Scientists accuse Ireland and New Zealand of methane ‘accounting trick'
A group of 26 climate scientists from around the world have penned an open letter to New Zealand and Ireland criticising how the methane greenhouse gas is measured.
In Ireland's case, it may be a reaction to the programme for government 2025 commitment to "recognise the distinct characteristics of biogenic methane, as described by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and advocate for the accounting of this greenhouse gas to be re-classified at EU and international level".
The 26 scientists, in an open letter shared with the London-based Financial Times newspaper, said governments with large livestock sectors, including those of Ireland and New Zealand, are increasingly using a new method for calculating methane's effect on climate change which estimates its contribution to warming based on how emissions are changing relative to a baseline.
They specifically accused politicians in New Zealand and Ireland of using an 'accounting trick' to back their sheep and cattle industries. It is believed they are referring to GWP*, a version of the Global Warming Potential formula devised by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Other climate researchers, at the University of Oxford, came up with GWP* about six years ago, as a better way for governments to set emissions targets for different greenhouse gases.
They said the original GWP100 method did not reliably account for the different impacts of long-lived (such as carbon dioxide) and short-lived (such as methane) gases.
They said different lifespans of emissions were crucial to understanding their potential to warm the earth's atmosphere. Carbon dioxide accumulates in the atmosphere, and even if its emissions ceases, the warming they caused would continues for centuries. But methane does not accumulate, being relatively rapidly removed naturally from the atmosphere. But GWP100 does not allow for this, according to the GWP* camp.
Now, a different scientist at the University of Oxford, Paul Behrens, global professor of environmental change at the university, is one of the 26 whose open letter to the Financial Times warned some governments are misapplying GWP*, to justify allowing emissions to remain flat rather than decline.
They warned this could set a precedent, allowing other countries to justify minimal reductions in methane emissions, and jeopardising commitments under the 2015 Paris Agreement as well as the Global Methane Pledge launched in 2021.
Myles Allen, professor of geosystem science at Oxford University's physics department, and one of the scientists behind GWP*, said governments, not scientists, must decide whether farmers should undo past warming from herd growth.
He still supports separate targets for methane and carbon dioxide, saying GWP100 overstates the warming impact of constant methane emissions, and is slow to reflect the impact of emission changes.
Read More
Rise in low-emission slurry spreading puts Ireland on track for ammonia target
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
15 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Three years left before best chance of managing global temperature rise is lost
A team of scientists from 17 countries including Ireland have calculated the remaining 'carbon budget' and warn it is set to run out in 2028. Their warning comes with a slew of new data that shows all the measurements of climate change moving in the wrong direction. Sea level, for example, has risen twice as fast over the last six years compared to the previous century as warming oceans expand and ice caps melt more rapidly than before. The surge is revealed in a collaboration by 61 experts from 54 universities and institutes published today. They warn that the Earth's atmosphere can take only three more years of carbon and other greenhouse gases being pumped out at today's rate before hitting a critical stage. At that point, the accumulation of warming gases is expected to be beyond what would provide a 50pc chance of keeping global temperature rise to 1.5C. Preventing temperature rise exceeding 1.5C is the aim of the landmark Paris Agreement signed by almost all the world's nations in 2015. Technically, the agreement is not broken by breaching 1.5C because it refers to that level of temperature rise being sustained over several decades. However, the scientists behind the Indicators of Global Climate Change (IGCC) initiative point out that the 1.5C mark was already exceeded in 2024 and, while this was a record-breaking year, the likelihood of it being repeated sooner and often is increasing all the time. The IGCC initiative was set up to provide annual updates on climate change in between publication of the flagship reports of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), which are produced only every six or seven years. ADVERTISEMENT Its latest report shows rapid changes since the last report was published in 2021. Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the most common and long-lasting greenhouse gas, rose by 1.3pc. The amount of CO2 accumulated in the atmosphere increased by 3.1pc while concentration of methane, which has a shorter lifespan but greater short-term warming impact, increased by 3.4pc. Average temperature rise grew by 13.8pc and the remaining carbon budget dwindled by 74pc – from 500 billion tonnes of CO2 to 130 billion tonnes at the start of 2025. Sea levels rose by 26mm, counting from 2019, giving an average increase of 4.3mm per year compared to an average of 1.8mm per year over the previous 120 years. 'This seemingly small number is having an outsized impact on low-lying coastal areas, making storm surges more damaging and causing more coastal erosion,' said Dr Aimee Slangen, of the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research. 'The concerning part is that we know that sea level rise in response to climate change is relatively slow, which means that we have already locked in further increases in the coming years and decades.'
