&w=3840&q=100)
Private credit drives a 'Buy Now, Pay Later' lending boom in Asia
Maria Hazel Regalado, a 48-year-old mother of four in the Philippines, needed a computer last year so she could work from home. Regalado, who helps manage rental properties in Australia, didn't have the cash or a credit card. A friend suggested she get a 'buy now, pay later' (BNPL) loan from Billease, an online lender.
The computer cost 37,999 Philippine pesos ($664), almost as much as Regalado earns in a month. Still, Billease approved her application within minutes. She agreed to make 12 monthly payments of 4,493 pesos each, including principal and interest. The effective annual rate: 42 per cent. 'At first I was hesitant, but I didn't have much choice,' says Regalado, who lives in southern Manila and had four installments left as of mid-July. 'I really needed that laptop.'
Lenders worldwide last year made $334 billion in BNPL loans, five times their value from five years before, according to technology analysis and consulting firm Juniper Research Ltd. In the US, merchants typically pay any fees, so customers get no-interest loans as long as they keep current. But the developing world has a different model: charging eye-popping interest rates to cash-strapped borrowers.
While Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand have been tightening regulation and warning consumers about the cost and risk of BNPL loans, companies such as Manila-based First Digital Finance Corp., which operates as Billease, say they're opening up consumer finance in underserved markets. They're attracting investors with a socially responsible tilt, such as private equity giant TPG Inc.'s The Rise Fund, one of Billease's owners. Traditional lenders didn't want to take on the risks of extending this kind of credit, says Georg Steiger, Billease's chief executive officer and co-founder. 'Early on, banks were not very comfortable with the type of collateral that we can offer, which is basically secured against a loan book,' he says.
So the booming $1.7 trillion private credit industry filled the gap. These lenders, which make loans outside both traditional banking and the world of publicly traded bonds, initially catered primarily to small and medium-size companies but have been expanding into consumer finance.
Billease has tapped private debt investors including UK-based Lendable Inc., which has raised money from Shell Plc's charitable foundation, development banks and investment firms catering to wealthy families. So have two of its biggest competitors, both based in Singapore: Kredivo Group Inc. has borrowed from money manager Janus Henderson Group's Victory Park Capital Advisors, and Apaylater Financials Pte., which does business as Atome, has looked to the growing private credit operations of BlackRock Inc., the world's largest money manager. The private credit companies typically lend out money to Southeast Asian BNPL outfits at annual rates of 10 per cent to 15 per cent, making the deals attractive to the companies' investors.
In Jakarta, Indonesia's capital, ads for the BNPL companies are almost inescapable both online and on billboards, city buses and commuter trains. One for Kredivo encourages customers to use BNPL loans for smaller daily purchases, even for train fares and items at convenience stores. 'It's that flexible!' the tagline reads.
Huy Pham, a senior finance lecturer at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Vietnam who specializes in financial technology, says BNPL loans can lead to splurges from consumers with unstable incomes, exposing both them and their lenders to growing risks. 'At the end of the day, if customers are not able to pay back the loans, then the platforms will be in trouble,' Pham says.
Indonesia's BNPL-related debt in May reached almost $1.9 billion, up 40 per cent from a year earlier. According to the country's Financial Services Authority, 3.74 per cent was nonperforming—meaning borrowers were more than 90 days behind on their payments—up from 3.22 per cent a year earlier. 'Consumers should assess their ability to repay the debt before using 'pay later' services,' says Agusman, the agency official who supervises financing, venture capital, microfinance and other financial institutions. (Like many Indonesians, he goes by only one name.)
The authority has been conducting financial literacy campaigns, aimed particularly at younger borrowers. It recently announced rules that will require individuals to be at least age 18 or married and have a minimum monthly income of 3 million rupiah ($184), just under Indonesia's average, before they can take out BNPL loans. Last year the regulator capped maximum daily interest rates for online personal loans at 0.3 per cent per day, which translates into an annualized rate of 109.5 per cent.
BNPL loans can be controversial in Indonesia, a nation of 284 million that has the world's largest population of Muslims, whose religion forbids the charging or paying of interest. The Indonesian Ulema Council, the nation's top body of Islamic clerics, issued a legal opinion on online lending in 2021, saying the practice is 'problematic.' It cited 'usury practices with extremely high interest rates, borrowers failing to repay on time as agreed, and lenders threatening or even physically assaulting those who default.' Last year the government started requiring debt collectors to stick to certain scripts and visit debtors only during specified times.
A 2023 paper by business school professors in Indonesia and Malaysia concluded that consumers generally had positive views of the online short-term loans despite what the academics called unethical interest rates and aggressive debt collection practices. 'People are borrowing beyond their means and buying things they cannot afford, because it's so easy to get loans,' says co-author Sri Rahayu Hijrah Hati, a professor of marketing at the University of Indonesia.
