More brickies, carpenters and health staff to be trained up in huge skills boost
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson Labour is 'backing the next generation by giving young people more opportunities to learn a trade, earn a wage and achieve and thrive'
More brickies, carpenters and healthcare support workers will be trained up under plans to increase workers' skills and boost career routes.
Some 120,000 new opportunities will be created for British young people as ministers drive efforts to end the reliance on overseas workers. Nearly 50,000 training places will be funded by hiking the charge paid by employers for bringing in foreign workers by a third.
The apprenticeship budget for 2025-26 is more than £3billion - up from last year's £2.73billion. It is the first time the funding pot has exceeded £3bn.
Among measures announced, the Department for Education has pledged £136million for skills bootcamps. The bootcamps take up to 16 weeks to complete, with many offering a qualification at the end or a leg-up onto a career path.
Hundreds of different schemes are available for young adults over age 19 across areas including early years, HGV driving and software development. Another £100million has been pledged for over four years to expand bootcamps specifically for construction.
Mayors will also be able to support 5,000 additional adult construction trainees, with £14million in skills funding to be handed down to local authorities for the next academic year. Ten technical excellence colleges specialising in construction skills will also open in September.
Funding will also be redirected away from masters-level apprenticeships from January(2026) towards training at lower levels, where it can have a bigger impact in supporting youngsters into the workforce. Support will be maintained for those aged 16-21 and existing apprentices.
Elsewhere ministers will implement a 32% increase in the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC), which will deliver up to 45,000 additional training places to 'upskill the domestic workforce and reduce reliance on migration in priority sectors'.
The ISC is a fee that UK employers pay when sponsoring skilled overseas workers under certain visa routes. Increasing it makes it more expensive to hire foreign staff, encouraging businesses to hire British workers.
Some one in eight 16-24 year olds are not in employment, education or training. It comes amid a dramatic fall in the number of apprenticeship starts over the last decade.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said 'a skilled workforce is the key to steering the economy forward'. 'We're backing the next generation by giving young people more opportunities to learn a trade, earn a wage and achieve and thrive,' she said.
'Everyone has a role to play in a thriving economy, and we're taking our responsibility seriously providing more routes into employment, it's now the responsibility of young people to take them.'
Sarah Yong, director of policy and public affairs at the Youth Futures Foundation, said: "International evidence shows apprenticeships are a highly impactful way to support young people to prepare for and access jobs, yet participation among under-25s, especially the most marginalised, has declined in recent years.
"With stubbornly high youth unemployment and inactivity, rebalancing the apprenticeship system can encourage investment in youth apprenticeships and is a first step in enabling more young people to access good work."
The Law Society urged the Government to continue to fund masters-level apprenticeships for those aged over 21.
The society's president Richard Atkinson said: "Level 7 solicitor apprenticeships continue to be the only route outside of university to qualify as a solicitor due to specific qualifications set by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Apprenticeships play a vital role in promoting social mobility."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
39 minutes ago
- STV News
Farage does not care about Scotland, says Swinney
Nigel Farage 'doesn't care about Scotland', John Swinney has said, as the Reform UK leader is set to head north of the border. Farage is expected to address a press conference in Aberdeen on Monday as the race in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election enters its final days. While the SNP and Labour were seen as frontrunners in the seat in a contest sparked by Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie, Reform UK has entered the mix ahead of the vote. But the party has come in for criticism for how it has campaigned in the seat, with attack ads on Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar being branded racist. Both of the frontrunners have also turned their attacks on Reform, with Mr Sarwar describing Mr Farage as a 'poisonous little man' and the First Minister accusing him of bringing 'racism and hatred' to the South Lanarkshire race. As campaigning enters its final days, Swinney warned of the potential threat from Reform, saying: 'Things remain tough for too many families who feel let down by Labour – who have given up in this campaign – and the deeply concerning rise in support for Farage. 'Be in no doubt, Nigel Farage doesn't care about Scotland. He poses a threat to our values and must be stopped, and only the SNP can do that. 'In this by-election, the SNP is the only party investing in Scotland's future, delivering for families and confronting Farage. On Thursday, vote SNP to stop Farage.' Swinney touted his own Government's record, including free prescriptions, free tuition and free bus travel for the young and the elderly, as well as plans to scrap peak rail fares and mitigate the two-child benefit cap. 