
Former Biden official Matthew Miller Israel has 'without doubt' committed war crimes in Gaza
A senior official in former president Joe Biden's administration has told Sky News that he has no doubt that Israel has committed war crimes in Gaza.
Speaking to the Trump 100 podcast, Matthew Miller, who, as a state department spokesman, was the voice and face of the US government's foreign policy under Mr Biden, revealed disagreements, tensions and challenges within the former administration.
In the wide-ranging conversation, he said:
• It was "without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes";
• That Israeli soldiers were not being "held accountable";
• That there were "disagreements all along the way" about how to handle policy;
• And that he "would have wanted to have a better candidate" than Mr Biden for the 2024 election.
Mr Miller served as the state department spokesman from 2023 until the end of Mr Biden's presidential term. From the podium, his job was to explain and defend foreign policy decisions - from Ukraine to Gaza.
"Look, one of the things about being a spokesperson is you're not a spokesperson for yourself. You are a spokesperson for the president, the administration, and you espouse the positions of the administration. And when you're not in the administration, you can just give your own opinions."
Now out of office, he offered a candid reflection of a hugely challenging period in foreign policy and US politics.
1:37
Gaza disagreements
Asked about Gaza, he revealed there were "small and big" disagreements within the Biden administration over the US-Israeli relationship.
"There were disagreements all along the way about how to handle policy. Some of those were big disagreements, some of those were little disagreements," he said.
Pushed on rumours that then- secretary of state Antony Blinken had frustrations with Mr Biden over both Gaza and Ukraine policy, Mr Miller hinted at the tensions.
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈
"I'll probably wait and let the secretary speak for himself… but I will say, speaking generally, look, it is true about every senior official in government that they don't win every policy fight that they enter into. And what you do is you make your best case to the president.
"The administration did debate, at times, whether and when to cut off weapons to Israel. You saw us in the spring of 2024 stop the shipment of 2,000-pound bombs to Israel because we did not believe they would use those in a way that was appropriate in Gaza."
Through the spring and summer of 2024, the Biden administration was caught between its bedrock policy of the unconditional defence of its ally Israel and the reality of what that ally was doing in Gaza, with American weapons.
Mr Mill said: "There were debates about whether to suspend other arms deliveries, and you saw at times us hold back certain arms while we negotiated the use of those arms…
"But we found ourselves in this really tough position, especially in that time period when it really came to a head… We were at a place where - I'm thinking of the way I can appropriately say this - the decisions and the thinking of Hamas leadership were not always secret to the United States and to our partners."
He continued: "And it was clear to us in that period that there was a time when our public discussion of withholding weapons from Israel, as well as the protests on college campuses in the United States, and the movement of some European countries to recognise the state of Palestine - appropriate discussions, appropriate decisions - protests are appropriate - but all of those things together were leading the leadership of Hamas to conclude that they didn't need to agree to a ceasefire, they just needed to hold out for a little bit longer, and they could get what they always wanted."
"Now, the thing that I look back on, that I will always ask questions of myself about, and I think this is true for others in government, is in that intervening period between the end of May and the middle of January [2025], when thousands of Palestinians were killed, innocent civilians who didn't want this war, had nothing to do with it, was there more that we could, could have done to pressure the Israeli government to agree to that ceasefire? I think at times there probably was," Mr Miller said.
Asked for his view on the accusation of genocide in Gaza, he said: "I don't think it's a genocide, but I think it is without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes."
Challenged on why he didn't make these points while in government, he said: "When you're at the podium, you're not expressing your personal opinion. You're expressing the conclusions of the United States government. The United States government had not concluded that they committed war crimes, still have not concluded [that]."
He went on to offer a qualification to his accusation.
"There are two ways to think about the commission of war crimes," he said.
"One is if the state has pursued a policy of deliberately committing war crimes or is acting recklessly in a way that aids and abets war crimes. Is the state committing war crimes?
"That, I think, is an open question. I think what is almost certainly not an open question is that there have been individual incidents that have been war crimes where Israeli soldiers, members of the Israeli military, have committed war crimes."
The Israeli government continues to strongly deny all claims that it has committed war crimes in Gaza.
