Novo's new CEO faces sceptical investors with Wegovy US sales in focus
LONDON (Reuters) -Novo Nordisk's new CEO Maziar Mike Doustdar has been handed the reins to turn around the Wegovy-making firm's flagging sales growth and sliding share price. He first will need to win over sceptical investors.
Doustdar, an Iranian-born Austrian national who grew up in the United States, is a company man. He joined Novo in 1992 as an office clerk in Vienna, rising through the ranks to head all commercial units globally - minus the U.S.
"The company needs to address recent market challenges with speed and ambition," Novo Nordisk Chair Helge Lund said in a statement on Tuesday. "Mike has a clear vision of how to unlock the full potential of the opportunities ahead."
Investors aren't so sure, worried that Doustdar's lack of U.S. experience will hinder his ability to turn things around in Novo's top market and take the battle to tough U.S. rival Eli Lilly.
Novo, which became Europe's most valuable listed firm after the launch of Wegovy in 2021, has seen its shares slump since mid last year, which led to the abrupt removal in May of CEO Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen. On Tuesday the shares plunged more than 20%, knocking some $70 billion off the group's market cap.
"When the stock falls as much as it has, people want to see change," said Barclays analyst Emily Field, adding that her sense was that "people are not happy" with the choice of CEO because it was not a big enough renewal.
"My understanding is that he has never had U.S. operational experience, and the U.S. is all that matters."
Novo - once worth as much as $615 billion, and now nearer $240 billion - has faced rising competition and been hit by copycat rivals to its weight-loss drugs, especially in the critical U.S. market, which led to a sharp profit warning earlier on Tuesday.
In early calls with analysts and journalists, Doustdar said that there was an "urgency" to do things differently.
"I don't like it," Doustdar said when asked about the share price plunge. "I don't like it as an employee, I don't like it as a CEO-elect, and I certainly don't like it as a shareholder myself. But setbacks don't define companies. Our response does."
Jefferies analysts said they were surprised by the appointment of Doustdar, noting that feedback had suggested a preference for an external candidate.
"I don't see this as super positive," said Lukas Leu, portfolio manager at Bellevue Asset Management, a Novo shareholder. Markus Manns, a portfolio manager at another shareholder, Union Investment, added there was "slight disappointment".
"People had hoped for an external candidate," he said.
Board chair Lund said external and internal candidates had been considered in the CEO search, and Doustdar had emerged as the leading candidate in part because he knows the company and its strengths and weaknesses.
"He can respond and take actions on those, I think, quicker than anyone could do coming from the outside," Lund said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-What are the new tariff rates Trump set on US imports from dozens of countries?
(Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Thursday new tariffs of up to 41% on goods imported from dozens of countries, again citing emergency powers he says he is using to shrink the country's trade deficits with many of its trade partners. Here are the new adjusted reciprocal tariff rates levied on U.S. importers that Trump announced ahead of his August 1 deadline for negotiated trade agreements, listed in alphabetical order by country of origin. Imports from some countries, like Brazil, are facing additional tariffs that stack on top of the reciprocal tariffs listed below. Afghanistan 15% Algeria 30% Angola 15% Bangladesh 20% Bolivia 15% Bosnia and Herzegovina 30% Botswana 15% Brazil 10% Brunei 25% Cambodia 19% Cameroon 15% Chad 15% Costa Rica 15% Côte d`Ivoire 15% Democratic Republic of the 15% Congo Ecuador 15% European Union 0%–15% Equatorial Guinea 15% Falkland Islands 10% Fiji 15% Ghana 15% Guyana 15% Iceland 15% India 25% Indonesia 19% Iraq 35% Israel 15% Japan 15% Jordan 15% Kazakhstan 25% Laos 40% Lesotho 15% Libya 30% Liechtenstein 15% Madagascar 15% Malawi 15% Malaysia 19% Mauritius 15% Moldova 25% Mozambique 15% Myanmar (Burma) 40% Namibia 15% Nauru 15% New Zealand 15% Nicaragua 18% Nigeria 15% North Macedonia 15% Norway 15% Pakistan 19% Papua New Guinea 15% Philippines 19% Serbia 35% South Africa 30% South Korea 15% Sri Lanka 20% Switzerland 39% Syria 41% Taiwan 20% Thailand 19% Trinidad and Tobago 15% Tunisia 25% Turkey 15% Uganda 15% United Kingdom 10% Vanuatu 15% Venezuela 15% Vietnam 20% Zambia 15% Zimbabwe 15% (Compiled by Jonathan Allen; Editing by Jamie Freed)
New York Post
12 minutes ago
- New York Post
SOS — Save Our Shipping: Trump must break China's chokehold on global trade