'On the final week of campaigning in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, it's clear which party is on Scotland's side,' he said. PA Media First Minister and SNP leader John Swinney addresses party activists in Hamilton (Craig Paton/PA). Swinney's comments come as his party's Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said Farage was 'just as dangerous to Scotland's long-term energy and economic future as the activists who would shut down the oil and gas industry tomorrow'. Farage has long been an opponent of net zero, while his deputy Richard Tice told the PA news agency one of his party's key policies ahead of the Holyrood elections next year would be to push for increased oil extraction. Responding, a spokesman for Reform UK said: 'The SNP's hostile environment to oil and gas has been holding Scotland back for decades. 'From standing idly by whilst the Grangemouth refinery closed, to opposing oil and gas exploration in the North Sea, the SNP have not only failed to realise the countless jobs that could be created in the sector, but also sacrificed hundreds of jobs on the altar of their net zero obsession.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
The Green Party's internal war
Photo byAlthough Zack Polanski's decision to run to be the next leader of the Green Party may have been unexpected, it certainly wasn't a surprise to party insiders. The current deputy leader and Member of the London Assembly unveiled his zeitgeisty, attention-grabbing campaign for 'eco-populism' only a few days after the May local elections – but he has been on manoeuvres for some time. While the Greens made a net gain in May, increasing their number of councillors to 859 in 181 councils, the party did not quite cut through nationally in the way many inside the party had hoped, off the back of their unprecedented performance in the general election last year, when the party won a record four MPs. With Labour moving rightwards to directly fend off the threat of Reform, the Greens have the opportunity to put pressure on the government from the left. Polanski's platform of 'eco-populism' is designed to fill the void – and he has chosen an opportune political moment. Disaffection is beginning to take root among members of the Labour left who are unhappy with Number 10's direction of travel. Keir Starmer's use of the phrase an 'island of strangers', cuts to disability benefit and the winter fuel payment have all contributed to growing irritation among left-wing MPs and party members. The outcome of the Green Party leadership election could therefore prove to be equally as significant for Labour. Speaking at the Compass Conference in central London on 31 June, in which the soft-left of the party looked to be beginning to mobilise – the Labour Mayor of Greater Manchester said his party should be looking increase collaboration with other parties, including the Greens. But things could get more serious than increased collaboration. As one Labour MP, and stalwart of the soft-left told me, several Labour MPs could defect to the Green Party if Polanski is elected in September. Though they did add that in their opinion, the current deputy leader is not the person to lead the Green Party to a more seismic victory ('he's too student-politics' they said). Another insider suggested to me that as many as 15 could move over if Polanski wins. No one has given Polanski a concrete commitment yet – though he has hinted at having had conversations with potential defectors. Polanski's decision to run – though precipitous – wasn't an outright challenge to the current co-leaders, Adrian Ramsay and Carla Denyer. The Green party was already due to hold a leadership election this year, after members voted to postpone last year's scheduled race due to the general election. Ramsay and Denyer are also two of the party's four MPs. Nominations for the race opened today (Monday 2 June) and voting will commence in September. Denyer has announced she will be stepping down from the leadership to spend more time in her Bristol constituency but Ramsay (who is the MP for Waveney Valley) has decided to defend his position, running to be co-leader with Ellie Chowns, the MP for North Herefordshire. Chowns is the only of the party's four MPs not to have taken on the leadership – Sian Berry, who replaced Caroline Lucas as MP for Brighton Pavillion, was co-leader with Jonathan Bartley between 2018-2021. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Though Polanski fired the starting gun, his calls for 'eco-populism' don't seem to have initiated a civil war in the Green Party – yet. But the nature of this race certainly exposes the party's ongoing identity crisis; does want to choose Polanski and offer a radical, left-wing, alternative for voters disillusioned with the Labour party? Or will it decide to remain moderate and nice, continuing to sweep up a wider pool of voters, including those who may previously have voted Conservative or Lib Dem? (Chowns and Ramsay, often described as 'establishment' Greens, would take the Greens in this direction). To some senior party members, choosing Polanski – and thereby choosing a more radical style of leadership – could lead to even more success. Stuart Jeffry, the leader of Maidstone Borough Council thinks Polanski's direction is exactly where the Greens should be going – though he told me he is uncomfortable with the phrase 'eco-populism'. 