Australia, Ukraine negotiate non-binding security pact
Defence experts say such a pact could help bolster collaboration between the two nations to boost Australia's capabilities.
Largely redacted briefing material prepared for Foreign Minister Penny Wong ahead of her December 2024 trip to Ukraine confirms the possibility of a security pact, but details remain classified.
Of the 28 bilateral security arrangements finalised with Ukraine as of late 2024, none were legally binding or included mutual defence or security obligations, one briefing document noted.
Ukraine's ambassador to Australia Vasyl Myroshnychenko didn't comment on any specific provisions that had been proposed due to the sensitivities of negotiations.
But he pointed to broad areas of collaboration such as intelligence sharing, drone technology and humanitarian assistance that have been covered in similar bilateral security agreements between Ukraine and other nations.
The British pact pledged increased co-operation between defence companies and the Ukrainian army, including building military repair facilities and providing cyber defence technology.
Humanitarian provisions are outlined in Japan's agreement, which pledges to provide medical treatment for wounded Ukrainian soldiers.
Japan and Ukraine also agreed to share and protect classified intelligence.
Ukraine has developed sophisticated drone capabilities after the three-and-a-half-year war that followed Russia's invasion.
"The innovation we have, no one in the world has it", Mr Myroshnychenko told AAP.
DroneShield CEO Oleg Vornik said the war showed drones had become central to modern warfare, "necessitating rapid innovation in counter-drone technologies".
The Australian company bolstered Ukraine's defences by giving soldiers the ability to detect and disable enemy drones.
A bilateral agreement between Ukraine and Australia would significantly elevate the company's ability to "operate more directly and responsively on the ground", Mr Vornik said.
He pointed to an arrangement in place between DroneShield and Ukrainian operators to ensure technology could be rapidly updated to tackle emerging threats.
Naval warfare expert Jennifer Parker said there were important lessons Australia could learn from Ukraine, but warned Canberra "can't lift and shift the capabilities they are using because our geography is fundamentally different".
Ukraine's use of naval drones was effective at hitting Russian ships and key infrastructure such as ports, but Australia would need to project power far beyond its coastline in a conflict, she said.
"Australia needs to defend the sea lines of communications, so we need to control certain parts of the ocean for certain periods of time - you can't do that with drones, you need ships," she said.
Naval drones could help protect key choke-points around Australia but the benefit of intelligence sharing and defence co-operation with Ukraine would come from lessons in cyber warfare and how to mobilise a local defence industry to build weapons at scale to avoid becoming over-reliant on imports, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Man of Many
43 minutes ago
- Man of Many
Meet the Australian Fragrance Brands Shaping a New Olfactory Landscape
Australia's love affair with fragrance is only just beginning. Over the past decade, the beguiling sector has undergone a quiet transformation, sweeping from a hive of mass-market imports and celebrity-endorsed perfumes to a true boutique industry. And at its heart lies a desire for originality in storytelling. If you ask the perfumers and fragrance experts leading the future of scent, a change is in the air. A shifting fashion climate and the rise of home-grown individualism have given way to a new form of contemporary luxury, one that isn't as concerned with pomp as it is with provenance. As Craig Andrade, founder of craft label The Raconteur, explains, fragrance, as a category, is fast-moving from status symbol to personal expression. 'When you have a great sense of scent in your wardrobe, it becomes this beautiful, invisible communication that says so much and yet, only those who are close to you can understand what it is you're trying to say,' Andrade says. 'It is the most subtle form of self-expression; the most exquisite form of communication a man can use to say who he is.' Adrade is one of the many boutique Australian producers helping to chart a new frontier in fragrance. The former law firm partner turned perfumer launched his business in 2019 after identifying a gap in the market for premium, artisanal scents that offered something different from the industry norm. When COVID hit just one year later, his gamble paid off. 'That moment accelerated and accentuated this heightened awareness around scent,' he tells me. 'It also brought this sort of category of wellbeing, where scent could play a role in small touches to elevate your space, to the forefront. When you're working from home, simply applying a room scent was a small ritual of self-care and something you could do at home.' 'There was a huge surge in demand; you started to see this audience that had a greater awareness and a greater level of sophistication when purchasing online. For men and for women, there was just a bigger appetite for getting into this space, and that was the tectonic shift in our industry globally, and certainly in Australia.'
