Indian Oil Corporation says not in talks for term crude import deal with Russia
Indian Oil Corporation
(IOC), the nation's largest oil firm, is not discussing a term or fixed quantity deal for import of Russian oil given the volatility in the international market, Chairman
A S Sahney
said on Wednesday. India's import of Russian oil has surged since the start of the Ukraine war in February 2022. Russia was India's top crude oil supplier for the third consecutive year in 2024-25, primarily driven by attractive discounts on Russian crude. The discounts, which have narrowed since, offset the logistical challenges and longer shipping times associated with sourcing oil from Russia.
Sahney said the share of Russian oil in the basket of oil that IOC imports for refining into fuels like petrol and diesel, has come down to 22-23 per cent from 30 per cent.
"It has to meet my requirements and also be commercially viable," he told reporters here.
The crude, he said, has to fit into the company's rigorous optimisation model which looks at producing the fuel that market wants from the most economically available source.
"It has to make commercial sense for me to import oil from a particular source," he said, adding the decision is not driven by sanctions or any other geopolitical issue.
Asked if the company was looking at getting into a term import deal for Russian crude, he said, "No. As of now, we are not in any active negotiations but we are open to it."
"We are waiting and watching because everyday things are changing," he said. "I don't think it is time to enter into any new term deal in these conditions."
On imports from the US, he said there is no 'mandate' from anyone to import a particular quantity of oil from any part of the world.
"We import if it makes commercial sense," he said.
The US has emerged as a significant crude oil supplier to India, which is more than 85 per cent dependent on imports to meet its oil needs.
Increasing oil and gas imports from the US has been talked about as one of the bargaining chips that India may use to avoid steep tariffs proposed by the Trump administration. Oil and gas could be part of the trade deal that India may enter into with the US.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Ukraine: Europe's war with Russia
The Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 marked more than a territorial conflict — it triggered a seismic shift in global geopolitics. This e-book from The Hindu Group unpacks the layers of this ongoing crisis, revealing how a war in Eastern Europe revived NATO, fractured old certainties, and redrew the contours of great power rivalry. As the U.S. reasserted its role in European security and NATO welcomed new members, Ukraine became a symbol of resistance — until geopolitical pressures shifted the narrative yet again. This e-book traces these dramatic developments with clarity and depth, featuring expert perspectives on war, diplomacy, and the reshaping of Europe's future. What's inside: · Introduction: Return of great power rivalry, by Stanly Johny · Russia-Ukraine conflict: Appraisal and strategic dimension, by Maj. Gen. B.K. Sharma · The defence of Ukraine: U.S., Europe & NATO, by P.S. Raghavan · Reorienting Europe, by Ravinder Kaur · India's policy towards the Russia-Ukraine war and its impact, by Happymon Jacob Editor's Note: War is rarely, if ever, between just two countries. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 shook up Europe and energised NATO. War was no longer a distant memory; it wasn't in geologically remote parts of Asia and Africa; the battles were now in Europe. NATO got new members in Finland and Sweden; the United States was again in the forefront of defending Europe. In many ways it was Russia against NATO as Ukraine symbolised the fight against Russian expansionism. Until it wasn't. Donald Trump as U.S. President changed many things, Ukraine one among them. He pushed both Ukraine and Russia to end the war; and since he had more influence over Ukraine than over Russia, it was Ukraine that was under greater pressure to agree to a ceasefire. In Ukraine: Europe's war with Russia, we trace the great power rivalry playing out in Ukraine, the centrality of NATO for Europe's security, and the reinventing of the idea of Europe and the liberal West. This digital book series is available for free for subscribers of The Hindu's online edition, including the e-paper, and can be purchased by non-subscribers on Amazon. Each e-book focuses on a single theme and provides a comprehensive perspective, featuring insights from subject experts. We hope this series serves as a valuable resource for our readers and enhances our expanding digital library. Suresh Nambath Editor, The Hindu To download a sample of the e-book : To buy the e-book from Amazon: To download the PDF version for the book, subscribe here: Content - Ukraine
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
