Hegseth shared information ahead of Yemen strikes in a Signal chat with wife and brother
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used his personal phone to send information about U.S. military operations in Yemen to a 13-person Signal group chat, including his wife and his brother, two sources with knowledge of the matter confirmed to NBC News.
He did so after an aide had warned him to be careful not to share sensitive information on an unsecure communications system before the Yemen operation, the sources said.
The development comes about a month after it became public that Hegseth shared details of strikes in Yemen in a separate Signal chat with top administration officials. The editor-in-chief of The Atlantic was mistakenly added to that chain.
The New York Times first reported the existence of the second Signal chat.
The Times cited four unnamed sources. Some of them, the Times reported, said the information Hegseth sent in the second chat — such as the flight schedule of the FA-18 planes being used — appeared to be similar to information he had shared in the Signal chat reported by the editor of The Atlantic. One source confirmed that to NBC News.
Sean Parnell, the chief Defense Department spokesman, denied that Hegseth had shared classified information. 'There was no classified information in any Signal chat,' he said on X.
Anna Kelly, a White House deputy press secretary, played down the significance of the second group chat.
'No matter how many times the legacy media tries to resurrect the same non-story, they can't change the fact that no classified information was shared,' she said in a statement.
Thirteen people were in the second Signal group chat, but no other Cabinet-level officials were included, the two sources said.
Participants included Joe Kasper, Hegseth's chief of staff; Darin Selnick, his deputy chief of staff; Eric Geressy, a retired Army sergeant major and Hegseth adviser; Tim Parlatore, a legal adviser to Hegseth and a Navy commander in the Judge Advocate General's Corps; Hegseth's brother, Phil, senior adviser to Hegseth for the Department of Homeland Security; and Hegseth's wife, Jennifer, according to the two sources.
In March, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, was mistakenly added to a Signal chat with multiple national security leaders, on which Hegseth shared operational plans for striking military targets in Yemen before they occurred. That chat is now the subject of an investigation by the Defense Department's inspector general.
In both instances, Hegseth used his personal phone, rather than his official one, the two sources said.
Hegseth came under scrutiny last month after it was revealed that his wife, a former Fox News producer, attended sensitive Defense Department meetings with British and NATO leaders. Jennifer Hegseth is not a Pentagon employee.
Hegseth's brother, Phil, is employed in the Pentagon as a Department of Homeland Security adviser to Hegseth— but it is not clear why he or Jennifer Hegseth would need to know or be privy to information about the military strikes in Yemen.
The Defense Department has had heavy turnover in the past week. Two of Hegseth's top advisers, Dan Caldwell and Selnick, were escorted out of the Pentagon early last week in connection with an investigation of allegations of a leak of sensitive information.
The official who announced the investigation into the supposed leak weeks ago, Hegseth's chief of staff, Joe Kasper, left his role at the Pentagon late last week, Politico reported. And Colin Carroll, chief of staff to the deputy secretary of defense, was also forced out late last week.
Caldwell, Selnick and Carroll said in a joint social media statement Saturday saying that did not know why they were being investigated, saying, 'Unnamed Pentagon officials have slandered our character with baseless attacks on our way out the door.'
Democrats reacted quickly to Sunday's news. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., posted on X that Hegseth 'must be fired.'
'The details keep coming out,' Schumer said. 'We keep learning how Pete Hegseth put lives at risk. But Trump is still too weak to fire him.'
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said on X: 'The latest story about Pete Hegseth's carelessness with sensitive information is yet another alarming example in this administration's unbroken pattern of incompetence. He should resign.'
Sen Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., a military veteran, called Hegseth 'a threat to our national security' in a statement.