'People are borrowing beyond their means and buying things they cannot afford, because it's so easy to get loans'
BNPL lenders say they obey debt collection rules and the rates they charge reflect the risks of the population they're serving. They say they don't purport to be compliant with Muslim law and most banks in the country also collect interest on loans. Andy Tan, Atome's chief commercial officer, says his company must contend with customers who disappear and erase their online presence, among other kinds of fraud. 'Credit risk is something we monitor day in and day out,' he says.
Billease's Steiger says his company's borrowing cost is close to 20 per cent after factoring in the midteens rates it pays on private debt, foreign currency hedges, withholding taxes and other expenses. At the same time, he says, Billease is flexible with clients who need more time to repay their debt. He adds that the company keeps collections in-house, recording conversations between borrowers and the company to prevent rude behavior, and refrains from charging more in late fees than the loan's original principal.
Kredivo CEO Akshay Garg says his company approves less than a quarter of its loan applications and primarily targets middle- and upper-class borrowers who are likely to repay. 'We're just lending to people who should be getting credit cards,' he says. Kredivo sends payment reminders to borrowers through its app and in emails, Garg says, and individuals get to keep the items they bought even if they default because the debt is unsecured.
BNPL lenders are betting on customers like Alexandra Santos, a 31-year-old tech professional in Manila. In 2023 she wanted to tour the province of Albay, in the southeast of the Philippines' Luzon island and famous for its cone-shaped Mayon volcano. She funded the holiday with a Billease loan of 8,200 pesos, payable in six installments of 1,552 pesos each over three months. That included total interest of about 1,112 pesos—an effective interest rate of 13 per cent over the period, or 52 per cent on an annualized basis.
Santos fully repaid the loan before its final due date and continues to borrow from Billease and other lenders. 'In our culture, being in debt carries a stigma,' she says. 'But in my view, it's not really bad to have debt as long as you know your financial responsibilities.'
If she and most other customers can keep paying back their loans, the profit for Billease will be enormous. The company typically charges 3.5 per cent a month on its loans, but it also turns the money it lends over many times a year. Steiger has estimated the expected annual return on this cash: 90 per cent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's Tariffs Stymie India's Bid to Steal Manufacturing From China
Since President Trump's first term, companies grappling for trade certainty have clung to one guiding principle: move production out of China. But months into the president's global tariff barrage , that doesn't always looking to diversify their supply chains saw India's vast population, its strengthening ties with Washington, and its abundance of engineers and scientists as a good hedge against China. But then Trump—who has been trying to pressure President Vladimir Putin into ending Russia's war on Ukraine—grew angry with India over the country's purchases of Russian oil. In recent weeks, Trump has slapped a 25% tariff on Indian imports and has threatened to double that by the end of this month. In that case, tariffs on India would match the roughly 50% duties the U.S. now charges on Chinese goods. That has left companies that have moved production to India scrambling to respond. 'All the effort that we put up over the last four to five months is suddenly up in the air,' said Rohin Malhotra, the chief technology officer of Posha, a Silicon Valley-based maker of countertop cooking robots that had been working to shift production from China to India. The company, whose robots are programmed to cook meals with prepped ingredients, has now put those plans on hold as it waits to see if the 50% tariff sticks. 'It's just wasted effort to think of an alternative destination for now,' he said. India has worked hard in recent years to attract businesses that decided to diversify away from China—a strategy dubbed 'China Plus One.' Indian authorities have worked to ease the thicket of regulations and modernize the country's infrastructure, both of which have hindered business investment in the past. The push has, in some cases, paid off handsomely, bringing in much-needed investment. For instance, Apple began shifting a large chunk of its iPhone production from China to India about a decade ago. India produced about 14% of Apple's iPhones in 2024, according to technology research firm TechInsights, up from zero nine years earlier. (The Trump administration has exempted iPhones from most tariffs.) But now, uncertainty over U.S. trade policy reigns. Some hope that Trump will lower the India tariffs after he meets with Putin later this week. At the same time, the U.S. and China are still in talks to determine the final level of tariffs. Other countries that have lured businesses away from China, like Vietnam and Malaysia, have been assigned tariff rates of around 20%. It is uncertain whether those tariffs are low enough for companies to justify the disruption of moving supply chains from China. Moreover, Trump intends to charge higher levies on so-called transshipped products, or those assembled in third countries with some Chinese components. However, the exact mechanism of such tariffs is unclear. 'Instead of a smooth 'China+1' diversification, many are now in 'China+None of the Above' mode,' unsatisfied with any of their options, wrote Mark Morgan, president of global commercial operations at Kinaxis, a supply-chain company. Liz Andarcia, co-founder of Rise Collective Consultants, a supply-chain consulting firm that has helped retailers shift production out of China, said some companies are hoping to wait a couple of weeks before making big moves. Still, she is working with one client—whose production is heavily concentrated in India—to shift some sites to Pakistan and Turkey. 'We're just fast-tracking those now, like pedal to the metal,' she said. India's purchase of Russian oil has angered President Trump. It's a difficult period for Serenial Technology, an Indian company setting up a contract manufacturing site in Dharwad, India. Renaud Anjoran, a co-owner, said U.S. clients who were eager to have their electronics products made in Dharwad are now indicating that they'll wait to see what happens with tariff rates before committing. 