Lockdown Overlords Missing In Action From The Podium Of Truth
'Hipkins and co loved the limelight at 1pm every day. They wielded extraordinary powers over citizens' lives, dismissing those who questioned them as uncaring. Now they're refusing to even show up, what a contrast.
'The then-Government used emergency powers more dramatically than any other in our country's peacetime history. Those powers included:
Separating families at the border and in hospitals even at times of birth, death, and severe illness
Letting unused Rapid Antigen Tests expire by the million, while locking down Auckland for over 100 days longer than the rest of the country.
Locking down Northland down for 11 days on false information that humiliated three women. Officials apologised, but Hipkins refused to.
Being were slow to close the border in early 2020, and even slower to adapt when Omicron made their Delta-era rules obsolete.
Sticking to outdated restrictions that hurt people but couldn't stop Omicron, keeping MIQ in place long after the virus was widespread in the community.
Putting surgeries, screenings, and medical treatments on hold.
Damaging the education of a generation, with school attendance still bounding back from the Government's forced closures.
Making strange, inconsistent rules that often hurt small businesses to the benefit of large chains– supermarkets could open, but butchers couldn't.
Ignoring Treasury warnings to spend $66 billion, driving inflation over 7%, and sparking a cost-of-living crisis and mortgage crunch households are still paying for.
Appointing a Royal Commission of Inquiry that would ignore most of the above costs, by focusing on the effectiveness of the COVID response rather than its costs.
'ACT campaigned to expand the Royal Commission inquiry and opened it to the public. If another pandemic arrives, we literally cannot afford to repeat the mistakes made during COVID, the bond ratings agencies will see to that. Facing another pandemic more successfully requires honest reflection from the decisionmakers of that period.
'Tens of thousands of New Zealanders have already engaged with the inquiry, sharing heart-wrenching experiences of how their lives were upended. They deserve the basic respect of accountability. If Chris Hipkins can't front up for a single day of questioning, he is not fit to act as Opposition leader, let alone return to Government.
'Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Grant Robertson, and Ayesha Verrall must change course and agree to publicly front the Royal Commission. It is a matter of duty and respect.'
Note:
A Curia poll suggests 69% of New Zealanders believe Ardern, Hipkins, Bloomfield, and other key decision-makers should testify in person at the Covid Inquiry hearings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
RMA Reforms To Deliver Jobs And Growth
Minister for RMA Reform The Government's second RMA Amendment Bill has passed into law, bringing in sweeping changes to many of the handbrakes on New Zealanders' lives, helping to drive economic growth, and laying the groundwork for job creation,' RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says. 'The Resource Management Act (RMA) has been holding New Zealand back for decades. It has let successive governments and councils say 'no' to progress, 'no' to development, and 'no' to building the houses, infrastructure, clean energy and other important projects that New Zealanders need to get ahead,' Mr Bishop says. 'Our full replacement for the RMA will be introduced to Parliament this year, be passed into law next year, and be in effect by 2027- but in the meantime, through this Amendment Bill, we're making it quicker and simpler to consent renewable energy, boost housing supply, and reduce red tape for the primary sector. 'The Bill contains five broad packages of changes which will remove roadblocks and cut red tape holding back progress for: Infrastructure and renewable energy Housing, including a streamlined process for removing heritage protections Farming and the primary sector Emergency and natural hazards package Resource Management system improvements 'We also added a new provision which requires Auckland Council to allow even greater housing and development around key stations benefitting from City Rail Link investment, to ensure Aucklanders reap the full benefits of this transformational investment into the city. 'We added changes to ensure a more cost-effective transition between the current RMA and the upcoming new planning system by putting a stop to councils making RMA plan or policy statement changes until the new system is in place in 2027. There will be some exemptions for important work that aligns with Government priorities, or for activities such as managing natural hazards. 'Alongside this change, we added a new a new regulation making power that will allow the responsible Minister to recommend changes or even removal of parts of council RMA plans and policy statements that are proven to be holding back economic growth, development, or job creation. 'This week we also took urgent action to prevent what could have amounted to a 'stop work' notice for thousands of New Zealand farmers, by further amending the Bill to broaden what water discharges can be allowed as a permitted activity. 'And, to the great excitement of countless Wellingtonians, we added a provision that removes heritage protections from the unsafe and derelict Gordon Wilson Flats in Wellington, clearing the way for the flats to be demolished so that new student accommodation can be built.' 'This legislation is part of our wider three-phase RMA reform programme. In Phase One, before Christmas last year, we repealed the previous government's overly complex RMA changes. 'Phase Two is now well underway, with our Fast-track one-stop shop up and running, the biggest package of national direction changes in New Zealand's history being worked through with decisions due before the end of this year, and this second Amendment Bill delivering meaningful improvements. 'Phase Three will see the complete replacement of the RMA with two new laws that better reflect the importance of private property rights. The new planning system legislation will be introduced to Parliament before the end of this year, pass into law next year, and be in effect by 2027.' The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be enacted the day after it receives royal assent, which is expected in the coming days. Fact sheet for a summary of changes to be enacted through the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill here.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
ACT Speeds Up Consents To Keep The Lights On And Costs Down
ACT MP and Energy spokesperson Simon Court is welcoming the passage of the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill into law. 'ACT campaigned to end the ban on oil and gas exploration and to use New Zealand's Crown minerals – including oil, gas, and coal – to keep our lights on and our economy moving,' Court said. 'We also identified that the RMA made it virtually impossible to consent thermal electricity generation, even when it was critical for energy security. 'From today, gas and coal-fired power stations have the same one-year priority consenting pathway as wind and solar projects. That means generators renewing or seeking new consents for thermal plants won't be bogged down in years of red tape. The race to net zero has made one thing clear – without reliable thermal backup, there's a limit to how much renewable energy the grid can handle. When the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine, New Zealanders still expect to heat their homes, run factories, and keep the lights on. ACT is making sure they can. 'Experience here and in Australia shows that as more wind and solar comes online, the need for reliable backup grows, too. These reforms make it faster to consent that firming generation so homes and businesses can count on a secure power supply.' ACT is also welcoming the requirement for specified energy or wood processing consents to be decided within a year, with extensions allowed, but never exceeding two years in total. "We're cutting years off the consenting process and removing uncertainty for major energy projects. That's good news for the construction sector and especially ordinary New Zealanders who pay the compliance costs," says Mr Court. 'By speeding up projects and cutting red tape, ACT is helping to keep power prices and building costs under control.'
