Over €66 million issued to mother and baby home survivors
OVER €66M IN payments have been issued under the government's mother and baby home redress scheme.
An awareness campaign is expected to be launched to encourage people to apply for the scheme, with a particular focus on people living in Great Britain.
Government set up the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme with the expectation of issuing payments to around 34,000 people and health supports to 19,000 people who were in mother and baby homes, at a cost of €800m.
Its third implementation report about the action plan for issues related to mother and baby homes, published on Tuesday, said that over 6,600 applications have been received as of 15 June, 2025.
By this date, over 4,400 payments had been processed to the value of over €66m.
Over 16,000 requests for information has also been completed under the Birth Information and Tracing Act.
'With an estimated 34,000 people eligible for this Scheme, an estimated 40% of whom live outside of Ireland, the department is conscious of the need to raise awareness of the scheme through all means possible and phase 2 of a public awareness campaign ran from October to December 2024 with a particular focus on Great Britain,' the report said.
'Further phases of the awareness campaign will be undertaken in the future.'
Advertisement
The government had sought for religious bodies to contribute around €270m to the cost of the Government-established Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme.
Only two of eight religious bodies linked to mother and baby homes in Ireland have offered to contribute, a report found in April.
The Sisters of Bon Secours offered €12.97m, while the Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul proposed contributing a building to the scheme.
A commission of investigation was set up in 2015 to examine homes run by the state and religious organisations where tens of thousands of unmarried Irish women were sent to have their babies.
The commission found that almost 170,000 women and children passed through the institutions from 1922 until the last one closed in 1998.
The investigation exposed the often harsh conditions and unforgiving regimes many women and children experienced in the institutions.
On Tuesday, the Department of Children said it would appoint four survivor representatives to the steering group for the planned National Centre for Research and Remembrance in Dublin.
Planning permission was granted by Dublin City Centre in February 2025 to redevelop the former Magdalene Laundry at Seán MacDermott Street into a national remembrance centre.
It will include a museum and exhibition space, an archive, a research centre and central repository of records, and a garden of reflection.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Blanket bans on smartphones are not the answer
Smartphones and social media are recurring features in the ongoing debates on declining mental health among young people. Earlier this month, the Irish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study reported nearly half of young people 'feel low' at least weekly . Invariably, any discussion on young people's mental health moves quickly to smartphones and social media, and the conclusion that the digital lives of young people are linked to a decline in their happiness. But we may be too quick to jump to conclusions on this. In truth, the evidence is limited. Links between the digital lives of children and adolescents and their mental wellbeing are often based on correlative data with few longitudinal or experimental studies. Studies don't always clearly separate how different types of smartphone or social media use affect young people, and they often don't distinguish between using a phone for learning versus mindlessly scrolling. There are likely positive and negative aspects to online activities, but sweeping conclusions and reactionary policies ignore this important nuance. A lot of the commentary around smartphone use in young people frames it as a post-pandemic problem, with increased screen time and online distractions seen as linked to lockdown-induced dependency. But this ignores digital educational policies established well before the pandemic, which encouraged the use of student-owned devices, particularly to support classroom learning. READ MORE Policy guidance laid important groundwork for the informal incorporation of smartphones into educational settings, particularly in schools where resources are tight and there isn't always access to 1:1 laptop or tablet schemes. Implementation often relied on devices students already owned – in most cases, this meant a smartphone. The increasing presence of smartphones in schools is less a byproduct of the pandemic and more a foreseeable consequence of earlier policy directions that were often reactive and technologically permissive. Media coverage of smartphone use in recent years has focused on, and often celebrated, more restrictive responses. Sweden, for example, has moved towards banning smartphones in primary classrooms, aligning with broader efforts to refocus on traditional forms of learning. Minister for Education Helen McEntee recently issued circulars requiring schools to implement a policy to restrict the use of, and access to, personal mobile phones by students for the duration of the school day at post primary level and a full ban at primary level. In 2024, the Australian government passed a new law which introduces a mandatory minimum age of 16 for accounts on some social media platforms. Controversially, parents cannot give their consent to under-16s to use these platforms, marking a new departure in terms of parents' rights. At a surface level, such actions offer clear, decisive action in the face of complex technological challenges, and resonate with public anxieties about youth wellbeing. But they're fraught with practical, human rights and ethical implications. Age verification systems can be circumvented and bans also risk pushing young users on to less-regulated platforms or creating generational disconnects in digital literacy. Blanket bans on smartphones, social media access and other digital activities overlook both the complexity of the issues and the realities of young people's lives. Restrictive policies and a one-size-fits-all approach may inadvertently exacerbate inequalities. Mobile devices and social media can serve as essential tools for