'It just threw a huge wrench in our plans basically,' he said. Many of his clients will stick with China, he said. All the tariff uncertainty has whipsawed Radhika Patil, the CEO and cofounder of Cradlewise, a Silicon Valley-based maker of cradles that soothe babies back to sleep. Cradlewise only began commercial sales five years ago, but it has already moved manufacturing twice, first from China to Vietnam, and last year from Vietnam to India. The company set up manufacturing in Pune, an industrial hub in western India that has traditionally produced cars. Patil said he was drawn to India because it is a strong base for raw materials, so that she wouldn't be reliant on imported parts. 'We just wanted to build more predictability into the supply chain,' she said. Instead, the tariffs are now forcing her to consider raising U.S. retail prices for her cribs by around $200, a step she has previously avoided out of fear of spooking customers. Moving production to the U.S. would be tricky, she said. Besides higher labor costs, the company would also have to contend with tariffs on imported components. Patil said it has been a stressful time. 'This was a sudden shift,' she said. 'Fifty percent—and overnight—is very difficult to absorb.' Write to Jon Emont at

Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
‘India can be EV auto manufacturing hub for the world', believes Mahindra CEO, says FTA opens up UK export market
Auto major Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M) plans to export electric vehicles to the United Kingdom, leveraging the UK-India free-trade agreement (FTA), CEO and MD Anish Shah told PTI on August 13. For this, the company's plans to mobilise its Mahindra Advanced Design Europe (M.A.D.E) facility at Banbury, Oxfordshire (UK). The goal is to have EVs comprise 30 per cent of M&M total sales by 2030, as per the report. 'We are looking forward to exporting our EVs to the UK and to take a bigger share of the UK market and competing in the UK on the back of this FTA,' Shah said. He added that the Indian government has done a fine job when it comes to the trade agreement with the UK. 'It balances a large number of things. First, it helps open up our market in a way to goods coming in from the UK. Second, it helps us export a lot more across multiple industries,' he stated. CEO Shah told PTI that India has the potential to emerge as the automobile manufacturing hub of the world, and the company's Oxfordshire facility serves as the conceptual hotbed for the company's portfolio of electric products. 'If you take the automobile sector as a specific example, India has tremendous potential to be the auto manufacturing hub of the we are much smaller, but with what we are doing now, and also the focus on ease of business, on production of logistics costs, on production of import duties in some areas, we have started to see much greater ability for us to produce very high quality cars in India,' Shah said. According to Shah, the FTA should be able to encourage innovation and manufacturing in the country. He noted that when he says India can be a production hub, it is not only for the domestic firms but global automakers. 'We want the best global automakers to be in India and produce in India. It will spur businesses. It will be better… more competition makes us better over time. So it's very important for us to be able to have a very thriving auto industry in India, consumers having the choice of the best cars in the world,' Shah said. On global competition, Shah noted, 'We've not just survived. We've gotten better as we've had competition that came in, and today we are actually standing at a much stronger position. The company has very strong R&D capabilities in India. It can manufacture higher-quality vehicles at a lower cost than many of the global competitors. We think it's good for India to have a thriving auto ecosystem, and that's something that we feel is better for consumers and good for us.'


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Perplexity AI offers Google $34.5 bn for Chrome browser
Perplexity AI offered Google on Tuesday $34.5 billion for its popular Chrome web browser, which the internet giant could potentially be forced to sell as part of antitrust proceedings . The whopping sum proposed in a letter of intent by Perplexity is nearly double the value of the startup, which was reportedly $18 billion in a recent funding round. "This proposal is designed to satisfy an antitrust remedy in highest public interest by placing Chrome with a capable, independent operator focused on continuity, openness, and consumer protection," Perplexity chief executive Aravind Srinivas said in the letter, a copy of which was seen by AFP. Google is awaiting US District Court Judge Amit Mehta's ruling on what "remedies" to impose, following a landmark decision last year that said the tech titan maintained an illegal monopoly in online search . US government attorneys have called for Google to divest itself of the Chrome browser , contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet. Google has urged Mehta to reject the divestment, and his decision is expected by the end of the month. Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Perplexity's offer vastly undervalues Chrome and "should not be taken seriously," Baird Equity Research analysts said in a note to investors. Given that Perplexity already has a browser that competes with Chrome, the San Francisco-based startup could be trying to spark others to bid or "influence the pending decision" in the antitrust case, Baird analysts theorized. "Either way, we believe Perplexity would view an independent Chrome -- or one no longer affiliated with Google -- as an advantage as it attempts to take browser share," Baird analysts told investors. Google contends that the United States has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system. "Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition," said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston. "It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players, and leave users with worse products." Google attorney John Schmidtlein noted in court that more than 80 percent of Chrome users are outside the United States, meaning divestiture would have global ramifications. "Any divested Chrome would be a shadow of the current Chrome," he contended. "And once we are in that world, I don't see how you can say anybody is better off." The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence ( AI ) to work fetching information from the internet in response to user queries. Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings.