logo
Pakistan warns India that changes to Indus Water Treaty an 'act of war'

Pakistan warns India that changes to Indus Water Treaty an 'act of war'

Pakistan has warned India that any move to restrict water into the country would be considered "an act of war", as relations between the nuclear-armed neighbours further deteriorate days after a deadly attack.
The attack at a popular tourist destination in India-controlled Kashmir that left
New Delhi said it had "cross-border" links to Pakistan, without providing any evidence.
Islamabad denied any involvement, with a previously unknown militant group that called itself the Kashmir Resistance claiming responsibility.
Hundreds have joined protests across Pakistan following India laying blame for the attack.
India and Pakistan claim the entirety of the Kashmir as its own, but both countries administer a part of the region, which has long been a point of contention.
India has increased security across Kashmir in the aftermath of the attack.
(
AP Photo: Mukhtar Khan
)
In the days following the attack, both countries have launched a diplomatic offensive against the other.
Pakistan has suspended all trade with India.
Islamabad also announced that Pakistan's airspace was closed for Indian airlines.
The two countries have cancelled the visas of nationals from the other country and expelled senior military officials.
The main land border between the two countries will also close.
Diplomatic missions in both countries will reduce from 55 to 30 as of May 1.
Indus Water Treaty suspended
India has also moved to suspend the Indus Water Treaty, which details how water that flows from India to Pakistan can be used by the countries.
Pakistan relies on the water under the agreement for 80 per cent of its irrigated agriculture and hydropower needs.
The agreement has been in place since 1960 and there is no provision in the treaty for either side to suspend or terminate the pact.
Anti-Pakistan protests have broken out in some parts of India this week.
(
AP Photo: Ajit Solanki
)
Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif reacted firmly to India's move to suspend the pact.
"Any attempt to stop or divert the flow of water belonging to Pakistan as per the Indus Waters Treaty … will be considered as an act of war and responded with full force across the complete spectrum of national power," a statement from his office said.
Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said India's claim that Islamabad was behind the Kashmir attack was "irresponsible".
At a rally on Thursday, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi said his country would "identify, track and punish every terrorist, their handlers and their backers."
"We will pursue them to the ends of the earth,"
Mr Modi said.
Funeral services are continuing for those killed in the attack in Kashmir.
(
AP Photo
)
He was expected to head meetings with all parties in India to discuss the country's response.
India's Defence Minister Rajnath Singh earlier this week pledged to "not only trace those who perpetrated the attack but also trace those who conspired to commit this nefarious act on our soil" and hinted at the possibility of military strikes.
Pakistan changed position on jihadi groups
Samina Yasmeen, Director for the Centre for Muslim States & Societies, said it was less likely that Pakistan supported the militants behind the attack than ten years ago.
She said the government and military had supported some groups in the past, but that both had "toned down" its support since the 1990s and early 2000s, when it had used militants "for jihadi purposes".
"If you constantly promote jihadi groups you can actually be a target yourself,"
Professor Yasmeen said.
"The Pakistani government's position has changed, but that still doesn't mean that there aren't some groups that are either taking it on their own, or have got some support — maybe not necessarily from the top-brass of the government — but somewhere."
Loading YouTube content
She said it looked unlikely at this stage that the two countries would engage in a full-blown conflict because neither could afford it economically, and New Delhi was trying to build stronger ties in the region.
"[India] couldn't be seen to be responding to something that they have come up with as an allegation by attacking Pakistan," she said.
"There could be incursions in the Pakistani side of Kashmir, but we will have to see how it goes."
Kashmir in mourning
Residents of Kashmir have been shocked by the attack on the tourists, with militants previously attacking Indian security forces.
Some Kashmiris have taken to the streets in protest following the attack, while others have held candle-lit vigils for those killed.
Markets, private schools and businesses were shut on Wednesday, local time, amid an uneasy calm following the violence.
The area had become a tourist hotspot, but many had rushed to leave in recent days.
'The people here are in fear and panic,' said hotelier Manzoor Ahmed, adding that tourists would now be skeptical of visiting Kashmir.
Funerals of several of those killed were also held across some Indian cities.
ABC/wires

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Muslim preacher denies delighting in Xmas controversy
Muslim preacher denies delighting in Xmas controversy