On Joe Biden's election hopes
Mr Miller also offered a candid reflection on the suitability of Mr Biden as a candidate in the 2024 US election. While Mr Biden initially ran to extend his stay in the White House, he stepped aside, with Kamala Harris taking his place as the Democratic candidate.
"Had I not been inside the government, had I been outside the government acting kind of in a political role, of course, I would have wanted to have a better candidate," he said.
"It's that collective action problem where no one wants to be the first to speak out and stand up alone. You stand up by yourself and get your head chopped off, stand up together, you can take action.
"But there was never really a consensus position in the party, and there was no one that was willing to stand up and rally the party to say this isn't going to work.
"I don't think there is anyone on the White House staff, including the most senior White House staffers, who could have gone to Joe Biden in the spring of 2023 or at any time after that and told him: 'Mr President, you are not able to do the duties of this job. And you will not win re-election.' He would have rejected that outright."
1:00
On the Donald Trump presidency so far, he offered a nuanced view.
He described Mr Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff as "an extremely capable individual" but expressed his worry that he was being manipulated by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"I know the people in the Biden administration who worked with him during the first negotiations for Gaza ceasefire thought that he was capable.
"I think at times he doesn't know what he doesn't know. And you see that especially in the negotiations to end the war in Ukraine, where you see him go into a meeting with Vladimir Putin and come out spouting Russian propaganda… I think he would benefit from a little diplomatic savvy and some experienced diplomats around him."
He continued: "But I do think it's extremely important that when people sit down with an envoy of the United States they know that that envoy speaks for the President of the United States and it is very clear that Witkoff has that and that's an extremely valuable asset to bring to the table."
On the months and years ahead under Mr Trump, Mr Miller said: "The thing that worries me most is that Donald Trump may squander the position that the United States has built around the world over successive administrations of both parties over a course of decades.
"I don't think most Americans understand the benefits that they get to their daily lives by the United States being the indispensable nation in the world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geeky Gadgets
12 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. S25 Edge: The ULTIMATE Speed Battle!
When comparing flagship smartphones, the iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge emerge as two of the most advanced options available. Each device caters to distinct user preferences, offering unique strengths in design, performance, and usability. The Galaxy S25 Edge emphasizes speed and innovation, while the iPhone 16 Pro Max focuses on delivering a refined and consistent user experience. Below is a detailed breakdown of how these two devices stack up across key features in a new video from Nick Ackerman. Watch this video on YouTube. Design and Build The Galaxy S25 Edge stands out with its ultra-thin and lightweight design, redefining portability in the smartphone market. Despite its slim profile, it incorporates effective heat management, making sure the device remains comfortable to use even during extended sessions. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritize sleekness and mobility. In contrast, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a more substantial build, emphasizing durability and robustness. Its slightly bulkier design accommodates a larger battery, which translates to longer usage times. For users who value sturdiness and extended battery life, the iPhone's design is a clear winner. Both devices showcase premium craftsmanship, but their appeal depends on whether you prioritize portability or endurance. Performance Performance is a critical factor for any flagship device, and here the Galaxy S25 Edge takes the lead with its faster app launch speeds and superior multitasking capabilities. The device's snappy interface and responsiveness are particularly noticeable during demanding tasks, making it a favorite among power users. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a different kind of performance advantage. Its smooth animations and optimized app performance create a polished and seamless user experience. While the Galaxy S25 Edge excels in raw speed, the iPhone prioritizes fluidity and consistency, which many users find more intuitive for everyday use. Both devices deliver exceptional performance, but their strengths cater to different user needs. Display and Software The iPhone 16 Pro Max features a ProMotion display with adaptive refresh rates, offering a visually smooth experience during scrolling, video playback, and gaming. This technology enhances usability and provides a refined visual experience, making it ideal for users who value visual precision and fluidity. In comparison, the Galaxy S25 Edge delivers a faster and more responsive user interface, appealing