safety, communication and family co-ordination, especially for older adolescents needing greater independence. Digital tools such as the language-learning app Duolingo, interactive Stem app Brilliant and online chess have opened up access to educational and enrichment opportunities that were once limited to wealthier families. These tools can give children from lower-income households a chance to learn languages, engage in advanced problem-solving, and develop critical-thinking skills. While regulatory efforts may form part of a broader digital policy toolkit, bans alone are a blunt instrument and probably ineffective. They do little to address the underlying needs that drive youth engagement with smartphones; the human desire for social connection, access to information and autonomy. So what can we do? A more effective response must be holistic: combining regulation with education, digital literacy and the co-creation of safe digital spaces that support both protection and participation. Collective action and voluntary agreements among parents of primary schoolchildren to delay children's access to smartphones can play an important role. The 'no smartphone' initiatives seen in parts of Ireland are a promising grassroots approach to addressing concerns around digital overexposure, cyberbullying and mental health. These agreements can help to reduce peer pressure and create a more uniform standard that benefits all children. Ideally, they should begin during primary school when habits and digital behaviours are still forming. Early implementation not only delays premature exposure to potentially harmful online environments, but also lays the groundwork for more responsible and mindful smartphone use in adolescence, supported by ongoing digital literacy education and parental involvement. Investment in education-based initiatives, such as the Webwise programme, can empower young people and their families to navigate the digital world safely. Safer Internet Day, which is held annually in more than 180 countries, presents a valuable opportunity to promote responsible online behaviour through schools and community engagement. Acceptable use policies, widely used across educational contexts, also present significant potential as instruments for guiding responsible smartphone and social media engagement among young people and advancing digital wellbeing. Of course we need to implement stronger regulations for the technology sector, including setting quality standards for children's content, controlling data extraction and algorithms and enforcing stricter privacy laws. But technology is part of contemporary life, and it is continuously evolving. Simply trying to ban it won't work. Policymakers must adopt a flexible approach that maximises its benefits while safeguarding young people from potential risks. Selina McCoy is professor in Sociology at the Economic and Social Research Institute and Ann Marcus-Quinn is associate professor in Technical Communication at the University of Limerick
The Journal
9 hours ago
- The Journal
Doctor's plea to Irish Government to help get mobile children's hospital into Gaza
A BRITISH-AUSTRALIAN doctor who has recently spent time working in Gaza is appealing to the Irish government to help lead the charge to get mobile hospitals into the besieged territory. Dr Mohammad Mustafa was invited to present to TDs, Senators, and their staff today in Leinster House by Independent Senator Lynn Ruane. Dr Mo, as he is known, told Oireachtas members of the sheer horror he witnessed during his time working in Gaza. The emergency medical doctor volunteered with the Palestinian Australian New Zealand Medical Association at al-Ahli Arab hospital, also known as the Baptist hospital. He explained how this hospital was never supposed to be relied on as a main hospital, but now it is the epicentre of healthcare in Gaza City, catering to almost a million people. 'The emergency room is 15m long and about 5m wide…That would be a corridor that should fit eight beds but we would have to fit 150 people on the floor.' The situation is so dire that while Dr Mo was working there, he was the only doctor with a thermometer. Five days after he left Gaza, Israel bombed the hospital , destroying the emergency room. 'It was the only emergency department that was functioning in the whole of Gaza City. With their own bare hands, they managed to clear the rubble and have put a tent in its place. 'The healthcare system is going to turn into tents. And it's not hygienic, it's not sterile. The worry is that as more and more of the healthcare system gets eroded, that's all that will be left, and more and more people will die,' Dr Mo said. Thirty-six of Gaza's 38 hospitals have been destroyed. Since leaving Gaza, Dr Mo has been campaigning across the globe to get governments to back plans to get mobile hospitals into Gaza. The mobile hospitals are refurbished solar-powered modular buildings with operating theatres, a pharmacy, a cafeteria and a kitchen. In particular, Dr Mo is campaigning to get a 100-bed children's hospital in as well as a maternity and neonatal hospital. 'Once this hospital gets driven into Gaza, it's assembled like a jigsaw puzzle and you have this semi-permanent structure that's air-conditioned, fully equipped with state-of-the-art medical equipment. With running sewage, running water, self-sufficient,' Dr Mo explained. The aid project is being led by an organisation called Pious Projects and would operate in coordination with the UN, the World Health Organisation, UNICEF and the Gaza Health Cluster. But what Dr Mo is pushing for is backing from governments internationally to help get the mobile hospitals' entry into Gaza. He said governmental support is needed to give the project legitimacy at a time when NGO [Non-governmental organisation] workers are being killed in Gaza. 'This is the way that we need to start thinking about doing healthcare, we need to start bringing hospitals into Gaza. We can't just bring in pocket ultrasounds with whichever doctors come in, and a stethoscope and a thermometer. We need to bring the whole hospital in,' he said. 'We've got the infrastructure in place in Jordan to do this. We have got the willingness of the Jordanian government to help with this. And we already have a maternity and neonatal hospital ready to go. Advertisement 'And when we bring in these hospitals, we bring in a whole team of doctors, nurses. It's fully equipped.' Dr Mo explained that he has travelled to Ireland to get as much support as possible. 