Epstein-Trump links: How did a real estate betrayal end their friendship? Jeffery believed 'it was Trump who went to the police'
Donald Trump
's longtime biographer Michael Wolff has claimed that a bitter falling-out over a $36 million Palm Beach mansion was the turning point in the his friendship with infamous child sex offender
Jeffrey Epstein
.
He said that this betrayal may have sparked a chain of events ending in Epstein's arrest, allegedly tipped off by Trump himself.
The centre of the fallout, Wolff said, was a luxury Palm Beach property Epstein believed he had secured in 2004 for $36 million. Epstein, who was close friends with Trump at the time, even brought him along to discuss changes to the swimming pool. But instead of giving advice, Trump allegedly went behind Epstein's back and bought the house himself, for $40 million.
'Epstein… understood that he didn't have $40 million to pay for this house,' Wolff said in a new interview. 'If that was the case, it was someone else's $40 million. At the time, Epstein believed this to be the $40 million of a Russian oligarch by the name of Rybolovlev.'
Less than two years later, the same house was sold for $95 million, to Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev. Wolff described the series of events as 'a red flag of money laundering.'
Furious, Epstein allegedly began threatening Trump with lawsuits, and even going public with claims that Trump was the front man for a money laundering deal.
'Trump panics at this point,' said Wolff.
'Epstein believed, and he believed to his dying day, that it was Trump who went to the police… fully acquainted with what was going on at Epstein's house… dropped the dime on him.'
Epstein was arrested in 2019 and later died in jail.
According to Wolff, the property dispute and Epstein's threats triggered a chain of events that led to his legal downfall, beginning with his arrest shortly after returning from Paris.
Wolff first detailed this account in his 2019 book Siege, which Epstein read while in France. 'He called me with some alarm and he said he was afraid that he might have said too much,' Wolff recalled. Three weeks later, Epstein was arrested upon landing in New Jersey.
The biography adds to a growing body of claims Wolff has made connecting Trump to Epstein and his former associate,
Ghislaine Maxwell
.
Earlier, Wolff had alleged that the White House believed Maxwell's family deliberately leaked Epstein's so-called 'birthday book' to The Wall Street Journal, including a 'salacious' 2003 birthday message from Trump, as a warning that she held damaging information. 'In the White House, they believe that the story… was a leak from the Maxwell family,' Wolff had said.
He also previously claimed that Epstein played a key role in introducing Melania Trump to her future husband. 'She's introduced by a model agent, both of whom Trump and Epstein are involved with… Epstein knew her well,' Wolff told The Daily Beast podcast.
Though Trump has distanced himself from both Epstein and Maxwell in public statements, Wolff's explosive claims continue to raise questions about just how intertwined their histories really are.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's peace offer to Putin on Ukraine war leaked while threatening deadly consequences if there's no peace
U.S. President Donald Trump plans to host Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, 2025, negotiations aiming at securing peace in the Ukraine war. But according to leaked reports, the peace proposal could involve crucial territorial concessions — and Trump has privately cautioned of 'serious consequences' if the talks fail. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Alaska as Host: A Symbolic and Strategic Choice Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Peace Deal or a Concession? Global Reactions: Unease in Europe, Silence in Asia Will It Lead to Peace or Provoke More Conflict? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs: U.S. President Donald Trump is all set to host Russian President Vladimir Putin at a controversial summit in Alaska on August 15, 2025, focusing on negotiating an ending to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Leaked Reports show that Trump has privately cautioned Putin to accept the peace terms or face 'serious and immediate consequences.' Although no information has been revealed, the statement is regarded as a high-stakes strategy to force Moscow into accepting the to insiders, the proposal suggests that Russia would retain control over four occupied Ukrainian regions: Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. In return, Moscow would commit to halting all offensive operations and demilitarizing certain contested zones. While the arrangement has been framed as a practical step toward ending the bloodshed, critics warn it could embolden future territorial upcoming summit will take place remotely in a military base near Anchorage, far from Washington, D.C. According to insiders, Alaska was chosen due to its geographical proximity to Russia and a degree of neutrality in international affairs. It also allows the U.S. to avoid potential complications tied to international legal mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court, which has issued an arrest warrant for measures have been significantly tightened, and the event is being said as one of the most sensitive diplomatic meetings in recent years. While the Biden administration has remained in public silence, it has reportedly raised internal concerns about the legitimacy and legality of the summit, especially if it includes territorial concessions without Ukraine's indicate that Trump is considering the idea of a territorial trade to bring an end to the conflict . Under this rumored deal, Russia would maintain control over several occupied territories in eastern Ukraine, including Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson in return for a full ceasefire and possible demilitarization of specific a recent Fox News appearance, Trump described the arrangement as a 'win-win' stating 'Everyone gets something. Most importantly, the dying stops,' he Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has sharply criticized, calling any agreement that excludes Ukraine 'illegitimate.' He stressed that no foreign power can decide Ukraine's future and cautioned that appeasing aggression would set a dangerous global Europe leaders have expressed strong reservations. NATO officials have cautioned that any agreement rewarding territorial aggression could undermine the entire continent. Germany, France, and the U.K. have jointly highlighted that Ukraine must be directly involved in any peace contrast, China and India have remained mostly silent, signaling their characteristically guarded approach when it comes to high-profile geopolitical disputes involving Western powers and the high-stakes summit approaches,uncertainty hangs in the air. The central question remains: will Trump and Putin reach an agreement that halts the bloodshed or will the event further rift the international community?It is evident that the summit is not just about Ukraine. At its core, It's about the role of American leadership in global conflict resolution and whether diplomacy can still thrive in an era defined by nationalism, military strategies, and competing eyes will be on Alaska—not just for peace, but for precedent that this meeting could set for future geopolitics..A1. It's a planned meeting to discuss a possible peace deal to end the war in Ukraine.A2. The summit is scheduled for August 15, 2025
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin ‘begged' Trump for meeting? US State Dept drops bombshell on Russian Prez's surprising request
Ahead of the Alaska summit, the US State Department has claimed that Russian President Vladimir Putin was the one who personally requested a meeting with US President Donald Trump.
