Wells Fargo maintained a Buy rating on Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO)
Analyst Brandon Couillard noted the recent Amendment to the acquisition deal with Solventum Corp (NYSE:SOLV). The revised agreement excludes Solventum's lower-margin Drinking Water Filtration business from the acquisition, reducing the purchase price from about $4.1 billion to $4.0 billion. Couillard believes that this simplifies the transaction and also potentially accelerates its closing by the end of 2025, while improving the financial attractiveness of the deal.
A workstation in a research lab stocked with laboratory products and services.
The deal revision is expected to be accretive to Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.'s (NYSE:TMO) earnings per share even after accounting for financing costs. The exclusion of the non-core Drinking Water business aligns with the focus of the company on higher-margin, higher-growth segments, supporting stronger earnings growth.
In addition, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (NYSE:TMO) has demonstrated consistent quarter-over-quarter improvement in core growth, with expectations of about 5% core growth in 2025. Moreover, its long-range plan aims to achieve robust organic growth of 7% to 9%, significant operational margin expansion, and double-digit growth in operating profits.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (NYSE:TMO) is a leading company in the life sciences and diagnostics industry.
While we acknowledge the potential of TMO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money.
Disclosure: None.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Painswick Capital Closes Inaugural Fund Above Target at $1.5 Billion
NEW YORK, Aug. 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Painswick Capital Management LP ("Painswick" or the "Firm") today announced the final close of its inaugural fund, Painswick Capital Fund I LP (the "Fund") and related entities, with total commitments of approximately $1.5 billion. The Fund exceeded its initial target of $750 million, attracting a diverse group of global investors, including pension funds, insurance companies, asset managers, foundations, endowments, family offices, and high-net worth individuals. Painswick was founded as a specialist investment firm to capitalize on the opportunity within the rapidly growing single-asset continuation vehicle market. Established in 2024 by Founder John L. Garcia, the Chairman and former CEO of AEA Investors, the Firm seeks to invest with high-performing management teams, companies, and sponsors. The Painswick team leverages its global network and cycle-tested private equity underwriting experience to select the best risk adjusted opportunities within this emerging asset class. "We are pleased to close our debut fund well above our target raise, which is a testament to the strategy, the experience of our team, and the increasing realization by investors of the attractiveness of this growing market," said John Garcia, Founder and Managing Partner of Painswick. "The single-asset continuation vehicle market is still early in its growth trajectory, and we are grateful for the support of our Fund I investors, who share our conviction in the significant and long-term potential of our strategy. With Fund I, Painswick is positioned as a scaled differentiated partner, with the ability to back exceptional businesses through a focused, disciplined strategy designed to deliver compelling risk-adjusted returns for our investors." Since its establishment in 2024, Painswick has completed four investments across a range of industries in North America and Europe. Simpson Thatcher and Bartlett LLP served as legal counsel to Painswick in connection with the fundraise. About Painswick CapitalPainswick is a New York-based specialist investment firm primarily focused on high-performing middle market companies within the rapidly expanding single-asset continuation vehicle market. Established in 2024 as a partnership between John L. Garcia and AEA Investors, Painswick seeks to invest with high-performing management teams, companies, and sponsors, utilizing the expertise and private equity underwriting experience of its team. More information is available at Media Contact Kate Thompson / Madeline JonesJoele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher212.355.4449media@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Painswick Capital Management LP
Fast Company
2 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Cloudflare vs. Perplexity: a web scraping war with big implications for AI
When the web was established several decades ago, it was built on a number of principles. Among them was a key, overarching standard dubbed 'netiquette': Do unto others as you'd want done unto you. It's a principle that lived on through other companies, including Google, whose motto for a period was ' Don't be evil.' The fundamental idea was simple: Act ethically and morally. If someone asked you to stop doing something, you stopped—or at least considered it. But Cloudflare, an IT company that protects millions of websites from hostile internet attacks, has published an eye-opening exposé suggesting that one of the leading AI tools today isn't following that principle. Cloudflare claims Perplexity, an AI-powered ' answer engine,' is overriding website requests not to crawl their content by spoofing its identity to hide that the requests are coming from an AI company. Cloudflare launched its investigation after receiving complaints from customers that Perplexity was ignoring directives in files, which are used by websites to signal whether they want their content indexed by search engines or AI crawlers. Perplexity's alleged behavior highlights what happens when the web shifts from being rooted in voluntary agreements to a more hard-nosed business environment, where commercial goals overrule moral considerations. 'The code of honor around crawling and files is a charming remnant from when the web was collaborative and based on community standards,' says Eerke Boiten, a cybersecurity researcher at De Montfort University in the U.K. Cloudflare's position as a market leader in web protection means that, for now at least, it's still possible to preserve some remnants of that morality, Boiten says. Boiten believes the sense of ethical cooperation online is fading fast, noting that many large AI companies show little regard for where or how they obtain their training data, often operating in murky ethical territory. While he sees OpenAI as generally respectful of the established norms, he's far less optimistic about others. 'Perplexity trying to scrape their way around any defenses feels like it will be the norm rather than the exception,' he says. Perplexity's alleged conduct stands out as particularly bold, especially given that the company is already facing a lawsuit over unauthorized content scraping. Dow Jones Company—the parent of the Wall Street Journal and New York Post — filed a lawsuit in October 2024, alleging that Perplexity 'copies on a massive scale' their content. (The case is ongoing.) The BBC also sent a letter in June to Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, threatening legal action for scraping its content without permission unless the company stops and either compensates for the data already accessed or deletes it entirely. Perplexity told the Financial Times that the BBC's case was 'manipulative and opportunistic' and reflected a 'fundamental misunderstanding' of copyright law. Perplexity did not respond to Fast Company 's request for comment on this story. But Boiten, for his part, anticipates an escalating arms race between those trying to protect online content from AI-driven web scraping and the companies attempting to do just that to improve their models. 'Cloudflare applying machine learning to spot Perplexity's patterns, and acknowledging that publication of all this likely means Perplexity will come up with new decoys,' he says. Cornell Law professor James Grimmelmann says the legal limits of scraping content without permission—or bypassing files—remain unclear, but Cloudflare's findings could expose Perplexity to more lawsuits. 'There is a loose judicial consensus that it is okay to scrape sites when their files allow it,' says Grimmelmann, 'but Perplexity seems determined to fuck around and find out whether the reverse is true.'