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
Podcast reviews: Does baby brain exist? Do women who have children later live longer and do men really have higher sex drives?
As AI-generated images and Chinese whispers catch fire on social media, many of us accept that inherent biases challenge the objectivity of science and history. And also how evolving technology changes results. Take light. In 1801 physicist Thomas Young performed 'the double-slit experiment' which confirmed light's wave characteristic. But current research suggests dark photons may instead be at play, therefore busting centuries' worth of quantum physics. This is one of the head-scratching subjects discussed in The World, The Universe and Us (Apple, Spotify), a new series co-hosted by Rowan Hooper and Penny Sarchet for New Scientist. Other heavy matter topics delivered with a light touch include an unsettling experiment of inserting bioelectronic devices into tadpoles, in a quest to further understand how early development of the human brain might work (hmmm?), and the dubious pros and common-sense cons of mining for platinum on the moon. Is baby brain real? Do women who have children later live longer? Do queer couples share the housework more equally? Do men have higher libidos? These are among the questions asked by Melbourne-based sociologist Leah Ruppanner on MissPerceived (Acast, Apple, Spotify), which queries gender myths and received wisdom. And regarding those aforementioned questions, the answers in a nutshell are: yes, hormonal changes absolutely disrupt cognitive functioning; genes are more likely to play a factor; yes, heterosexual men undeniably do the least domestic chores; it's complicated, but the latest study used masturbation as the end goal, which troubles Ruppanner in the first place – but I'd encourage you to listen to find out how she comes to those conclusions as she even-handedly compares empirical and anecdotal data. Artificial intelligence is typically discussed in its most dystopian conclusions – robots replacing the human race. Journalist George Butler co-hosts with Internet Advertising Bureau's CSO James Chandler on AI Haven't a Clue (Apple, Spotify), to explore how AI affects our day-to-day life. 'The world is changing at a pretty crazy rate,' says Butler, 'and I don't really understand how and why. Luckily I've now got James and expert guests.' These include Muhammad Lila, CNN war-zone correspondent turned AI entrepreneur, and Tobias Allen, CEO of influencer platform Fanvue, as they unpick current AI headlines.
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Scientists accuse Ireland and New Zealand of methane ‘accounting trick'
A group of 26 climate scientists from around the world have penned an open letter to New Zealand and Ireland criticising how the methane greenhouse gas is measured. In Ireland's case, it may be a reaction to the programme for government 2025 commitment to "recognise the distinct characteristics of biogenic methane, as described by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and advocate for the accounting of this greenhouse gas to be re-classified at EU and international level". The 26 scientists, in an open letter shared with the London-based Financial Times newspaper, said governments with large livestock sectors, including those of Ireland and New Zealand, are increasingly using a new method for calculating methane's effect on climate change which estimates its contribution to warming based on how emissions are changing relative to a baseline. They specifically accused politicians in New Zealand and Ireland of using an 'accounting trick' to back their sheep and cattle industries. It is believed they are referring to GWP*, a version of the Global Warming Potential formula devised by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Other climate researchers, at the University of Oxford, came up with GWP* about six years ago, as a better way for governments to set emissions targets for different greenhouse gases. They said the original GWP100 method did not reliably account for the different impacts of long-lived (such as carbon dioxide) and short-lived (such as methane) gases. They said different lifespans of emissions were crucial to understanding their potential to warm the earth's atmosphere. Carbon dioxide accumulates in the atmosphere, and even if its emissions ceases, the warming they caused would continues for centuries. But methane does not accumulate, being relatively rapidly removed naturally from the atmosphere. But GWP100 does not allow for this, according to the GWP* camp. Now, a different scientist at the University of Oxford, Paul Behrens, global professor of environmental change at the university, is one of the 26 whose open letter to the Financial Times warned some governments are misapplying GWP*, to justify allowing emissions to remain flat rather than decline. They warned this could set a precedent, allowing other countries to justify minimal reductions in methane emissions, and jeopardising commitments under the 2015 Paris Agreement as well as the Global Methane Pledge launched in 2021. Myles Allen, professor of geosystem science at Oxford University's physics department, and one of the scientists behind GWP*, said governments, not scientists, must decide whether farmers should undo past warming from herd growth. He still supports separate targets for methane and carbon dioxide, saying GWP100 overstates the warming impact of constant methane emissions, and is slow to reflect the impact of emission changes. Read More Rise in low-emission slurry spreading puts Ireland on track for ammonia target