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
State celebrates major milestone for women in politics
August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71. August marks 100 years since NSW elected its first woman to parliament, feminist and temperance campaigner Millicent Preston-Stanley. While Australian women were given the right to vote and stand in federal elections in 1902, it took the states longer to catch up. Opponents to females in the state's legislature argued that they couldn't match it with men for knowledge of mining, land laws and other matters dealt with by elected MPs, according to former High Court justice Virginia Bell. Nevertheless, NSW parliament passed a law in 1918 - the Women's Legal Status Act - which allowed the then so-called fairer sex to be elected as members of parliament, appointed judges or magistrates and admitted as solicitors or barristers. "An undercurrent in the Hansard debates on the bill was the view that its enactment wasn't going to disrupt the (status quo)," Ms Bell this week said at a NSW parliament event celebrating the centenary of Ms Preston-Stanley's election. "The electorate, it was felt, was not going to return women as members and the legal profession wasn't going to be overwhelmed by them, either." In 1925, Ms Preston-Stanley became the first woman elected to the NSW Legislative Assembly as a Nationalist Party representative for the eastern suburbs, nearly 25 years after women gained the right to vote. On August 25 that year she became the first woman to speak on the floor of the house as an elected member, delivering her maiden speech. A staunch feminist and trailblazer, Ms Preston-Stanley was a fierce advocate for women and children, laying the foundations for reforms in maternal health, child welfare and housing for women. During her time in parliament, she advocated for fairer divorce laws, better healthcare for mothers and improved protection for children. In 1927, Ms Preston-Stanley's seat was abolished and she failed to be re-elected in another electorate. However under her leadership, a private professional women's lobby known as the Feminist Club stood apart from many other women's organisations during the period which primarily concerned themselves with home keeping, family and religion. She also kept working to encourage other women into politics. Progress was slow, with only three females elected to the Legislative Assembly in the 50 years after her election. Now, more than 150 women have served as members of the NSW parliament. Women make up about 42 per cent of the NSW Legislative Assembly today, a remarkable progression from Ms Preston-Stanley's time as the sole female voice in the chamber. "She was a truly remarkable, staunch trailblazer and it's very fitting that her pioneering advocacy for women should be acknowledged," Ms Bell said. Ms Preston-Stanley married former South Australian premier Crawford Vaughan in 1934. She died in June 1955, aged 71.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Trump leaves Alaska summit with Putin empty-handed
Donald Trump has failed to secure an agreement from Vladimir Putin to end Russia's war in Ukraine, falling short in his most significant move yet to stop the bloodshed, even after rolling out the red carpet for the man who started it. "There's no deal until there's a deal," the US president said, after Putin claimed they had hammered out an "understanding" on Ukraine and warned Europe not to "torpedo the nascent progress". Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders to brief them on the talks. Trump, who for years has baulked at American support for Ukraine and expressed admiration for Putin, had pledged confidently to bring about an end to the war on his first day back in the White House. Seven months later, after berating Zelenskiy in the Oval Office and staunching the flow of some US military assistance to Kyiv, Trump could not bring Putin even to pause the fighting, as his forces make gains on the battlefield. The US president had offered Putin both a carrot and a stick, issuing threats of punishing economic sanctions on Russia while also extending a warm welcome at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but he appeared to walk away without any concrete progress on ending the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Instead, he handed Putin long-sought recognition on the international stage, after years of Western efforts to make him a pariah over the war and his crackdown on dissent, and forestalled the threat of additional US sanctions. In a sign that the conversations did not yield Trump's preferred result, the two leaders ended what was supposed to be a joint news conference without taking questions from reporters. During a subsequent interview with Fox News before leaving Alaska, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be somehow on Zelenskiy "to get it done", but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. That was notable since Zelenskiy was excluded from Trump and Putin's meeting. The US president had wanted to show off his deal-making skills, while Putin wanted to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains, block Kyiv's bid to join the NATO military alliance and eventually pull Ukraine back into Moscow's orbit. "We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to," Trump