Tax-dodging Congressman Charles Rangel left puny estate: records
Rangel, who died May 26 at age 94, had assets worth only $300,000, according to Manhattan Surrogate Court filings.
That is far less than his net worth of more than $1.7 million upon his retirement from Congress in 2017, as reported by the watchdog group Open Secrets.
Advertisement
3 Congressman Charles Rangel died in May at age 94.
Getty Images
The current assets of the once-powerful chair of the House's Ways and Means Committee were not detailed in court filings.
His daughter, Alicia Rangel-Haughton, was named executor of the Democrat's estate.
Advertisement
The late representative's property is to be placed in the Charles Bernard Rangel Revocable Trust, the assets of which were not disclosed in a will signed March 31, just nine weeks before his death at Harlem Hospital.
3 Alicia Rangel-Haughton will serve as executor of her father's estate, court records show.
REUTERS
Rangels' financial misbehavior and other ethical questions dogged him throughout his decades-long career, long before The Post outed his business dealings in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.
He was criticized right from the start of his career when, in the 1960s, he took a low-interest loan from a New York City program meant to help the poor and used it to renovate his family's Central Harlem home, turning the property into rental apartments — one of which he used for himself.
Advertisement
Decades later, Rangel was caught using four rent-stabilized apartments in Lenox Terrace for himself, including one he used as a campaign office.
3 Rangel, seen here in 2010 leaving his Harlem home, was thought to be worth more than $1 million when he retired from Congress in 2017.
Ben Parker for NY Post
He parked his vintage Mercedes for free in a House of Representatives garage; was questioned for his participation in junkets to the Caribbean sponsored by corporations and lobbyists in violation of House rules, and eventually copped to omitting as much as $780,000 in assets from financial disclosures he filed in the 2000s.
He was also slammed for using Congressional stationery to solicit donations for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at the City College of New York, a move which broke House ethics rules.
Advertisement
A week after The Post's 2008 exposé revealed Rangel's ownership of the three-bedroom, three-bath casita No. 412 at a beachfront resort in Punta Cana — which he rented out for between $500 and $1,100 a night — he confessed he'd failed to disclose rental income from the property.
Rangel failed to declare $75,000 in income from the sun-drenched property, he eventually admitted. He unloaded the villa in 2010 and made a handsome profit.
In December 2010, Rangel's financial misdeeds earned him a censure from his Congressional colleagues. He retired from Congress in 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Historic Medicaid cuts to come as Trump signs domestic policy bill
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump on Friday signed Republicans' major tax and domestic policy bill into law, setting into motion massive cuts to Medicaid that could remove millions of people from the safety-net insurance coverage. The legislation was sent to Trump's desk on Thursday, after months of rancorous debate in Congress. The Senate narrowly passed its version of the bill earlier this week, calling in Vice President JD Vance to cast the tiebreaking vote. House Republicans then scrambled to get their caucus in line, as moderates raised concerns about the Senate's steeper cuts to Medicaid and conservatives lambasted the legislation's growing contribution to the national debt. But the lower chamber ultimately voted to pass the megabill 218 to 214, nearly entirely along party lines. Only two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, declined to support the legislation. GOP lawmakers cheered its passage Thursday. Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said the law 'strengthens Medicaid for those who need it most.' Here are some of the healthcare provisions in the law: Medicaid work requirements. Some beneficiaries in the safety-net insurance program — including childless adults and those with children older than 14 — would need to work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to stay enrolled. Medicaid eligibility. States would be required to check enrollees' eligibility for the coverage every six months instead of yearly. The law also prevents the HHS from enforcing a regulation that aimed to streamline eligibility and enrollment for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. Cost-sharing in Medicaid. Higher-income beneficiaries would have to pay cost-sharing up to $35 per service for some care. Provider taxes. The law freezes provider taxes — arrangements states use to finance their share of Medicaid funding — in states that haven't expanded Medicaid, and gradually lowers allowed rates in expansion states. State-directed payments. The arrangements that allow states to make supplemental payments for services covered in Medicaid managed care contracts face new restrictions. The law directs the HHS to revise that payment limit from the average commercial rate to Medicare rates in expansion states, and 10% above the Medicare rate in non-expansion states. Affordable Care Act subsidy verification. The law requires pre-enrollment verification of eligibility for premium tax credits that subsidize the cost of health plans on the ACA exchanges. Limit immigrant eligibility for Medicare, Medicaid and ACA premium tax credits. Only green card holders and certain classes of immigrants would be eligible for these programs. Cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. The law blocks Medicaid funds for services offered by abortion providers like Planned Parenthood for one year. Rural healthcare support. The policy includes a $50 billion fund to help states support providers and hospitals in rural communities. Nursing home staffing. The HHS is prohibited from enforcing a Biden-era regulation that would have required long-term care facilities to increase staffing and have a registered nurse on-site. The Medicaid provisions of the law have been some of the most contentious. The policies reduce federal spending on the safety-net coverage by $1 trillion, according to a Tuesday estimate by health policy researcher KFF. Nearly 12 million additional people would become uninsured by 2034 under the law, according to an analysis published Saturday by the Congressional Budget Office. As such, the policies have been lambasted by the healthcare sector. Hospitals worry the growing number of uninsured patients would cause uncompensated care to soar, weighing on their bottom lines. Rural hospitals and providers that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients would be particularly hard hit, forcing them to cut services to close their doors altogether, experts say. Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association, said in a statement Thursday the impact from the law 'will reverberate for years,' leaving patients sicker with less access to care. Chip Kahn, president and CEO of the Federation of American Hospitals, urged Congress to take action to mitigate damage from the law's healthcare provisions by extending enhanced financial assistance for people who buy coverage on the ACA marketplaces, which is set to lapse at the end of the year. 'Time is of the essence,' he said in a Thursday statement. 'Without action extending these credits, we will see the gains to health care access and affordability our country has made over the years further evaporate, and too many will not be able to pick up the slack.' Recommended Reading Senate passes Trump's spending bill with massive Medicaid cuts
UPI
21 minutes ago
- UPI
Florida lawmakers denied access to 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention facility
Activists attend the 'Stop Alligator Alcatraz' protest in front of the entrance of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Fla., on June 28. Photo by Cristobal Herrera-Ulashkevich/EPA July 5 (UPI) -- Five Florida state Democrat lawmakers on Thursday were denied access to the state's newly opened "migrant" detention facility that has been dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz." State Representatives Michele Rayner, Anna Eskamani and Angie Nixon and Senators Carlos Guillermo Smith and Shevrin Jones were turned away while attempting to tour the facility, The Hill reported. State law enforcement officers from several agencies stopped the lawmakers from entering the facility after showing up for an unannounced inspection of the facility that President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis toured on Tuesday and before detainees arrived there. Safety concerns cited Eskamani said they were told they could not tour the facility due to "safety concerns," CNN reported. "If it's unsafe for us, how is it safe for the detainees?" Eskamani said she asked the general counsel for the Florida Division of Emergency Management. The Florida lawmakers said they have the legal authority to inspect the detention facility. "Florida law gives legislators the authority to make unannounced visits to state-run facilities," Jones said in a post on X made on Thursday afternoon. Jones said the group went to the detention facility "to inspect conditions and check on the well-being of the people inside." A group statement issued on Thursday accuses state officials of a "blatant abuse of power and an attempt to conceal human rights violations from the public eye." The facility received its first 500 detainees midweek and eventually will be capable of holding up to 3,000 detainees while undergoing deportation proceedings. Not a federal facility The detention facility is located in the Everglades along U.S. 41, about 70 miles west of Miami. A local airport previously occupied the site, which Florida officials converted into a detention facility in eight days, DeSantis said while touring it with Trump on Tuesday. Although Trump toured it, the facility is not a federal operation. "The Department of Homeland Security has not implemented, authorized, directed or funded Florida's temporary detention center," DHS attorneys said in a court filing made on Thursday, the Miami Herald reported. The filing is in response to a lawsuit challenging the detention facility's purpose, which prompted the Department of Justice to defend its existence. The DOJ "has defended President Trump's immigration agenda in court since day one and we are proud to protect 'Alligator Alcatraz' from baseless, politically motivated legal schemes," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement issued on Thursday. Florida officials are considering adding two more such facilities to help hold and process detainees who are undergoing deportation proceedings. The Department of Defense is deploying 200 Marines to Florida to assist with logistical and administrative support.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'A slap in the face': Georgia and Arkansas' Medicaid work rules may preview the road ahead
President Donald Trump is expected Friday to sign into law his sprawling domestic policy bill, which includes nearly $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid, the government health insurance program for low-income and disabled Americans. Dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill,' the new legislation will extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts and make up for them in part by slashing federal Medicaid funding, introducing copays for some services and — for the first time — implementing nationwide Medicaid work requirements. The final version of the bill didn't include an estimate of coverage losses; an earlier Congressional Budget Office report projected that about 11 million people could lose their health coverage and become uninsured by 2034 because of the program cuts. Medicaid is jointly funded by the federal government and the states, which usually mandate that applicants meet certain criteria, such as low income, disability or caregiving status. Only two states have implemented Medicaid work requirements: Arkansas in 2018 and Georgia in 2023. Georgia's program, called Pathways to Coverage, remains in effect. Over the 10 months Arkansas' work requirement was in place, more than 18,000 people in the state lost Medicaid coverage. Georgia hasn't done a good job keeping track of how many have lost coverage, but enrollment remains low, said Leighton Ku, director of the Center for Health Policy Research at the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University. When people lose Medicaid coverage, they view it as 'sort of a slap in the face,' Ku said. 