued by the White House that there are mental health issues associated with gender dysphoria that complicate military service and readiness, and as a result, we made the decision.' Baldwin again pressed that she has 'asked for that analysis. Please provide it for me and the committee,' to which Hegseth said he would. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.