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
NITI Aayog CEO says 6.5% GDP growth not enough to become Viksit Bharat
India's annual GDP growth needs to be 8 per cent, and not 6.5 per cent, if it wants to achieve its target of becoming a developed economy by 2047, said BVR Subrahmanyam, CEO, NITI Aayog, while highlighting the crucial role statistics needs to play in policymaking. 'This data business is very, very important for our goal of Viksit Bharat. After all, if you grow at 6.5 per cent, you will not be Viksit Bharat; (if) you grow at 8 per cent, you will be Viksit Bharat,' Subrahmanyam on Thursday. 'It looks very small, 1.5 per cent. But the difference, I tell you, in 2047 is going to be immense… What looks very minuscule can have major, major difference at the end,' the NITI CEO added while speaking at a sensitisation-cum-review meeting with statistical advisers in various ministries and departments, organised by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI). Subrahmanyam's comments come amid risks to India's economic growth from the 50 per cent tariff announced by the US earlier this month, with the 25 per cent penalty component coming into force on August 27. While economists have predicted a potential hit of about 50 basis points (bps) to India's 2025-26 GDP growth from the 50 per cent tariff, S&P Global Ratings on Thursday said the effect will be 'manageable' as it upgraded India's rating to BBB from BBB-. India's GDP growth has edged lower recently, with the 6.5 per cent growth recorded in 2024-25 being the lowest in four years. Last week, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) retained its growth forecast for the current fiscal at 6.5 per cent, with Governor Sanjay Malhotra saying that while there is a lot of uncertainty, the central bank did not have 'sufficient data to revise our GDP forecasts'. Hours later on the same day, US President Donald Trump announced that the previously-threatened 'penalty' for importing Russian energy and arms was 25 per cent, taking the total tariff rate to 50 per cent for Indian goods entering the world's largest economy from August 27. Speaking at the MoSPI meeting on Thursday, Niti CEO Subrahmanyam said statistical advisers had a 'major, major role to play' and that the government has to move towards data and evidence-based decision and policymaking. 'And you are providers of the evidence and you are also the providers of the analysis of the evidence… If you are not able to provide, somebody else will be asked to provide. We need to develop those skills within ourselves. We should all be proficient in the latest tools and techniques that are there.' Highlighting the importance of data in decision-making, Subrahmanyam said 'when you confront people with data, they start improving' as it makes them more accountable. Chief Economic Adviser V Anantha Nageswaran, also present at the meeting, echoed the NITI CEO's views, saying statistics are fundamental to an efficient and informed decision-making process, be it at the level of an individual, corporate, or the government. The government's top economist also made note of MoSPI's recent partnerships with several international organisations — such as the United Nations Statistics Division — saying these collaborations were key to aligning India with global best practices. He added that the statistics ministry's efforts to revamp, update, and modernise official statistics and produce them in a more timely fashion with greater frequency also comes at a time when questions are being raised about the credibility of data in some developed countries, seemingly referring to the sacking of a key US statistician by Trump earlier this month. 'So, sooner rather than later, we will be the ones who will be setting the global standard and the global benchmark,' Nageswaran said, On August 1, Trump sacked Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), after the agency said that non-farm payrolls — or new jobs outside of agriculture — rose by just 73,000 in July, while the numbers for the previous two months were revised downwards by more than a quarter of a million to a mere 19,000 for May and 14,000 for June. Trump claimed the jobs numbers were being 'rigged' to make him and the Republican party 'look bad'.
