logo
UBS, Goldman refused to open bank accounts for US-backed Gaza aid foundation: Sources

UBS, Goldman refused to open bank accounts for US-backed Gaza aid foundation: Sources

Al Arabiya13 hours ago
UBS declined a request by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to open a bank account in Switzerland while Goldman Sachs did not set up a Swiss account for GHF after initial talks, two people with knowledge of the discussions told Reuters.
GHF is a US- and Israeli-backed organization that began delivering humanitarian supplies to Palestinian civilians in Gaza in May, bypassing traditional aid channels including the United Nations.
GHF had sought to open a bank account for a unit based in Geneva to help facilitate donations from outside the United States, two other people with knowledge of its plans said.
The foundation started talks with lawyers and banks including UBS and Goldman last autumn about the Swiss entity's structure, before deciding to withdraw from Switzerland in May, they said.
The two people declined to say which other banks GHF had engaged with and Reuters could not establish that information independently. GHF did not respond to questions about whether it had spoken to other banks.
According to two of the people, the foundation's plans for a Geneva branch faced setbacks including a lack of donations and resignations of founding members, including GHF executive director Jake Wood, as well as difficulties opening a Swiss bank account.
A GHF spokesperson told Reuters by email that the decision to withdraw from Switzerland was not because of any setbacks, adding: 'It was a strategic decision to be located in the US'
One stumbling block in talks with banks was lack of transparency about where the foundation's funds would come from, one of the people with knowledge of the discussions told Reuters. Before accepting clients, banks must conduct due diligence to establish their identities and ownership, the nature of their business activities and their sources of wealth.
GHF has not disclosed details of its finances. A GHF spokesperson said it has 'spoken about initial funding from Europe, but we don't disclose donors for their privacy.'
Reuters reported on June 24 that the US government would give $30 million - its first known financial contribution - to GHF, now headed by Rev. Dr. Johnnie Moore, a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, after Wood quit in May.
UBS was approached in late 2024 and did not accept GHF as a client after conducting compliance, risk and reputational due diligence, one of the people with knowledge of the talks said.
A representative for UBS said the bank could not comment on matters related to potential, existing or former clients. GHF did not respond to questions from Reuters about UBS.
The other person with knowledge of the discussions said GHF also held preliminary talks with Goldman Sachs about opening a bank account in Switzerland. Without giving details, that person said Goldman did not open an account and has no banking relationship with GHF in the United States either.
An undated and unsigned GHF briefing document that Reuters reported details of on May 8 said the foundation had 'a verbal commitment from Goldman Sachs to establish a bank account' for a Swiss-based affiliate it was setting up.
Reuters could not establish any details about Goldman's verbal commitment or why Goldman did not open an account for GHF. A spokesperson for Goldman Sachs declined to comment.
A GHF spokesperson said the document was old and that it had decided not to commence operations in Switzerland and so 'walked away from discussions with banking entities there.'
'Our organization is US-based and has multiple highly reputable banking partners,' the spokesperson told Reuters, without giving details.
GHF was incorporated in 2025 in Delaware, filings show, and has a US bank account with JPMorgan, according to a separate person with knowledge of the situation. A JPMorgan spokesperson declined to comment.
Its briefing document reported by Reuters in May said it had 'secure banking and financial relationships' with JPMorgan and North Carolina-based Truist Bank. A Truist Bank representative said it does not discuss or confirm client relationships.
Distribution
GHF uses private US security and logistics companies to get supplies into Gaza, where it has been operating since May under a distribution plan described by the United Nations as 'inherently unsafe. '
Its operations have been beset by violence and chaos including deadly shootings of scores of Palestinians near its food distribution sites guarded by Israeli forces, Reuters has reported.
The UN and other humanitarian groups have refused to work with GHF, questioning its neutrality and criticizing the new distribution model as militarizing aid and forcing displacement of Palestinians. Wood resigned before GHF's May 26 launch, saying he could not abandon 'the principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.'
GHF has repeatedly said it has distributed aid from its sites without incident and has previously told Reuters it 'strictly adheres' to humanitarian principles.
'The Palestinian people of Gaza must be fed and GHF is the only organization that has demonstrated ability to deliver food assistance,' a spokesperson said.
Dissolution
According to Switzerland's Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations (ESA), a foundation must hold capital in a Swiss bank account and at least one member of its board must be resident in Switzerland.
In filings dated February, seen by Reuters, GHF said its Swiss entity had an initial endowment. However, that capital contribution was never made, a spokesperson for GHF said.
ESA told Reuters GHF had never provided information about a bank account in Switzerland or statutory initial capital. ESA is taking steps to order the dissolution of GHF's Swiss branch, Reuters reported on July 2.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs ‘big, beautiful' bill on US Independence Day
Trump signs ‘big, beautiful' bill on US Independence Day

