Ellen DeGeneres Did Move To UK Due To Trump: Opinion
Shortly after the 2024 election, it was reported that Ellen and wife Portia de Rossi had moved to the Cotswolds, a rural area in England. It's worth noting that this was after her final standup tour and the end of her daytime show, following allegations of a toxic work environment.
As per the BBC, when Ellen was recently asked at an event in Cheltenham, England, whether her decision to move nearby was motivated by Trump, she replied, "Yes."
Initially, Ellen said that she and Portia bought the house to live in part-time. "We got here the day before the election and woke up to lots of texts from our friends with crying emojis, and I was like, 'He got in,'" she said. "And we're like, 'We're staying here.'"
"It's absolutely beautiful," she continued. "We're just not used to seeing this kind of beauty. The villages and the towns and the architecture — everything you see is charming and it's just a simpler way of life."
"It's clean. Everything here is just better — the way animals are treated, people are polite. I just love it here," she added. "We moved here in November, which was not the ideal time, but I saw snow for the first time in my life. We love it here. Portia flew her horses here, and I have chickens, and we had sheep for about two weeks."
Elsewhere, Ellen specifically mentioned LGBTQ+ rights in the US. "The Baptist Church in America is trying to reverse gay marriage," she said. "They're trying to literally stop it from happening in the future and possibly reverse it. Portia and I are already looking into it, and if they do that, we're going to get married here."
I really don't want to make mountains out of molehills here: I'm sure Ellen is having a lovely time in England. But, as a Brit, I think some liberal Americans can be prone to adopting rose-colored glasses when it comes to issues in other parts of the world, when in reality the rise of far-right bigotry is very much a global problem. I just want to throw it out there, for anyone reading this, that the UK Ellen is describing is more complex than that.
For one, it's worth noting that the UK is currently having its own issues with upholding LGBTQ+ rights. It's currently ranked as the second-worst Western European country for LGBTQ+ rights, 22nd overall in Europe (just below Estonia), by ILGA-Europe's Rainbow Map.
Indeed, in terms of legal gender recognition, ILGA-Europe puts the UK as one of the worst countries in Europe. The main reason for this is because, in April, the UK Supreme Court essentially ruled that trans women aren't legally women.
It's also worth considering that anti-immigration sentiment is also on the rise in the UK. Literally in this week, anti-immigrant protests in one part of England became violent — as the BBC notes, "Demonstrators on Sunday chanted 'send them home' and 'save our kids,' as projectiles were thrown towards police vans blocking the entrance to the hotel." Last August, riots happened across the country spouting anti-immigrant rhetoric.
In May, the government published an immigration white paper, which proposes a number of increased cuts on immigration, such as reducing positions available for Skilled Worker jobs and doubling the qualifying period for permanent residence. As the proposals were unveiled, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers" without stricter immigration. He was subsequently accused of evoking Enoch Powell's "rivers of blood' speech, which warned against white people finding "themselves made strangers in their own country" (Starmer later apologized for the remarks and denied any intention of similarity with Powell).
What I think is likely more accurate is "rich white cis lady finds life is better somewhere else," which, yes. Good on her for not being as inundated with news about the orange man! You can read more about Ellen's words here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UFC Vegas 108's Chris Duncan credits teammate Dustin Poirier in rise to gilly goose royalty
Until last year, Chris Duncan hadn't won a fight via guillotine since his professional debut in 2018. But now suddenly he's riding a two-fight streak with both victories sealed by the technique? A couple of weeks ago, when honoring his legendary teammate Dustin Poirier, I couldn't help but notice one particular sentence in the midst of the plaudits Duncan gave 'The Diamond'. 'I watched you when I was a young kid [in] WEC, you are the guy who then became a teammate,' wrote the 32-year-old Scot on Instagram. Then came the kicker: 'Then you showed me the famous gilly grip!!!!' Could it be? Had Duncan inherited the magical method that made Poirier the de facto leader of the Gilly Goose Gang for the past few years? Granted, the Louisiana poster boy captivated audiences for his attempts of the choke rather than his execution, but according to Duncan, he wasn't just throwing compliments out there willy-nilly. 'When he was getting ready for Benoit Saint-Denis, we were doing a lot of wrestling together,' Duncan told Uncrowned of Poirier. 'I was being used for grappling rounds only, because I'm not a southpaw. Every Saturday he was doing his conditioning circuit, live pads and live grappling rounds. His objective was to keep getting up and a few times he was catching me with that submission. I always thought I had a good guillotine as it was, but I asked, 'What are you doing there?' Because even when I was doing everything right, he was still getting me with it. 'Over time he helped me develop it and he showed me the different things he was doing — and believe it or not, it's won me a lot of money!' Duncan is no doubt referring to the Performance of the Night bonus he secured with his guillotine victory over Bolaji Oki this past September, which he followed up with another guillotine victory in March over one of the golden boys of the U.K. scene, former Cage Warriors champion Jordan Vucenic. 'I threw him about like an empty tracksuit,' Duncan remembered. 'I try not to badmouth any of my opponents, and I hope this doesn't sound wrong, but I make a lot of sacrifices in every fight camp to travel to American Top Team. I'm training with the best guys in the world, whereas he did his fight camp in [English town] Corby — most people don't know where that is.' You see, Duncan never got the big promotional backing that Vunenic enjoyed in his pre-UFC career. The first time I saw him fight, he upset a highly-hyped hometown favorite in Dublin's 3 Arena, silencing the partisan Irish crowd to the point of disbelief at a Bellator show in 2019. It took the Scot minutes to dispose of striking standout Sam Slater that night. He went on to win two more tests under the Bellator banner, but was never afforded the push like others on the now-defunct promotion's European roster. In a strange way, not being synonymous with the brand like James Gallagher or Fabian Edwards may have helped Duncan contractually when it came to getting a nod for the UFC's Contender Series. Although it took him two bites of the apple before he earned his UFC contract, Duncan now has his feet comfortably under the table as a five-fight veteran. While it's certainly an escalation in terms of rankings, you get the sense that Duncan is relishing the thought of facing Mateusz Rębecki in the co-main event of this weekend's UFC Vegas 108 card. He may be the underdog, but the way he sees it, that just gives him a bigger opportunity to win the masses over. 'People are always going to doubt you,' he explained. 'I haven't had any crazy performances — I've had some good ones, but I haven't had a crazy fight in there yet. People probably think I'm just an average fighter, but I'll prove to them that I'm far from average.' And what are the chances he could make it three guillotine finishes in a row? 'I'm going to try it," Duncan exclaimed. "I think he's going to wrestle, so I should get a chance. It's f***ing embedded into my game. I've got so many ins and so many outs with that submission. It's definitely possible, you'll have to wait and see.'