'When your income is down, when you're unemployed, that's when you lose everything,' he said. 'When you're most in need. That's when you lose your food assistance, that's when you lose your health insurance coverage.' Kendall Rogers, 40, of Stone Mountain, Georgia, is looking for a job after he lost his Medicaid coverage this year because of the state's work requirements, according to his mom, Trudy Rogers, 59. The change means Trudy now has to take care of herself for long parts of the day. She has fibromyalgia and nerve problems in her back that make it difficult for her to get around. Kendall was caring for her nearly full time, Trudy said, but Georgia's work requirements don't offer exemptions for caregivers for older adults. She called the new requirements 'an insult not only to him, but to me.' 'Because now he's forced to go out and look for work, and I need him to stay around the house,' she said. To justify the cuts, Republicans have argued that they're not taking Medicaid from those who are rightfully entitled to it — such as, they say, single mothers or the disabled — but from 'young, able-bodied men' who they say are abusing the system. 'If you clean that up and shore it up, you save a lot of money, and you return the dignity of work to young men who need to be out working instead of playing video games all day,' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said in April. But as seen in Georgia and Arkansas, that's not who is largely affected. Cynthia Gibson, director of the Georgia Legal Services Program's Health Law Unit, which helps appeal Medicaid denials, said many people in the state lose coverage not because they aren't working, but because they aren't aware of the new rules or face administrative issues like missed paperwork or not having received notices. Others, like Kendall Rogers, are caring for family members but don't qualify for exemptions. Likewise, in Arkansas, only 3% or 4% of the people on Medicaid in 2018 weren't working and didn't qualify for the exemptions under the state program, said Dr. Benjamin Sommers, a physician and health economist at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Sommers published a study in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2019 looking at the impact of Arkansas' work requirements. His research found that about 40% of the other roughly 96% of people on Medicaid in the state were working the required 80 hours a month under the state program. The rest either had medical conditions that prevented them from working or had other responsibilities, such as school or caring for family members. Implementing work requirements also didn't result in a higher employment rate — one of the arguments Arkansas officials used in favor of the new work rules. 'Most people, almost everybody, was already doing what [the state] wanted them to do,' he said. Very few were 'the proverbial on the couch, video game story that we're hearing from some of the supporters.' Most commonly, Gibson said, people aren't actually aware that they've lost coverage until they go see their doctors. 'And that creates kind of a panic,' she said. 'Sometimes they may have something really important scheduled that the doctors won't do when they run their insurance and find out they no longer have coverage.' Gibson said the people most often affected by the work requirement are those in noncorporate jobs, including independent workers — like Uber drivers or delivery workers — who don't receive regular pay stubs and can't meet Georgia's work verification requirements. Others include people with certain disabilities that don't qualify for exemptions, as well as caregivers for children or elderly relatives. People who lose coverage often avoid going to the doctor or getting medical care unless it's an emergency, because they don't want to accumulate debt, she said. 'They just don't get treatment; they don't go to the doctor,' she said. Heather Payne, 53, of Dalton, Georgia, couldn't avoid medical care after she had a series of debilitating strokes in 2022. Unable to work, she was told she didn't qualify for an Affordable Care Act plan and didn't qualify for Georgia's Medicaid program because she was a childless adult. She later enrolled in classes to become a nurse practitioner — a career she could pursue despite her disability. By that point, the state's work requirement had gone into effect. However, Payne was told she still didn't qualify for Medicaid because she wasn't taking enough credit hours. She couldn't afford to take more. To pay for her medical bills, she burned through her $40,000 in savings and is now in collections for tens of thousands of dollars. 'When you have a problem, there's no help for you,' she said. 'It makes you feel as though society doesn't care what happens to you.' Dimitris Terrell, 49, of Clarkston, also worries her 24-year-old son, Justin Anderson, could start to accumulate debt following changes to Georgia's Medicaid program. Anderson doesn't work, but he has Medicaid coverage because he has Crohn's disease, a bowel disease that can cause chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Terrell said her son started having to pay large copays last year, after the state began charging copays for prescription drugs and certain services. Anderson has paid over $400 out of pocket on doctor's visits and hundreds of dollars for the dentist, neither of which he could afford, his mother said. She also worries about his losing coverage — either because he would no longer qualify or because of missed paperwork. 'He's pretty sad and shocked,' Terrell said. 'He said, 'Like, Mama, I don't understand why I have to pay.'' This article was originally published on