PSU OMCs slide as crude oil boils
Shares of three state-run oil marketing companies fell 1.2% to 2.6% after Brent crude prices flared up following an Israeli airstrike on Iran that sharply escalated tensions in the Middle East. In commodities, Brent crude (August 2025 contract) soared $5.59, or 8.06%, to $74.95 per barrel amid heightened geopolitical tensions. Meanwhile, the Nifty 50 index was down 203.45 points, or 0.82% at 24,685.25. BPCL (down 2.59%), HPCL (down 2.24%) and Indian Oil Corporation (down 1.2%) edged lower. The heightened geopolitical unrest has sparked fears of potential disruptions to global oil supplies, especially through key transit points like the Strait of Hormuz. Higher crude oil prices could increase under-recoveries of PSU OMCs on domestic sale of LPG and kerosene at controlled prices. The government has freed pricing of petrol and diesel.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Attacking Iran, Israel brazenly defies 'man of peace' Trump
Washington: US President Donald Trump on Thursday implored Israel not to attack Iran and declared once again his goal was to be a peacemaker. Hours later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu , one of Trump's closest international allies, brazenly defied his advice by unleashing a major military campaign described as a "preemptive" strike against Iran's nuclear program. The attack marks only the latest setback for Trump's lofty goal set out at the start of his second term of being a "man of peace." Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom Trump has also boasted a warm relationship, has rebuffed his overtures on a ceasefire with Ukraine. And Israel resumed another massive offensive in Gaza after talks bogged down on extending a ceasefire with Hamas reached with Trump's support at the end of his predecessor Joe Biden 's term. Live Events Trump's friend and roving envoy Steve Witkoff -- who has negotiated in all three crises -- had been set to meet Iranian officials again Sunday in Oman. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a statement made clear the United States was not involved in attacking Iran and warned Tehran not to retaliate against US troops in the region. Rubio said that Israel advised that it attacked out of "self-defense," but conspicuously did not say if the United States agreed. Trump, hours before the strikes, doubled down with a social media post saying he remained "committed to a diplomatic resolution" on Iran. Netanyahu has described Iran's cleric-run government, which backs Hamas, as an existential threat and already last year ordered strikes that knocked out its air defenses. "We've clearly seen a fork in the road in the American and Israeli approaches to this problem set," said Dana Stroul, a former senior Pentagon official who is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "These strikes are going to disrupt and delay and degrade Iran's nuclear program. The question, I think, is whether or not the United States and Israel in the future are going to work together on what to do to maximize the time that's put back on the clock," she said. Increasingly at odds Stroul noted that rifts had been building between Israel and Trump, who last month agreed to remove sanctions on Syria after former Islamist guerrilla Ahmed al-Sharaa swept into power. Trump embraced the new Syrian leader after appeals on a tour of Gulf Arab monarchies -- which have also backed diplomacy on Iran. In Qatar last month, Trump said after meeting the emir that he believed a deal was in sight with Iran and that there would be no "nuclear dust" over the region. Despite growing disagreements, Israel enjoys robust support in Trump's right-wing base. The Trump administration in recent days has again taken lonely positions to back Israel, with the United States casting one of the only votes at the UN General Assembly against a Gaza ceasefire resolution and criticizing top allies, including Britain, for imposing sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers. Justin Logan, director of defense and foreign policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Israeli attack will "destroy US diplomatic efforts" on Iran and called for Trump to reject any US military role in protecting Israel from retaliation. "Israel has the right to choose its own foreign policy. At the same time, it has the responsibility to bear the costs of that policy," he said. But lawmakers in Trump's Republican Party quickly rallied behind Israel. Senator Tom Cotton said that the United States should "back Israel to the hilt, all the way," and topple Iran's Islamic Republic if it targets US troops. Trump's Democratic rivals, who mostly backed his diplomacy on Iran, were aghast at Israel's action on the eve of new US-Iran talks. "Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," said Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Forces Committee.
