Kenya central bank cuts rates for seventh time with inflation in target
The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) cut its policy rate to 9.50% from 9.75% previously, the seventh cut in a row.
The decision was in line with the median forecast in a Reuters poll of economists.
"The (Monetary Policy) Committee ... concluded that there was scope for a further easing of the monetary policy stance to augment the previous policy actions aimed at stimulating lending by banks to the private sector," the CBK said in a statement.
Consumer inflation (KECPI=ECI), opens new tab rose to 4.1% year-on-year in July, compared with 3.8% the previous month, but it remains well within the central bank's preferred 2.5% to 7.5% band.
Though price pressures have been contained, the East African country's public finances have been under pressure because of heavy debt repayments and revenue underperformance.
The CBK left its economic growth forecasts for this year and next unchanged, at 5.2% and 5.4%, respectively.
It also maintained its projection for this year's current account deficit, estimating it at 1.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) compared to 1.3% of GDP last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Fed grappling with impact of tariffs as it ponders rate decisions, Goolsbee says
Aug 13 (Reuters) - Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee said on Wednesday the U.S. central bank is grappling with understanding whether tariffs will push up inflation just temporarily or more persistently, which would inform its decision on when to cut interest rates. "As we go into the fall, these are going to be some live meetings and we're going to have to figure it out," Goolsbee told the Greater Springfield Chamber of Commerce in Springfield, Illinois. "The hardest thing that a central bank ever has to do is to try to get the timing right when there are moments of transition." Goolsbee said he is uneasy assuming tariffs will be just a one-time shock to inflation and wants to see more data including wholesale price data due out this week and broader inflation data next month before coming to a view on whether a rate cut is warranted. The Fed left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range at its meeting last month, a decision that drew dissents from Fed Vice Chair of Supervision Michelle Bowman and Fed Governor Christopher Waller. Bowman and Waller wanted to cut rates to head off what they worried was incipient weakness in the labor market. Two days after the end of that policy meeting, the U.S. Labor Department revised its earlier estimates of job growth in May and June sharply downward and reported a smaller-than-expected job gain in July. President Donald Trump called the data rigged and fired the commissioner in charge of producing it. Even so, allies including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have seized on the recent jobs report to call for rate cuts that Trump has pushed hard for all year. Some Fed officials also feel the July jobs report bolstered the case for easing policy. Goolsbee cautioned against reading too much into slowing job growth since that may reflect the sharp drop in immigration. He said he puts more weight on data like the unemployment rate, which at 4.2% is historically low. "I think the state of the labor market is pretty strong, pretty solid," Goolsbee said. Data earlier this week showed consumer prices rose 0.2% on a monthly basis in July, a downshift from the 0.3% reported for the prior month. Goolsbee said he took note of the rise in services inflation, which is not directly related to tariffs, and would be concerned if upcoming data continued to show a broadening of price pressures.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Bank of Canada divided on impact of monetary policy given tariffs, say minutes
By Promit Mukherjee and David Ljunggren OTTAWA, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Ahead of the Bank of Canada's July 30 interest rate decision, governors were divided on how much monetary policy could aid growth under current economic conditions, minutes of the meeting showed on Wednesday. The BoC kept its key policy rate unchanged at 2.75% for the third time in a row but said it could cut rates if the economy weakened as a result of U.S. tariffs and inflationary pressures were kept under control. "Monetary policy works to control inflation by influencing demand and is not well suited to shocks that push prices up because of a decline in aggregate supply," said the minutes. "In this context, there was some debate about what monetary policy could do to support the economy." The bank said the worst case tariff scenario had not transpired and noted there were no signs inflation expectations were becoming de-anchored. The minutes showed some members of the seven-person rate-setting team felt the BoC might have already provided all the support it could by bringing the rates to the middle of its so-called neutral range. The neutral rate is the point where the key rate is just enough to not stimulate or restrict economic growth, and the bank estimates this rate to be within the 2.25% and 3.25% range. "Given the lagged effects of monetary policy, there was a risk that further easing might take effect only as demand was recovering, which could add to price pressures," the meeting noted. But others believed that more support would likely be needed "given the estimated amount and persistence of slack in the economy, particularly if the labor market softened further". Members agreed the spillovers from lower export demand into business investment, employment and household spending had been limited so far. The BoC also discussed how much government spending could partially offset tariff-led weakness. But given the uncertainty and the path of trade negotiations between the U.S. and Canada, they would need to wait to draw firm conclusions on how the economy and inflation would evolve, forcing them to look "over a shorter horizon than usual." The bank's next rate decision will be on Sept. 17. Money markets see the odds of another pause are roughly 67% since most analysts and economists think the worst impact of tariffs on the Canadian economy is likely over. (Reuters Ottawa editorial) Keywords: CANADA CENBANK/