The Spinoff
4 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Covid-19 inquiry row reignites political battle over pandemic legacy
Four ex-ministers say they've already given full evidence in private, but their successors accuse them of dodging public accountability, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Former Labour ministers defend inquiry no-show To a greater or lesser extent, four former Labour ministers – Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Grant Robertson and Ayesha Verrall – spent much of yesterday defending their decision not to appear at the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19. As summarised in a minute published by the commission this week, the four believed their attendance would have been 'performative' rather than 'informative' and expressed concerns that livestreamed or published evidence could be manipulated or misused, especially given reports of abuse towards earlier witnesses. All have already provided extensive private testimony – Ardern's spokesperson said her most recent interview lasted three hours – and offered to answer any further questions in private, The Post's Kelly Dennett reports (paywalled) Writing in the Herald (paywalled), Thomas Coughlan says Ardern and her colleagues had good reasons to stay away: 'What some of the royal commission hawks seem to want is not an inquiry, but a trial', in which the ex-ministers are punished with a 'brief, livestreamed public grilling for their perceived crimes'. Government seizes on 'gutless' decision Government ministers were swift to condemn the Labour group's decision. As RNZ's Russell Palmer reports, deputy prime minister David Seymour accused the group of 'running from accountability', contrasting their daily televised briefings during the pandemic with their reluctance to front now. Senior minister Chris Bishop said they were 'ashamed of their record', highlighting the 'debt disaster' the government had inherited as a result of Labour's pandemic-era spending. Justice minister Judith Collins called Ardern's decision 'gutless and hypocritical', while foreign minister Winston Peters said the 'Podium of Truth' – a reference to Ardern's 1pm Covid-era updates – had become the 'Podium of Evasion'. Meanwhile prime minister Christopher Luxon stated confidently, but wrongly, that the four had defied a summons. In fact, explains Stuff's Lloyd Burr, the commission confirmed it had decided against compelling attendance, judging that doing so would be adversarial and unlikely to yield new information. The chair, Grant Illingworth KC, said their non-appearance would not hinder the inquiry's work, though public confidence might have been enhanced had they attended. Phase two under fire Hipkins has previously criticised the second phase of the inquiry – established by the current government – as 'far more political' than the first, accusing it of providing a platform for 'conspiracy theorist views'. He argued the terms of reference had been 'deliberately constructed to achieve a particular outcome', in part by excluding from consideration the period when Labour governed with NZ First. Phase two covers the years 2021 and 2022 only, and examines whether lockdowns, vaccine mandates, MIQ and other measures struck the right balance between public health and social and economic costs. But the inquiry has also faced scrutiny from the right. Documents obtained by Newsroom's Marc Daalder show Act's Brooke van Velden, the minister responsible for royal commissions, was advised to press Illingworth to improve planning, risk assessment and reporting, warning that failure to deliver on time and within budget would 'further undermine' confidence. Van Velden says she now has confidence in the chair and still expects the final report to be delivered to her by February 2026. Debating the pandemic's toll While the inquiry probes the social consequences of the Covid-19 response, debate continues over its impact on mortality. Writing in The Spinoff last month, University of Canterbury epidemiologist Michael Plank examined claims that New Zealand dramatically under-reported excess deaths to the end of 2023. His team found total deaths between 2020 and 2023 were between 2% higher and 0.8% lower than expected – far below excess mortality rates in countries like the UK or US. The timing of excess deaths closely matched Covid-19 waves, suggesting the virus, not indirect effects, was the main driver. Plank concluded: 'New Zealand's response was far from perfect, and there were undoubtedly harms as a result of lockdowns and other measures that are not reflected in mortality statistics. But there can be no doubt that the response saved thousands of lives compared with the alternatives.'