West Australian

timean hour ago

  • West Australian

Muslim preacher denies delighting in Xmas controversy

An Islamist preacher being sued for referring to Jewish people as "treacherous" has previously stirred up controversy over Christmas greetings. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad has been accused of racial discrimination during a series of fiery sermons from November 2023, which have racked up thousands of views online. He was quizzed in the Federal Court on Wednesday on a 2022 lecture in which he said that Christmas greetings were worse than congratulating someone for murder. The preacher denied the speech was "highly offensive" and that he delighted in media controversy by repeating it on his social media page. Peter Braham SC, acting for two Jewish plaintiffs, made those accusations and suggested it was one "highly offensive" example of how Mr Haddad previously sought to amplify his views. "Everything that happens at the Al Madina Dawah Centre is designed and calculated for public consumption and to create or attract controversy," Mr Braham said. Mr Haddad's barrister has argued the allegedly anti-Semitic speeches were intended for a small private Muslim audience and weren't reasonably likely to attract the attention of the broader community. "That is absolutely not how this man has run his life," Mr Braham said. Mr Haddad told the Federal Court he wasn't responsible for uploading the allegedly racist videos to social media, but he knew they were being recorded and would be published online. He agreed that recordings of his lectures were likely to appear on YouTube, Rumble, Telegram and SoundCloud in 2023. His lawyer argued the allegedly racist lectures have been selectively edited and would not have been seen by Jewish people if not reported on by the media. But Mr Braham said the speeches did not need to be immediately witnessed by Jewish people to be viewed as threatening, humiliating and denigrating. Mr Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, denies breaching anti-discrimination laws and claims he was delivering historical and religious lectures on events from the Koran to contextualise the war in Gaza. He is being sued by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who want the published speeches brought down and Mr Haddad banned from making similar comments. They claim the speeches are offensive and intimidating, and could normalise anti-Semitic prejudices or encourage violence towards Jewish people. "Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards ... are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising," Mr Wertheim told the court on Tuesday. The hearing continues. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636

Up to 45 anti-ICE protesters arrested after clashing with NYPD officers
Up to 45 anti-ICE protesters arrested after clashing with NYPD officers

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Up to 45 anti-ICE protesters arrested after clashing with NYPD officers

Up to 45 protesters have been arrested during an anti-ICE protest as demonstrators clash with the New York Police Department. A massive group of protesters were seen in lower Manhattan on Tuesday, with it quickly spiralling into chaos. According to the New York Post, demonstrators hit the streets near Foley Square near City Hall to protest ICE deportations. Police sources confirmed up to 45 protesters were arrested by the NYPD in the surrounding area of the Federal Plaza.

Muslim preacher denies delighting in Xmas controversy
Muslim preacher denies delighting in Xmas controversy

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Muslim preacher denies delighting in Xmas controversy

An Islamist preacher being sued for referring to Jewish people as "treacherous" has previously stirred up controversy over Christmas greetings. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad has been accused of racial discrimination during a series of fiery sermons from November 2023, which have racked up thousands of views online. He was quizzed in the Federal Court on Wednesday on a 2022 lecture in which he said that Christmas greetings were worse than congratulating someone for murder. The preacher denied the speech was "highly offensive" and that he delighted in media controversy by repeating it on his social media page. Peter Braham SC, acting for two Jewish plaintiffs, made those accusations and suggested it was one "highly offensive" example of how Mr Haddad previously sought to amplify his views. "Everything that happens at the Al Madina Dawah Centre is designed and calculated for public consumption and to create or attract controversy," Mr Braham said. Mr Haddad's barrister has argued the allegedly anti-Semitic speeches were intended for a small private Muslim audience and weren't reasonably likely to attract the attention of the broader community. "That is absolutely not how this man has run his life," Mr Braham said. Mr Haddad told the Federal Court he wasn't responsible for uploading the allegedly racist videos to social media, but he knew they were being recorded and would be published online. He agreed that recordings of his lectures were likely to appear on YouTube, Rumble, Telegram and SoundCloud in 2023. His lawyer argued the allegedly racist lectures have been selectively edited and would not have been seen by Jewish people if not reported on by the media. But Mr Braham said the speeches did not need to be immediately witnessed by Jewish people to be viewed as threatening, humiliating and denigrating. Mr Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, denies breaching anti-discrimination laws and claims he was delivering historical and religious lectures on events from the Koran to contextualise the war in Gaza. He is being sued by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who want the published speeches brought down and Mr Haddad banned from making similar comments. They claim the speeches are offensive and intimidating, and could normalise anti-Semitic prejudices or encourage violence towards Jewish people. "Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards ... are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising," Mr Wertheim told the court on Tuesday. The hearing continues. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store