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Whatever happens to inflation, it's food prices that really bite
I've been guilty of an annoying habit over the summer, one that produces eye-rolling from others. I peer into a punnet of strawberries, count them, do the mental sum and then expostulate with something like '25p per berry!' Or, with added old-man grumpiness: 'Five shillings for a strawberry!' You might think this focus on the price of fruit as evidence for the rising cost of living is a bit weird, but you'd be wrong. We're all prone to it. Research by economists at the Bank of England found that of all spending categories, it is food items that are most likely to catch our eye and determine our view of the inflation rate more generally. Not only that, the research, published in May, found that rises in food prices in particular tend to exaggerate our view of future living costs: a 1 per cent rise in food costs increases our expectations of overall inflation in a year's time by 1.8 per cent, almost twice as much. Or in Bank-speak: 'Our results imply that the risk of household expectations contributing to persistent inflationary dynamics is greatest following large and inflationary shocks to, specifically, food prices.' Even energy bills and fuel prices aren't as potent, they found, in spite of accounting for a greater chunk of household spending. Those of us who thought the petrol price displayed at filling stations was the single most influential number in shaping the public mood about living costs are wrong. The phenomenon holds across all age groups, regions, income levels, job types and both genders, the researchers found. The only product or service category even more psychologically powerful than food was alcohol, especially for higher income and older households. Imbibers tended to be 'excessively sensitive to price changes': a 1 per cent increase in the price of their tipple produced a 4 per cent increase in their perception of the overall inflation rate. The researchers didn't say whether this was before or after consumption. Food, which only accounts for 11 per cent of average household spending, may be distorting our view of inflation more generally. So, for example, the very welcome £60 or 10 per cent fall in the average motor insurance premium to £562, announced on Wednesday by the Association of British Insurers, may carry less weight with us than the 10p increase in the cost of the chocolate bar we buy every day. This matters for two reasons. First, because present-day inflation expectations can exacerbate future price pressures in a self-feeding spiral. Firms raise prices when they expect their own input prices to rise. Employees push for pay rises which lead to firms putting up prices again. Second, because food prices in particular are surging right now. Annual food price inflation in June was 4.5 per cent. That compares to 3.6 per cent for the wider consumer prices index (CPI). Poor harvests have pushed up prices of coffee and cocoa beans while dry conditions at home have lifted beef and dairy prices. The problem is more pronounced in the UK than elsewhere. Food price inflation is 1.5 percentage points higher here than in the euro area. Different British tastes and therefore different weightings in the CPI basket may explain some of it, but two factors confined to the UK may have added to the effect. One is the rise in the minimum wage and in national insurance, which disproportionately affects the food industry, a low-wage sector. The other is the imminent new regime for packaging, which loads the cost of disposing of or recycling plastic, cardboard and glass on to the industry that produces it. The first EPR (extended producer responsibility) invoices will be sent out to food firms in October and some are already raising their prices in anticipation. UK food price inflation is therefore heading beyond 5 per cent in the next few months and rising to as high as 5.5 per cent by the year-end, according to Bank projections. This is not just an awkward statistic for monetary policy makers. The government will need very fancy footwork this autumn as it finds itself (probably) forced to raise taxes at a time when the price of that most essential of essentials is escalating and wages growth is slowing. (Note to all MPs: mug up on the price of a litre of milk or loaf of bread to avoid embarrassing interview ambushes this autumn.) The potency of food prices in influencing consumer thinking is a potential trap for the Bank. It is already losing the confidence of households. Inflation has been above its 2 per cent target in 46 of the past 60 months. In the latest 'Inflation Attitudes' survey, the average prediction of members of the public for inflation in five years is now 3.63 per cent, the highest since May 2019 and higher even than in 2022 when the actual inflation rate hit double digits. Bank of England credibility has been eroded and the UK is now 'an outlier' compared to Europe, according to Pantheon Economics. 'Something has changed — for the worse — in the way consumers make inflation forecasts,' warns Robert Wood, Pantheon's chief UK economist. Public faith in the Bank's determination to bring inflation back down to target is already wobbling. The coming pick-up in food price increases could sour that confidence further. Even if the wider CPI rate does start to come down, households may not feel it or believe it. Last week's cut in the base rate to 4 per cent could soon look premature. This may not be a Marie ('Let them eat cake') Antoinette moment. But the accelerating price of food is certain to rise up the agenda this autumn, in Westminster and the City.
