Watch: In conversation with AIMPLB president Khalid Saifullah Rahmani
The Board has sought to include women, and people belonging to other faiths in the protests, even as its president Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani, in an exclusive interview with The Hindu, asserts that their struggle is not against Hindus, but against the government which is trying to wrest lands and properties from the control of Muslims.
Read the full interview
Reporting: Syed Mohammed
Videography: Siddhant Thakur
Editing: Zeeshan Akhtar
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Uttarakhand Cabinet approves amendments to anti-conversion law
Dehradun, Aug 13 (PTI) The Uttarakhand Cabinet on Wednesday approved amendments to the anti-conversion law to make it harsher, with stringent provisions like punishment up to life imprisonment and heavy fines being added to the new bill. The Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill-2025 was approved in the state cabinet meeting chaired by Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami, official sources said. According to the bill, apart from strict punishment for illegal religious conversion, provisions such as ban on propaganda through digital medium and protection of victims have been added, they said. The definition of inducement has been expanded in the bill to include gifts, cash/goods benefits, employment, free education, promise of marriage, hurting religious faith or glorifying another religion, categorising all of them as crime. It makes punishable the acts like promoting or inciting conversion through social media, messaging app or any online medium. There is a provision in the bill for three to 10 years imprisonment for general violation, five to 14 years in cases related to sensitive class and 20 years to life imprisonment in serious cases and heavy fines. The proposed bill also makes a provision for strict punishment for marriage by creating fake identity or hiding religion besides making a provision for protection, rehabilitation, medical, travel and maintenance expenses of the victims of illegal conversions. According to the state government, the proposed legislation will protect the religious rights of the citizens, prohibit conversion by fraud, inducement or pressure and maintain social harmony, the sources said. PTI ALM ALM KVK KVK view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Fatehpur land dispute: Temple or tomb? An exclusive report based on official records
A ruckus broke out in Uttar Pradesh's Fatehpur after a group offered prayers at a tomb, considering it a temple. The Hindu side claims the land belongs to Hindus and houses a temple dedicated to Lord Krishna and Lord Shiva. The Muslim side, on the other hand, insists it is the tomb of Aurangzeb's Faujdar Abdul Samad and his son Abu what is this dispute really about? How was this tomb declared national property? This exclusive report is based on historical documents and official records related to the dispute traces back to the British era. In 1927–28, a case was filed for the division of 28 bighas of land in Fatehpur between two landlord families — Lal Girdhari Lal Rastogi and the Mansingh family. On 14 August 1928, the court under the then British government allotted Gata numbers 751, 752, and 754 to Lal Girdhari Lal Rastogi and Gata number 753 to the Mansingh family. Gata number 753 measured 1.7650 hectares (1,89,983 square feet). On 30 December 1970, Shakuntala Mansingh, wife of Nareshwar Mansingh — a descendant of the Mansingh family — sold this land to Ramnaresh Singh. Singh later divided the land into plots. According to an SDM Fatehpur investigation report dated 10 July 2014, Singh plotted 1.5890 hectares and sold it to various 2007, the Muslim side, claiming the site as the tomb of Aurangzeb's Faujdar Abdul Samad and his son Abu Bakar, filed a case before the SDM court (Case No. 26/2007). Mohammad Anees filed the case against Ramnaresh Singh. On 20 April 2012, the court ordered the removal of Singh's name from the records and registered the property under 'Mangi Maqbara (National Property), Mutawalli Mohammad Anees' of Abu Gata number 753 is recorded in Fatehpur's land revenue records as belonging to Mangi Maqbara (National Property), with Mutawalli Mohammad Anees as its 2019, the property was formally registered as Waqf land with the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board. It was listed as Waqf No 1635, Fatehpur district, in the names of Abdul Samad and Abu Mohammad. After Mohammad Anees, his son Abu Huraira became the turning point came in 2013, when Mohammad Anees petitioned the Allahabad High Court, claiming illegal encroachment on Gata number 753. The then Chief Justice, DY Chandrachud, directed the Fatehpur district administration to investigate and prevent illegal SDM's investigation revealed that before the legal dispute, Singh had already sold plots carved out of Gata number 753. The report detailed the current status of the land:advertisementTotal area: 1.7650 hectaresBuilt-up houses: 0.5890 hectaresFoundation dug: 1.000 hectaresMangi Maqbara structure: 0.0600 hectaresVacant land: 0.1160 hectares (approx. 12,486 sq ft), under the possession of Mutawalli Anees dispute remains unresolved, with both sides holding firm to their claimsa; one citing religious heritage, the other historical ownership backed by legal records.- EndsTune InMust Watch
The Wire
5 hours ago
- The Wire
Delhi: Exhibition on India's Freedom Struggle Celebrates Inclusive Nationalism and Women Freedom Fighters
