logo
Seattle leaders pass tax hike for big companies, cuts for small biz – but voters get final word

Seattle leaders pass tax hike for big companies, cuts for small biz – but voters get final word

Geek Wire11 hours ago
View of Seattle's downtown and Harbor Island, the city's maritime shipping hub, from the Smith Tower. (GeekWire Photo / Lisa Stiffler)
With a mix of hand-wringing and can-do enthusiasm, Seattle City Council members this afternoon unanimously passed a tax overhaul that would eliminate business taxes for thousands of small companies while significantly raising rates on the city's biggest revenue generators, including Amazon.
The measure now goes to voters to decide its fate.
The Seattle Shield Initiative would nix the city's business and occupation (B&O) tax for companies earning up to $2 million annually, while boosting rates on receipts above that threshold. City officials project the restructured tax would generate an additional $80 million per year, with funds designated for human services programs such as support for food insecurity, services for immigrants, drug abuse funding and other programming.
Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell and City Councilmember Alexis Mercedes Rinck proposed the legislation on June 25, and needed its approval by today so that it could be included on the Nov. 4 ballot.
The measure was originally intended to help plug a $250 million projected budget shortfall for Seattle and to aid in backfilling federal funding that's being cut by the Trump administration. On Monday, councilmembers received a more favorable forecast, learning that the two-year budget deficit is expected to be $150 million.
Seattle has struggled for years to find politically viable funding solutions for city services, affordable housing, and downtown recovery efforts following the COVID pandemic. In November, the council narrowly rejected a 2% capital gains tax on stock and bond sale profits exceeding $262,000 as a partial solution to the revenue challenges.
A comparison of business and occupation taxes in Seattle and surrounding cities, as produced by Seattle's Office of Economic and Revenue Forecasts and City Budget Office Chart and shared on Aug. 4, 2025. Some city leaders expressed concerns about Seattle's B&O taxes outpacing those collected elsewhere.
Jon Scholes, president and CEO of the Downtown Seattle Association, previously called the B&O tax overhaul 'a boneheaded proposal of epic proportions' that would put 'big risks to the fragile commercial tax base.'
GeekWire reached out to Amazon for comment on the proposal.
A service business company with $20 million in gross revenue that currently pays $85,400 in B&O taxes would see that number rise to $117,720 if voters approve the changes. A corporation earning $100 million would go from $427,000 up to $640,920. The rates are lower for big businesses in retail, wholesale and manufacturing.
City staff earlier noted that the legislation would shrink the B&O tax base from 21,000 taxpayers to just 5,000, potentially creating less predictable revenue collections.
Among those sharing reservations on the measure — while still voting in favor of it — was City Council President Sara Nelson.
'This was a rushed process,' Nelson said. 'We are talking about completely restructuring the way we charge B&O taxes, which makes up about a third of our general fund revenue, and could have pretty profound impacts on our economy and — most importantly — jobs.'
The council rejected tax exemptions targeting the maritime industry, while adding B&O breaks for Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and Seattle Children's.
Rinck framed the bill as smart, progressive policy for safeguarding city services and expressed optimism that voters would agree.
'Once the voters provide us with this tool, we can ensure that critical city services are maintained despite the challenges … our budget or the Trump administration presents,' she said. 'We will also be giving Seattle voters a choice on shielding our small businesses — the heartbeat of our neighborhoods — from economic uncertainty.'
Key details
Under the Seattle Shield Initiative:
The B&O tax threshold exemption increases from $100,000 to $2 million in gross revenue.
Businesses that exceed that threshold would not pay tax on the first $2 million.
An estimated 76% of small- and medium-sized businesses would no longer pay the tax.
About 90% of all businesses would pay less than they do currently.
Retail, wholesale and manufacturing businesses above the $2 million exemption would pay 34 cents per $100, up from 22 cents.
Service companies would see a jump from 43 cents per $100 up to 65 cents.
RELATED:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple (AAPL) Reiterated as Hold by Jefferies Amid iPhone 17 Price Hike Expectations
Apple (AAPL) Reiterated as Hold by Jefferies Amid iPhone 17 Price Hike Expectations

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Apple (AAPL) Reiterated as Hold by Jefferies Amid iPhone 17 Price Hike Expectations

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the On July 30, Jefferies analyst Edison Lee reiterated a Hold rating on the stock with a $188.32 price target According to the analysts, Apple may increase prices for the upcoming iPhone line-up due to strong second-quarter demand and increasing cost pressures. 'We saw more evidence of strong iPhone demand in 2Q25, as key US telcos reported ~22% growth in equipment sales in 2Q driven by pull-in, the highest in the last 6 Qs. So CP/IDC's reported growth (4%/1.5%) may be an under-estimate. Separately, we expect a US$50 selling price hike for iPhone 17 Slim/P/PM to offset higher component costs and China tariff. Others such as India tariff, sectorial tariff and lower yield in India are not yet covered.' 10 Smartphones with the Best Cameras and Battery Life The firm believes that the price hike 'may barely cover the above cost increases.' Apple is a technology company known for its consumer electronics, software, and services. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None.