'Every day he stays in his job is another day our troops' lives are endangered,' she said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Where Hegseth Wants US Military on China's Doorstep
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. defense chief Pete Hegseth on Wednesday stressed the role of regional partners in the Pentagon's bid to counter an increasingly assertive China. "The Indo-Pacific is our priority theater, and China is our pacing threat,' he said while making the case for the defense budget requested by the Trump administration for the next fiscal year. Those words echoed his May 31 remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue defense summit in Singapore, where he hailed examples of U.S. and allied military cooperation—including those illustrated on the Newsweek map below. Why It Matters China's rapid military buildup and competing territorial claims have strained ties with several neighbors, including U.S.-allied Philippines and Japan, both of which share defense treaties with Washington that could potentially draw American forces into a conflict. Chinese threats and increasing military activities around Taiwan, the island democracy Beijing claims as its territory, have further raised concerns. The tensions have driven some of China's neighbors to deepen military cooperation with the United States and one another. Newsweek contacted the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., for comment by email, but did not receive a response before publication time. What To Know In Singapore, Hegseth praised President Donald Trump's "America First" foreign policy while blaming former President Joe Biden for the U.S.-Mexico border crisis to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Yet, he added, "America First certainly does not mean America alone." Taking aim at what he called China's "destabilizing actions," Hegseth said the U.S. should be prepared for war, although deterring Chinese military aggression by raising its costs was preferable. "We're doing this here in the Indo-Pacific in three distinct ways: first, by improving our forward force posture. Second, by helping allies and partners strengthen their defense capabilities. And third, by rebuilding defense industrial bases," he told attendees. These efforts include deploying to the first island chain assets such as the U.S. Marine Corps' NMESIS high-precision anti-ship missile system to the Luzon Strait—a maritime choke point frequented by Chinese warships. A U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, or Typhon missile system fires a Standard Missile-6 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on November 8, 2024. A U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, or Typhon missile system fires a Standard Missile-6 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on November 8, 2024. The platform was delivered to the Philippines' far-northern Batanes province about 120 miles south of Taiwan. The deployment "enhanced our interoperability and improved our readiness on cutting-edge platforms, where we need them and when we need them," Hegseth said. The NMESIS missile system adds to the growing U.S. firepower in the Southeast Asian country. Last year, the U.S. deployed a U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, also known as the Typhon missile launcher, to the Philippines ahead of joint military drills last spring. Philippine officials initially suggested the system would be removed after the drills, but later indicated it could remain indefinitely, irking officials in Beijing over the system's ability to reach China's eastern seaboard with weapons like as the Standard Missile-6 and the Tomahawk cruise missile. A second Typhon system will be deployed to AUKUS partner Australia this summer, where the U.S. Army plans to conduct its first-ever live-fire test of the system on foreign soil, Hegseth said. This year, Washington and Canberra also reached an agreement for Australia to produce 155-millimeter artillery rounds and assemble guided multiple-launch rocket systems, boosting Australia's potential as a force multiplier in the event of a conflict. Washington's efforts to deepen cooperation with Japan, a key Pacific security treaty ally, are also advancing, with upgrades to the joint headquarters of the U.S. Forces Japan. The move will increase deterrence and mark "progress the alliance has made toward improving interoperability and strengthening Japan's capabilities," Hegseth said. The changes, which began in April, will integrate U.S. land, air, sea, space and cyber forces under a single headquarters. There are currently over 50,000 active-duty American military personnel in Japan—the most stationed in any foreign country. The U.S. is also ramping up cooperation with India, one of the four Quad nations and a country that continues to experience friction with China along its disputed border regions in the Himalayas. The Pentagon is working with the South Asian country—an increasingly capable arms manufacturer—to "co-produce equipment needed to deter aggression, and this includes negotiating an agreement to bring our industrial bases ever closer," Hegseth said. Following February talks in Washington between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the two leaders announced an "Autonomous Systems Industry Alliance" that will see the two countries co-develop and co-produce sea drones and counter-drone systems. What People Are Saying: Da Wei, director of the Center for International Security and Strategy at Beijing's Tsinghua University, told Newsweek:"What I want to stress is we are on the path to better relations with regional countries—so we don't need the U.S. to teach us." "I think Secretary Hegseth is kind of trying to [come] between China and regional countries. I don't think this will be successful." What's Next The House Appropriations Committee advanced the Pentagon's request for a base defense budget of $892.6 billion, lower than the $1 trillion figure previously pledged by Trump. That, along with a $150 billion reconciliation package providing additional funds for priority programs such as shipbuilding and munitions, is expected to pass in the overall congressional vote.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Israeli strikes on Iran looked beyond military facilities to target leaders
Richard Engel, NBC News chief foreign correspondent, talks with Jen Psaki about early reporting on what was targeted by Israel in its attack on Iran, with some indications that individuals and residences were included along with military facility targets.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK is not currently providing support to Israel as Iran retaliates, local media reports
LONDON (Reuters) -Britain is not currently providing military support to Israel to defend against Iran's retaliation to overnight Israeli strikes, two British media outlets reported on Friday. The Times newspaper cited defence sources as saying that Britain was not providing support to Israel on Friday morning. Sky News separately reported that British warplanes were not currently involved in helping to defend Israel's skies, but that this could change as the situation develops. In October 2024, when Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, Britain said two of its fighter jets and an air-to-air refuelling tanker played a part in attempts to prevent further escalation, but that the jets did not engage any targets. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has urged both sides to use restraint and return to diplomacy, and Britain was not involved in Israel's strikes against Iran overnight. Britain's foreign office and Ministry of Defence did not immediately respond to a request for comment on any potential British involvement in protecting Israel.