Arab News

time2 hours ago

  • Arab News

Trump signs ‘big, beautiful' bill on US Independence Day

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump signed his flagship tax and spending bill into law Friday, capping a pomp-laden White House Independence Day ceremony featuring a stealth bomber fly-by. 'America is winning, winning, winning like never before,' Trump said at the event where he signed the so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' flanked by Republican lawmakers. The party fell into line and pushed the bill through a reluctant Congress on Thursday, in time for Trump to sign the bill as he had hoped on the Fourth of July holiday marking America's 249th birthday. Two B-2 bombers of the type that recently struck Iranian nuclear sites roared over the White House at the start of the ceremony, accompanied by fighter jets on their wingtips. Pilots who carried out the bombing on Iran were among those invited to the White House event. The passage of the unpopular bill caps two weeks of significant wins for Trump, including an Iran-Israel ceasefire that was sealed after what he called the 'flawless' US air strikes on Iran. Ever the showman, Trump melded his various victory laps into one piece of political theater at the ceremony marking 249 years of independence from Britain. The sprawling mega-bill honors many of Trump's campaign promises: extending tax cuts from his first term, boosting military spending and providing massive new funding for Trump's migrant deportation drive. Trump glossed over deep concerns from his own party and voters that it will balloon the national debt, while simultaneously gutting health and welfare support. 'The largest spending cut,' Trump said with First Lady Melania Trump at his side, 'and yet you won't even notice it.' Trump forced through the 'big beautiful bill' despite deep misgivings in the Republican Party — and the vocal opposition of his billionaire former ally, Elon Musk. It squeezed past a final vote in the House of Representatives 218-214 after Republican Speaker Mike Johnson worked through the night to corral the final group of dissenters. Trump thanked Johnson at the White House event. The legislation is the latest in a series of big wins for Trump that also included a Supreme Court ruling last week that curbed lone federal judges from blocking his policies, and a NATO deal to increase spending. But the bill is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit. At the same time it will shrink the federal food assistance program and force through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. Up to 17 million people could lose their insurance coverage under the bill, according to some estimates. Scores of rural hospitals are expected to close as a result. Democrats hope public opposition to the bill will help them flip the House in the 2026 midterm election, pointing to data showing that it represents a huge redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest.

Pentagon has undermined Trump's goal of Ukraine peace
Pentagon has undermined Trump's goal of Ukraine peace