said while standing next to Putin. "And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there." He continued: "We didn't get there." Putin says Trump 'shows understanding' that Russia has its own interests. For Putin, just being on US soil for the first time in more than a decade was validation after being ostracised following his invasion of Ukraine. His meeting with Trump may stall economic sanctions the US presiden promised unless Moscow worked harder to bring the fighting to a close. It also may simply lead to more meetings, giving his forces more time to make progress on the battlefield. Putin said Russia and the US should "turn the page and go back to co-operation". He praised Trump as someone who "has a clear idea of what he wants to achieve and sincerely cares about the prosperity of his country, and at the same time shows understanding that Russia has its own national interests". "I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also mark the beginning of the restoration of businesslike, pragmatic relations between Russia and the US," Putin said. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, "we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon". When Putin smiled and offered, "next time in Moscow", Trump said "that's an interesting one" and said he might face criticism but "I could see it possibly happening". When Trump and Putin arrived in Alaska, they greeted each other with a warm handshake, chatting almost like old friends, and gripped hands for an extended period on a red carpet rolled out at the military base. As they chatted, Putin grinned and pointed skyward, where B-2s and F-22s — military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the Cold War — flew overhead. The two then shared the US presidential limo for a short ride to their meeting site, with Putin offering a broad smile as they rolled past the cameras. It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies and belied the bloodshed and suffering in the war Putin started in Ukraine. Although not altogether surprising considering their longtime friendly relationship, such outward friendliness likely raised concerns from Zelenskiy and European leaders, who fear Trump is primarily focusing on furthering US interests and not pressing hard enough for Ukraine's. Donald Trump has failed to secure an agreement from Vladimir Putin to end Russia's war in Ukraine, falling short in his most significant move yet to stop the bloodshed, even after rolling out the red carpet for the man who started it. "There's no deal until there's a deal," the US president said, after Putin claimed they had hammered out an "understanding" on Ukraine and warned Europe not to "torpedo the nascent progress". Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders to brief them on the talks. Trump, who for years has baulked at American support for Ukraine and expressed admiration for Putin, had pledged confidently to bring about an end to the war on his first day back in the White House. Seven months later, after berating Zelenskiy in the Oval Office and staunching the flow of some US military assistance to Kyiv, Trump could not bring Putin even to pause the fighting, as his forces make gains on the battlefield. The US president had offered Putin both a carrot and a stick, issuing threats of punishing economic sanctions on Russia while also extending a warm welcome at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but he appeared to walk away without any concrete progress on ending the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Instead, he handed Putin long-sought recognition on the international stage, after years of Western efforts to make him a pariah over the war and his crackdown on dissent, and forestalled the threat of additional US sanctions. In a sign that the conversations did not yield Trump's preferred result, the two leaders ended what was supposed to be a joint news conference without taking questions from reporters. During a subsequent interview with Fox News before leaving Alaska, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be somehow on Zelenskiy "to get it done", but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. That was notable since Zelenskiy was excluded from Trump and Putin's meeting. The US president had wanted to show off his deal-making skills, while Putin wanted to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains, block Kyiv's bid to join the NATO military alliance and eventually pull Ukraine back into Moscow's orbit. "We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to," Trump said while standing next to Putin. "And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there." He continued: "We didn't get there." Putin says Trump 'shows understanding' that Russia has its own interests. For Putin, just being on US soil for the first time in more than a decade was validation after being ostracised following his invasion of Ukraine. His meeting with Trump may stall economic sanctions the US presiden promised unless Moscow worked harder to bring the fighting to a close. It also may simply lead to more meetings, giving his forces more time to make progress on the battlefield. Putin said Russia and the US should "turn the page and go back to co-operation". He praised Trump as someone who "has a clear idea of what he wants to achieve and sincerely cares about the prosperity of his country, and at the same time shows understanding that Russia has its own national interests". "I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also mark the beginning of the restoration of businesslike, pragmatic relations between Russia and the US," Putin said. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, "we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon". When Putin smiled and offered, "next time in Moscow", Trump said "that's an interesting one" and said he might face criticism but "I could see it possibly happening". When Trump and Putin arrived in Alaska, they greeted each other with a warm handshake, chatting almost like old friends, and gripped hands for an extended period on a red carpet rolled out at the military base. As they chatted, Putin grinned and pointed skyward, where B-2s and F-22s — military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the Cold War — flew overhead. The two then shared the US presidential limo for a short ride to their meeting site, with Putin offering a broad smile as they rolled past the cameras. It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies and belied the bloodshed and suffering in the war Putin started in Ukraine. Although not altogether surprising considering their longtime friendly relationship, such outward friendliness likely raised concerns from Zelenskiy and European leaders, who fear Trump is primarily focusing on furthering US interests and not pressing hard enough for Ukraine's. Donald Trump has failed to secure an agreement from Vladimir Putin to end Russia's war in Ukraine, falling short in his most significant move yet to stop the bloodshed, even after rolling out the red carpet for the man who started it. "There's no deal until there's a deal," the US president said, after Putin claimed they had hammered out an "understanding" on Ukraine and warned Europe not to "torpedo the nascent progress". Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders to brief them on the talks. Trump, who for years has baulked at American support for Ukraine and expressed admiration for Putin, had pledged confidently to bring about an end to the war on his first day back in the White House. Seven months later, after berating Zelenskiy in the Oval Office and staunching the flow of some US military assistance to Kyiv, Trump could not bring Putin even to pause the fighting, as his forces make gains on the battlefield. The US president had offered Putin both a carrot and a stick, issuing threats of punishing economic sanctions on Russia while also extending a warm welcome at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but he appeared to walk away without any concrete progress on ending the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Instead, he handed Putin long-sought recognition on the international stage, after years of Western efforts to make him a pariah over the war and his crackdown on dissent, and forestalled the threat of additional US sanctions. In a sign that the conversations did not yield Trump's preferred result, the two leaders ended what was supposed to be a joint news conference without taking questions from reporters. During a subsequent interview with Fox News before leaving Alaska, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be somehow on Zelenskiy "to get it done", but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. That was notable since Zelenskiy was excluded from Trump and Putin's meeting. The US president had wanted to show off his deal-making skills, while Putin wanted to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains, block Kyiv's bid to join the NATO military alliance and eventually pull Ukraine back into Moscow's orbit. "We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to," Trump said while standing next to Putin. "And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there." He continued: "We didn't get there." Putin says Trump 'shows understanding' that Russia has its own interests. For Putin, just being on US soil for the first time in more than a decade was validation after being ostracised following his invasion of Ukraine. His meeting with Trump may stall economic sanctions the US presiden promised unless Moscow worked harder to bring the fighting to a close. It also may simply lead to more meetings, giving his forces more time to make progress on the battlefield. Putin said Russia and the US should "turn the page and go back to co-operation". He praised Trump as someone who "has a clear idea of what he wants to achieve and sincerely cares about the prosperity of his country, and at the same time shows understanding that Russia has its own national interests". "I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also mark the beginning of the restoration of businesslike, pragmatic relations between Russia and the US," Putin said. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, "we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon". When Putin smiled and offered, "next time in Moscow", Trump said "that's an interesting one" and said he might face criticism but "I could see it possibly happening". When Trump and Putin arrived in Alaska, they greeted each other with a warm handshake, chatting almost like old friends, and gripped hands for an extended period on a red carpet rolled out at the military base. As they chatted, Putin grinned and pointed skyward, where B-2s and F-22s — military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the Cold War — flew overhead. The two then shared the US presidential limo for a short ride to their meeting site, with Putin offering a broad smile as they rolled past the cameras. It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies and belied the bloodshed and suffering in the war Putin started in Ukraine. Although not altogether surprising considering their longtime friendly relationship, such outward friendliness likely raised concerns from Zelenskiy and European leaders, who fear Trump is primarily focusing on furthering US interests and not pressing hard enough for Ukraine's. Donald Trump has failed to secure an agreement from Vladimir Putin to end Russia's war in Ukraine, falling short in his most significant move yet to stop the bloodshed, even after rolling out the red carpet for the man who started it. "There's no deal until there's a deal," the US president said, after Putin claimed they had hammered out an "understanding" on Ukraine and warned Europe not to "torpedo the nascent progress". Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders to brief them on the talks. Trump, who for years has baulked at American support for Ukraine and expressed admiration for Putin, had pledged confidently to bring about an end to the war on his first day back in the White House. Seven months later, after berating Zelenskiy in the Oval Office and staunching the flow of some US military assistance to Kyiv, Trump could not bring Putin even to pause the fighting, as his forces make gains on the battlefield. The US president had offered Putin both a carrot and a stick, issuing threats of punishing economic sanctions on Russia while also extending a warm welcome at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but he appeared to walk away without any concrete progress on ending the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Instead, he handed Putin long-sought recognition on the international stage, after years of Western efforts to make him a pariah over the war and his crackdown on dissent, and forestalled the threat of additional US sanctions. In a sign that the conversations did not yield Trump's preferred result, the two leaders ended what was supposed to be a joint news conference without taking questions from reporters. During a subsequent interview with Fox News before leaving Alaska, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be somehow on Zelenskiy "to get it done", but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. That was notable since Zelenskiy was excluded from Trump and Putin's meeting. The US president had wanted to show off his deal-making skills, while Putin wanted to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains, block Kyiv's bid to join the NATO military alliance and eventually pull Ukraine back into Moscow's orbit. "We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to," Trump said while standing next to Putin. "And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there." He continued: "We didn't get there." Putin says Trump 'shows understanding' that Russia has its own interests. For Putin, just being on US soil for the first time in more than a decade was validation after being ostracised following his invasion of Ukraine. His meeting with Trump may stall economic sanctions the US presiden promised unless Moscow worked harder to bring the fighting to a close. It also may simply lead to more meetings, giving his forces more time to make progress on the battlefield. Putin said Russia and the US should "turn the page and go back to co-operation". He praised Trump as someone who "has a clear idea of what he wants to achieve and sincerely cares about the prosperity of his country, and at the same time shows understanding that Russia has its own national interests". "I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also mark the beginning of the restoration of businesslike, pragmatic relations between Russia and the US," Putin said. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, "we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon". When Putin smiled and offered, "next time in Moscow", Trump said "that's an interesting one" and said he might face criticism but "I could see it possibly happening". When Trump and Putin arrived in Alaska, they greeted each other with a warm handshake, chatting almost like old friends, and gripped hands for an extended period on a red carpet rolled out at the military base. As they chatted, Putin grinned and pointed skyward, where B-2s and F-22s — military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the Cold War — flew overhead. The two then shared the US presidential limo for a short ride to their meeting site, with Putin offering a broad smile as they rolled past the cameras. It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies and belied the bloodshed and suffering in the war Putin started in Ukraine. Although not altogether surprising considering their longtime friendly relationship, such outward friendliness likely raised concerns from Zelenskiy and European leaders, who fear Trump is primarily focusing on furthering US interests and not pressing hard enough for Ukraine's.
