Trinity Place Holdings: Q1 Earnings Snapshot
The New York-based company said it had a loss of 6 cents per share.
The real estate holding company posted revenue of $239,000 in the period.
_____
This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on TPHS at https://www.zacks.com/ap/TPHS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
National Association of Home Builders seeks federal intervention to block state's looming gas appliance ban — here's what's happening
The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and the New York State Builders Association (NYSBA) submitted a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi to delay or prevent the impending ban on dirty fuel appliances that is set to start in 2026, NAHB announced. What's happening? In 2023, New York lawmakers enacted a new proposal, the All-Electric Buildings Law, that would ban gas stoves from being used in new buildings statewide. The ban affects new buildings that are seven stories or less starting on January 1, 2026, and all new buildings on January 1, 2029. On July 23, 2025, the federal court for the Northern District of New York upheld this ban, making it "the first statewide law that restricts natural gas use in new buildings." However, the joint letter from the NAHB and NYSBA has asked the federal government to "investigate and pursue legal action to delay, postpone, or preempt New York State's impending statewide ban on fossil fuel appliances and infrastructure in new buildings," as the letter read. "The gas ban violates core constitutional principles of interstate commerce by attempting to dictate national energy usage through state-level restrictions," the cosigners wrote. NAHB noted the pending federal lawsuit, Mulhern Gas Co. vs Rodriguez et al, that challenges the constitutionality of the gas ban as a reason to halt the impending deadline for the New York state ban. "We stand ready to assist your office in defending the rule of law and ensuring that states like New York do not impose coercive environmental mandates on the nation as a whole," the writers concluded in the letter. Why is this letter important? "I'm excited that we are finally tackling, statewide, our largest source of fossil-fuel emissions," NY state assemblymember Emily Gallagher said. According to a 2024 report from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, buildings account for 31% of the entire state's pollution, more than any other sector, including transportation and electricity. As the Environmental Protection Agency notes, natural gas from heating and cooking releases harmful gases, including carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Gas stoves increase the risk of asthma and other respiratory illnesses. The harmful pollution from gas stoves also causes the most damage to communities of color and low-income groups, according to the EPA. Should the government ban gas stoves? Yes Only in new buildings Only in restaurants No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "Numerous studies … show that both air pollution and climate change disproportionately impact low-income communities and communities of color," said the director of policy and legislative affairs at WE ACT, Lonnie Portis. She added that the gas ban "is a significant step forward for environmental and climate justice." If the federal government does respond to the NAHB letter halting or ending the New York state mandate, then gas stoves can continue to be used in new buildings, exposing harmful pollutants to residents and children and impacting air quality. What's being done about gas stoves? While the federal government hasn't responded to the letter from the NAHB and the NYSBA, you can still help counteract the harmful effects of gas stoves by switching to an electric or induction stove. Induction stoves use a magnetic field to heat instead of natural gas, so an induction stove helps eliminate the need for gas and the pollution that comes with it. According to the U.S Department of Energy, induction stoves also cook 20-40% faster than gas stoves, which can save you time and money on energy costs. "Induction is so much safer and so much cleaner than gas," said popular online chef, Erica Wides. Through the Inflation Reduction Act, you can get up to $840 off the cost of an induction stove in tax credits. Even if you can't install a new induction stove due to financial constraints or because you rent, plug-in induction stoves are available at relatively cheap prices. While the future of the All-Electric Buildings Law in New York is uncertain, the passage of the act was a success in the eyes of the Northeast region director at Food & Water Watch, Alex Beauchamp. "When New Yorkers come together … we can win even in the face of opponents with an almost-limitless budget," Beauchamp said. "That is how we won this bill. It's also how we are going to continue the fight to get fossil fuels out of all the existing buildings in the state." Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Should I sell my vacation home that I dream of living in when I retire to pay off $50K in credit card debt?