Fast Company
2 minutes ago
- Fast Company
How Tesla's Autopilot verdict could stifle Musk's robotaxi expansion
A court verdict against Tesla last week, stemming from a fatal 2019 crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, could hurt its plans to expand its nascent robotaxi network and intensify concerns over the safety of its autonomous vehicle technology. A Florida jury ordered Musk's electric vehicle company on Friday to pay about $243 million to victims of the crash, finding its Autopilot driver-assistance software defective. Tesla said the driver was solely at fault and vowed to appeal. The verdict follows years of federal investigations and recalls related to collisions involving Tesla's autonomous-vehicle technology, and comes as CEO Elon Musk seeks regulatory approval to rapidly expand the robotaxi service across the U.S. 'The public perception of this verdict or things like this are going to fuel pressure on regulators to say, 'We just can't let this stuff be launched without a lot more due diligence',' said Mike Nelson, founder of Nelson Law and an expert on legal issues in the mobility sector. Tesla could have a tough time convincing state regulators that its technology is road-ready, threatening Musk's goal of offering robotaxis to half the U.S. population by year-end, legal experts and Tesla investors said. Expanding its robotaxi service is crucial for Tesla as demand for its aging lineup of EVs has cooled amid rising global competition and a backlash against Musk's far-right political views. Much of Tesla's trillion-dollar market valuation hinges on his bets on robotics and artificial intelligence. Success in the self-driving realm will require winning the confidence of regulators and potential customers on the full-self driving (FSD) software that underpins Tesla's robotaxis, analysts said. 'The timing (of the verdict) for Tesla in light of the FSD rollouts and robotaxis is awful,' said Aaron Davis, co-managing partner at law firm Davis Goldman. 'Now there's essentially an opinion that some aspect of Tesla's business is not safe and maybe the safety that the company advertises isn't what it's cracked up to be.' The FSD is an advanced version of Autopilot. Autopilot, which was been updated since 2019, controls speed, distance and lane centering on highways, while the FSD can operate on city streets, helping the vehicle make automatic turns and change lanes. 'This case does not have direct implications for Tesla's FSD roll-out,' analysts at Piper Sandler said in a note on Sunday, citing the modern iterations of the software. A spokesperson on behalf of Tesla acknowledged the company had received a request for comment from Reuters but had not provided one by the time of publication. Regulatory road ahead Perfecting autonomous vehicles has been harder than expected. The high costs of hardware, years of trial and error, and regulatory hurdles have forced many players to close shop or pivot, including General Motors' Cruise unit. Musk, however, has pursued what he calls a simpler and cheaper path, relying only on cameras and AI instead of pricey sensors such as lidars and radars used by Alphabet's Waymo, Amazon's Zoox and others. After years of missed deadlines, Musk rolled out a small robotaxi trial in June with about a dozen Model Y crossover SUVs in Austin, Texas, each overseen by a human safety monitor in the front passenger seat. While Musk has said Tesla was being 'super paranoid about safety', he has also pledged to expand the service fast and make it available for half of the U.S. population in the next five months – a stark contrast to Waymo's cautious years-long rollout. Until Tesla's entry, Waymo was the only U.S. firm to operate a paid, driverless robotaxi service. Tesla is currently awaiting approvals in several states, including California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida. California's department of motor vehicles declined to comment on the impact of the verdict on regulatory approval. Nevada said it held talks with Tesla about a robotaxi program several weeks ago, while Arizona said it was still considering Tesla's request for certification. Both did not comment on the verdict. Florida did not respond. Tesla has typically either won other Autopilot litigation or resolved the case with the plaintiffs out of court. The Florida verdict stands out. Several such cases are pending. The case involved a Model S sedan that went through an intersection and hit the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it. The driver had reached down to retrieve a dropped cellphone and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign before the crash. The jury found that Tesla's Autopilot had a defect and held the company partially responsible, despite the driver admitting fault. 'It's going to take time to get regulators to move forward and time being more than the end of the year,' said Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, a Tesla investor. 'From an image standpoint, it's a black eye.' —Abhirup Roy, Reuters The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