Arab News

time5 hours ago

  • Arab News

Pentagon has undermined Trump's goal of Ukraine peace

The US Department of Defense halted deliveries of Patriot air defense systems and other precision weapons to Ukraine last week following an internal assessment of its own stockpiles. Some of these weapons were already in Poland waiting for final transfer. The news came as a shock. While the Trump administration has taken a more nuanced approach to Ukraine and Russia than its predecessor, it had continued the flow of weapons to Kyiv as leverage in its effort to bring Moscow to the negotiating table. The timing could not be worse. Russia has launched some of the most intense aerial bombardments in the history of its invasion, including night-time barrages of more than 400 drones and ballistic missiles at a time. For Ukraine, already stretched thin on ammunition and air defense capabilities, this freeze in support threatens to make a difficult situation even more dire. The decision also undermines President Donald Trump's stated goal of ending the war. On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly emphasized the need to bring Russia and Ukraine to a negotiated settlement and made it a cornerstone of his foreign policy. But six months after he returned to the Oval Office, the war appears no closer to resolution than it was on his first day. There is no doubt the president has been sincere in his desire to bring the two sides to the table. He has called for a ceasefire and for negotiations, and Ukraine has signaled its willingness to work with the White House. The Kremlin, however, has been far more reluctant. Trump has hinted at increasing pressure on Russia to engage more seriously in diplomacy. That's precisely why the Pentagon's decision to halt aid is so surprising — and damaging. Trump appeared to have geopolitical momentum on his side. His bold military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, an action many believed he would never take, restored a sense of American credibility abroad, especially after what many saw as the Biden administration's appeasement of Tehran. Then, at the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump had a major win. He convinced European allies to commit to significantly increased defense spending, including a landmark pledge to reach 5 percent of GDP by 2035 — spending levels not seen even during the Cold War. At that same summit, a Ukrainian journalist asked Trump about the urgent need for air defense systems to protect civilians from Russian missile attacks. The president responded with genuine emotion. He said he would return to Washington and explore the possibility of sending more Patriot missile interceptors to Ukraine. Days later, however, his own Department of Defense contradicted both his words and apparent intent. There is no doubt Trump has been sincere in his desire to bring the two sides to the table. Luke Coffey This is not the first time the Pentagon has acted out of sync with the president. In February, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ordered a temporary halt to military assistance to Ukraine without coordinating with the White House. That pause lasted only a few days, but it rattled allies and partners across Europe and sent shockwaves through Kyiv. At the time, the White House quietly aired its frustration. Now, it appears the Pentagon may be repeating the same mistake. This latest move underscores a deeper problem: an ideological struggle within the Trump administration over US foreign policy. On one side are the isolationists who believe America should retreat from global commitments and focus exclusively on domestic concerns. They see little value in supporting Ukraine or NATO, or even maintaining a robust defense budget, since their vision of America's role in the world is minimal at best. Opposing them are the so-called prioritizers, who believe the US should focus nearly all of its strategic energy and resources on Asia, and particularly on countering the growing threat from China. In this view, America must prepare for a potential conflict over Taiwan, even if doing so means deprioritizing Europe or the Middle East. Every dollar spent and every missile deployed must serve the Indo-Pacific theater first. Both factions, for different reasons, see Ukraine as a distraction, so when aid is withheld, both are satisfied. As long as this internal tug-of-war continues, behind closed doors and in public, the president will struggle to implement a coherent and effective foreign policy. Trump may be most comfortable dealing with issues such as trade, the economy, and border security, but the reality is that global leadership also requires strategic clarity on defense and diplomacy. To succeed, he needs a team aligned with his vision — not one that undermines it. Now is the time for Trump to reassert control and redouble efforts to end Russia's war in a way that promotes lasting European stability and delivers a fair, just outcome for Ukraine. Achieving this will probably be one of the most difficult foreign policy challenges of his presidency. But he cannot meet that challenge with a divided administration. He needs a unified front — particularly from his Department of Defense. The sooner Trump reverses the Pentagon's decision to halt military aid to Ukraine, the better the prospects for peace. Time is of the essence, and any further delay could cost lives — and squander the strategic gains he has worked hard to achieve.

French President Macron and Malaysian PM reaffirm calls for Gaza ceasefire
French President Macron and Malaysian PM reaffirm calls for Gaza ceasefire

Arab News

time5 hours ago

  • Arab News

French President Macron and Malaysian PM reaffirm calls for Gaza ceasefire

'Our two countries are urging, more than ever, for a ceasefire,' said MacronPARIS: French President Emmanuel Macron and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim reaffirmed on Friday their calls for a ceasefire in the fighting in Gaza, as Macron hosted Ibrahim in Paris.'Our two countries are urging, more than ever, for a ceasefire, the release of the hostages, and for aid to get through,' said Macron, referring to Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store