S.N. Sahu At a time when India's history is being distorted by the Modi regime, the exhibition celebrates the roles played by Hindus, Muslims, Christians and people of other religious persuasions in freeing India from colonial rule. ' Hamaara Itihaas – Archives of Freedom Fighters', the exhibition organised and curated by Sagari Chhabra, is quite fascinating and captures the saga of freedom struggle and its manifold aspects. Organised at the Art Gallery, Kamaladevi Complex, India International Centre, 40 Max Mueller Marg in Delhi, it is open for public viewing from August 9, 2025, and will run till August 23, 2025. The defining aspects of the exhibition is centered around the role of women freedom fighters in different phases of our struggle for independence. First provisional government of India It is tragic that India's history is being distorted by the Modi regime, and the Moghul period is being depicted in NCERT books as brutal, in negation of the historical accounts showing the commonalities of people of that period, regardless of faiths they pursued. It is in this context that the exhibition assumes significance, for it celebrates the roles played by Hindus, Muslims, Christians and people of other religious persuasions in freeing India from colonial rule. It is educative that the exhibition, while explaining the commencement of the first war of independence in India in 1857, and some of the struggles preceding that, explores details of the lesser known first provisional government of independent India, established in 1915 in Afghanistan by Maharaja Mahendra Pratap. A respected figure of our history, he followed an inclusive approach and it was evident from the very composition of that government, of which he was the President, Maulana Barkatullah, the prime minister, and Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi, the home minister. The objective of the provisional government was to liberate India from British rule. For the daring act of leading a government outside India, Mahendra Pratap faced sedition charges and his properties were confiscated. Ultimately, he left the country and worked outside India for its freedom. In his weekly journal, titled Young India, Mahatma Gandhi wrote on July 14, 1929: 'Raja Mahendra Pratap is a great patriot. For the sake of the country, this noble man has chosen exile as his lot.' Pratap was a member of the first Lok Sabha and defeated Atal Bihari Vajpayee in the elections. In 1929, Mahendra Pratap sent a letter to Gandhi, outlining the idea of non-violence. He wrote, ' Ahimsa, as I understand it, is not to give pain to anybody in mind or body by one's thought, talk or action. However, to be a follower of this principle does not stop here. A follower of ahimsa has to change all those conditions under which himsa is practised or becomes possible. I call it worst kind of himsa, opposite of ahimsa, when a man tolerates or aids himsa of others. Many people in India today deliver some very fine sermons on the beauties of ahimsa; however, they do little to destroy the himsa of the British.' Elsewhere, Mahendra Prata wrote, 'In the true spirit of ahimsa, I cannot force my will on others'. That utterance is intensely relevant for India which, after 2014, is witnessing violent imposition of majoritarianism, with minorities being attacked and many lives being snuffed out in the name of what they eat, how they dress and who they worship. As I visited Sagari Chchabra's curated exhibition and saw at the very beginning a picture of Mahendra Pratap, I was reminded of Gandhi and Pratap's nuanced reflections on non-violence. In no exhibition on freedom struggle have I ever seen any depiction of the first provisional government before. It preceded the provisional government headed by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose as prime minister in late 1940s. Global scope of freedom movement It is quite fascinating to see the exhibition showcasing oral testimonies, photos, audio, video and film recordings of freedom struggle which covered in its scope not just India but also Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Myanmar and many other European countries and Canada. It is delightful to see photos and documents from London, Paris, Geneva, Stuttgart, San Francisco and other places, showing that India's freedom struggle was both revolutionary and non-violent. The exhibition also showcased rare documents of the papers ' Bande Mataram' and ' Talvar ', started by Madam Bhikaiji Cama, a Parsi, who for the first time hoisted a version of the Indian flag outside India, at the International Socialist Conference in Stuttgart. The depiction of the Ghadar Party, based in Vancouver and San Francisco, in the exhibition is also very captivating. Netaji and the Indian National Army It is well known that Netaji Subhas Bose was described by Mahatma Gandhi as a prince among patriots and so, the exhibition, with its special section on Netaji's phenomenal role in freeing India from British rule, is very impactful. In addition to casting light on the Netaji-led provisional government, the exhibition specially focuses attention on Rani Jhansi regiment of Indian National Army (INA), the first regiment of the world, entirely consisting of women and led by Captain Lakshmi Sahgal. The spirit of INA was so infectious in inspiring women that a lady freedom fighter's words from that period, that 'sarees should go to hell' and 'what ladies needed were uniforms, caps, belts and boots to fight for liberation of India' summed up the temper of that time. Trial of INA heroes The trial of INA heroes Colonel Prem Sahgal, Colonel Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon and Major-General Shah Nawaz Khan became a trial of the British empire. British intelligence officer Hugh Toy, in his book The Springing Tiger, paid tribute to Netaji and wrote that that trial and subsequent Naval Mutiny hastened the independence of India. While explaining to the visitors about the exhibition, Sagari said that when the three heroes were put on trial, the slogan of that time – 'Lal Quila Se Aai Awaj, Sahagal, Dhilon and Shah Nawaj (A voice rose from the Red Fort, of Sehgal, Dhillon and Shah Nawaz)' – stirred new heights of inclusive nationalism for people Gandhian era Finally, the section on Mahatma Gandhi in the exhibition shows how women, and that too ordinary women from all parts of India, willingly participated in the freedom struggle because of Gandhi's non-violence movement for the freedom of India. This section depicts specifically the Dandi March of 1930 launched by Gandhi to break the iniquitous salt law, preventing Indians from manufacturing salt, and achieve independence. A multitude of women joined the Salt Satyagraha, the exhibition shows, breaking the salt law with the march that shook the British empire by the sheer strength unleashed by totally unarmed men and women. Gandhi, who was arrested and put behind bars, was declared 'Man of the Year' by the Time magazine in 1930. The exhibition also screens the documentary film, ' Asli Azaadi', directed by Sagari Chhabra, 1999, on women freedom fighters. In these trying times, when history is distorted and people operating the state apparatus are deriding the values of freedom struggle, this exhibition serves not just as inspiration but also as education. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
