Parties happy as wait for civic polls to end soon
Mumbai: The Supreme Court order on local body elections was welcomed by political parties in Maharashtra.OBC leader and NCP MLA Chhagan Bhujbal said he was very happy with the direction. He said Akhil Bharatiya Mahatma Phule Samata Parishad, headed by Bhujbal, had filed a petition in SC."We put up lawyers in court. Sameer Bhujbal and Mahesh Zagade were present in court. In the last few days, they held discussions with various lawyers, explaining to them about the injustice. All parties accepted that OBC/Nomadic Tribes reservations, prior to the Banthia Commission, will be implemented. In the last 8 days, we've had two pieces of good news. Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a caste census, and today our demand has been accepted by the Supreme Court. All panchayat, zilla parishad, nagar palika and mahanagar palika elections will now be held on this basis," he said.BJP state president Chandrashekhar Bawankule said SC delivered a landmark verdict benefiting countless party workers. "We have been waiting for this moment for the past 3 years. The SC delivered a decision that strengthens the democratic framework. This ruling paves the way for prompt local body elections, doubling the enthusiasm among party workers."Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee president Harshwardhan Sapkal said the govt must hold all local body polls within 4 months as directed by SC. "Without any excuse, the govt must hold local body elections and restore the prestige of the corporator, mayor, and chairman of local bodies."tnn
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Supreme Court Leaves Intact Ban on High-Capacity Gun Magazines
(Bloomberg) -- The US Supreme Court turned away a fresh gun-rights appeal, refusing to question the District of Columbia's ban on large-capacity ammunition-feeding devices. The justices on Friday rejected arguments from four firearms owners who said the ban violates the gun-rights protections in the Constitution's Second Amendment. On June 2, the high court rejected a similar appeal in a Rhode Island case along with a challenge to a Maryland ban on so-called assault weapons. In each case, the court fell one vote short of the four required to take up a new case. In addition to DC, 14 states outlaw high-capacity ammunition-feeding devices, according to Giffords Law Center, an interest group that supports gun restrictions. The DC law makes it a felony to possess gun magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. It was enacted in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's landmark 2008 decision striking down the district's handgun ban and for the first time saying the Constitution protects individual gun rights. A federal trial judge and then an appeals court upheld the DC restrictions. Gun-rights advocates who sued to block the DC measure sought to extend the 2022 Supreme Court decision that declared a constitutional right to carry a firearm and established a tough new test for assessing restrictions. The challengers said Americans possess hundreds of millions of large-capacity magazines, many of them for self-defense purposes. Supporters of the bans say the devices have been repeatedly used in mass shootings. The law was backed at the lower court level by Everytown for Gun Safety, an advocacy group founded and backed by Michael Bloomberg, founder and majority owner of Bloomberg News parent company Bloomberg LP. The case is Hanson v. District of Columbia, 24-936. More stories like this are available on
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Assamese web series spotlights NRC ‘scam'
GUWAHATI Sixteen years after a petition in the Supreme Court led to the exercise to update Assam's list of citizens, the National Register of Citizens (NRC) is back in the form of entertainment. The trailer of Scam 2019, an Assamese web series based on alleged financial irregularities in the Supreme Court-monitored updating process that cost the government more than ₹1,600 crore, was released on Friday (June 6, 2025). Aabhijeet Sharma, the producer and story writer of the web series, did the honours along with others involved with it. As the head of Assam Public Works, an NGO, he was the key person behind the 2009 petition in the Supreme Court seeking a mechanism to weed out '41 lakh illegal immigrants' from the State. The NRC process began in 2013, with retired bureaucrat Prateek Hajela as its State Coordinator. The complete draft of the NRC, published in August 2019, excluded 19.06 lakh people out of 3.3 crore applicants for lack of documents to prove their citizenship. Mr Sharma insisted Scam 2019 is a fictional account of a corrupt officer, who becomes involved in a massive scam when entrusted with the responsibility to preserve the identity and culture of Assam's indigenous communities. 'This scam not only leads to financial loss, but also triggers a multi-faceted crisis affecting the State's physical, emotional, and cultural fabric,' he said. Hitesh Dev Sarma, who succeeded Mr Hajela as the State NRC Coordinator, said the exercise was fraught with corruption, involving kickbacks and money laundering. He also accused his predecessor of fraudulently including the names of suspected foreigners in the updated NRC. The trailer, however, indicates it is closer to reality than fiction. One of the main characters, played by popular actor Jatin Bora, is based on Mr Sharma and his activism. The web series will stream on Red Cinemas 18+, an OTT platform with multilingual subtitles targeting regional and international audiences. Apart from Mr Bora, the cast includes Bibhuti Bhushan Hazarika, Maytrayee Goswami, Manik Roy, Yankee Parasar, Bhabesh Das, Arsana Pujari, and R.K., who is also the director of the web series. Bhaskar Deka has penned the screenplay and dialogues, while Bitul Das has handled the cinematography, Jhulan Krishna Mahanta the editing, and Rideep Das the music.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
SC refuses to urgently hear plea against order allowing animal slaughter for Eid-ul-Azha at 'dargah'
Agencies Supreme Court (File Photo) The Supreme Court on Friday refused to accord urgent hearing on a plea challenging the Bombay High Court order which permitted animal slaughter for Eid-ul-Azha and Urs at a 'dargah' at Vishalgad fort in Maharashtra's Kolhapur fort is a protected monument, citing which the authorities had prohibited slaughtering of animals and birds on the plea challenging the high court's June 3 order was mentioned for urgent listing before a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma. "Tomorrow, Bakri Eid is there and in a protected monument, Vishalgad, in Maharashtra, the high court has permitted slaughter," the counsel, who mentioned the matter, said. He said the high court has allowed animal slaughter in the protected monument area also for Urs till June 12. "In protected monuments, so many religious activities are going on," the bench lawyer claimed there was a specific notification of the state of Maharashtra which said animals cannot be slaughtered in the protected said last year, animal slaughter within enclosed premises was permitted by the high counsel said the high court has said in its order that restrictions which were there last year, would apply this year also."Be it of any religion or faith, in a protected monument, so many activities are going on," the bench observed."Let me tell you, sitting in Tripura (high court), I had banned animal slaughter there and then this court modified the order to say, in an enclosed place it would be carried out," Justice Karol counsel then urged the bench to list the matter for hearing next week. "What is the urgency? The matter would be infructuous," the bench observed. A vacation bench of the high court had heard an application by Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan Dargah Trust, seeking permission for slaughtering animals. The high court had permitted animal slaughter for Eid-ul-Azha to be celebrated on June 7 and the four-day Urs (fair) to be held from June 8 to 12 at the 'dargah' at Vishalgad had said the order shall extend not just to the 'dargah' trust but to other devotees high court had said similar permission was granted last year had added that conditions imposed last year like carrying out the animal slaughter only in private and enclosed space specifically at Gate No. 19, which is privately-owned by Mubarak Usman Mujawar, and not in public areas, shall apply this year too. The Deputy Director of Archaeology had prohibited animal sacrifice at the fort, citing the Maharashtra Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act. The trust argued that the sacrifice was an "age-old practice" conducted on private land 1.4 km away from the fort, and that the meat was distributed to pilgrims and villagers nearby.