1 Green Flag for Costco Stock (COST) Right Now
1 Green Flag for Costco Stock (COST) Right Now

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

1 Green Flag for Costco Stock (COST) Right Now

Key Points Costco has been a phenomenal performer for many years. Its business model has multiple attractive features. But the stock isn't cheap. 10 stocks we like better than Costco Wholesale › Costco (NASDAQ: COST) has been an amazing investment for lots of people, averaging annual gains of more than 20% over the past three, five, 10, and 15 years. That's quite impressive! You might, therefore, want to invest in Costco yourself. Well, here's a green flag for you -- but there's a red flag, too. The green flag is simply Costco itself and the way it does business. It serves multiple stakeholders very well: It limits its markups on products, offering customers good prices; it offers above-average wages and benefits to its employees; and it delivers not only solid stock-price appreciation over time to shareholders but also dividend income. Costco's dividend yield was recently just 0.55%, but the company has occasionally paid out some hefty special dividends. Policies and practices such as these result in rather loyal customers, employees, and shareholders. Costco is an appealing stock for lots of reasons, a key one being its membership model. You need to be a member to shop there, and memberships start at $65 per year. That alone delivered close to $5 billion in revenue for Costco in 2024 -- and it made up the bulk of profits, too. The company also has a strong private-label brand in Kirkland, which generates greater profits than name-brand items in general. So, what's the red flag? Well, it's Costco's valuation, which seems on the steep side. Its recent forward-looking price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 46 is above its five-year average of 40, and its recent price-to-sales ratio of 1.56 is above the five-year average of 1.12. Buying into the company today would leave you with little or no margin of safety. And safety would be welcome these days, with so much economic uncertainty, due to tariffs, for example. Costco often trades at a lofty valuation, though, because it has performed so well. So, if you're afraid you may never see a much more attractive price, you might just buy some shares for your long-term portfolio, but perhaps not a boatload. You might build a position in the stock incrementally over time. Should you buy stock in Costco Wholesale right now? Before you buy stock in Costco Wholesale, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Costco Wholesale wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Selena Maranjian has positions in Costco Wholesale. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Costco Wholesale. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Green Flag for Costco Stock (COST) Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Analysis-US companies spending record amounts to protect executives as threats rise
Analysis-US companies spending record amounts to protect executives as threats rise

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analysis-US companies spending record amounts to protect executives as threats rise

By Ross Kerber and Isla Binnie (Reuters) -U.S. companies are spending record amounts to keep their executives safe in response to rising threats and the killings of two high-profile corporate officials in separate attacks in Manhattan over the last eight months. Corporations have doubled the number of plain-clothed security teams outside buildings in New York City since a shooting last week in which four people were killed, said Glen Kucera, president of the enhanced protection services unit at Allied Universal, a security and facilities services firm. "It's unspeakable. I never knew anyone who was murdered," said Rich Friedman, chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, who previously worked with one of the victims, Blackstone executive Wesley LePatner. Her death shook Wall Street, even though authorities believe her killing was a random event. Police said the shooter was targeting the headquarters of the National Football League, which is housed in the same building in the Midtown area of Manhattan where LePatner worked. The shooter also killed a New York City police officer, building security guard and employee at real estate company Rudin before turning the gun on himself. The attack was "shocking and hits very close to home," Citigroup spokesperson Ed Skyler said in a note to employees a day after the July 28 killings in Midtown. "Understandably, yesterday has also left many of us feeling uneasy," he said, assuring employees that the bank has beefed up security at its Manhattan headquarters over the last year. Threats against executives "have massively ramped up since 2020," said Chris Pierson, the CEO of cybersecurity firm BlackCloak. He noted how the man charged with murdering a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband near Minneapolis in June allegedly kept a target list of mostly other politicians and used online people-search services to find their addresses. Ben Joelson, head of security risk and resilience for the Chertoff Group, a security advisory firm, said threats against executives are higher than at any time in the decade he has worked in the field, with social media posts magnifying complaints against institutional leaders. Artificial intelligence is compounding the problem, leading to an "exponential rise" in realistic phishing attempts, Joelson was cited as saying in a report by research firm Equilar. When UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot to death in New York in December, it seemed to be a very rare "black swan event," Joelson told Reuters in an interview. But targeted attacks have continued, including the killings in Minnesota and the shooting deaths of two employees of the Israeli embassy in Washington in May. "It's increasingly acceptable for some bad actors or adversaries to address grievances through violence," which has led many companies to put a new focus on security, Joelson said. Matthew Dumpert, global leader of enterprise security risk management at financial and risk advisory firm Kroll, said a lot of existing and new clients reached out last week following the deadly attack in Midtown. "Several of the outreaches directly to me have been by the executive committees ... whoever owns risk. It's chief legal officers, admin officers, compliance officers, security officers," Dumpert said. He added that several clients that had emergency response projects slated to start later this year have asked him to "put those on the front burner. Start immediately, and let's move forward." 'TREND IS UNSURPRISING' Median spending on executive security for top officers including chief executives, chief financial officers and others rose 16% to a record $106,530 last year, according to new data from Equilar, which reviewed financial filings for the 500 largest U.S. public companies by revenue. Security spending includes surveillance and alarm systems for executives' homes, personal guards and cybersecurity protections. Equilar analysts said the trend is likely to continue as firms grapple with the growing threats to their executives and employees. The percentage of executives at those companies with such protection rose to 33.8% from 23.3% over the 2020-2024 period, Equilar said. Nearly a third of CEOs in the group, 32.4%, received security services last year, up from 21.9% in 2020; the value of those CEOs' security perks reached a median $77,976 last year, up from $40,052 in 2020. Tech companies had the biggest growth in implementing security measures for executives, with a 73.5% jump in those receiving the benefits from 2020 to 2024, but communications companies spent the most, at a median value of $1.2 million a year, Equilar found. Blue-chip companies such as Walmart, General Motors, American Express, and chipmaker Broadcom, previously disclosed new or increased security expenses from previous years following Thompson's killing. "The trend is unsurprising considering the broader concerns about executive safety amid geopolitical instability, increasing cyber threats and the high public visibility of top leadership roles," Equilar said in its report. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store