'It's about the media coverage that we get,' he told me when we spoke over the phone, 'I've been a member for 40 years and our media coverage has never been particularly good'. Jeffry thinks that's 'mostly because we say things that don't resonate – or which people frankly don't have time to understand the complexities of'. When I ask whether he means the party needs a leader with more charisma, Jeffry hesitates: 'I'm not going to say that, because Adrian is a good friend of mine. I think I'd use the word energy.' He adds that Polanski, who was grilled by Laura Kuenssberg on the BBC last week, has got 'more on-screen presence than perhaps some of the others'. Polanski, who is a former actor (and a former Lib Dem), has clearly learnt to use this ability to communicate to his advantage. As deputy leader, he is regularly out on the broadcast rounds representing the Greens. Polanski's call for 'eco-populism' has cut through on the cultural left. During his campaign, he has appeared on PoliticsJoe's YouTube Channel and in conversation with Novara Media's Aaron Bastani. He has also been endorsed by The Guardian columnist, Owen Jones, who left the Labour party and backed the Greens during the election campaign last year. Polanski has failed to garner the support of Green party grandees such as former leader Caroline Lucas and house of Lords member, Jenny Jones, who have both endorsed Ramsay and Chowns. Polanski is clearly not seen as the establishment candidate; this is primarily channelled into criticism that, unlike Ramsay and Chowns, he is not an MP. Catherine Braun, who is the deputy leader of Stroud Borough Council, told me that being an MP gives the party leader 'more of a platform' and more exposure. 'They have more opportunities to be invited on Question Time, to be out on stage and to make their points in parliament,' Braun said. She has publicly endorsed Ramsay and Chowns. 'I do think it's time for us to continue to have our co-leaders from the parliamentary party,' she added. (It should be noted that neither Ramsay nor Denyer were MPs when they were elected co-leaders, nor was Sian Berry). To some members, however, Polanski's lack of a seat in parliament isn't an issue. Anthony Slaughter, the leader in the Green Party in Wales told me: 'Zack is what we need to make the next step,'. He added: 'People seem to have forgotten Zack is a member of the London Assembly and has been for several years.' When I suggest to Slaughter that having an official leader and a leader of the parliamentary party may cause trouble if the pair disagree, he explained: 'it's one of the challenges of success. We're not a whipped party, so as we have more success and get more people elected, there is more scope for disagreement.' Rumours over a split in the party leadership over trans rights triggering Denyer's decision to step down have already been swirling (this followed Ramsay's failure to say whether he still believed 'trans women are women'). Could this split worsen if Polanski – who has said he will 'rebuild consensus on trans rights'– takes the leadership, with Ramsay potentially taking control of the parliamentary party? The next leader of the Green Party will be announced on 2 September. If the choice is Zack Polanski, the Green Party will do more than steal votes from Labour – it could take its MPs too. [See more: The British left is coming for the government] Related
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Labour's 'sunlight of hope' is now the darkness of despair
Well, a lot of things were supposed to be different under Labour; the problem is though that they are not. Voters who were promised "Change" are increasingly feeling conned. The "sunlight of hope" which the Prime Minister promised in his General Election victory speech has become the darkness of despair, and anyone hoping that Sir Keir Starmer might show some respect for the voters of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse and turn up to explain himself will be sadly disappointed, with Labour's own sources admitting that the Prime Minister is "not playing well on the doorsteps and is not considered an asset at this point in the electoral cycle". And those are the truest words we've heard from Labour for a long time. Ruth Marr, Stirling. An electoral disaster beckons The way things are going, it does not look as though Labour could win a second term in office. It came in with big ideas about growth and investment to rescue the UK from the yawning chasm of inequality only to find that there was a shortage of funds despite the highest level of taxation for eons. Out of fear of catastrophic headlines, Labour tied its own hands by ruling out increasing taxation in important areas, thus leaving itself little wriggle room for its manoeuvres. In its desperation to show that it could be steely in its determination, it hit targets which were clearly going to provoke vociferous public outcry destined to damage its standing in opinion polls and to test the strength of its resolve. The reduction in numbers of those eligible for the winter fuel allowance has left an indelible imprint in the minds of many voters which will backfire on Labour at the next election while the National Insurance increase on employers' contributions has put a squeeze on Labour's much-vaunted ambition to boost business growth. Read more letters Labour must have hoped that the electorate would understand that Labour's project to reform the economy would take time, but it had not factored in the the fragmentation of society where individual groups and institutions do not see themselves as members of the larger national community but are interested only in protecting their own members' interests and devil take the hindmost. Where Labour needs every business, public service and trade union to realise that a sinking ship needs all hands to the pumps, it faces demands from all sides for a restoration of parity with the economy prior to 2010 and additional funds to put into operation