Los Angeles Times
6 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Corp. for Public Broadcasting shuts down after federal funding cuts
The Corp. for Public Broadcasting said Friday it was shutting down, about one week after President Trump signed legislation stripping its funding. The group, which administers funds for PBS TV affiliates and NPR radio stations, said it would 'begin an orderly wind-down of its operations.' A majority of staff positions will be cut Sept. 30, when the group's fiscal year ends. 'A small transition team will remain through January 2026 to ensure a responsible and orderly closeout of operations,' the nonprofit said in a statement. 'This team will focus on compliance, final distributions, and resolution of long-term financial obligations, including ensuring continuity for music rights and royalties that remain essential to the public media system.' Since returning to office, Trump has made a priority of yanking federal funding for public broadcasters as part of a wider campaign against media outlets that he dislikes. The president derided PBS and NPR as government-funded 'left-wing propaganda.' Congress fell into line. It passed a measure in mid-July that clawed back $1.1 billion that previously had been allocated for public broadcasting for two years. Separately, lawmakers introduced a Senate appropriations bill for 2026 that excludes funding for the Corp. for Public Broadcasting for the first time in more than 50 years. Conservatives have long wanted to strip funding from public media because of its perceived liberal bias. The actions left the group without a steady source of operating money — and little hope that more would be on the way. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' Corp. for Public Broadcasting Chief Executive Patricia Harrison said in a statement. The organization dates back nearly 60 years and has helped nurture such notable programs as 'Sesame Street,' 'PBS NewsHour,' 'NOVA,' numerous Ken Burns documentaries and 'Antiques Roadshow.' Through its partnerships with local stations and producers, the nonprofit made a mission of supporting educational and cultural programming, local journalism and emergency communications. The move could cripple smaller public stations, including those in rural areas that struggle to mount high-dollar local membership campaigns. The Corp. for Public Broadcasting helps support more than 1,500 local public television and radio stations nationwide. PBS SoCal, which operates member stations KOCE and KCET in Orange and Los Angeles counties, respectively, was set to lose more than $4 million in federal funding, Andy Russell, president and chief executive of the stations, previously told The Times. NPR has two large affiliates serving Los Angeles: KCRW-FM (89.9) and LAist/KPCC-FM (89.3). LAist, based in Pasadena, will lose about 4% of its annual budget — $1.7 million. Alejandra Santamaria, the station's chief executive, told The Times last month that funding helped pay for 13 journalist positions in its newsroom. KCRW in Santa Monica had been expecting $1.3 million from the Corp. for Public Broadcasting. The stations have asked listeners to donate in order to compensate for the shortfall. 'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life, providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country,' Harrison said in the statement. 'We are deeply grateful to our partners across the system for their resilience, leadership, and unwavering dedication to serving the American people.'
CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
Corporation for Public Broadcasting to close after funding cut, in blow to local media
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting will shut down its operations after the loss of federal funding, the nonprofit said on Friday, in a blow to local TV and radio stations that have relied on its grants for nearly six decades. The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed a $9 billion funding cut to public media and foreign aid last month. This included the elimination of $1.1 billion earmarked for the CPB — which distributes funding to news outlets National Public Radio and Public Broadcasting Service — over the next two years. "Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations," CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison said. CPB informed its employees that the majority of its staff will be let go as of September end, except a small transition team that will remain through January 2026 to ensure closeout of operations. Created by the U.S. Congress in 1967, the CPB distributed more than $500 million annually to the PBS, NPR and more than 1,500 locally operated public radio and television stations. U.S. President Donald Trump and many of his fellow Republicans argue that financing public broadcasting is an unnecessary expense and that its news coverage suffers from an anti-right bias. The Trump administration has also filed a lawsuit against three board members of the CPB who have not left their posts despite Trump's attempt to fire them.