to those who prioritize speed and efficiency. However, its rapid transitions and animations may feel overwhelming to users accustomed to a more measured pace. Both devices feature high-quality displays, but the choice between them depends on whether you prioritize visual refinement or interface responsiveness. Unlocking and Biometrics Biometric security is another area where these devices differ significantly. The iPhone 16 Pro Max relies on Face ID, a secure and seamlessly integrated system that works intuitively with its swipe-to-unlock functionality. This system is reliable and easy to use for most users. The Galaxy S25 Edge, however, offers greater versatility with both in-display fingerprint scanning and face unlock. These options provide faster access and cater to users who prefer having multiple unlocking methods. While both systems are effective, the Galaxy S25 Edge's variety may appeal to those who value flexibility and convenience. Gaming and Graphics For gaming enthusiasts, the Galaxy S25 Edge is a standout performer. Its multi-core processing power and advanced 3D graphics capabilities make it ideal for resource-intensive games. The device handles demanding titles with ease, delivering a smooth and immersive gaming experience. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, while slightly behind in multi-core performance, excels in single-core tasks and game launch speeds. Both devices maintain similar temperatures during extended gaming sessions, making sure comfort for users. Ultimately, the Galaxy S25 Edge is better suited for hardcore gamers, while the iPhone offers reliable performance for casual gaming. Camera Performance The iPhone 16 Pro Max excels in everyday photography, offering fast camera launch speeds and a responsive shutter. Its camera system is optimized for social media, making sure consistent results across platforms. This makes it a dependable choice for users who frequently capture spontaneous moments. The Galaxy S25 Edge, equipped with a 200MP main sensor, shines in capturing fine details and high-resolution images. However, its zoom capabilities fall short compared to Samsung's Ultra models. While both devices deliver impressive results, the iPhone's consistency and ease of use give it a slight edge for most users. Battery Life Battery life is a crucial consideration, and the iPhone 16 Pro Max outperforms the Galaxy S25 Edge in this area. Its larger battery capacity ensures longer usage times, making it a reliable choice for users with demanding schedules. The Galaxy S25 Edge, while capable of lasting a full day with moderate use, sacrifices battery capacity for its thin and lightweight design. This trade-off may appeal to users who prioritize portability, but those seeking endurance and reliability will find the iPhone more dependable. Future Implications The Galaxy S25 Edge's innovative design sets a new benchmark for smartphone portability. Its ultra-thin profile has sparked speculation about future trends, including the possibility of an 'iPhone Air' model. As manufacturers continue to push the boundaries of design and performance, devices like the Galaxy S25 Edge pave the way for thinner and more efficient smartphones. Meanwhile, the iPhone 16 Pro Max reinforces Apple's commitment to delivering a polished and consistent user experience, emphasizing durability, battery life, and ecosystem integration. These qualities ensure its relevance in a market increasingly focused on balancing innovation with practicality. Final Thoughts The iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge represent two distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. The Galaxy S25 Edge impresses with its ultra-thin design, faster app launches, and superior gaming performance, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and portability. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max delivers a refined and consistent experience, excelling in battery life, camera functionality, and ecosystem integration. Ultimately, the choice between these devices depends on your priorities. Whether you value innovative design or reliability and durability, both smartphones offer compelling features tailored to different user needs. Here are more detailed guides and articles that you may find helpful on iPhone 16 Pro Max. Source & Image Credit: Nick Ackerman Filed Under: Android News, Apple iPhone, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
No kids, excess heat and payment plans. What to know about Hajj 2025
Muslims from around the world are in the Saudi city of Mecca for the Hajj, one of the Five Pillars of Islam. In the coming days, people will immerse themselves in religious rituals and acts of worship that originated more than 1,400 years ago. They also have to contend with excess heat and other earthly factors, like a ban on children under the age of 12 and a crackdown on unauthorized entry. Here's what to know about this year's Hajj: Beating the heat in the Saudi desert Last year's pilgrims struggled through burning sun and suffocating hot weather, with the mercury hitting 47 degrees Celsius (117 degrees Fahrenheit). More than 1,300 people died. This year, Saudi authorities are advising caution in direct sunlight, telling pilgrims to avoid going out during the day and uncovering their heads, except for rituals, unless necessary. An official