A high-stakes deal that would give an American company a major role in running dozens of strategically crucial global ports is now in limbo — as China aggressively demands a stake. The United States cannot let that happen. US asset manager BlackRock and its partners are vying for 43 of the world's most important shipping ports, including the two that straddle the Panama Canal. The seller is C.K. Hutchison, a major Hong Kong operator that is one of China's 'big three' port giants — and the only one not owned outright by the Chinese government. Prying these ports from China's oversight is a critical move for both US national security and the global economy. Now the Chinese Communist Party is trying to block the deal, unless its state-owned COSCO joins the buyers' group and gains veto rights over port operations. Alarmingly, all three main parties are reportedly open to letting that happen, apparently thinking that a compromised deal is better than no deal at all. But with all that's at stake, President Donald Trump should use every tool available — starting with the ongoing US-China trade talks — to push the original deal through and keep COSCO out. The 43 ports that Hutchison seeks to sell would launch a global liberation from oppressive Chinese surveillance and control. If the plan falls through — or if it's altered to add COSCO to the ownership group — China could tighten its grip on the global shipping system, by replacing a Beijing-influenced company with a Beijing-controlled one. While the media has dubbed this the 'Panama Canal deal,' it's actually much bigger. The canal, a vital artery that runs through the center of the western hemisphere, is certainly critical — but many of the other ports involved in the deal are equally so. For example, this deal would include a port inside the Malacca Strait, the only direct maritime pathway between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It sees 90,000 ships and $3.5 trillion worth of global trade every year. Hutchison is also looking to sell five ports that it owns on both sides of the Suez Canal, the preferred maritime commercial route between the Asian and European markets. About 12% of global trade, $1 trillion a year, passes through Suez. As China's purchases of sanctioned Iranian oil draw greater US scrutiny, Hutchison's four ports on the southern side of the Strait of Hormuz are also critical. Nearly all Iranian oil must pass through the strait, along with oil and gas from Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar. In Europe, Hutchison controls 13 ports that act as a key entry point for Chinese goods into the European Union. The original deal would reduce China's port foothold on the continent — and the geopolitical influence that comes with it. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Like all major commercial deals, this one is complicated. Apart from the two Panama Canal ports, BlackRock would retain 20% ownership of the remaining facilities; its partner, Europe-based Mediterranean Shipping Corp., would control 70%, with Singapore's Sovereign Wealth Fund owning the rest. Meanwhile, China's power in global shipping is massive. China produces 95% of world shipping containers and all of the refrigerated ones. Ports around the world are plugged into China's logistical software platform, LOGINK, which tracks sensitive trade, market, maritime and passenger data. Huawei's 'Smart Port' 5G telecommunication towers provide Wi-Fi — and ready surveillance capacity — at ports worldwide. A Chinese state-owned company makes more than 70% of the world's ship-to-shore cranes (and 80% of the cranes used in America) — a major risk, according to the House Homeland Security Committee, which has alleged those cranes may be engaging in covert surveillance on behalf of the CCP. Adding state-owned COSCO to ports deal would give the CCP the power to veto any attempts to replace Huawei towers, LOGINK systems, Chinese cranes or other tools that may already be spying on behalf of the state. With BlackRock's minority interest in the vast bulk of these ports, replacing a private Chinese company with a state-owned one is even worse for the United States than the status quo. Breaking China's maritime monopoly is urgent. At the same time, America's economic leverage has never been higher. As Beijing trumps up patently absurd anti-monopoly investigations to stall or scuttle the BlackRock-MSC deal, the United States should Trump right back. He must make the choice clear: Access to American markets cannot continue unless Beijing releases its maritime monopoly. Elaine Dezenski heads the Center on Economic and Financial Power at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, where Susan Soh is a research associate.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Japan June jobless rate unchanged at 2.5%
TOKYO (Reuters) -Japan's jobless rate in June was unchanged from the previous month at 2.5%, government data showed on Friday. Economists' median forecast was also for 2.5%. The jobs-to-applicants ratio in June fell to 1.22 from 1.24 in May. The median forecast was 1.25. Sign in to access your portfolio