the about-turn Labour advocates for the economic betterment of the UK. Unless patience and belief in the efforts of community action replace the selfishness and impatience of individual entitlement, Labour will be in the position of Sisyphus, condemned never to succeed in the task it has taken on. That will just spell out electoral disaster when the burden of blame rests elsewhere. Denis Bruce, Bishopbriggs. By-election opportunity For the last few weeks, the environment in the UK has been particularly stressful: widespread anti-government protests have swept the country, whereas the approval ratings of Sir Keir Starmer have hit a record low of 22%. Such an outcome is a response of the population against rising taxes, withholding social safety net programmes and healthcare reform. But despite the growing frustration of the public, the PM has been building up multi-billion aid to Ukraine from already shaky budgets with no concern about internal problems. Taking into account the reluctance of the Government to scale back its ambitions that are affecting the population, the victory of Reform UK in the English local elections seems to be no surprise. Even Nigel Farage is regarded as a worthier candidate than any member of the Conservative or Labour parties that left the public disappointed with their unpopular policies. As people didn't manage to get through to the Government by ordinary means, they resorted to drastic measures. 'Change your political course, otherwise we'll replace you with the opposition' – that's what the population wanted to say by voting for the right. The by-election in Scotland on Thursday is one more opportunity to show the Government that Reform UK's big win in local elections was no accident. People can't put up with the fact that their problems are being put on the back burner, they are now in a serious mood to struggle for their welfare. And in this struggle every single voice is badly needed. Iain Brocklebank, Glasgow. • The Hamilton by-election seems to be an opportunity for all mass media outlets to be showing images of Nigel Farage grinning. This is a little disturbing because of the uncanny resemblance between Mr Farage and Joe E Brown, the actor who stole scene after scene from Marilyn Monroe, Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon, as the useless millionaire Osgood Fielding III in Some Like it Hot, Billy Wilder's 1959 smash-hit comedy. Given that the film's two male actors pretended to be women throughout and the trouble we're having in Scotland with the issues of gender identity, seeing the final scene in which Joe E Brown, with his trademark wide, wide grin announces that "Nobody's perfect" is quite comforting. Nobody is, but I still can't quite imagine Nigel Farage adopting such a magnanimous position – on anything. AJ Clarence, Prestwick. Joe E Brown and Jack Lemmon in Some Like It Hot (Image: United Artists) Existential crisis for the NHS I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiments expressed by Dr Andrew Docherty (Letters, May 29) regarding the parlous state of the NHS. It is perhaps going too far to say that the NHS, which is supposed to protect us from danger, has become the danger in the same way as Frankenstein's monster turned on its creator, but long waiting lists and lack of adequate resource (both human and material) mean that people are dying needlessly. The truth of the matter is that the NHS has become a huge, bloated, costly monster with an insatiable appetite for cash on which it gorges but with no consequent improvement in patient outcomes. This is hard to accept as it goes against everything we have been taught as believers in the 'national religion' and the myth of the NHS's saintliness. I would emphasise that this assessment does not apply to the doctors, nurses and other medical support staff who are generally excellent, but the organisation they work for, which is well past its sell-by date. The problem is simple but difficult. Unlike most other business entities, the NHS does not exist to make money. It exists to spend it and so, because it is taxpayers' money it is spending it has to be monitored by a committee to ensure there are no financial shenanigans going on behind the scenes. As that committee is a public body it has to be monitored to ensure it meets all its sustainability and diversity targets. Then the body set up to do that will need an HR department to ensure that the mental health issues are being properly addressed. Then all these bodies, panels and committees will need to be housed in offices which will have to be financed. Then suddenly there is a need for a CEO who will need some supporting staff, and they will need an HR department too, which means a private finance operation will have to be started which will in turn need an oversight committee which will need another HR department. And then from way down the food chain a doctor will say that he could do with some new PPE and there will be a massive outcry about buying medical supplies. This means a procurement committee will be necessary and the Chancellor will announce she is spending enough already so Labour will be accused of underfunding the NHS. No private company would allow this to happen. It would concentrate on the core business and house the HR department in a Portakabin in the car park. Private companies exist to make money, not to waste it on meeting mindless irrelevant targets Of course, you can't just shut the NHS down for six months to do the required reforming and restructuring followed by a grand reopening ceremony but accountability and good governance completely focused on patient outcomes is the only way out of this existential crisis. Keith Swinley, Ayr.