'This needs to be a government-led initiative. It cannot be an NGO initiative. 'With NGOs, NGOs get bombed. 'NGOs don't have the leverage to break the siege, but governments do. 'Even the UN doesn't, because the UN has almost been outplayed and pushed aside by the US and Israel. And their legitimacy has been eroded away. This is a way we can get legitimacy back into the systems in Gaza,' he said. Dr Mo said the project would be done with the support of UN agencies but that it needs the oversight from international governments who are willing to help run and oversee the security and logistics. 'We're not asking for funding because I understand that could be contentious, but what we are trying to do is take away all the variables. The maternity hospital is already in Jordan, ready to go in. We just need help to get it in. 'The next project that we have is a pediatric hospital, which will be a similar set up to this. And that's the hospital that we want all governments to get involved in. 'We already have the blueprint in place and we're at the end stages of securing funding. 'What we need right is the legitimacy, and the oversight, and the political leverage of governments to get involved.' Healthcare workers Speaking about his experience in Gaza, Dr Mo said the healthcare workers on the ground are exhausted. 'When I was there the last time, over half the workers had jaundice because they had hepatitis A from dirty drinking water. 'Most of these healthcare workers were living in tents because their homes had been destroyed, so they would leave their tents to come to work and do a full 24-hour shift. 'Sometimes, while some of these healthcare workers were working, their entire families were killed. They are working under the most stressful conditions.' Dr Mo argued that healthcare workers in Gaza need more support. 'They have been carrying a load for the last two years that is unbearable. 'I was there for over a month and I was exhausted. I can only imagine what it is like to do that for two years, not having a warm bed to go home to, not knowing if your kids are going to be safe when you go to work, walking through demilitarised zones to get to work where you could be shot at, this is a way to help them as well. 'This is a way we can help those heroes in Gaza by giving them a hospital and allowing them to rest while we pick up some of the load.' The Department of Foreign Affairs and Tánaiste Simon Harris have been contacted for comment. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Independent
10 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘Discriminatory and unjust' mother and baby redress scheme has re-traumatised survivors
The scheme was opened in March 2024, and was announced alongside the appointment of a "special advocate" to act as a voice for survivors. In her first annual report brought to Cabinet today, Patricia Carey says the eligibility criteria for redress have caused "anger and distress" to many, has re- traumatised some survivors and has created a "hierarchy of suffering'. The scheme excludes children who spent less than 180 days in an institution; those who were "boarded-out" or fostered and people in institutions not included under the legislation, among others. The special advocate says that those who are eligible, and who did receive redress, "have shared their strong feelings of distress and guilt" because they were accepted "while others who were in the same institution were left behind'. Ms Carey also says that separate laws to provide enhanced health, education, and other services to survivors of abuse in residential institutions is "unfair and exclusionary" because they do not apply to survivors who were previously paid redress. They expressed concern that those who were unable to apply under the redress scheme or who were ineligible are not included. The Support for Survivors of Residential Abuse Bill was passed in the Dáil last month. The special advocate report said that "sadly' many survivors and their families did not apply for redress because they were not aware of it, they missed the deadline, they were in hospital, prison or other institutions or because of mental or physical health issues. "Given the ageing survivor population, it is unfair and exclusionary to further discriminate against those who, through no fault of their own, were unable to or unaware of previous redress schemes and this would further enforce a lack of justice for all survivors.' The Government set up the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme with the expectation of issuing payments to around 34,000 people and health supports to 19,000 people who were in mother and baby homes, at a cost of €800 million. ADVERTISEMENT Its third implementation report about the action plan for issues related to mother and baby homes, published today, said that over 6,600 applications have been received as of June 15, 2025. By this date, over 4,400 payments had been processed to the value of over €66 million. Over 16,000 requests for information has also been completed under the Birth Information and Tracing Act. 'With an estimated 34,000 people eligible for this scheme, an estimated 40pc of whom live outside of Ireland, the department is conscious of the need to raise awareness of the scheme through all means possible and phase 2 of a public awareness campaign ran from October to December 2024 with a particular focus on Great Britain,' the report said. 'Further phases of the awareness campaign will be undertaken in the future.' The Government had sought for religious bodies to contribute around €270 million to the cost of the scheme. Only two of eight religious bodies linked to mother and baby homes offered to contribute, a report found in April. The Sisters of Bon Secours offered €12.97 million, while the Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul proposed contributing a building to the scheme. A commission of investigation was set up in 2015 to examine homes run by the State and religious organisations where tens of thousands of unmarried Irish women were sent to have their babies. The commission found that almost 170,000 women and children passed through the institutions from 1922 until the last one closed in 1998. The investigation exposed the often harsh conditions and unforgiving regimes many women and children experienced in the institutions.