safety kit emphasizes the importance of light-colored clothing and umbrellas. It also has details on recognizing and treating the symptoms of dehydration and heat exhaustion. But it's tough to avoid the heat and crowds when the Hajj is outdoors. It's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for many, elevating the personal stakes further, and temperatures in Mecca are already 41 degrees Celsius (about 106 Fahrenheit). Although the desert kingdom spends billions of dollars on crowd control and cooling, the volume of pilgrims and climatic conditions make it difficult to guarantee people's safety. A ban on children under 12 at the Hajj Saudi Arabia has banned children under 12 from this year's Hajj — one of the biggest policy changes in recent years. Riyadh reportedly introduced the ban as a precautionary measure to ensure children's safety during the pilgrimage, which could be a dangerous environment for them because of the huge crowds. Children are exempt from doing the Hajj and are not required to fulfill other Islamic obligations, like prayer and fasting, until they reach puberty. But that doesn't stop some parents from wanting to take their children to experience the Hajj and see the holiest site in Islam, the Kaaba, the black, cube-shaped structure that is the focal point for daily prayers. Father of five Talha Ayub, from the Pakistani city of Lahore, said his kids were staying with their grandparents while he and his wife performed the Hajj in a 'more relaxed way.' 'Even if children were allowed, we probably wouldn't have taken them because the weather is extremely harsh this year,' said Ayub, whose children are aged 1 to 13. 'I have mixed feelings about leaving them behind. I'll miss them.' There's no official age breakdown for pilgrims, but most are between 35 and 64. Layaways and lowering the price tag The price of a Hajj ranges from $4,000 to $20,000, depending on the length of stay, level of comfort, and country of departure. Depreciating currencies, high inflation, and tax hikes in Saudi Arabia also have an impact on how much Muslims end up paying. The countries that typically send the most pilgrims are developing nations. Some have trimmed the price of government-backed Hajj programs to make them more affordable. But this step isn't always enough. Farid Ahmed Majumder, secretary general of the Hajj Agencies Association of Bangladesh, said the country was allowed to send some 127,000 pilgrims this year but failed to meet this quota, mainly because of higher costs. Pakistan has reduced the price of the state-run Hajj program. It has also debuted a flexible payment system. Farmer and small business owner Zaheer Ahmad said he didn't have enough money to pay for his Hajj up-front, 1.2 million rupees or about $4,255. He paid in three installments, applying for the Hajj in December with an advance and finishing his payments in February. 'Otherwise, I might not have been able to go for Hajj at all,' he said. In Saudi Arabia, which has also introduced flexible payments, domestic pilgrims pay 20% within 72 hours of booking, another 40% during Ramadan and the final 40% the following month. Managing wait times and overcrowding Although the Hajj is a once-in-a-lifetime obligation, people don't want to wait a lifetime to fulfill it. But the Hajj has limited capacity, countries have set quotas, and there is only one time each year to do it. Patience really is a virtue and everything needs to align: availability, health, and finances. Muslim-majority countries like Indonesia and Malaysia have decades-long waiting lists for the Hajj. Indonesia has 5.4 million people awaiting their turn, with the number increasing each year. While there is nothing to stop people from performing the Hajj more than once, some governments believe this practice deprives others of the opportunity, especially in countries where demand is high. India has a ban on 'repeaters' and excludes applications from anyone who has previously performed the pilgrimage through the national Hajj committee, although there are exceptions from those accompanying certain categories of people like the elderly. With a restricted supply of Hajj spaces, it's inevitable that people will try to find ways to get to the holy city and stay there. In April, to curb unauthorized Hajj pilgrimages and control inbound travel, Saudi Arabia suspended the issue of short-term visas for 14 countries: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Nigeria, Jordan, Algeria, Sudan, Ethiopia, Tunisia, Yemen, and Morocco. People have in the past traveled to Saudi Arabia on short-term visas and entered Mecca without official permission for the Hajj. Authorities said that many of those who died in the heat during last year's Hajj were unregistered and unable to access air-conditioned pilgrim amenities. The Interior Ministry warned in May that a fine of up to 20,000 riyals, or about $5,330, would be imposed on anyone attempting to enter Mecca during the Hajj without the correct visa. ___ Associated Press writers Sheikh Saaliq in New Delhi, Julhas Alam in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Munir Ahmed in Islamabad contributed to this report. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
AP PHOTOS: Cuba's energy crisis forces families to find ingenious solutions to get by
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.