Total credit card debt in the US stands at $1.18 trillion this year, with 4.3% of debt in delinquency, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. With these near record-high numbers, many Americans are feeling the pinch and want to find ways to dig themselves out. But should you allow your debt to disrupt your retirement plans? Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Let's look at the example of Gavin, a 40-year-old married man with two children. He bought a home in the Caribbean in 2019 with the goal of eventually making the house his retirement home. The house is worth $400,000 now, with a $120,000 mortgage balance. Unfortunately, the mortgage loan has a variable interest rate, which is currently at 10.5% with no possible options for refinancing. The home currently generates $700 per month in profit as a short-term rental, but makes less during off off-season and managing it is stressful. Worse, the neighborhood may soon prohibit short-term rentals in the area, so that would be the end of this revenue stream. Additionally, Gavin might also be on the hook for local property taxes and, as a foreign investor, other possible fees and taxes too. On top of this, the buyer is a renter in the US where he currently lives and he has $50,000 in credit card debt. Does it make sense for him to sell the vacation property to pay off what he owes? He's considering buying a home locally and using the rest of the money to invest, build up an emergency fund, or start a college fund for his kids. Selling the vacation home could be a great solution Selling the vacation home in this particular case seems like an easy answer. While it is currently generating a small profit, earning $8,400 per year on a $400,000 asset isn't a great return, especially given the hassle of being the host and the substantial interest he is paying on his mortgage. But losing the short-term rental income would be a major downside. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Aside from the poor ROI of the home, the interest on $50,000 in credit card debt that he currently has is an absolute financial killer, given that the average credit card interest rate is 21.16% as of May 2025. The $700 per month he is earning from his rental most likely is not even enough to cover the interest that his credit card debt accrues each month. With a home worth $400,000, and assuming closing costs are around 4% (the average is 2% to 5%), this homeowner would still end up with about $384,000 after paying for the transaction fees from the sale of the home. Now, since the home isn't his primary home, it's possible he could owe capital gains taxes if his profits exceeded $250,000 as a single person or $500,000 as a married joint filer. However, since Gavin is married and the home isn't netting in excess of $500,000, he'd likely be spared this tax. He may also need to pay additional sales taxes to the government of his host country. If he doesn't, he could pay off the $120,000 still remaining on the mortgage he owes, as well as his $50,000 in credit card debt and still walk away with around $214,000. That would be a good start to make a down payment on a home in the US for his family (in which he can retire), or to start investing for his future. He could save for his two kids to go to college, start an emergency fund and best of all, free up a lot of income by eliminating his credit card debt and the interest he would be paying on that into the future. In fact, if he uses the money wisely, he could not only set himself up for financial stability, but he could also choose to save to buy another retirement home down the road, when it makes more financial sense. Are there downsides to selling? While Gavin's circumstances make a strong case for selling the home, it's worth looking at whether there are any downsides to doing so, beyond losing the $700 in rental income. Since the home he owns doesn't have a great mortgage, isn't generating a big profit and there's no reason to believe it is a one-of-a-kind home, there's very little downside in cashing out now and using the proceeds to create some more financial stability. The only real risk would be that real estate values skyrocket in his chosen Caribbean retirement destination. This would either price him out of buying his dream retirement home later on or prevent him from earning more on the possible future sale of his vacation home. However, it's unlikely the ROI on Caribbean real estate would exceed the returns he'd get by investing in the stock market in the states or that the increase in the value would be worth paying the interest on the credit card debt and the mortgage combined. There are likely wiser ways to make that money work. So, if he's investing wisely over time, he should likely be able to buy a comparable home as a retiree if he wants to. He could also end up changing his retirement plans if he decides he'd rather stay in the US and be close to his potential grandchildren — and if that happens, it would have been a poor investment to pay for a house that's costly to keep only to end up not retiring there anyway. Selling now with the chance to rebuy later seems like a much better bet. In fact, all signs point to the fact that selling the home seems like the best move in this situation and it could be the start of a much more financially secure — and less stressful — future. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
Faruqi & Faruqi Reminds Centene Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit with a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of September 8, 2025
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $75,000 In Centene To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you suffered losses exceeding $75,000 in Centene between December 12, 2024 and June 30, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - August 17, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Centene Corporation ('Centene' or the 'Company') (NYSE: CNC) and reminds investors of the September 8, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See According to the complaint, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Centene's enrollment and morbidity rates. Investors began to question the veracity of defendants' public statements on July 1, 2025, when Centene issued a press release withdrawing 2025 guidance. Particularly, following an analysis of the 2025 Health Insurance Marketplace, Centene's overall market growth across 22 states, or 72% of the Company's marketplace membership, was lower than expected. In pertinent part, the Company stated that this preliminary analysis resulted in a reduction of its previously issued guidance to approximately $1.8 billion or an adjusted diluted EPS of $2.75. Following this news, Centene's common stock declined dramatically, from a closing market price of $56.65 per share on July 1, 2025, Centene's stock price fell to $33.78 per share on July 2, 2025, a decline of 40.4%. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Centene's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. To learn more about the Centene Corporation class action, go to or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook. Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner. To view the source version of this press release, please visit
